Google Answers Whether Having Two Sites Affects Rankings via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Google’s John Mueller answered whether having two sites could negatively affect search rankings. His answer is surprisingly applicable to different ways of interpreting the question.

Can Having Two Sites Affect Rankings?

A person submitted a question to Google where they wanted to know if having two sites could negatively affect their rankings. The question as reproduced in Google is concise and also a little vague which leads to the outcome that the question can be answered in way that’s different from the way that Mueller answered it.

This is the question:

“My rankings have dropped due to Google finding out I have two websites. Is this correct?”

Google’s John Mueller answered:

“No. That’s not likely. Many people have several websites. Separate websites are not a problem.

The issue is often more indirect: if you work on a lot of websites, you’re not going to have a lot of time to make truly awesome websites everywhere. And, if you’re making websites that aren’t awesome, then that can be something which our algorithms pick up on when it comes to recommending your site to others.”

A Different Way To Answer The Question

John Mueller answered the question under the assumption that the two sites in the question are on different topics. He prefaced his answer by saying that many “people have several websites” which is true.

But many people don’t have multiple websites on the same topic. The person asking the question was vague about whether the sites were about different topics, too.

It’s very possible that the sites are on the same topic, in which case it makes sense why they may be concerned that Google found out about the two sites because it could be seen as trying to game Google. After all, who worries about having multiple sites on different topics?

If the sites were on the same topic then the answer to the question is somewhat different.

One of the important considerations when one person controls multiple sites on the same topic is that they’re doing it for ranking purposes which is not a good starting point for any website.

I’m not saying there’s something corrupt about the practice but I am saying that it’s not really the best starting point for creating signals of quality. It’s not a matter of someone thinking that they’re going to create multiple high quality sites for users, right?

Another reason why people create multiple sites for ranking (and not quality) is because people feel if they split up a topic into subsidiary subtopics they can create stronger sites about those related subtopics as opposed to one site with multiple related subtopics.

But what almost inevitably happens is that they wind up running multiple related sites that could be stronger together as one authoritative website.

I asked Bill Hartzer of Hartzer Consulting (Facebook profile) if he thought multiple sites on the same topic could affect rankings.

Bill agreed with me and shared:

“A lot of people, after building a website that ranks well, will think that they can simply create another website on the same topic and “make double the money” or get “double the traffic” and it’s simply not true.

Companies will also have one main website, but they’ll create a separate website on a separate domain name for each of their products or services. Over the past 10 years or so, that hasn’t been a good strategy. While it’s good to register the domain names of your products or services, it’s better to combine all those websites into one main, more authoritative website.

Typically if they’re on the same topic, one website, the original site, will continue to rank well. But the second website doesn’t rank as well. In most cases, it’s always better to combine the websites into one website.”

Multiple Sites And Rankings

John Mueller is right that publishing multiple sites (on different topics) could compromise a person’s ability to focus on one site to make it outstanding, remarking that there’s an indirect negative effect on rankings. He is also correct in saying that it’s unlikely to have a direct negative effect on rankings.

Changing the question to whether there’s an effect on ranking if the multiple sites are on the same topic, then the answer becomes more nuanced but follow a similar trajectory as Mueller’s original answer that it detracts from being able to create one outstanding site and can lead to a person creating multiple middling sites.

But that’s not necessarily a foregone conclusion when a person is creating  multiple sites on different topics. It’s absolutely possible to create multiple sites on different topics and to be successful at it. It might be hard for one person alone to pull it off but it’s not difficult to do when multiple people are working on the websites creating content and focusing on promotion.

Watch/listen to the Google SEO Office hours at the 33 second mark:

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Asier Romero

Google Answers If Changing Web Hosting Affects SEO via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Google’s Gary Illyes answered if switching web hosting platforms could result in a negative outcome for rankings and SEO. It’s a reasonable question because migrating a site to a new web host involves multiple technical factors that can go wrong and have an immediately negative effect.

What Does Changing A Website Host Entail?

Changing web hosts can be complicated but if the site is just a regular WordPress site then migrating to a new host is relatively easy, especially if you use plugins.

But even doing a manual migration isn’t that difficult if you’re already familiar with administering website database with apps like phpMyAdmin and know how to use an SFTP software.

Gary Ilyes’ answer refers to doing it “by the book” which is actually quite a lot and can be overwhelming if you’ve never done this before.

Does Changing Website Hosting Affect SEO?

The question that was asked is:

“My company is considering switching hosts for our website. Would switching have a negative and lasting effect on our SEO rankings?”

Google’s Gary Illyes responded:

“If you do things by the book, meaning the website keeps being resolvable and the actual downtime is minimal, changing hosts should not have negative effects on your pages’ rankings in Google’s search results.”

Two Things To Be Mindful Of

Gary Illyes’ answer assumes that the new web host is as good as the old web hosting platform. Obviously, downgrading the web hosting may come with minor to major negative outcomes.

Gary mentioned two factors to be mindful of:

  1. Website domain resolves
  2. Downtime is minimal

1. Website Is Resolvable

This is a reference to how the domain name is translated to an IP address that matches where the website itself is hosted. This typically means obtaining the Name Servers (NS) information from the new website hosting platform where the site files are and updating that at the domain name registrar. Additionally, the A Record (Address Record) should reflect the correct IP address for the new web hosting space (and other entries related to email).

2. Downtime Is Minimal

Believe it or not your website can be down for weeks and it won’t permanently lose rankings as long as when it comes back everything is exactly the same as it previously was. I know this from personal experience as I’ve been operating websites for 25 years. For example, there were a couple times when one or another of my websites went down due to hard drive failure at the dedicated web host, incorrect settings causing 500 errors and from taking having to take a website offline to fix hacked files.

A site can recover from being down for weeks and in my experience it’ll take a couple weeks for Google to recrawl and add all the webpages back into the search engine results pages (SERPs).

Listen to the answer on YouTube at the 7:58 minute mark:

Featured Image by Shutterstock/New Africa

Pinpoint Traffic Drops with Search Console, GA4

Organic search traffic fluctuates. It’s never static owing to Google’s algorithm updates, changes in search result layouts, and competition.

The fluctuations have been dramatic in 2024, the biggest in years. I’ve corresponded with many legit, non-spammy businesses whose sites have lost a lot of traffic. Most don’t know why.

Here is how to identify pages with traffic losses and the cause.

Search Console

Google Search Console is the quickest way to identify pages that lost organic traffic. Use the “Compare” option inside the “Performance” report and set the dates before and after the losses.

Then click on the “Pages” tab and sort by the number of clicks. Here’s an example of a site with extreme organic traffic losses and the impacted pages.

Screenshot of Search Console page showing page clicks in two separate periodsScreenshot of Search Console page showing page clicks in two separate periods

In Search Console, set the dates before and after traffic losses and compare clicks for each page. Click image to enlarge.

From there, click any URL in the first column, and the report will filter to that page. Click the “Queries” tab and sort by “Clicks” again to see the search terms with the biggest traffic drop.

Those are the priorities. Search on Google for each query. Note new features in the results. Study the top-ranking pages for quality, user experience, and search intent.

Search Console report for queries and clicks in two periods.Search Console report for queries and clicks in two periods.

Click the “Queries” tab and sort by “Clicks” to see the search terms with the biggest traffic drop. Click image to enlarge.

Google Analytics

Google Analytics 4 can also identify pages with traffic losses, although it has no easy sorting options.

Typically, popular pages account for most declines. In GA4, go to “Engagement” > “Landing Page.” These pages have the most traffic — from all sources, not just organic search.

To isolate organic search traffic:

  • Click “Add filter.”
  • Select “Dimension” > “Session manual source/medium.”
  • Click “Match Type” > “exactly matches.”
  • Select “Value” > “google / organic.”

In GA4, apply filters to isolate organic search traffic. Click image to enlage.

Next, after filtering for organic search, select “Compare” to analyze two periods.

Unlike Search Console, GA4 provides engagement time and thus potential recovery tactics. Improve or update pages with an average engagement of a few seconds that also lost traffic. (Use the “Search” field to find a specific page.)

Follow the same filtering steps for any traffic source beyond organic search.

GA4 provides “Average engagement time per session,” a helpful recovery metric. Click image to enlarge.

Meta Integrates Google & Bing Search Results Into AI Assistant via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

Meta’s AI assistant, powered by the new Llama 3 model, will now incorporate real-time search results from Google and Bing.

This integration marks a step forward in AI assistant capabilities and their potential impact on the search industry.

You can access Meta AI within Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger, and the newly launched Meta.ai desktop experience.

Google & Bing Search + Meta

Meta is integrating Google and Bing results directly into its AI assistant.

Instead of relying solely on training data or a single search engine, Meta’s AI assistant intelligently selects and displays results from either Google or Bing, depending on the query.

This provides users with a more comprehensive and diverse range of information.

Based on my limited testing before writing this piece, I could only get Meta AI to search using Bing. I’m uncertain about the criteria or conditions that would cause it to use Bing versus Google for web searches.

Here’s an example showing that it’s capable of providing up-to-date information:

Screenshot of a smartphone displaying a notification from Meta AI about the Google core update. The message details the update's gradual rollout, its focus on improving spam protections, and enhancing content quality in Google & Bing

Seamless Search Across Apps

Meta’s new search experience allows you to access relevant information without switching platforms.

For example, while planning a trip in a Messenger group chat, you can ask the assistant to find flights and determine the least crowded weekends to travel.

A screenshot of a smartphone messaging app named Screenshot from: about.fb.com/news/, April 2024.

Meta is taking a multi-pronged approach to make its AI assistant a consistent presence across its family of apps:

  • Integration into the search boxes of Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Messenger
  • Appearing directly in the Facebook main feed to respond to posts
  • A new meta.ai website where users can log in to have continued conversations
  • Real-time text-to-image generation with an “Imagine” feature in WhatsApp
  • Future integration with Meta’s VR headsets and smart glasses

More information about these initiatives is available in Meta’s announcement.

Implications For Search Engine Optimization

Integrating Google and Bing search results into Meta’s AI assistant has potential consequences for SEO.

As AI chatbots become increasingly popular for finding information, visibility in the integrated search results will become more valuable for publishers.

SEO strategies may need to evolve to accommodate traditional search engines and AI assistants.

This could involve a greater focus on satisfying conversational queries that mirror how users interact with chatbots.

A Shifting Landscape

Meta’s move to integrate search results from Google and Bing into its AI assistant highlights the evolving nature of the search industry.

As the lines between traditional search and conversational AI continue to blur, companies are vying for dominance.

Meta’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, has expressed ambitious plans for the AI assistant, aiming to make it the most intelligent and widely accessible AI tool available.

With the release of the powerful Llama 3 model and incorporating search results from leading search engines, Meta is positioning itself as a top contender in the AI chatbot market.


FAQ

How is Meta’s AI Assistant changing how we interact with search engines?

Meta’s AI assistant is transforming the search engine experience by integrating Google and Bing search results, simplifying access to information across multiple platforms.

Users can search directly through Meta’s AI assistant within Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Messenger. This integration enables real-time information retrieval and a conversational interface that aligns with how users increasingly prefer to find and interact with content online.

By catering to conversational queries and reducing the need to switch platforms, Meta’s AI assistant may shift the focus of SEO strategies toward satisfying these user interactions.

What new features does Meta’s AI Assistant offer?

Meta’s AI Assistant provides various unique features to create a seamless search experience alongside live search results from Google and Bing.

These features include:

  • Integration into the search functions within Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Messenger.
  • The ability to interact with posts directly on the Facebook feed.
  • Access to the meta.ai desktop experience for continued conversations.
  • Real-time text-to-image generation through the “Imagine” feature in WhatsApp.
  • Planned future integration with Meta’s virtual reality headsets and smart glasses.


Featured Image: Screenshot from about.fb.com/news/, April 2024