Why Google’s 4th Quarter Results Raise Questions for SEO & PPC via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Few professions can match a digital marketer’s perspective on what Google’s fourth-quarter results mean for SEO and online advertising. I asked six search marketers, each with over 20 years of experience in all areas of search for insights into what those results mean. What they shared indicates what SEO and advertising professionals should be paying attention to in 2025.

The six digital marketers who were separately interviewed all suggested that four general trends may be impacting Google search and advertising performance:

  1. Shifting User Behavior
  2. Changes To Google Search
  3. Google’s Not Immune To Competition
  4. Wider Economic & Market Conditions

Shifting User Behavior & Rising Competition

Although I interviewed each search marketer individually, they all agreed that user search habits were trending away from traditional search and migrating to AI and social platforms, indicating that Google is no longer immune to competitive pressure in both search and advertising.

Benu Aggarwal of Silicon Valley-based Milestone, Inc. (LinkedIn Profile) referenced the staggering investments in AI infrastructure as tangible proof of an ongoing shift in how people access information across consumer and business use cases.

“A lot of traffic is moving to LLMs such as ChatGPT, Perplexity (and Google’s Gemini). This is evidenced by Alphabet’s investments in AI, particularly in making compute inexpensive. They’re not alone, Meta, OpenAI, Nvidia, AWS, others are all investing in AI compute to support the surging demand.”

Michael Bonfils, of Digital International Group, (LinkedIn profile) shared that OpenAI was the leading disruptor to Google’s search platform, followed by a generational shift away from search toward visual social media platforms.

Michael said:

“I’ve been saying this since November 30, 2022 that this thing that OpenAI has just released has the potential to disrupt the intent of search users on Google, making it faster and more responsive with no ad disruptions and filtering out forum comments And the timing couldn’t be worse when you have an entire generation (Z/Alpha) who have moved to TikTok/IG for their search results.”

Chuck Price of Measurable SEO (LinkedIn profile) contributing additional nuance to the observation of user platform shift:

“Platform migration pressures play a role. Behavioral shifts toward visual/search hybrids (TikTok, Instagram) and answer-engine interfaces (Perplexity) suggest Google’s monopoly on search touchpoints is eroding, particularly among Gen Z and technical audiences.”

Duane Forrester, SVP, Search INDEXR.ai and formerly of Bing and Yext (LinkedIn profile) noted that the consumer journey is increasingly beginning somewhere other than Google Search:

“Search starts are down as consumers move to social platforms. Revenue is being impacted.

This is going to be our new normal in the search industry. With younger generations now aging and their habits being different, it’s natural to see them shift behavior from traditional search into new directions.

If you thought search engines were a forever thing, you were wrong. Reliance without diversification was always a recipe for disaster. This formula remains consistent. Change is also consistent and as people shift behavior, you better, too.”

Changes To Google Search

The fact that people are using other platforms for shopping ideas, inspiration and information gathering may be signs that Google’s search dominance is increasingly vulnerable to competition. That’s something that was unthinkable as recently as five years ago.

There were multiple changes to how search results are presented in Google Search, with the most notable being that AI Overviews and other search features reduced the need to click through to an answer. This trend to show answers and not links, often referred to as “zero-click” search results, is an ongoing trend that was previously limited to informational search queries.

The complaints from some SEOs about zero-click search results that initially greeted the introduction of Featured Snippets were arguably overstated. Informational searches that require one-dimensional answers (spelling, name of a person, etc.) don’t lead to meaningful traffic (for the website or the user). The traffic from Featured Snippets becomes very meaningful when people have a reason to dig deeper to learn more about a product, movie, a celebrity or a topic.

But Google AI Overviews (AIO) completely destroyed that useful tradeoff with the Internet ecosystem. The comprehensiveness of AIOs reduce the need to click to a website because they show the answer to the current question and enable users to view summaries to answers Google anticipated follow-up questions (read about Google’s Information Gain Patent).

While the complaints about zero-click search results for featured snippets were overstated, Google’s AIO and expanded layouts virtually eliminate the need to click through to websites. This not only disrupts the web ecosystem but may also introduce unanticipated shifts in search advertising trends.

Everett Sizemore, of eSizemore search marketing consultancy (LinkedIn Profile) offered his opinion on how changes to Google Search and external pressures are affecting Google’s earnings:

“The slowdown in Google’s growth doesn’t surprise me for several reasons.

First, what used to be a rumor of competition has grown into a measurable threat. According to Statcounter Global Statistics, Google’s global search market share dipped below 90% for the last three months of 2024. That hasn’t happened since 2015.

And those numbers likely don’t even account for the rising wave of AI-driven search alternatives like Perplexity and GPTSearch, the latter of which is conservatively projected to capture at least 1% of the search market by year’s end. Among younger users, the shift will likely be even more dramatic.

Second, Google’s search results pages (SERPs) are an absolute mess. Too many cluttered, disparate features have turned the once-streamlined UX into a Frankenstein-like disaster.

Remember those bloated Yahoo Search pages from the late ’90s? The ones Google originally disrupted with its clean, white background and ten blue links? Well, we’ve come full circle—back to the chaotic, overstuffed experience we were trying to escape in the first place. Frankly, it looks like someone puked up a bunch of widgets onto the page.

Google isn’t disappearing anytime soon, but its hold on search is weakening—one earnings quarter at a time.”

Google Is No Longer Immune To Competition

Chuck Price, founder of search consultancy Measurable SEO (LinkedIn profile), called attention to how multiple trends may be contributing to an erosion of search dominance and its concomitant effect on search advertising, putting some of the blame on the zero-click paradigm:

“The main takeaway, as I see it, is that the 0.2% YoY deficit doesn’t tell the full story.

What’s surprising for me in the Alphabet earnings report is the relative stability of search revenue, 12.5% growth versus 12.7% YoY. This seems counterintuitive, when considering how the SERPs have evolved over the past year with expanded answer boxes, AI-generated summaries and entity-driven knowledge panels. All of these features reduce the need to click on an ad or click through to a website.

Did Google’s advertising algorithms manipulate pricing to get that close? If one were to look at the YoY click data, I strongly suspect the deficit is far worse.”

Google is under pressure from ChatGPT Search, Perplexity AI and other AI search engines which introduce entirely new platforms that replace the 25+ year old Search Engine Paradigm. Google is competing platform to platform with AIO and their Gemini search assistant. Michael Bonfils suggested that those events have forced Google into a difficult position with limited options:

“They have reached a damned if I do damned if I don’t situation. They are either going to make the experience better for the user, worse for the publisher/advertiser or vice versa.”

Wider Economic And Advertising Pressure

Gabriella Sannino, founder of international marketing and SEO company Level343 (LinkedIn profile) shared a wider perspective of trends to interpret what Google’s fourth quarter results means for the search marketing community. Her answer, reflecting 20 years experience in all areas of digital marketing, included search advertiser sentiment and the worldwide economic situation.

Gabriella answered:

“When you look at the big picture and then the results, I don’t think the slower growth is entirely because of major SERP changes. I think it’s a mix of factors causing buyer behavior shifts:

First, ad and marketing budgets often get cut first when times get uncomfortable. So, slower growth may just be reflecting the sign of the times rather than anything Google’s done.

Second, ongoing privacy changes can affect ads in ways that have nothing to do with Google. Browser privacy settings can make ads less targeted or reduce how well they can be measured. Consequently, advertisers get less data for conversion improvements, retargeting, and ad optimization.

Third, you can’t review the advertising situation in isolation. The competition for ad dollars from TikTok, Amazon ads, Microsoft Advertising (especially with the AI-driven Bing hype), and so on must also be considered. A multi-channel mix means some of Google’s revenue goes bye-bye to other platforms.

Many businesses have tighter budgets, so ad ROI is under more scrutiny. And, there are many disillusioned business owners realizing that Google is changing too frequently to put their entire budget on it. AIOs were a real sign that things were changing, again. I wouldn’t be surprised if Google starts playing with ad space there fairly soon.”

Google’s Not In A Downward Spiral

Our panelist of search marketers interpret the fourth quarter results as signaling that Google is no longer immune from competition and is vulnerable to losing traffic to AI and social platforms as consumers increasingly begin their shopping and informational journeys outside of traditional search.

Google’s search results are perceived as cluttered and unstable because of constant changes to SERP layouts triggered by an increasing amount of keyword phrases. This may contribute to a sense of uncertainty. Nobody observed that Google is in a downward spiral. But the combination of the instability, changes in user behavior, and gains by other platforms are trends to look out for in 2025.

Stepping back for an overall view shows that continuing global economic issues and the attractiveness of advertising across multiple channels may be contributing to a shift in marketing spend. The search marketers I interviewed, who collectively have over 120 years of experience, hinted at concerns about deeper challenges in Google’s core businesses, with one search marketer questioning if there’s more paid search instability than is apparent in the most recent quarterly results.

Google Reveals How It Prefetches Search Results For Faster Loading via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

Google has shared new details on how it uses the Speculation Rules API to speed up clicks on search results.

When searching in Chrome, Google preloads parts of a webpage before you click, leading to faster load times.

Here’s an overview of how it works and the benefits Google has observed.

How Prefetching Works

Google loads the top two search results before you click them. When you see the results on the screen, your browser automatically fetches these links.

If you click on one, it will already be partially loaded, reducing your wait time.

Google explains:

“Google Search has been making use of the Speculation Rules API to improve navigation speed from the search results page to the result links and they’ve been using a few features of the API that may be of interest to other site owners.”

Early on, one of Google’s primary tactics was:

“One of the first uses of speculation rules was to prefetch the first two search results.”

In other words, your browser quietly fetches the HTML from the top search results as soon as you land on the results page, giving you a head start if you decide to click.

Performance Gains

Tests show a noticeable speed boost.

On Chrome for Android, Google recorded a 67-millisecond drop in Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), while Desktop Chrome users saw a 58.6-millisecond improvement.

Beyond prefetching the top two results, Google selectively prefetches other results when a user’s cursor hovers over them on desktop:

“[The Speculation Rules API] was enhanced with an eagerness property that allows speculations to only happen when the user hovers on, or starts to click a link. Google Search decided to move beyond the first two search results and also prefetch remaining search results—but only when the user hovers over the link…”

The hover action triggers a moderate prefetch, saving bandwidth for links that might not be clicked.

Mobile devices, however, lack hover functionality, so Google didn’t see the same benefits there.

Future Experiments & Browser Support

Google is exploring prerendering entire search results pages (SERPs) in certain scenarios, such as when you start typing a search in Chrome’s address bar.

Other search engines can adopt this technology, too, but Google remains the main implementer for now.

The Speculation Rules API currently works in Chromium-based browsers like Chrome.

Why This Matters

Prefetching can shave critical milliseconds off your page load time.

Google notes that even slight speed boosts matter, especially with billions of daily searches.

If your audience primarily uses Chrome, you could see performance gains by implementing the Speculation Rules API on your site.


Featured Image: Thaspol Sangsee/Shutterstock

Google CrUX Report Update Targets LCP & Network Delays via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

Google Chrome has released its latest Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX).

This update zeroes in on individual components of page speed, offering fresh data on largest contentful paint (LCP) image subparts and real-world network conditions (RTT).

For SEO professionals, this means you’ll have a better understanding of what needs improvement.

Barry Pollard, Web Performance Developer Advocate at Google Chrome, made the announcement on Bluesky.

Key Updates to CrUX Report

Speed and user experience are known to impact search visibility, and Google’s latest CrUX update breaks down site performance barriers with greater detail:

Granular LCP Details
New “image subparts” let you pinpoint what’s slowing down your largest image element.

With Time to First Byte, Resource Load Delay, Resource Load Duration, and Element Render Delay all in one mix, you can see if your bottleneck is server lag, render delays, or even how late the browser finds your image.

RTT Over ECT
Rather than lumping user connections into outdated “3G/4G” bins, Google’s new round trip time (RTT) tri-bins highlight the true speed of your audience’s networks.

Identifying high-latency segments can guide you toward optimizing for users in specific regions or network conditions.

BigQuery & CrUX Vis Updates
SEO professionals can access updated BigQuery datasets, which include more granular RTT information and broader coverage for metrics like Interaction to Next Paint (INP).

Additionally, the CrUX Vis tool (cruxvis.withgoogle.com) now shows everything from streamlined LCP subparts to country-level RTT stats, ideal for spotting speed issues at a glance.

Better Data Coverage, More Competitive Edge
By retiring the Effective Connection Type (ECT) dimension, Google can report richer data for a broader range of sites.

How To Leverage The New Metrics

  • Zero In on Server Delays: Pinpoint high Time to First Byte if your hosting setup or backend scripts are slowing that crucial first load.
  • Check Image Discovery Times: A Resource Load Delay might indicate a late-discovered hero image or JavaScript injection issues, which are common trouble spots in modern frameworks.
  • Optimize Media Files: Long Resource Load Duration can highlight oversized or unoptimized images that hamper page speed, a frequent cause of poor LCP.
  • Tailor Solutions for Different Regions: With RTT tri-bins now informing you if certain countries or networks face big delays, you can serve region-specific content faster (e.g., via CDNs or local servers).

Why This Matters

The latest CrUX update provides new data and identifies where your page may fail visitors, potentially harming your rankings. This can help you fix issues quickly, potentially improving site performance and visibility.

To analyze your site, visit cruxvis.withgoogle.com or check the CrUX BigQuery dataset.


Featured Image: julslst/Shutterstock

YouTube Dominates TV Streaming: New Opportunities For Marketers via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

YouTube’s CEO, Neal Mohan, has announced that TV screens have become the most popular device for watching YouTube in the United States, surpassing mobile devices.

In a blog post, Mohan states:

“TV has surpassed mobile and is now the primary device for YouTube viewing in the U.S. (by watch time), and according to Nielsen, YouTube has been #1 in streaming watch time in the U.S. for two years.”

Data shows that viewers consume over one billion hours of YouTube content daily on TV screens.

Mohan attributes this growth to YouTube’s integration with smart TVs and streaming devices.

This marks a significant shift in audience behavior, presenting an opportunity to take advantage of new ad formats.

What This Means For Marketers

Fresh Advertising Opportunities

YouTube’s audience is moving towards television, which offers different advertising options and ways to engage viewers.

Marketers can take advantage of this changing viewer behavior in the following ways:

  1. QR Codes on TV: Showing a QR code during a video or ad lets viewers scan it with their phones, linking big-screen watching with mobile actions.
  2. Pause Ads: When viewers pause a video, advertisers can show targeted messages on the screen, capturing attention without interrupting the show.
  3. Second Screen Experiences: YouTube is testing features that let viewers interact with TV content using their phones. This allows them to leave comments, share videos, or make purchases while watching.

These tools can improve viewer engagement and help measure results.

Unlike traditional TV ads, which don’t allow for immediate interaction, these digital options give brands a new way to connect with their audience.

Strategic Considerations

Longer Watch Times
Viewers spend more time watching YouTube on TV than on mobile devices, which can lead to deeper engagement with ads and branded content.

Big-Screen Mindset
Advertising for YouTube consumption on TV requires high production quality to achieve a broadcast-like feel. Marketers should consider the advantages of creating content designed for a living room environment.

Measuring Performance
As technology advances, tracking conversions across multiple devices (TV and mobile) may become increasingly complex. Implementing cross-platform analytics and attribution models will be essential.

Podcasts

Another format thriving on YouTube is podcasting.

Mohan claims YouTube is the number one way people in the U.S. listen to podcasts, stating:

“One of the most relevant formats driving culture — podcasts — is thriving on YouTube. YouTube is now the most frequently used service for listening to podcasts in the U.S.”

As more people engage with TV and podcasts on YouTube, marketers can effectively combine these formats through video podcasts.

This can help brands connect with their audience in an engaging way, leveraging the trend of long videos on larger screens.

Looking Ahead

This signals YouTube’s evolution from a mobile-first platform to a dominant TV streaming service.

Marketers should adapt their strategies to align with this shift in viewer behavior.

Key takeaways include:

  • Leverage new ad formats like QR codes and ‘pause ads’
  • Create high-quality content tailored for big screens
  • Embracing new opportunities like video podcasts

With longer watch times and increased TV engagement, brands have a unique opportunity to connect with audiences more effectively.

However, staying ahead will require focusing on cross-platform analytics and thoughtful integration of mobile and TV experiences.


Featured Image: Kaspars Grinvalds/Shutterstock

Google Sitelinks Algorithm Bug Shows Wrong Links via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Google’s search algorithms are showing multiple languages in the sitelinks for Google Search Console. Regardless of whether this is new or not, it may give an idea of how the underlying algorithm evaluates a website for sitelinks.

Sitelinks Are Supposed To Be Helpful

Sitelinks is a Google Search feature that shows links to different areas of a website when a user does a search for a brand name. Google supposedly analyze a website’s site structure and links to pages that users will find the most useful, which is helpful. Google’s documentation doesn’t get into details of what that analysis analyzes but I suspect that Google notes which sections of a site users tend to search for, inbound links, and site architecture (internal linking) then uses that information to generate the sitelinks feature.

There may be a bug in how Google is showing sitelinks for Google Search Console though.

A search for Google Search Console shows sitelinks in multiple languages:

  • Japanese
  • Hungarian
  • Dutch
  • Danish

Screenshot Of Google Sitelinks Bug

I searched using the domains of other websites and didn’t see the same effect. It’s unclear how long this has been happening but it’s interesting from an SEO perspective. The reason it’s interesting is because whatever analysis Google is using to determine sitelinks is causing this weird search result.

Hat tip to web developer and search marketing expert Brenda Malone (LinkedIn profile) for spotting this!

AI Chatbots Fail News Accuracy Test, BBC Study Reveals via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

BBC study finds leading AI chatbots consistently distort news content, raising concerns about information accuracy and trust.

  • AI chatbots are getting news wrong more often than right.
    Trusted brands like BBC are losing control of their content.
  • The problem is industry-wide, affecting all major AI platforms.
  • The problem is industry-wide, affecting all major AI platforms.
Google Confirms Business Profile Reviews Outage via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Google confirmed an outage in business profile reviews that has resulted in missing reviews for many local business profiles and is working toward fixing the problem.

Google Business Profile

Google Business Profiles are a way for local businesses to add their business to Google and have it show up in local search and Google Maps. It also allows businesses to manage how their site shows up in search, enabling Google to show accurate information about hours, website, contact information, images and reviews.

The reviews is a feature that allows users to share their experiences with businesses. It’s a useful way for businesses to increase earnings through positive word of mouth.

GBP Reviews Outage

Google Business Profile reviews have gone missing, which is bad news for businesses because of how influential reviews are for building trust.

A Googler acknowledged the outage and committed to updating the community about fixes to the system. She did however ask businesses to read their guidelines about reviews, which could be seen as implying that some businesses with missing reviews may have had reviews removed for a reason.

She wrote:

“GBP Review Count Known Issue Update

Known Issue
We’re aware of an issue affecting some Google Business Profiles, causing some profiles to show lower-than-actual review counts due to a display issue. The reviews themselves have not actually been removed. We’re working hard to resolve this and restore accurate review counts as quickly as possible. We appreciate your patience and will share updates on this thread as they become available.

Before reporting missing reviews, please note that there are several reasons why reviews may be removed from maps. Usually, missing reviews are removed for policy violations like spam or inappropriate content.

Read more about our Review policy guidelines here before proceeding. You can also refer to the Help Center Article for more information.”

This is a developing story, this article will be updated with additional information once it becomes available.

Featured Image by Shutterstock/The Image Party

Google Updates Its Gambling & Games Advertising Policy via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

Google has announced an upcoming revision to its Gambling and Games advertising policy, which will take effect on April 14.

The company shared a preview of the new guidelines before the official rollout.

We observed several additions worth highlighting after comparing the preview to Google’s existing policy.

Below is an overview of the changes advertisers need to know.

Stricter Definitions

One of the most notable changes is the more precise way the policy defines “gambling” and “gambling-promoting content.”

Under the new guidelines, any content that provides direct links to online gambling or facilitates gambling services will be labeled as gambling-promoting.

This clarifies that aggregator or affiliate websites must exclusively focus on providing information or comparisons about authorized gambling services. Anything beyond that scope will face restrictions.

Country-Specific Requirements

While the current policy generally refers to “country restrictions,” the updated policy offers a detailed list of countries that permit or prohibit various forms of gambling.

This includes explicitly referencing nations where offline gambling ads are entirely banned (for example, Bulgaria, China, and Egypt).

The policy also addresses social casino games. It specifies which regions require a separate certification application and confirms where social casino game ads may be lawfully run.

New Guidance On Mahjong & “Casino-Like” Games

The updated policy has a specific clause prohibiting promoting Mahjong activities involving money in the Asia-Pacific region. In the past, Mahjong wasn’t explicitly mentioned.

Further, the definition of “online gambling” now covers any games traditionally associated with casinos, even if they use virtual currencies or items with real-world value.

Licensing & Certification

In the updated policy, Google advises maintaining valid licenses and registrations.

As an advertiser, you must notify Google if your licenses are suspended, revoked, or terminated. Serving gambling ads without valid documentation can result in account suspension.

Previously, this requirement was in place but less explicitly highlighted.

Social Casino Games

The updated policy devotes considerable attention to social casino games.

These online games simulate gambling yet do not offer a chance to win money or prizes of real-world value. The preview clarifies that social casino advertisers must apply for certification and keep separate accounts if they also promote real-money gambling content.

Additionally, any real-money gambling ads in social casino games or related websites are strictly disallowed.

Policy Violations

Google considers breaches of social casino game regulations “egregious,” meaning they could result in immediate and permanent account suspensions.

While similar penalties existed in the prior policy, the update stresses the severity of non-compliance in the social casino game category.

In other sections, repeated or severe violations can also result in an account suspension.

New Section On “Online Non-Casino Games”

The updated policy distinguishes between general “online non-casino games” and conventional gambling.

This separate category covers skill-based gaming, offering advertisers more clarity on when special certifications may apply.

Under the new policy, if a skill-based game meets the legal definition of gambling in a particular region, the advertiser must follow all gambling-related restrictions and obtain the necessary approvals.

What This Means For Advertisers

Advertisers looking to promote gambling, social casino services, or non-casino games need to:

  1. Review Licensing: Ensure any relevant permits are current and that Google knows of any changes.
  2. Obtain Certifications: Apply for and maintain the necessary Google Ads certifications based on the specific gambling category and target regions.
  3. Manage Target Countries: Ads targeting disallowed regions may be disapproved or labeled “Eligible (limited).”
  4. Monitor Policy Requirements: Review the aggregator and affiliate site rules to avoid inadvertently promoting gambling activities outside the scope of local regulations.

Looking Ahead

You can view the updated policy and review the changes before they take effect on April 14.

If you plan to continue gambling-related ads after that date, be aware of these updates. For more details, visit Google’s Help Center and check local laws.


Featured Image: SrideeStudio/Shutterstock

WordPress Leader Mullenweg Silences Joost De Valk via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Matt Mullenweg, co-creator of WordPress, posted a statement on X (formerly Twitter) announcing that Joost de Valk was no longer speaking at WordCamp Asia and was persona non grata for having “stabbed” him when he was vulnerable and betraying his confidence. Mullenweg cited statements by de Valk to prove his point, but those statements were presented without their full context, which significantly altered their meaning.

Joost de Valk Removed From WordCamp Asia

Joost de Valk, creator of the Yoast SEO plugin was scheduled to speak at WordCamp Asia on February 21st but was removed from the schedule. He had been scheduled to speak on the topic of marketing WordPress products. A post on X by Matt Mullenweg explaining why he was removed suggests that de Valk was removed on orders by Mullenweg.

Screenshot Of Joost De Valk’s WordCamp Asia Speaker Agenda

Mullenweg: Joost “Stabbed Me When I Was Down”

Matt Mullenweg posted an explanation of why Joost was removed from the WordCamp Asia schedule, with his motivation being to get ahead of any “drama” stirred up by de Valk, although at the time of writing Joost has been silent about the removal on both X and his blog.

Mullenweg posted:

“Before he tries to make more drama about not being at WordCamp Asia, I just wanted to say that I feel @jdevalk stabbed me when I was down, betrayed confidence, tried to take advantage of a situation for personal clout and influence.

I have given him hundreds of hours of my time and more access than almost anyone in the WP community, including admin access on Google Analytics, a marketing leadership position, and more. This trust was betrayed.

His previous contributions do not “make up” for this behavior, nor has he apologized or taken any conciliatory action. This deeply saddens me.

Because of this, I will not interact with him any further or participate with anything he’s involved with, he’s persona non grata.”

The term persona non grata means that a person is unwelcome. It’s use originated in diplomatic contexts but is now used for any situation where a person is no longer welcome.

Out Of Context Citations

Mullenweg followed up with another post with citations of statements  published by Joost de Valk that Mullenweg characterize de Valk is trying to “stage a coup” of WordPress.

He continued:

He’s trying to claim he didn’t want to fork or stage a coup, but wrote:

‘I think it’s time to let go of the cult and change project leadership.’

‘But it’s clear now, that we can no longer have him be our sole leader’

‘I’m already talking to several hosts about this, and would welcome anyone who wants to join these conversations, so we’re not duplicating work.’

‘I’m here, and willing to lead through this transition. I do have the time, the energy and the money needed to fund myself doing it.’

X is a micro-blogging format that limited how much context Mullenweg could post.  It’s helpful to see those statements in context in order to fully understand them.

For example, the quote in which Joost references the “cult” nature of WordPress leadership takes on a different meaning when viewed in its full context.

Here’s the out of context version:

“I think it’s time to let go of the cult and change project leadership.”

The full version of the passage makes it clear that de Valk is merely suggesting the creation of a board (later on detailing that it’s a board with Matt involved in a leadership position).

The full statement:

“I’ve spoken to many slightly outside of our industry over the past months about what was happening and several people, independent of each other, described WordPress as ‘a cult’ to me. And I understand why.

I think it’s time to let go of the cult and change project leadership. I’ve said it before: we need a ‘board’. “

Joost later explains that he isn’t advocating for removal of Matt from leadership but rather giving a voice to all stakeholders, including Matt’s.

He wrote:

“I’m still, to this day, very thankful for what Matt has created. I would love to work with him to fix all this. But it’s clear now, that we can no longer have him be our sole leader, although I’d love it if we could get him to be among the leaders.”

The reality is that Joost was never arguing for a change in leadership. From September to December Joost had largely limited his opinion to suggesting that there should be more transparency about how much of the trademark licensing fee goes to support the WordPress project.  Rather than stabbing Mullenweg when he was down and calling for a coup, Joost was more cautious and circumspect in his public remarks.

It was only in December that he published his “Breaking the Status Quo” blog post where he openly advocated that Mullenweg consider a change in governance that reflected the voices of more than one stakeholder, with Mullenweg still in a position of control. Joost was not leading the call for change, others had already been doing that for months. Joost was lending his (considerable) voice to a movement that was already asking for change in how the WordPress project is governed.

Response To Mullenweg’s Post

Responses to his post were muted because the ability to respond was limited to those he mentions or is following. @arniepalmer responded by explaining that events look far differently from his perspective, pointing out that de Valk was not trying to seize leadership of WordPress away from Mullenweg but discussing a way to expand leadership beyond just one person.

He wrote:

“Matt, I can see how you could be offended by someone who has an opinion on how things in WordPress leadership could be improved and mention that project leadership needs a change. Especially when you have led the project for so many years. However, in my opinion, @jdevalk was engaging in a discussion for a wider solution, not a fork, not a takeover, just a start over with you still being A leader – which is again, in my opinion, essential.

I am saddened that Joost has been excluded from @wcasia2025 as it could have been an opportunity for you and him to discuss options in person. An opportunity to build bridges and even if no solution is reached, the effort has been seen to be made to not exclude those that have differing opinions on how this community driven project moves forward. Criticism of leadership is never a pleasant situation for anyone. I believe a walk back on this is possible and as tickets (including airline and hotels) are already booked for all concerned, booking a meeting room is the smallest of concerns here.”

Joost de Valk Is Ousted And Silenced?

Some time ago, I asked someone how a civil war in his country started. His nutshell explanation was that for decades, citizens, students, and unions had demanded change, but one by one, the government sealed off every avenue for dialogue. Rather than gaining control, it built pressure to the breaking point, leaving no other outlet for change, which eventually came.

Joost de Valk has not made a statement (or drama) about his ouster from WordCamp or his new “persona non grata” status with Mullenweg. It’s unclear what attempting to silence de Valk has accomplished.

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Ollyy