YouTube introduced separate filtering for organic and paid traffic metrics in YouTube Analytics, allowing you to distinguish between unpaid and promoted content performance.
Channels can now filter views, engaged views, likes, comments, shares, and watchtime by traffic source. The update addresses longstanding questions about how paid advertising affects organic channel growth.
YouTube’s announcement included clarification that advertising doesn’t negatively impact organic performance, stating the two systems operate independently.
What’s New
The Analytics update adds traffic source filtering across core engagement metrics.
You can view performance data split between organic sources and paid advertisements, including YouTube Promote campaigns and brand-sponsored content.
YouTube’s announcement stated:
“Organic performance is determined by how the platform’s algorithm recommends your video to viewers based on factors like watch time, engagement, and audience retention. This is your video’s word of mouth reach, determined by the quality of the content itself. Whether or not it also runs as an ad has no impact.”
The platform distinguishes paid ad performance as determined by budget and targeting settings rather than algorithmic recommendations.
This is explained in more detail in the video below:
Addressing Performance Questions
YouTube addressed creator concerns about lower aggregate metrics when combining organic and paid performance.
The announcement noted that advertising often targets new audiences who may engage at lower rates than existing subscribers, which can reduce overall retention and click-through metrics when viewed in aggregate.
The new filtering allows creators to analyze each traffic source separately rather than viewing combined data.
Why This Matters
You can now measure organic content performance without paid promotion data affecting your metrics.
This separation helps identify which growth strategies work independently rather than attributing paid gains to organic strategy or vice versa.
The filtering clarifies whether audience retention issues stem from content quality or new audience targeting in ad campaigns.
Looking Ahead
The traffic filtering feature is available now in YouTube Analytics. YouTube didn’t specify whether additional metrics or filtering options will be added to the organic versus paid breakdown.
The update coincides with YouTube’s October 2025 terminology change renaming the “Views” metric to “TrueView views” in Google Ads reporting, though this naming change doesn’t affect how views are counted or billed.
A simplified explanation of how Google ranks content is that it is based on understanding search queries and web pages, plus a number of external ranking signals. With AI Mode, that’s just the starting point for ranking websites. Even keywords are starting to go away, replaced by increasingly complex queries and even images. How do you optimize for that? The following are steps that can be taken to help answer that question.
Latent Questions Are A Profound Change To SEO
The word “latent” means something that exists but cannot be seen. When a user issues a complex query the LLM must not only understand the query but also map out follow-up questions that a user might ask as part of an information journey about the topic. Those questions that comprise the follow-up questions are latent questions. Virtually every query contains latent questions.
Google’s Information Gain Patent
The issue of latent queries poses a new problem for SEO: How do you optimize for questions that are unknown? Optimizing for AI search means optimizing for the entire range of questions that are related to the initial or head query.
But even the concept of a head query is going away because users are now asking complex queries which demand complex answers. This is precisely why it may be useful for AI SEO purposes to optimize not just for one query but for the immediate information needs of the user.
How does Google understand the information need that’s hidden within a user’s query? The answer is found in Google’s Information Gain Patent. That patent is about ranking a web page that is relevant for a query then afterward ranking other web pages that have different but related content.
Identify The Latent (Hidden) Questions
One way to look at AI search results is to break them down into the questions that the AI answers are satisfying, to identify the hidden query fan-out questions.
For example, if you ask Google’s AI Mode how to make pizza dough the AI Mode will generate a pizza dough recipe. The answer is synthesized from multiple queries.
There is a way to extract the hidden (latent) questions by using a Reverse Question Answering Prompt, which I’ll show below.
Here is an example of an initial query and the additional query fan-out questions that are involved:
Initial Query: How to make pizza dough?
Query Fan-Out Questions:
What ingredients are needed to make pizza dough?
How much pizza dough does this recipe make?
What indicates that the yeast is active?
How long should the dough be kneaded by hand?
How long should the dough be kneaded with a mixer?
How long should the dough rise during the first proofing?
How can you develop more complex flavor in the dough?
What should the oven temperature be for baking the pizza?
How long should the pizza bake?
Actual AI Mode Question And Answers
Here are some of the hidden query fan-out questions accompanied by the answers that Google’s AI Mode generated.
Question: What ingredients are needed to make pizza dough? Answer: “1 and 1/3 cups warm water (around 105-110°F or 40-43°C); 1 tablespoon granulated sugar (or honey); 1 packet active dry or instant yeast (2 1/4 teaspoons); 3 1/2 to 4 cups all-purpose or bread flour, plus more for dusting; 2 tablespoons extra-virgin olive oil, plus more for greasing; 1 teaspoon salt.”
Question: How much pizza dough does this recipe make? Answer: “This recipe makes enough dough for two 10-12 inch pizzas.”
Question: What indicates that the yeast is active? Answer: “Cover and let it sit for about 5-10 minutes, until the mixture is foamy and bubbly. This indicates the yeast is active.”
Screenshot Of The Actual AI Mode Answer
Reverse Question Answering Prompt
You can use the Reverse Question Answering Prompt to identify the underlying questions in any AI Mode answer. You can even use a similar but more precise prompt to analyze your own content to identify what questions the document answers. It’s a good way to check if your content does or does not answer the questions you want it to answer.
Prompt To Extract Questions From AI Mode
Here is the prompt to use to extract the hidden questions within an AI Mode answer:
Analyze the document and extract a list of questions that are directly and completely answered by full sentences in the text. Only include questions if the document contains a full sentence or sentences that clearly answers it. Do not include any questions that are answered only partially, implicitly, or by inference.
For each question, ensure that it is a clear and concise restatement of the exact information present. This is a reverse question generation task: only use the content already present in the document.
For each question, also include the exact sentences from the document that answer it. Only generate questions that have a complete, direct answer in the form of a full sentence or sentences in the document.
Reverse Question Answering Analysis For Web Content
The previously described prompt can be used to extract the questions that are answered by your own or a competitor’s content. But it will not differentiate between the core search queries the document is relevant for and other questions that are ancillary to the main topic.
To do a Reverse Question Answering analysis with your own content, try this more precise variant of the prompt:
Analyze the document and extract a list of questions that are core to the document’s central topic and are directly and completely answered by full sentences in the text.
Only include questions if the document contains a full sentence or contiguous sentences that clearly answers it. Do not include any questions that are answered only partially, implicitly, or by inference. Crucially, exclude any questions about supporting anecdotes, personal asides, or general background information that is not the main subject of the document.
For each question, ensure that it is a clear and concise restatement of the exact information present. This is a reverse question generation task: only use the content already present in the document.
For each question, also include the exact sentences from the document that answer it. Only generate questions that have a complete, direct answer in the form of a full sentence or sentences in the document.
The above prompt is meant to emulate how an LLM or information retrieval system might extract the core questions that a web document answers, while ignoring the parts of the document that aren’t central to its informational purpose, such as tangential commentary that do not directly contribute to the document’s main topic or purpose.
Cultivate Being Mentioned On Other Sites
Something that is becoming increasingly apparent is that AI search tends to rank companies whose websites are recommended by other sites. Research by Ahrefs found a strong correlation between sites that appear in AI Overviews and branded mentions.
According to Ahrefs:
“So we looked at these factors that correlate with the amount of times a brand appears in AI overviews, tested tons of different things, and by far the strongest correlation, very, very strong correlation, almost 0.67, was branded web mentions.
So if your brand is mentioned in a ton of different places on the web, that correlates very highly with your brand being mentioned in lots of AI conversations as well.”
This finding strongly suggests that visibility in AI search may depend less on backlinks and more on how often a brand is discussed across the web. AI models seem to learn which brands are recommended by how often those sites are mentioned across other sites, including sites like Reddit.
Post-Keyword Ranking Era
We are in a post-keyword ranking era. Google’s organic search was already using AI and a core topicality system to better understand queries and the topic that web pages were about. The big difference now is that Google’s AI Mode has enabled users to search with long and complex conversational queries that aren’t necessarily answered by web pages that are focused on being relevant to keywords instead of to what people are actually looking for.
Write About Topics
Writing about topics seems like a straightforward approach but what it means depends on the context of the topic.
What “topic writing” proposes is that instead of writing about the keyword Blue Widget, the writer must write about the topic of Blue Widget.
The old way of SEO was to think about Blue Widget and all the associated Blue Widget keyword phrases:
Associated keyword phrases
How to make blue widgets
Cheap blue widgets
Best blue widgets
Images And Videos
The up to date way to write is to think in terms of answers and helpfulness. For example, do the images on a travel site communicate what a destination is about? Will a reader linger on the photo? On a product site, do the images communicate useful information that will help a consumer determine if something will fit and what it might look like on them?
Images and videos, if they’re helpful and answer questions, could become increasingly important as users begin to search with images and increasingly expect to see more videos in the search results, both short and longform videos.
New agentic capabilities are launching in AI Mode: you can now get help booking event tickets or beauty & wellness appointments. This is available to all users opted into Labs in the U.S., with higher limits for Google AI Pro & Ultra subscribers.
AI Mode now performs multi-site searches for three booking categories and returns real-time options with a curated list of time slots or ticket prices.
Here’s what U.S. users see when visiting the landing page in Search Labs:
Screenshot from: labs.google.com/search/experiment/43, November 2025.
Screenshot from: labs.google.com/search/experiment/43, November 2025.
Restaurant Reservations
You can ask for party size, time, neighborhood, or cuisine.
Google’s example:
“find me a dinner reservation for 3 people this Friday after 6pm around Logan Square. craving ramen or bibimbap.”
Results include available times with links to book.
Event Tickets
Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers can search for concert and event tickets with price and seating preferences, for example:
“find me 2 cheap tickets for the Shaboozey concert coming up. prefer standing floor tickets.”
Wellness Appointments
Also for Pro and Ultra subscribers, AI Mode can surface real-time availability from local service booking platforms and link you to complete the appointment.
How It Works
AI Mode searches across multiple websites to surface real-time availability, then presents a curated list. It links you directly to the provider’s booking page to finalize the reservation or purchase.
The latest Ahrefs podcast shares data showing that brand mentions on third-party websites help improve visibility across AI search surfaces. What they found is that brand mentions correlate strongly with ranking better in AI search, indicating that we are firmly in a new era of off-page SEO.
Training Data Gets Cited
Tim Soulo, CMO of Ahrefs, said that off-page activity that increases being mentioned on other sites improves visibility in AI search results, both those based on training data and those drawing from live search results. The benefits of conducting off-page SEO apply to both. The only difference is that training data doesn’t get into LLMs right away.
Tim recommends identifying where your industry gets mentioned:
“You just need to see like where your competitors are mentioned, where you are mentioned, where your industry is mentioned.
And you have to get mentions there because then if the AI chatbot would do a search and find those pages and create their answer based on what they see on those pages, this is one thing.
But if some of the AI providers will decide to retrain their entire model on a more recent snapshot of the web, they will use essentially the same pages.”
Tim cautioned that AI companies don’t ingest new web data for training and that there’s a lag in months between how often large language models receive fresh training data from the web.
Appear On Authoritative Websites
Although Tim did not mention specific tactics for obtaining brand mentions, in my opinion, off-page link-building strategies don’t have to change much to build brand mentions.
Tim underlined the importance of appearing on authoritative websites:
“So yeah, …essentially it’s not that you have to use different tactics for those things. You do the same thing, you appear like on credible websites, but yeah, let’s continue.”
The only thing that I would add is that authoritativeness in this situation is if a site gets mentioned by AI search. But the other thing to think about is if a site is simply the go-to for a particular kind of information, relevance
Topicality Of Brand Mentions
The other thing that was discussed is the topicality of the brand mentions, meaning the context in which the brand is discussed. Ryan Law, Ahrefs’ Director of Content Marketing, said that the context of the brand mention is important, and I agree. You can’t always control the narrative, but that’s where old-fashioned PR outreach comes in, where you can include quotes and so on to build the right context.
Law explained:
“Well, that segues very nicely to what I think is probably the most useful discrete tactic you can do, and that is building off-site mentions.
A big part of how LLMs understand what your brand is about and when it should recommend it and the context it should talk about you is based on where you appear in its training data and where you appear on the web.
What topics are you commonly mentioned alongside?
What other brands are you mentioned alongside?
I think Patrick Stox has been referring to this as the era of off-page SEO. In some ways, the content on your own site is not as valuable as the content about you on other pages on the web.”
Law mentioned that these off-page mentions don’t have to be in the form of links in order to be useful for ranking in AI search.
Testing Shows Brand Mentions Are Important
Law went on to say that their data shows that brand mentions are important for ranking. He mentions a correlation coefficient of 0.67, which is a measure of how strongly two variables are related.
Here are the correlation coefficient scales:
1.0 = perfect positive correlation (two things are related).
0.0 = no correlation.
–1.0 = perfect negative correlation (for example, for every minute you drive the distance gets smaller, a negative correlation).
So, a correlation coefficient of 0.67 means that there’s a strong relationship in what’s observed.
Law explained:
“And we did indeed test this with a bit of research.
So we looked at these factors that correlate with the amount of times a brand appears in AI overviews, tested tons of different things, and by far the strongest correlation, very, very strong correlation, almost 0.67, was branded web mentions.
So if your brand is mentioned in a ton of different places on the web, that correlates very highly with your brand being mentioned in lots of AI conversations as well.”
He goes on to recommend identifying industry domains that tend to get cited in AI search for your topics and try to get mentioned on those websites.
Law also recommended getting mentions on user-generated content sites like Reddit and Quora. Next he recommended getting mentioned on review sites and on YouTube video in the transcripts because YouTube videos are highly cited by AI search.
Ahrefs Brand Radar Tool
Lastly, they discussed their Ahrefs tool called Brand Radar that’s useful for identifying domains that are frequently mentioned in AI search surfaces.
Law explained:
“And obviously, we have a tool that does exactly that. It actually helps you find the most commonly cited domains. …if you put in whatever niche you’re interested in, you can see not only the top domains that get mentioned most often across all of the thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions of conversations we have indexed. You can also see the individual pages that get most commonly mentioned.
Obviously, if you can get your brand on those pages, yeah, immediately your AI visibility is going to shoot up in a pretty dramatic way.”
Citations Are The New Backlinks
Tim Soulo called citations the new backlinks for the AI search era and recommended their Brand Radar tool for identifying where to get mentions. In my opinion, getting a brand mentioned anywhere that’s relevant to your users or customers could also be helpful for ranking in the regular search as well as AI (Read: Google’s Branded Search Patent)
Watch the Ahrefs podcast starting at about the 6:30 minute mark:
WordPress managed web hosting company Kinsta announced that it is changing how it bills its customers by not charging users for bandwidth related to unwanted bot and scraper traffic.
Daniel Pataki, CTO at Kinsta explained:
“In the past 12 months we’ve seen bot traffic rise due to the prevalence of both good and bad uses of AI. These bots can not be filtered as effectively, modifying our typical visits-to-bandwidth ratio. We’re working internally and with Cloudflare to improve bot filtering, but our top priority remains our customers’ success. Reducing bot-related costs as quickly as possible will have the greatest impact.”
Bot And Scraper Traffic Out Of Control
Anyone who’s watched their live traffic statistics can confirm that scraper and hacker bots make up a significant amount of traffic to a website, accounting for as much as half of the bandwidth costs for a website. I still remember the time I added a forum to a content site a few years ago and purposely left it without bot protection to see how long it would take to get spammed. I didn’t have to wait long; a spam bot registered itself and started posting spam within minutes.
Kinsta is providing bandwidth-based options that don’t charge for wasted bandwidth while also providing options such as caching and CDNs that help mitigate the impact of bad bot visits.
Kinsta’s announcement explains:
“Now with bandwidth-based options, Kinsta is giving customers more choice, transparency and control in how they pay for hosting: by visits or bandwidth. Customers are not locked into a single pricing model. This is consistent with Kinsta’s long-term approach of delivering quality and building trust. The new pricing option is setting the standard for hosting by giving customers the freedom to choose how they pay, in a way that reflects how the modern web actually works.”
The new feature is available to every visitor-based tier, enables the flexibility to switch between visits and bandwidth-based, and with improved usage notifications plus no charges for scrapers and bad bots the risk of unexpectedly running out of bandwidth is lower.
Apple is reportedly paying Google to build a custom Gemini AI model that will power a major Siri upgrade targeted for spring 2026, according to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman.
The custom Gemini model is expected to run on Apple’s Private Cloud Compute infrastructure. Neither Apple nor Google has officially announced the partnership.
What’s Being Reported
Bloomberg reports Apple conducted an internal evaluation comparing AI models from Google and Anthropic for the next-generation Siri.
Google’s Gemini won based largely on financial terms. Bloomberg says Anthropic’s Claude would have cost Apple more than $1.5 billion annually.
According to the report, Google’s models will provide the query planner and summarizer components of Siri’s new architecture. Apple’s own Foundation Models would continue handling on-device personal data processing, with the Google-supplied models running on Apple’s servers.
The project carries the internal codename “Glenwood.”
Apple Won’t Acknowledge Google’s Role
Bloomberg reports Apple plans to market the updated Siri as Apple technology running on Apple servers through an Apple interface, without promoting Google’s involvement.
In practice, Gemini would operate behind the scenes while Apple positions the capabilities as its own work.
Launch Timeline
Bloomberg reports Apple is targeting spring 2026 for the Siri overhaul as part of iOS 26.4.
Earlier Bloomberg reporting also pointed to a smart home display device on a similar timeline that could showcase the assistant’s expanded capabilities.
What We Don’t Know Yet
Financial terms beyond the broad “paying Google” characterization are undisclosed.
Neither company has confirmed the partnership, and the legal and technical data-handling arrangements are not public. It’s also unclear whether the deal is finalized or still being negotiated.
Why This Matters
A Gemini-powered backend could change how Siri answers questions, and who gets credit in AI responses, even if the branding remains Apple-only.
If Bloomberg’s report holds, more answers will start and finish inside Siri and Spotlight on iPhone, which can reduce early web discovery.
The open questions are how sources will appear and whether traffic will be traceable.
Looking Ahead
Apple has already enabled ChatGPT access within Siri and Writing Tools as part of Apple Intelligence, and Anthropic says Claude is available in Xcode 26 for developers.
The potential Gemini partnership would be Apple’s most consequential AI arrangement to date because it would underpin core Siri functionality rather than optional features.
Watch for official details closer to the iOS 26.4 window.
Benjamin Houy shut down Lorelight, a generative engine optimization (GEO) platform designed to track brand visibility in ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity, after concluding most brands don’t need a specialized tool for AI search visibility.
Houy writes that, after reviewing hundreds of AI answers, the brands mentioned most often share familiar traits: quality content, mentions in authoritative publications, strong reputation, and genuine expertise.
“There’s no such thing as ‘GEO strategy’ or ‘AI optimization’ separate from brand building… The AI models are trained on the same content that builds your brand everywhere else.”
Houy explains in a blog post that customers liked Lorelight’s insights but often churned because the data didn’t change their tactics. In his view, users pursued the same fundamentals with or without GEO dashboards.
He argues GEO tracking makes more sense as one signal inside broader SEO suites rather than as a standalone product. He points to examples of traditional SEO platforms incorporating AI-style visibility signals into existing toolsets rather than creating a separate category.
Debate Snapshot: Voices On Both Sides
Reactions show a genuine split in how marketers see “AI search.”
Some SEO professionals applauded the back-to-basics message. Others countered with cases where assistant referrals appear meaningful.
Here are some of the responses published so far:
Lily Ray: “Thank you for being honest and for sharing this publicly. The industry needs to hear this loud and clear.”
Randall Choh: “I beg to differ. It’s a growing metric… LLM searches usually have better search intents that lead to higher conversions.”
Karl McCarthy: “You’re right that quality content + authoritative mentions + reputation is what works… That’s not a tool. It’s a network.”
Nikki Pilkington raised consumer-fairness questions about shuttering a product and whether prior GEO-promotional content should be updated or removed.
These perspectives capture the industry tension. Some see AI search as a new performance channel worth measuring. Others see the same brand signals driving outcomes across SEO, PR, and now AI assistants.
How “AI Search Visibility” Is Being Measured
Because assistants work differently from web search, measurement is still uneven.
Assistants surface brands in two main ways: by citing and linking sources directly in answers, and by guiding people into familiar web results.
Referral tracking can come through direct links, copy-and-paste, or branded search follow-ups.
Attribution is messy because not all assistants pass clear referrers. Teams often combine UTM tagging on shared links with branded-search lift, direct-traffic spikes, and assisted-conversion reports to triangulate “LLM influence.”
That patchwork makes case studies persuasive but hard to generalize.
Why This Matters
The main question is whether AI search needs its own optimization framework or if it primarily benefits from the same brand signals.
If Houy is correct, standalone GEO tools might only produce engaging dashboards that seldom influence strategy.
On the other hand, if the advocates are correct, overlooking assistant visibility could mean missing out on profitable opportunities between traditional search and LLM-referred traffic.
What’s Next
It’s likely that SEO platforms will continue to fold “AI visibility” into existing analytics rather than creating a separate category.
The safest path for businesses is to continue doing the brand-building work that assistants already reward, while testing assistant-specific measurements where they are most likely to pay off.
Google’s VP of Product for Google Search confirmed that PR activities may be helpful for ranking better in certain contexts and offered an explanation of how AI search works and what content creators should focus on to stay relevant to users.
PR Helps Sites Get Recommended By AI
Something interesting that was said in the podcast was that it could be beneficial to be mentioned by other sites if you want your site to be recommended by AI. Robby Stein didn’t say that this is a ranking factor. He said this in the context of showing how AI search works, saying that the behavior of AI is similar to how a human might research a question.
The context of Robby Stein’s answer was about what businesses should focus on to rank better in AI chat.
Stein’s answer implies the context of the query fan-out technique, where, to answer a question, it performs Google searches (“questions it issues“).
Here’s his answer:
“Yeah, interestingly, the AI thinks a lot like a person would in terms of the kinds of questions it issues. And so if you’re a business and you’re mentioned in top business lists or from a public article that lots of people end up finding, those kinds of things become useful for the AI to find.”
The podcast host, Marina Mogilko, interrupted his answer to remark that this is about investing in PR. And Robby Stein agreed.
He continued:
“So it’s not really different from what you would do in that regard. I think ultimately, how else are you going to decide what business to go to? Well, you’d want to understand that.”
So the point he’s making is that in order to understand if a business should be recommended, the AI, like a human, would search on Google to see what businesses are recommended by other sites. The podcast host connected that statement to PR and Stein agreed. This aligns with anecdotal experiences where not just Google’s AI but also ChatGPT will provide answers to recommendation type queries with links to sites that recommend businesses. As the podcast host suggested and Stein seems to agree, this raises the importance of PR work, getting sites to mention your business.
Mogilko then noted that her friends might not have seen the articles that were published as a result of PR activities but that she notices that the AI does see those mentions and that the AI uses them in answers.
Robby agreed with her, affirming her observation, saying:
“That’s actually a good way of thinking about it because the way I mentioned before how our AI models work, they’re issuing these Google searches as a tool.”
Content Best Practices Are Key To Ranking In AI
Stein continued his answer, shifting the topic over to what kind of content ranks well in an AI model. He said that the same best practices for making helpful and clear content also applies for ranking in AI.
Stein continued his answer:
“And so in the same way that you would optimize your website and think about how I make helpful, clear information for people? People search for a certain topic, my website’s really helpful for that. Think of an AI doing that search now. And then knowing for that query, here are the best websites given that question.
That’s now… will come into the context window of the model. And so when it renders a response and provides all of these links for you to go deeper, that website’s more likely to show up.
And so it’s a lot of that standard best practices around building great content really do apply in the AI age for sure.”
The takeaway here is that helpful and clear content is important for standard search, AI answers, and people.
The podcast host next asked Robby about reviews, candidly remarking that some people pay for reviews and asking how that would “affect the system.” Stein didn’t address the question about how paid reviews would affect AI answers, but he did circle back to affirming that AI behaves like a human might, implying that if you’re going to think about how the AI system approaches answering a question, think of it in terms of how a human could go about it.
Stein answered:
“It’s hard. I mean, the reviews, I think, again, it’s kind of like a person where like imagine something is scanning for information and trying to find things that are helpful. So it’s possible that if you have reviews that are helpful, it could come up.
But I think it’s tricky to say to pinpoint any one thing like that. I think ultimately it’s about these general best practices where you want is reliable. Kind of like if you were to Google something, what pages would show up at the top of that query? It’s still a good way of thinking about it.”
AI Visibility Overlaps With SEO
At this point, the host responded to Stein’s answer by asking if optimizing for AI is “basically the same as SEO?”
Stein answered that there’s an overlap with SEO, but that the questions are different between regular organic search and AI. The implication is that organic search tends to have keyword-based queries, and AI is conversational.
Here’s Stein’s answer:
“I think there’s a lot of overlap. I think maybe one added nuance is that the kinds of questions that people ask AI are increasingly complicated and they tend to be in different spaces.
…And so if you think about what people use AI for, a lot of it is how to for complicated things or for purchase decisions or for advice about life things.
So people who are creating content in those areas, like if I were them, I would be a student of understanding the use cases of AI and what are growing in those use cases.
And there’s been some studies that have done around how people use these products in AI.
Those are really interesting to understand.”
Stein advised content creators to study how people are using AI to find answers to specific questions. He seemed to put some emphasis on this, so it appears to be something important to pay attention to.
Understand How People Use AI
This next part changes direction to emphasize that search is transforming beyond just simple text search, saying that it is going multimodal. A modality is a computer science word that refers to a type of information such as text, images, speech, or video. This circles back to studying how users are interacting with AI, in this case expanding to include the modality of information.
The podcast host asked the natural follow-up question to what Stein previously said about the overlap with SEO, asking how business owners can understand what people are looking for and whether Google Trends is useful for this.
Stein affirmed that Google Trends is useful for this purpose.
He responded:
“Google Trends is a really useful thing. I actually think people really underutilize that. Like we have real-time information around exactly what’s trending. You can see keyword values.
I think also, you know, the ads has a really fantastic estimation too. Like as you’re booking ads, you can see kind of traffic estimates for various things. So there’s Google has a lot of tools across ads, across the search console and search trends to get information about what people are searching for.
And I think that’s going to increasingly be more interesting as, a lot more of people’s time and attention goes towards not just the way people use search too, but in these areas that are growing quickly, particularly these long specific questions people ask and multimodal, where they’re asking with images or they’re using voice to have live conversation.”
Stein’s response reflects that SEOs and businesses may want to go beyond keyword-based research toward also understanding intent across multiple ways in which users interact with AI. We’re in a moment of volatility where it’s becoming important to recognize the context and purpose in how people search.
The two takeaways that I think are important are:
Long and specific questions
Multimodal contexts
What makes that important is that Stein confirmed that these kinds of searches are growing quickly. Businesses and SEOs should, therefore, be thinking, will my business or client show up if a person searches with voice using a lot of specific details? Will they show up if people use images to search? Image SEO may be becoming increasingly important as more people transition to finding things using AI.
Google Wants To Provide More Information
The host followed up by asking if Google would be providing more information about how users are searching, and Stein confirmed that in the future that’s something they want to do, not just for advertisers but for everyone who is impacted by AI search.
He answered:
“I think down the road we want to get, provide a glimpse into what people are searching for broadly. Yeah. Not just advertisers too. Yeah, it could be forever for anyone.
But ultimately, I think more and more people are searching in these new ways and so the systems need to better reflect those over time.”
Watch the interview at about the 13:30 minute mark:
ChatGPT Go, OpenAI’s heavily discounted version of ChatGPT, is now available in 98 countries, including eight European countries and five Latin American countries.
ChatGPT Go offers everything that’s included in the Free plan but more. So there’s more access to GPT-5, image generation, extended file upload capabilities, a larger context window, and collaboration features. ChatGPT Go is available on both Android and Apple mobile apps and on the macOS and Windows desktop environments.
The eight new European countries where ChatGPT Go is now available are:
Austria
Czech Republic
Denmark
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Spain
Sweden
The five Latin American countries are:
Bolivia
Brazil
El Salvador
Honduras
Nicaragua
The full ChatGPT availability list is here. Note: The official list doesn’t list Sweden, but Sweden appears in the official changelog.
Google used its Q3 earnings call to argue that AI features are expanding search usage rather than cannibalizing it.
CEO Sundar Pichai described an “expansionary moment for Search,” adding that Google’s AI experiences “highlight the web” and send “billions of clicks to sites every day.”
Pichai said overall queries and commercial queries both grew year over year, and that the growth rate increased in Q3 versus Q2, largely driven by AI Overviews and AI Mode.
What Did Google Report In Its Q3 Earnings?
AI Mode & AI Overviews
Pichai reported “strong and consistent” week-over-week growth for AI Mode in the U.S., with queries doubling in the quarter.
He said Google rolled AI Mode out globally across 40 languages, reached over 75 million daily active users, and shipped more than 100 improvements in Q3.
He also said AI Mode is already driving “incremental total query growth for Search.”
Pichai reiterated that AI Overviews “drive meaningful query growth,” noting the effect was “even stronger” in Q3 and more pronounced among younger users.
Revenue: By The Numbers
Alphabet posted $102.3 billion in revenue, its first $100B quarter. “Google Search & other” revenue reached $56.6 billion, up from $49.4 billion a year earlier.
YouTube ads revenue reached $10.26 billion in Q3. Pichai said YouTube “has remained number one in streaming watch time in the U.S. for more than two years, according to Nielsen.”
Pichai added that in the U.S. “Shorts now earn more revenue per watch hour than traditional in-stream.”
The quarter also included a $3.5 billion European Commission fine that Alphabet notes when discussing margins. Excluding that charge, operating margin was 33.9%.
Why It Matters
Google is telling Wall Street that AI surfaces expand search rather than replace it. If that holds, the company has reason to put AI Mode and AI Overviews in front of more queries.
The near-term implication for marketers is a distribution shift inside Google, not a pullback from search.
What’s missing is as important as what was said. Google didn’t share outbound click share from AI experiences or new reporting to track them. Expect adoption to grow while measurement lags. Teams will be relying on their own analytics to judge impact.
The revenue backdrop supports continued investment. “Search & other” rose year over year and Google highlighted growth in commercial queries. Paid budgets are likely to remain with Google as AI-led sessions take up a larger share of usage.
Looking Ahead
Google plans to keep pushing AI-led search surfaces. Pichai said the company is “looking forward to the release of Gemini 3 later this year,” which would give AI Mode and AI Overviews a stronger model foundation if the timing holds.
Google described Chrome as “a browser powered by AI” with deeper integrations to Gemini and AI Mode and “more agentic capabilities coming soon.”
The company also raised 2025 capex guidance to $91–$93 billion to meet AI demand, which supports continued investment in search infrastructure and features.