ChatGPT To Begin Testing Ads In The United States via @sejournal, @brookeosmundson

Just today, OpenAI confirmed it will begin testing advertising in the United States for ChatGPT Free and ChatGPT Go users in the coming weeks, marking the first time ads will appear inside the ChatGPT experience.

The test coincides with the U.S. launch of ChatGPT Go, a low-cost subscription tier priced at $8 per month that has been available internationally since August.

The details reveal a cautious approach, with clear limits on where ads can appear, who will see them, and how they will be separated from ChatGPT’s responses.

Here’s what OpenAI shared, how the tests will work, and why this shift matters for users and advertisers alike.

What OpenAI Is Testing

ChatGPT ads are not being introduced as part of a broader redesign or monetization overhaul. Instead, OpenAI is framing this as a limited test, with narrow placement rules and clear separation from ChatGPT’s core function.

Ads will appear at the bottom of a response, only when there is a relevant sponsored product or service tied to the active conversation. They will be clearly labeled, visually distinct from organic answers, and dismissible.

Users will also be able to see why a particular ad is being shown and turn off ad personalization entirely if they choose.

Just as important is where ads will not appear.

OpenAI stated that ads will not be shown to users under 18 and will not be eligible to run near sensitive or regulated topics, including health, mental health, and politics. Conversations will not be shared with advertisers, and user data will not be sold.

Timing Ad Testing with the Go Tier Launch

The timing of the announcement doesn’t seem accidental.

Alongside the ad testing plans, OpenAI confirmed that ChatGPT Go is now available in the United States.

Priced at $8 per month, Go sits between the free tier and higher-cost subscriptions, offering expanded access to messaging, image generation, file uploads, and memory.

Ads are positioned as a way to support both the free tier and Go users, allowing more people to use ChatGPT with fewer restrictions without forcing an upgrade.

At the same time, OpenAI made it clear that Pro, Business, and Enterprise subscriptions will remain ad-free, reinforcing that paid tiers are still the preferred path for users who want an uninterrupted experience.

Explaining the Guardrails of Early Ad Testing

OpenAI spent as much time explaining what ads will not do as what they will.

The company was explicit that advertising will not influence ChatGPT’s responses. Answers are optimized for usefulness, not commercial outcomes. There is no intent to optimize for time spent, engagement loops, or other metrics commonly associated with ad-driven platforms.

This is a notable departure from how advertising has historically been introduced elsewhere on the internet. Rather than retrofitting ads into an existing product and adjusting incentives later, OpenAI is attempting to define the rules up front.

Whether those rules hold over time is an open question. But the clarity of the initial framework suggests OpenAI understands the risk of getting this wrong.

What Early Ad Formats Tell Us

OpenAI shared two examples of the ad formats it plans to test inside ChatGPT.

In the first example, a ChatGPT response provides recipe ideas for a Mexican dinner party. Below the response, a sponsored product recommendation appears for a grocery item. The ad is clearly labeled and visually separated from the organic answer.

Image credit: openai.com

In the second example, ChatGPT responds to a conversation about traveling to Santa Fe, New Mexico. A sponsored lodging listing appears below the response, labeled as sponsored. The example also shows a follow-up chat screen, indicating that users can continue interacting with ChatGPT after seeing the ad.

Image credit: openai.com

In both examples, the ads appear at the bottom of ChatGPT’s responses and are presented as separate from the main answer. OpenAI stated that these formats are part of its initial ad testing and may change as testing progresses.

Why This Matters for Advertisers

This is not something advertisers can plan for just yet.

There are no announced buying models, no targeting details, no measurement framework, and no indication of when access might expand beyond testing. OpenAI has been clear that this is not an open marketplace at the moment.

Still, the implications are hard to ignore. Ads placed alongside high-intent, problem-solving conversations could eventually represent a different kind of discovery environment. One where usefulness matters more than volume, and where poor creative or loose targeting would feel immediately out of place.

If this becomes a real channel, it is unlikely to reward the same tactics that work in search or social today.

How Marketers Are Reacting So Far

Early industry reaction has been measured, not alarmist.

Most commentary acknowledges that advertising inside ChatGPT was inevitable at this scale.

Lily Ray stated her curiosity to “see how this change impacts user experience.”

Most people in the comments of her post are not shocked by this:

There is also skepticism, particularly around whether relevance can be maintained over time without pressure to expand inventory. That skepticism is warranted. History suggests that once ads work, the temptation to scale them follows.

For now, though, this feels less like an ad platform launch and more like OpenAI testing whether ads can exist inside a conversational interface without changing how people trust the product.

The Bigger Signal for AI Platforms

For users, OpenAI is expanding access while trying to preserve the trust that has made ChatGPT widely used. Introducing ads without blurring the line between answers and monetization sets a high bar, especially for a product people rely on for personal and professional tasks.

Outside of ChatGPT itself, this update shows how AI-first products may think about revenue differently than search or social networks. Ads are positioned as a way to support access, not as the product, with paid tiers remaining central.

OpenAI says it will adjust how ads appear based on user feedback once testing begins in the U.S.

For now, this is a limited test rather than a full advertising launch. Whether those boundaries hold will matter, not just for ChatGPT, but for how monetization inside conversational interfaces is expected to work.

5 Ways To Reduce CPL, Improve Conversion Rates & Capture More Demand In 2026 via @sejournal, @CallRail

The marketers who crack attribution aren’t chasing perfection; they’re layering multiple data sources to get progressively closer to the truth.

What To Do: Identify Which Marketing Efforts Are Actually Working

A starting point: add a simple “How did you hear about us?” field to your intake process, then compare those responses against your digital attribution data.

The gaps you uncover will show you exactly where your current tracking is falling short, and where your brand and word-of-mouth efforts are working harder than you realized.

Learn more about self-reported attribution and how it can transform your reporting →

Improve Conversion Rates By Learning & Implementing What Buyers Ask Before They Convert

There’s a goldmine sitting right under your nose: your customer conversations.

Most marketers hand off call data to sales and never look back. Big mistake.

Avoid This Myth: “Call Insights Are Only For Sales Teams”

Those conversations contain exactly what you need to create more personalized marketing communications and sharpen your strategy.

Literal Keys To Conversion Are Hiding In Your Sales Team’s Call Data

Think about what’s buried in your call recordings:

  • Conversion signals for better targeting. When you understand what makes callers convert, you can build lookalike audiences and refine your ad targeting around those characteristics.
  • Sentiment data for email segmentation. Callers who expressed frustration need different nurture sequences than those who were enthusiastic. Conversation intelligence can automatically score sentiment, letting you segment accordingly.
  • Caller details for personalization. Names, pain points, specific needs—these details can feed directly into personalized follow-up campaigns.
  • Term analysis for more relatable ad creation. What words do your best prospects actually use? Call transcripts reveal the language that resonates, helping you craft offers that speak directly to buyer needs.
  • Keyword clouds for SEO and PPC. The phrases your customers use on calls often differ from the keywords you’re bidding on. Mining conversations for terminology can uncover high-intent search terms you’re missing.

What To Do: Turn Customer Communication (Calls, Chats, Emails) Into Marketing Intelligence

The shift here is mindset.

Stop thinking of call data as a sales asset and start treating it as a marketing intelligence feed. When you analyze trends across hundreds of conversations (not just individual calls) you uncover patterns that can reshape your entire strategy.

Conversation Intelligence can automatically transcribe and analyze calls, surfacing these insights without requiring hours of manual listening. They can even generate aggregated summaries across campaigns, highlighting the questions prospects ask most frequently, the objections that come up repeatedly, and the language that signals buying intent.

The data is there. You just need to start using it.

Give More Attention To SMS Marketing (Open Rates Up To 98%)

Don’t Fall For Myth #4: “Texting Is Irrelevant to Marketers”

Why? Because text messages have a 98% open rate.

Compare that to email’s 20% average, and it’s clear why dismissing SMS as “not a marketing channel” is leaving conversions on the table.

What To Do: Capture More High-Intent Leads With Texting

Giving your buyers choice in how they communicate with you boosts conversion. Period.

Here are two immediate ways to put texting to work:

  1. Click-to-text from your marketing assets. Add trackable click-to-text links in your emails, ads, and website. When a prospect clicks, their native messaging app opens with a pre-populated message to your business. You capture the lead, they get instant communication, and you maintain full attribution visibility.
  2. Local Services Ad (LSA) message leads. If you’re running Google Local Services Ads, you can receive SMS leads directly through the platform. These are high-intent prospects who chose to message instead of call—often because they’re at work, in a waiting room, or simply prefer texting. Missing these leads because you’re not set up for SMS is like leaving the front door locked during business hours.

The key is tracking these text interactions with the same rigor you apply to calls and form fills. When every channel is measured, you can finally see the complete picture of what’s driving results.

The bottom line: your prospects have communication preferences, and those preferences increasingly skew toward texting. Meeting them where they are isn’t just good customer experience; it’s a competitive advantage. The businesses that make it easy to text will capture leads that competitors lose.

Reduce Missed Leads & Lower CPL With AI Voice Assistants

Let’s get personal for a second:  your leads aren’t being answered, and you should care more than anyone.

Stop Thinking “AI Voice Assistants Aren’t for Marketers”

Over 50 million customer calls go unanswered every year.

That’s not just a sales problem-that’s hundreds of millions of dollars in marketing investment generating leads that never convert because nobody picked up the phone.

Think about it.

You spend a significant budget driving calls through paid ads, SEO, and local listings. When 30% of those calls go unanswered (the current average), you’re effectively lighting a third of your budget on fire.

Image created by CallRail, January 2026

What To Do: Ensure Every Inbound Call Converts To A Lead

AI voice assistants solve this by ensuring every call gets answered, 24/7. But they do more than just pick up:

  • Never miss a lead again. Voice assistants answer, capture, and qualify inbound calls around the clock, even when your team is focused on other customers or the office is closed.
  • Drive better outcomes. You can confidently extend ad windows into evenings and weekends, knowing leads will be handled. Early adopters have seen answered calls increase by 44% and client ROI improve by up to 20%.
  • Lower your cost per lead. When every call converts to a captured lead, your CPL drops and your campaign efficiency improves. Plus, consistently answering calls helps your responsiveness scores on platforms like Google’s Local Services Ads.
  • Prioritize follow-up. AI assistants can capture caller intake details, assess intent, and score leads, so your team knows exactly which opportunities to prioritize when they return to the office.

This isn’t about replacing human connection. It’s about plugging the leaks in your funnel so the leads you worked so hard to generate actually have a chance to convert.

The combination of AI voice assistance with call tracking creates a system where every lead is captured, every conversation is logged, and every marketing dollar can be tied back to results.

Explore how Voice Assist transforms missed calls into revenue →

Moving Forward: Market With Confidence

These five myths share a common thread: they take real challenges and use them as excuses to give up.

The marketers who will win in 2026 aren’t the ones who throw their hands up, they’re the smart ones who know how to adapt.

Your 2026 Marketing Action & Attribution Plan

  1. Redefine your MQLs around behaviors that actually predict revenue.
  2. Layer self-reported attribution onto your digital tracking to capture the full buyer journey.
  3. Mine your call data for targeting, personalization, and keyword insights.
  4. Add texting as a tracked communication channel your buyers actually prefer.
  5. Deploy AI voice assistants to ensure no lead goes unanswered.

The tactics aren’t broken.

The execution just needs an upgrade.

Want the complete playbook?

Watch our webinar: 2026 Forecast—5 Expert Marketing Strategies You Need to Refine by Q2 →

10 Hard Truths About PPC: Insights From Last Year’s Best Debates For 2026 via @sejournal, @siliconvallaeys

Hosting my podcast, gives me a front-row seat to the unfiltered reality of our industry, the gritty, “in-the-trenches” reality shared by experts who manage millions in spend.

Last year, my guests, including Greg Finn, Christine “Shep” Zirnheld, Julie Friedman Bacchini, Andrew Lolk and Shawn Walker didn’t hold back. They dismantled “best practices,” called out platform biases, and highlighted exactly where the algorithms fail without human hands.

Here are the 10 most interesting (and sometimes uncomfortable) things my guests shared last year that you can take forward for 2026.

1. Google Is “Shaking The Couch Cushions” (And You’re The Couch)

We need to stop pretending Google’s incentives are perfectly aligned with ours. As Greg Finn and Christine Zirnheld from “Marketing O’Clock” pointed out, Google is, ultimately, a for-profit company, and while it remains an important advertising partner, its objectives don’t always perfectly align with what’s best for advertisers.

Finn put it perfectly: Have you ever noticed that the “Recommendations” tab always suggests raising your budget but never lowering it? That bias is literally built into the UI. With CPCs hitting record highs, “success” for the platform often just means “more revenue” for the shareholder.

And we’ve seen this play out in the data. Optmyzr analyzed more than 17,000 Google Ads accounts and found no consistent correlation between a high Optimization Score and strong performance. In fact, many of the best-performing accounts improved not by accepting Google’s recommendations, but by selectively rejecting them and focusing only on fixes that actually moved CPA, ROAS, or profit.

So, the takeaway is simple: Stop treating recommendations as gospel. Treat them as upsells, because the data shows that blindly following them doesn’t reliably help advertisers, but it does reliably help Google.

2. Automation Without Guardrails Is Just “High-Speed Waste”

The consensus from Shawn Walker from Symphonic Digital, Finn, and Julie Friedman Bacchini, President & Founder of Neptune Moon & Managing Director of PPC Chat, was unanimous: AI can execute, but it cannot strategize.

Walker noted that without strict conversion quality thresholds, Smart Bidding inevitably chases “cheap junk leads” because they are the easiest conversions to get. Meanwhile, Julie warned about “algorithm drift,” where a campaign slowly expands into irrelevant search terms because it thinks it’s being helpful.

Automation is necessary for modern account management, but that doesn’t mean “set it and forget it.” Your job isn’t moving bids anymore, it’s designing the right layers of automation and guardrails so the algorithms work, not the other way around.

I recently tested how well AI could diagnose a drop in conversions, and it confidently identified the campaign’s limited budget as the cause. The reasoning was simple: Some keywords were still receiving impressions while others weren’t, so the budget must be the bottleneck. But that didn’t make sense. Budget constraints usually affect campaigns broadly, reducing visibility across the board rather than selectively shutting off individual keywords.

When only certain keywords go dark, the more plausible explanation is a bidding issue. And if bidding is automated, that often indicates the algorithm deems those keywords as lower quality, resulting in lowered bids and ultimately, disappearing impressions.

The bigger point is this: AI often answers with confidence before it answers with accuracy. It can absolutely help you refine ad copy or strengthen relevance, but it still struggles to understand the nuanced and often counterintuitive interdependencies within a PPC account. In other words, it can assist with execution, but it’s not yet as reliable as a strategist.

3. The “Rule of 30” Is The New Law Of Gravity

One of the most practical takeaways of the year came from Walker. We often debate how much data Smart Bidding needs, but Shawn gave us the math:

You need ~30 conversions per campaign, per 30 days.

Not per account. Not across shared budgets. Per campaign. Below that threshold, the machine is just guessing. If you’re wondering why your small campaigns are volatile, it’s not bad luck; it’s bad math. You are starving the algorithm.

In Optmyzr’s 2024 study on the impact of bidding strategies on performance, we saw the same. 50+ conversions per month are ideal. 30+ is good, and anything less isn’t great. However, I would like to add one refinement to Shawn’s point. The real threshold isn’t “30 conversions per campaign,” but enough volume on the conversion goal/actions Smart Bidding is optimizing toward. Google’s systems can use broader, account-level conversion patterns to reduce data scarcity, and account-default goals and portfolio strategies are designed to expand the learning set beyond a single campaign.

What truly matters is having enough volume for the action you want Smart Bidding to optimize toward. If multiple campaigns are all working toward the same conversion event, they can effectively “pool” their learnings. In other words, campaigns don’t have to hit 30+ conversions individually as long as the underlying conversion action has enough aggregate volume for the system to learn and make reliable decisions.

4. “Soft Conversions” Are The Backbone Of SMB Success

So, what do you do if you can’t hit that magic number of 30? You have to feed the beast something else.

Guests heavily advocated for moving up the funnel. Walker detailed the necessity of “engaged visitor” signals, custom metrics like a user scrolling to a certain depth or spending time on site, fired only once per unique user to prevent inflation.

Whether it’s a PDF download, an add-to-cart, or a pricing page visit, these “soft” signals are no longer optional crutches; for smaller accounts, they are the only way to generate enough data density for Smart Bidding to function.

In other words, micro conversions still matter. They give Smart Bidding a richer sequence of intent signals to learn from: Did the user compare products? Did they view pricing? Did they return within 24 hours? Did they engage with interactive tools? In my experience, these micro-signals are what prevent smaller accounts from starving the algorithm and ultimately help it recognize high-quality users earlier in the journey.

5. SKAGs Are Finally, Truly Dead

If you are still using single keyword ad groups (SKAGs) in 2025, you are fighting a war that ended years ago. Bacchini was blunt: SKAGs have “run their course.”

The granular control we used to prize is now a liability. It fragments your data, making it harder for the AI to learn. Andrew Lolk, Founder at SavvyRevenue, backed this up, warning that over-segmenting campaigns destroys shared learnings. The winning structure for 2025 is radically simple: Consolidate until the data proves you need to separate.

What does that mean? Well, you should split campaigns when there are business reasons, like different bid targets, different promotions, etc. Put simply, you separate campaigns only when there’s a strategic reason, such as assigning different ROAS targets to products with different margins, or isolating seasonal inventory, like ski jackets, from evergreen categories like swimwear, so each can be optimized on its own performance curve.

And while single-keyword ad groups are outdated, single-theme ad groups (STAGs) have become the modern, more effective alternative. Instead of isolating each keyword, STAGs cluster queries that share the same intent and require the same message, giving Google enough data to learn without sacrificing relevance.

A better way to think about it:

A STAG isn’t just “all running shoes terms,” but it’s “all running shoes for distance training terms,” or “all waterproof trail-running shoes terms.” Each theme represents a specific user intent that warrants a specific ad and landing page combo

So, a more realistic STAG example might look like:

Theme: Long-distance running shoes

  • “best long-distance running shoes”
  • “marathon training running shoes”
  • “long-distance running shoes men”

All different keywords, but they relate to the same core motivation, the same benefits to highlight, and the same landing page experience.

STAGs preserve the messaging control SKAGs once offered, but without the data fragmentation that hinders Smart Bidding from working at its best. They give you messaging precision while still feeding the algorithm enough volume to learn.

6. Stop Splitting Performance Max

Speaking of consolidation, Lolk had some strong words for how we manage Performance Max. A common mistake is splitting PMax campaigns by asset group, brand, or generic themes without a distinct ROAS target.

His take? “Splitting = Starving.”

PMax campaigns don’t share data well. If you split them, you force each new campaign to learn from scratch, requiring double the volume to stabilize. Unless you have a radically different ROAS target for a specific category, keep it together. And for the love of PPC, stop running “feed-only” PMax, he says. Just use Standard Shopping if you need that control.

7. Search Is Making A Quiet Comeback

In a surprising twist, we repeatedly heard that ecommerce brands have overemphasized PMax and Shopping, leaving money on the table in Search.

Lolk argued that Search is reclaiming its role as the high-intent workhorse because it offers what PMax cannot: diagnostic visibility and true messaging control. You can’t capitalize on a weather trend or a specific seasonal moment if you’re waiting for PMax to “learn” about it. Search lets you move fast, and it lets you control the landing page, a lever we’ve severely undervalued lately.

8. Your Competitive Advantage Is Now “Post-Click”

With Google automating bids, targeting, and even the creative process, what is left for us? Bacchini says the answer lies after the click.

Differentiation is the new battleground. If your offer is weak or your landing page is generic, no amount of bid tweaking will save you. Clients often dramatically underestimate their competitors and overestimate their own value propositions. As PPC pros, our value add is shifting from “technical setup” to “business consultancy,” fixing the offer, the positioning, and the user experience.

9. Generative AI Is Your New Junior Strategist

We moved past the “AI will write my ads” hype and got into real use cases.

  • Zirnheld explained that AI has become her go-to tool for smoothing the communication gap between complex PPC work and client understanding. She uses it to draft clearer explanations, refine messaging, and spark creative concepts she can develop further. AI helps her accelerate the early stages, allowing her to spend more time on higher-value thinking.
  • Walker described how AI has become a true technical force multiplier inside his workflow. He now uses it to write Google Ads scripts, build custom tools, generate and debug code, and automate tasks that previously required days of manual effort. AI effectively turns his ideas into working prototypes, allowing him to iterate faster and push the boundaries of what one PPC manager can build.
  • Bacchini shared that AI has transformed how she researches competitors and analyzes positioning. Instead of manually combing through search results and landing pages, she can feed everything into AI and instantly see patterns, themes, and gaps. It gives her a strategic overview in seconds, helping her craft sharper messaging and understand where clients stand in a crowded landscape.

The consensus? AI won’t replace you, but an expert using AI will absolutely replace an expert who refuses to touch it.

In Silicon Valley, we used to lionize the idea of the 10x engineer, the kind of person who could out-code an entire team, see around corners in the architecture, and somehow ship things at a pace that felt almost unfair. But lately, the stories I’m hearing in my own network tell a different tale: Many of those “10x” engineers are starting to fall behind the so-called mediocre ones who are simply pushing the limits of what they can do with AI by their side.

And this no longer applies just to engineering. In every role, those who learn to partner with AI will outperform those who rely solely on talent and hustle.

10. The “Search” We Knew Is Disappearing

Finally, we touched on the existential shift. Shep mentioned she now uses Perplexity.ai for research more than Google. Greg Finn highlighted the instability of AI Overviews.

As I’ve been saying all year, we’re witnessing a dramatic shift from keywords to prompts. Search is no longer just about matching a query to an ad; it’s about connecting users who do complex prompts with solutions, and maybe showing an ad if that would be helpful.

In an AI-driven ecosystem, the “prompt” becomes the new keyword: a richer, more contextual signal that reflects not just what users type, but what they’re trying to accomplish. Advertisers who still think in terms of isolated keywords will fall behind; those who think in prompts, tasks, and intent paths will thrive.

The Bottom Line

The work of the modern PPC marketer continues to shift from pulling levers to thinking critically about the levers being pulled on our behalf. Automation is no longer optional, but neither is oversight. The winners this year were the advertisers who understood where algorithms shine, where they stumble, and where a human needs to step in with context that the machine simply doesn’t have.

And this evolution is far from over. As we head into 2026, I expect the debates on PPC Town Hall to get even more interesting. We’ll likely spend less time arguing about whether to adopt AI, and more time unpacking how to direct it, how to measure it, and how to prevent it from homogenizing every account it touches. We’ll explore what happens when prompts truly become the new keywords. And we’ll hear from practitioners who find creative, sometimes surprising ways to bend automation back toward profitability and strategy, rather than convenience.

If 2025 was the year we learned to tell the machine “No,” then 2026 may be the year we learn how to tell it “Do this and here’s why.” The marketers who thrive will be those who don’t just manage campaigns, but manage systems, using judgment, experimentation, and clear intent to guide increasingly powerful tools.

I’m looking forward to another year of unfiltered conversations on PPC Town Hall and to seeing what new hard truths (and opportunities) we uncover together.

More Resources:


Featured Image: Anton Vierietin/Shutterstock

Paid Media Marketing: 8 Changes Marketers Should Make In 2026 via @sejournal, @brookeosmundson

Paid media didn’t slow down last year. If anything, the platforms made sure we stayed busy.

Google rolled out more AI-assisted ad creation features, new Performance Max reporting updates, and continued refining how AI-influenced results shape visibility across search.

Microsoft pushed forward with its own set of AI tools inside Ads and Copilot, along with quality updates that changed how some advertisers measure performance. Meta expanded Advantage+ capabilities and tightened its recommendations for creative structure.

We also saw strong momentum from platforms that used to sit on the sidelines. TikTok introduced more search-focused ad placements. Reddit continued improving its targeting and creative tools.

Privacy shifts kept moving as well. Targeting options continued evolving, and some long-standing measurement assumptions started to feel less reliable. Marketers had to adjust how they test, track, and validate results across every channel.

As we head into 2026, the message is familiar but still true. You can’t always rely on what worked a year ago, and you can’t assume the platforms will keep things the same. This list focuses on the changes that matter most right now. These are practical adjustments that help teams stay competitive without rebuilding everything from scratch.

Let’s walk through the strategies worth prioritizing this year and why they deserve your attention.

1. Embrace The Shift To Conversational AI In Ad Creation

Conversational AI tools like Google’s Gemini and Microsoft’s Copilot enable ad creation and optimization in a more fluid, interactive way.

They’re becoming essential for marketers who want to scale ad variations without exhausting creative resources.

If you’re looking to test and scale how this can work for you, start small with AI-generated ad copy tests. Use the conversational AI tools within the Google Ads platform to create a few new ad variations that differ from your standard copy.

For instance, if your current ads are heavily CTA-focused, let the AI suggest more storytelling or benefits-driven language and test these versions in a limited campaign to gauge performance.

Another tip is to start experimenting with ad personalization at scale. AI tools allow you to input audience insights, such as location or interests, to create tailored ad variations.

Create segmented ads that appeal to different demographics or psychographics and use split testing to identify which approach resonates best.

Lastly, whenever you’re using AI-generated content, make sure to set aside time to review those suggestions monthly. Take note of recurring suggestions that could highlight hidden opportunities or adjustments you may not have initially considered.

2. Refine Ad Targeting With Data Privacy In Mind

With the unreliability of third-party cookies, the upcoming year marks the need for refined targeting strategies that balance effectiveness with privacy.

Tools like Google’s enhanced privacy features and Microsoft’s predictive audience segmentation help ensure you’re reaching the right users in a compliant way.

Now’s the time to develop a robust first-party data strategy. Start by auditing your first-party data to identify gaps and potential sources for future data.

You can also utilize your customer relationship management (CRM) tools and website data collection to capture behavior-based insights and create audience segments you own.

Additionally, because both Google and Microsoft allow Customer Match solutions, it’s a great time to review those policies.

Use tools like cookie consent managers and transparency banners to build trust and ensure you’re gathering data responsibly. If you don’t, you’re at risk of not being able to use first-party data solutions by the ad platforms.

When creating a consent-based tracking strategy, it’s also a good idea to proactively share with users how you use their data and offer clear opt-out options. Transparency is key in this two-way buyer and seller relationship journey.

3. Optimize For AI-Driven Search Ad Placements

AI-generated search summaries, especially in Google’s AI Overviews, are creating new ad placements and impacting traditional ad performance. This trend requires close monitoring and proactive adjustments to stay competitive.

As these new ad placements continue to roll out, here are a few tips to make sure your PPC ads are optimized for this new wave of AI content.

  • Monitor CTRs On AI-Influenced Placements: Start tracking the click-through rates of ads appearing in AI-generated results versus traditional SERPs. This insight can help you understand whether AI-generated placements impact user engagement and identify areas for improvement.
  • Create Specialized Assets For AI Overviews: Use images, headlines, and descriptions designed for short attention spans. For instance, include a compelling image and a clear, concise CTA in your ad to boost appeal in this new placement.
  • Review Performance Max Insights Regularly: Google’s Performance Max campaigns, which include AI-driven placements, provide insights into what combinations work best across channels. Use this data to refine ads in other campaigns where similar placements are available.

4. Lean Into Multi-Channel Campaign Integration

With consumers using multiple platforms interchangeably, paid media strategies must embrace an integrated, omni-channel approach.

Platforms like TikTok and Reddit have built out more robust ad offerings, providing marketers with more cross-platform synergy.

Start by mapping out a cross-platform customer journey. Outline your audience’s touchpoints across different platforms.

For instance, if your customer typically discovers products on TikTok but purchases through Google Shopping, ensure you’re present and active on both channels with consistent messaging.

Another item to keep in mind is utilizing platform-specific metrics to refine your strategy.

Each platform has unique engagement metrics. For example, on TikTok, you can monitor completion rates and engagement (likes, comments) to assess content effectiveness.

LinkedIn, on the other hand, is a place to focus on connection and message response rates.

Tailor your content based on what performs best on each channel. Each channel should have a different content strategy, not just putting the same ads across all platforms, hoping that one of them will click with a user.

5. Optimize Creative Customization With AI Image Editing

AI-powered image editing allows for rapid customization across visuals, which is critical for multi-audience campaigns.

Canva’s integration with Google Workspace and Microsoft’s AI image generator simplifies the creative process, enabling customization without extensive design resources.

To make the most of these AI editors and integrations, start with creating templates for faster customization.

Design or download templates on Canva that match your brand guidelines, making it easy to adjust colors, fonts, and messages for different audiences with minimal effort.

The templates can help you maintain visual consistency while catering to different segments.

To take it up a notch, try running A/B tests on custom visuals. Create two or more variations of AI-edited images to test different elements.

When testing creative, make sure to test differences that are noticeable enough. Track which visual styles drive the most engagement, and use those insights to guide future designs.

If you’re targeting multiple locations in your ads, use AI tools to adjust visuals for regional appeal.

For example, if you’re running an ad in New York and California, you can use AI to create images that feature landmarks or seasonal elements relevant to each location.

6. Enhance Attribution Tracking And Adjust KPIs Accordingly

A multi-device world demands better attribution tracking to understand the entire customer journey.

Google’s Enhanced Conversions and Microsoft’s Customer Insights provide more reliable data across touchpoints, helping marketers adjust KPIs to reflect complex engagement patterns.

To start, review enhanced conversions for first-party tracking to determine if this makes sense for your account.

Enhanced Conversions capture data from form fills or purchases to match offline actions back to Google Ads. When setting this up, make sure your campaigns reflect actual conversions, not just clicks, allowing for more accurate reporting.

Additionally, if you’re still using Last Click attribution models, you will be left in the dust.

It’s time to move beyond last-click attribution to track the impact of each customer touchpoint. You can use Google Analytics or Microsoft’s attribution reports to assess the role of each ad in a customer’s journey, and allocate credit accordingly.

Lastly, when it comes to measurement, it’s time to evolve your key performance indicators (KPIs). Not every channel in your marketing mix should be measured by direct purchases.

Just last year, in North America, the average person owned 13 devices – a 63% increase from 2018.

Users leverage multiple devices during their purchase journey, accounting for more visits but fewer conversions. No wonder conversion rates are decreasing!

For example, if you’re running a brand awareness campaign on TikTok for an audience who’s never heard of you, your KPIs should not be measuring purchases.

Track meaningful metrics like engagement rates, increase in branded search queries, or time on site to understand how those platforms contribute to long-term brand growth and loyalty.

7. Make Influencers Part Of Your Marketing Model

Influencer marketing still has value. But the rules have changed. What used to feel like a side bet now needs to operate with the same discipline you apply to any other channel.

One of the biggest shifts in 2025 was the rollout of Creator Partnerships inside Google Ads. The new tool lets brands find YouTube creators who already mention or align with their products, request to link their content directly in Ads, and then promote that content as ad assets.

That matters because it addresses many of the traditional challenges of influencer marketing.

Brands no longer have to manage a separate workflow or use external tools to run creator campaigns. Everything can be done natively inside Google Ads. Finding creators, getting permission, promoting videos, building remarketing audiences, and tracking performance – it all happens in the same place as your other media.

This integration changes what influencer marketing should be. Instead of treating creator content as a loose “boost,” treat it as another media channel that you plan, test, track, and optimize.

When you find a creator whose audience overlaps yours, link their video, promote it via “Partnership Ads,” and compare performance against other video or display placements. Use the same ROI expectations, the same reporting discipline, the same budget scrutiny.

That does not mean every influencer partnership needs to run through Creator Partnerships. But for brands that want to take creator content seriously, this is now the clearest path forward.

Influencer marketing can still introduce your brand to new audiences, but only if it becomes part of a broader, data-driven media mix rather than a side experiment.

8. Invest In Brand-Owned And Emerging Media Channels

Paid platforms can shift without much warning, which is why brands need more stability built into their mix. That stability comes from channels you control and channels that offer predictable reach without relying entirely on algorithm changes.

Brand-owned channels like email, SMS, and your CRM audience lists continue to grow in value as privacy rules tighten. These channels help you stay connected with people who have already shown interest, and they support every other part of your media strategy. When your first-party data is strong, your targeting improves across search, social, and display.

At the same time, emerging media channels are becoming easier to test and measure.

Connected TV, podcasts, retail media networks, and social commerce have grown into meaningful sources of reach and intent. Many brands are now seeing that a small, well-planned investment in these channels helps lift branded search, engagement rates, and assisted conversions across their entire account.

You do not need to adopt every new channel. You only need to choose a few that match your audience and test them with clear goals.

Look for indicators like uplift in search demand, stronger remarketing pools, or improvements in cross-channel efficiency. When these channels support your paid campaigns, they earn a long-term place in your strategy.

The brands that put effort into these areas now will be less dependent on any single platform. They will also see more consistent performance as auctions change, costs fluctuate, and targeting evolves throughout the year.

Your 2026 Plan Should Be Evolving

Paid media will keep shifting this year, but the path forward does not need to feel overwhelming.

The changes outlined above reflect what marketers are running into every day across search, social, retail media, and emerging channels.

None of these updates requires a complete rebuild. They simply call for a more intentional approach to testing, measurement, creative, and channel mix.

The advertisers who stay close to the data, spend time understanding how each platform is evolving, and make steady adjustments will see the most consistent results. The year ahead is less about chasing every new feature and more about choosing the changes that actually strengthen performance.

If you focus on the areas that matter, you’ll be in a strong position to keep improving your campaigns as the platforms continue to evolve.

More Resources:


Featured Image: Anton Vierietin/Shutterstock

PPC Pulse: Reddit Max Campaigns, Google Creator & Microsoft Targeting Updates via @sejournal, @brookeosmundson

Welcome to the first PPC Pulse of 2026! In this week’s update, Reddit introduces a new automated campaign type, Google expands its Creator Partnerships beta, and Microsoft announces new data-driven targeting capabilities.

Reddit launched Max Campaigns, an automated campaign format designed to simplify setup and expand reach across its ad inventory.

Google rolled out updates to its Creator Partnerships beta, adding creator search and centralized inquiry management inside Google Ads.

Microsoft announced a new partnership with Publicis Media Exchange and Epsilon, bringing Epsilon audience data directly into the Microsoft Advertising platform.

Read on for more details and why they matter for advertisers.

Reddit Ads Introduces Max Campaigns

Reddit has officially introduced Max Campaigns, its new automated campaign type designed to simplify setup and expand reach across the platform’s inventory.

Max Campaigns automate targeting, bidding, and ad delivery with the goal of driving conversions at scale. Advertisers provide a few core inputs, including budget, creative, and optimization goals, and Reddit’s system handles the rest.

If this sounds familiar, it should. Max Campaigns mirror the broader industry shift toward automation-first buying, similar to Google’s Performance Max or Meta’s Advantage+ formats.

What’s notable is the timing. Reddit has spent the last year improving its ad infrastructure, creative formats, and targeting capabilities. Max Campaigns feel like the next logical step in pushing advertisers toward a more consolidated buying experience.

Why This Matters For Advertisers

For advertisers already testing Reddit, Max Campaigns lower the barrier to scaling spend without building complex campaign structures.

This matters most for teams that have struggled with Reddit’s historically manual setup. Instead of managing multiple ad groups or niche targeting layers, Max Campaigns encourage a broader approach that lets Reddit’s system identify where conversions actually come from.

That said, this is not a “set it and forget it” situation.

Advertisers should expect trade-offs, as with any other automated campaign type.

Automation reduces setup friction, but it also limits visibility and control. Early testers will need to pay close attention to conversion quality, placement mix, and creative fatigue, especially since Reddit’s communities behave very differently from traditional social feeds.

The opportunity here is testing, not wholesale replacement. Max Campaigns make Reddit easier to experiment with, but they still need guardrails, realistic expectations, and clear success metrics.

Google Ads Expands Creator Partnership Beta

Google Ads quietly rolled out meaningful improvements to its Creator Partnerships beta, adding tools that make creator discovery and management far more usable for advertisers.

The update was first spotted by Thomas Eccel on LinkedIn.

Screenshot by author on LinkedIn, January 2026

The first is Creator Search, which allows advertisers to search for creators directly using keywords. This replaces the clunky browsing experience that made creator discovery feel disconnected from actual campaign goals.

Advertisers can now filter creators by:

  • Subscriber Count.
  • Average Views.
  • Location.
  • Preferred contact methods.

The second update is a Management Menu that centralizes creator inquiries. Advertisers can view creator names, statuses, subjects, response deadlines, and contact details in one place.

Why This Matters For Advertisers

Google is clearly positioning creators as a more integrated part of paid media strategy, not just a brand add-on.

For advertisers already running Demand Gen or YouTube campaigns, this update closes a workflow gap. Instead of managing creator outreach in spreadsheets or external tools, Google is pulling creator collaboration closer to the ad platform itself.

This also matters for efficiency. Teams can align creator selection more closely with campaign objectives, audience geography, and performance expectations.

It also signals where Google is headed. Creators remain one of the few formats that consistently earn attention instead of getting lost in a sea of generic ads. Google investing in better creator discovery suggests this channel will play a larger role in future campaign types.

The caveat is program maturity. This is still a beta. Measurement, attribution, and scalability remain open questions. Advertisers should approach this as a testing ground, not a replacement for established creator programs.

Microsoft Announces New Data-Driven Targeting Capabilities

Microsoft Advertising used CES to announce a new collaboration with Publicis Media Exchange and Epsilon that brings Epsilon data directly into the Microsoft Advertising platform.

The initiative, called Third-Party Search (3PS), allows Publicis Media clients to activate Epsilon’s identity and audience data across Microsoft’s search, native, and display inventory.

According to Microsoft, early pilots in the travel vertical showed strong results, including higher return on ad spend (ROAS) and access to net-new audiences that were not previously identifiable through standard in-market targeting.

The announcement reinforces Microsoft’s push toward identity-driven personalization while staying compliant with evolving privacy expectations.

There wasn’t detail provided about what specific audience types or how advertisers can use these audiences in the platform, but I’m sure more detail will follow in the coming weeks or months.

Why This Matters For Advertisers

This update highlights Microsoft’s long-term strategy: differentiated data partnerships instead of pure scale competition with Google.

For large advertisers and agencies with access to Epsilon data, this unlocks more precise audience activation without relying solely on keyword intent. That’s especially valuable in verticals like travel, finance, and retail, where user intent is fragmented across devices and touchpoints.

It also reflects a broader shift away from traditional in-market audiences. As privacy constraints tighten, platforms are leaning on richer identity frameworks and curated data partnerships to maintain performance.

For advertisers not working with Publicis or Epsilon, this announcement still matters. It signals where Microsoft is investing and how future audience solutions may evolve.

Expect more emphasis on data interoperability, identity resolution, and partnerships that sit outside standard platform-owned audiences.

Theme Of The Week: Platforms Are Simplifying Entry, Not Strategy

This week’s updates all lower the barrier to getting started, but none of them remove the need for thoughtful decision-making.

Reddit’s Max Campaigns make it easier to launch and scale without building complex structures, but advertisers still have to define success, monitor conversion quality, and decide when broader delivery is actually working.

Google’s Creator Partnerships updates streamline discovery and outreach, but they do not solve measurement, creative fit, or long-term performance questions.

Microsoft’s data collaboration expands access to richer audiences, yet advertisers still need a clear plan for how those audiences fit into their overall targeting approach.

The common thread is access, not automation as a substitute for judgment.

As setup gets easier, the real differentiator becomes how clearly advertisers define what they want these systems to achieve, and how disciplined they are about evaluating results.

More Resources:


Featured Image: beast01/Shutterstock

Google Ads Using New AI Model To Catch Fraudulent Advertisers via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Google published a research paper about a new AI model for detecting fraud in the Google Ads system that’s a strong improvement over what they were previously using. What’s interesting is that the research paper, dated December 31, 2025,  says that the new AI is deployed, resulting in an improvement in the detection rate of over 40 percentage points and achieving 99.8% precision on specific policies.

ALF: Advertiser Large Foundation Model

The new AI is called ALF (Advertiser Large Foundation Model), the details of which were published on December 31, 2025. ALF is a multimodal large foundation model that analyzes text, images, and video, together with factors like account age, billing details, and historical performance metrics.

The researchers explain that many of these factors in isolation won’t flag an account as potentially problematic, but that comparing all of these factors together provides a better understanding of advertiser behavior and intent.

They write:

“A core challenge in this ecosystem is to accurately and efficiently understand advertiser intent and behavior. This understanding is critical for several key applications, including matching users with ads and identifying fraud and policy violations.

Addressing this challenge requires a holistic approach, processing diverse data types including structured account information (e.g., account age, billing details), multi-modal ad creative assets (text, images, videos), and landing page content.

For example, an advertiser might have a recently created account, have text and image ads for a well known large brand, and have had a credit card payment declined once. Although each element could exist innocently in isolation, the combination strongly suggests a fraudulent operation.”

The researchers address three challenges that previous systems were unable to overcome:

1. Heterogeneous and High-Dimensional Data
Heterogeneous data refers to the fact that advertiser data comes in multiple formats, not just one type. This includes structured data like account age and billing type and unstructured data like creative assets such as images, text, and video. High-dimensional data refers to the hundreds or thousands of data points associated with each advertiser, causing the mathematical representation of each one to become high-dimensional, which presents challenges for conventional models.

2. Unbounded Sets of Creative Assets
Advertisers could have thousands of creative assets, such as images, and hide one or two malicious ones among thousands of innocent assets. This scenario overwhelmed the previous system.

3. Real-World Reliability and Trustworthiness
The system needs to be able to generate trustworthy confidence scores that a business has malicious intent because a false positive would otherwise affect an innocent advertiser. The system must be expected to work without having to constantly retune it to catch mistakes.

Privacy and Safety

Although ALF analyzes sensitive signals like billing history and account details, the researchers emphasize that the system is designed with strict privacy safeguards. Before the AI processes any data, all personally identifiable information (PII) is stripped away. This ensures that the model identifies risk based on behavioral patterns rather than sensitive personal data.

The Secret Sauce: How It Spots Outliers

The model also uses a technique called “Inter-Sample Attention” to improve its detection skills. Instead of analyzing a single advertiser in a vacuum, ALF looks at “large advertiser batches” to compare their interactions against one another. This allows the AI to learn what normal activity looks like across the entire ecosystem and make it more accurate in spotting suspicious outliers that don’t fit into normal behavior.

Alf Outperforms Production Benchmarks

The researchers explain that their tests show that ALF outperforms a heavily tuned production baseline:

“Our experiments show ALF significantly outperforms a heavily tuned production baseline while also performing strongly on public benchmarks. In production, ALF delivers substantial and simultaneous gains in precision and recall, boosting recall by over 40 percentage points on one critical policy while increasing precision to 99.8% on another.”

This result demonstrates that ALF can deliver measurable gains across multiple evaluation criteria under actual real-world production conditions, rather than just in offline or benchmarked environments.

Elsewhere they mention tradeoffs in speed:

“The effectiveness of this approach was validated against an exceptionally strong production baseline, itself the result of an extensive search across various architectures and hyperparameters, including DNNs, ensembles, GBDTs, and logistic regression with feature cross exploration.

While ALF’s latency is higher due to its larger model size, it remains well within the acceptable range for our production environment and can be further optimized using hardware accelerators. Experiments show ALF significantly outperforms the baseline on key risk detection tasks, a performance lift driven by its unique ability to holistically model content embeddings, which simpler architectures struggled to leverage. This trade-off is justified by its successful deployment, where ALF serves millions of requests daily.”

Latency refers to the amount of time the system takes to produce a response after receiving a request, and the researcher data shows that although ALF increases this response time relative to the baseline, the latency remains acceptable for production use and is already operating at scale while delivering substantially better fraud detection performance.

Improved Fraud Detection

The researchers say that ALF is now deployed to the Google Ads Safety system for identifying advertisers that are violating Google Ads policies. There is no indication that the system is being used elsewhere such as in Search or Google Business Profiles. But they did say that future work could focus on time-based factors (“temporal dynamics”) for catching evolving patterns. They also indicated that it could be useful for audience modeling and creative optimization.

Read the original PDF version of the research paper:

ALF: Advertiser Large Foundation Model for Multi-Modal Advertiser Understanding

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Login

20 AI Prompt Ideas & Example Templates For PPC (Easy + Advanced) via @sejournal, @theshelleywalsh

AI prompts and templates can help to support PPC professionals from campaign planning to paid media reporting. So, we created a list of example prompts for you to use and adapt to your needs.

With the right prompt, tasks like creating negative keyword lists, quick ad copy variations, and summarizing reports for clients can become faster and easier. By using AI as an assistant, you can focus on the strategy and creative decision-making.

These prompt templates serve as starting points to help you scale your PPC workflows. To create an effective prompt, make sure you have:

  • Clear input: Assign it a role, be specific about the task, and outline the data you’re providing.
  • Context: Provide a background so that it understands your overall goal, not just your question.
  • Constraints: Set guardrails or structure (outlines, rulebooks, style guides, etc.) so that the result will fall within your expectations and avoid off-target answers.

Here is a list of example prompts curated by our team at Search Engine Journal to help with PPC tasks. We will be updating this on a regular basis.

Keyword Research & Planning

For all the prompts listed below, please insert your unique information in the prompt example where indicated, e.g., [INSERT …].

1. Long-Tail Keyword Expander

Generate themed keyword groups from a seed keyword for campaign structure. The task is to expand the seed keyword into 20-30 related long-tail variations grouped by search intent (informational, commercial, transactional). Include modifiers like “best,” “cheap,” “near me,” and “how to.” Prioritize keywords with buyer intent for paid search, and group similar keywords into three to five themed ad groups.

[Input Data]
Seed keyword: [INSERT MAIN KEYWORD OR PRODUCT CATEGORY] 
Target location: [INSERT LOCATION OR "NATIONWIDE"] 
Campaign objective: [INSERT "TRAFFIC", "LEADS", OR "SALES"]
[Goal Description]  Generate themed keyword groups from a seed keyword for campaign structure.
[Task Description]  Expand the seed keyword into 20–30 related long-tail variations grouped by search intent (informational, commercial, transactional). Include modifiers like "best," "cheap," "near me," and "how to." Prioritize keywords with buyer intent for paid search. Group similar keywords into 3–5 themed ad groups.
[Output Format]  Table with columns:
Ad Group Theme
Keyword List
Estimated Intent

2. Match Type Strategy Recommender

Assign the right match type to each keyword based on control and volume goals. The task is to recommend whether each keyword should use exact, phrase, or broad match based on competitiveness, intent clarity, and budget. For high-intent terms, favor exact or phrase. For discovery, suggest broad with tight negatives. Explain the tradeoff for each choice.

[Input Data]  Keywords: [INSERT LIST OF 10–15 KEYWORDS]
Campaign goal: [INSERT "AWARENESS", "CONVERSIONS", OR "ROAS TARGET"] 
Monthly budget: [INSERT BUDGET RANGE]
[Goal Description]  Assign the right match type to each keyword based on control and volume goals.
[Task Description]  Recommend whether each keyword should use exact, phrase, or broad match based on competitiveness, intent clarity, and budget. For high-intent terms, favor exact or phrase. For discovery, suggest broad with tight negatives. Explain the tradeoff for each choice.
[Output Format]  Table with columns:
Keyword
Match Type
Reasoning

3. Negative Keyword Starter List

Prevent wasted ad spend by identifying irrelevant search terms upfront. The task is to generate 15-25 negative keywords that would attract non-buyers or irrelevant clicks. Include common wastes like “free,” “jobs,” “DIY,” “tutorial,” competitor names, and terms indicating wrong intent. Explain why each negative matters for this campaign. Note that terms like “free” or “cheap” may be part of valid high-intent searches (e.g., “free shipping”), so add negative keywords selectively. The output should recommend whether each negative keyword should be phrase match or exact match.

[Input Data]  
Product/service: [INSERT CORE PRODUCT OR SERVICE] 
Industry: [INSERT INDUSTRY OR VERTICAL] 
Bidding on: [INSERT KEYWORDS YOU'RE BIDDING ON]
[Goal Description]  Prevent wasted ad spend by identifying irrelevant search terms upfront.
[Task Description]  Generate 15–25 negative keywords that would attract non-buyers or irrelevant clicks. Include common wastes like "free," "jobs," "DIY," "tutorial," competitor names, and terms indicating wrong intent. Explain why each negative matters for this campaign.
Note:  Terms like “free” or “cheap” may be part of valid high-intent searches (e.g., “free shipping”). Add negative keywords selectively.
Match type guidance:  Recommend whether each negative keyword should be phrase match or exact match, depending on how tightly the search term should be blocked.
[Output Format]  Three-column list:
| Negative Keyword | Match Type | Reason to Exclude |

Ad Copywriting & Testing

4. RSA Asset Generator (Google Ads)

Create diverse responsive search ad assets optimized for testing. The task is to write 10 unique headlines (30 characters max) and four descriptions (90 characters max) that mix emotional hooks, feature callouts, urgency, and social proof. Include at least one headline with a number or stat, and ensure assets can combine in any order without repetition or contradiction. The Google Ads recommendation is to provide at least five unique headlines to reach “Good” Ad Strength.

[Input Data]  Product/service: [INSERT PRODUCT/SERVICE NAME]
Benefits/features: [INSERT TOP 3 BENEFITS OR FEATURES] 
Call-to-action: [INSERT PRIMARY CTA]
[Goal Description]  Create diverse responsive search ad assets optimized for testing.
[Task Description]  Write 10 unique headlines (30 characters max) and 4 descriptions (90 characters max) that mix emotional hooks, feature callouts, urgency, and social proof. Include at least one headline with a number or stat. Ensure assets can combine in any order without repetition or contradiction. 
Note:  Pinning assets can reduce Ad Strength. Pin only when required for compliance.
Google Ads Recommendation:  Provide at least  5 unique headlines  to reach “Good” Ad Strength. Including 10 or more can help increase variation and improve performance.
Tip:  When appropriate, test Dynamic Keyword Insertion (DKI) to match ads more closely to user search intent.
[Output Format]  Two sections:
Headlines (numbered 1–10)
Descriptions (A–D) 

5. RSA Asset Mixer (Google Ads)

Turn features, benefits, and CTAs into testable responsive search ad components. The task is to generate 12 headlines and four descriptions by mixing and matching the provided benefits, features, and CTAs. Vary the messaging style across emotional appeal, logical reasoning, urgency, and social proof. Keep all copy within Google Ads character limits and ensure combinations work together seamlessly. The Google Ads recommendation is to provide at least five unique headlines to reach “Good” Ad Strength.

[Input Data]  
Product benefits: [INSERT LIST OF 3–5 BENEFITS] 
Product features: [INSERT LIST OF 3–5 FEATURES] 
CTAs: [INSERT 2–3 PREFERRED CTAS]
[Goal Description]  Turn features, benefits, and CTAs into testable responsive search ad components.
[Task Description]  Generate 12 headlines and 4 descriptions by mixing and matching the provided benefits, features, and CTAs. Vary the messaging style across emotional appeal, logical reasoning, urgency, and social proof. Keep all copy within Google Ads character limits and ensure combinations work together seamlessly.
Note:  Pinning assets can reduce Ad Strength. Pin only when required for compliance.
Google Ads Recommendation:  Provide at least  5 unique headlines  to reach “Good” Ad Strength. Including 10 or more can help increase variation and improve performance.
Tip:  When appropriate, test Dynamic Keyword Insertion (DKI) to match ads more closely to user search intent.
[Output Format]  Two sections:
Headlines (numbered 1–12)
Descriptions (A–D) 

6. Ad Angle Brainstorming Tool

Discover fresh messaging angles to test against current ads. The task is to generate six alternative ad angles, such as scarcity, authority, pain/solution, comparison, guarantee, or transformation. For each angle, write one sample headline and explain when to use it, avoiding repetition of the current ad’s approach.

[Input Data]  Current ad copy: [INSERT TOP-PERFORMING AD COPY] 
Product details: [INSERT PRODUCT OR SERVICE DETAILS] 
Audience pain points: [INSERT TARGET AUDIENCE PAIN POINTS]
[Goal Description]  Discover fresh messaging angles to test against current ads.
[Task Description]  Generate 6 alternative ad angles such as scarcity, authority, pain/solution, comparison, guarantee, or transformation. For each angle, write one sample headline and explain when to use it. Avoid repeating the current ad's approach.
[Output Format]  Table with columns:
Angle Type
Sample Headline
Best Use Case

Audiences & Targeting

7. Audience Segment Hypothesis Builder

Draft testable audience segments with conversion rationale. The task is to propose four to six audience segments (e.g., in-market, affinity, custom intent, remarketing) with clear definitions. For each, explain why they’re likely to convert and suggest initial bid adjustments (raise/lower/neutral). Prioritize audiences with historical relevance if mentioned.

[Input Data]  Product/service: [INSERT PRODUCT OR SERVICE OFFERING]
 Customer data: [INSERT KNOWN DEMOGRAPHICS OR BEHAVIORS] 
Campaign goal: [INSERT "AWARENESS", "CONSIDERATION", OR "PURCHASE"]
[Goal Description]  Draft testable audience segments with conversion rationale.
[Task Description]  Propose 4–6 audience segments (e.g., in-market, affinity, custom intent, remarketing) with clear definitions. For each, explain why they're likely to convert and suggest initial bid adjustments (raise/lower/neutral). Prioritize audiences with historical relevance if mentioned.
[Output Format]  Table with columns:
Audience Name
Definition
Why It Converts
Bid Adjustment

8. Keyword-To-Funnel Stage Mapper

Align keywords with buyer journey stages for smarter targeting. The task is to categorize each keyword as cold (informational), warm (comparison/research), or hot (ready to buy). The output should recommend which keywords deserve higher bids, tighter targeting, or special landing pages, and flag any keywords that may need remarketing support.

[Input Data]  
Keywords: [INSERT LIST OF 10–20 PERFORMING KEYWORDS]
Customer journey: [INSERT TYPICAL JOURNEY: AWARENESS → DECISION] 
Conversion goal: [INSERT "LEAD", "SALE", OR "SIGNUP"]
[Goal Description]  Align keywords with buyer journey stages for smarter targeting.
[Task Description]  Categorize each keyword as cold (informational), warm (comparison/research), or hot (ready to buy). Recommend which keywords deserve higher bids, tighter targeting, or special landing pages. Flag any keywords that may need remarketing support.
[Output Format]  Table with columns:
Keyword
Funnel Stage
Bidding Priority
Notes

Bidding & Budget

9. Bidding Strategy Selector

Recommend the right automated or manual bidding strategy. The task is to suggest whether to use manual CPC, maximize clicks, target CPA, target ROAS, or maximize conversions, explaining which strategy fits based on data maturity and control needs. Include one caution or condition for each option, noting that Target CPA and Target ROAS work best with around 30-50 recent conversions.

[Input Data]  
Campaign goal: [INSERT "CLICKS", "CONVERSIONS", OR "ROAS"] 
Conversion volume: [INSERT DAILY OR WEEKLY CONVERSION NUMBERS] 
Budget: [INSERT BUDGET SIZE AND FLEXIBILITY]
[Goal Description]  Recommend the right automated or manual bidding strategy.
[Task Description]  Suggest whether to use manual CPC, maximize clicks, target CPA, target ROAS, or maximize conversions. Explain which strategy fits based on data maturity and control needs. Include one caution or condition for each option. 
Note: Target CPA and Target ROAS work best when the campaign has enough recent conversions (around 30–50 in the last 30 days). Low-volume campaigns may not perform well with these automated bidding strategies.
[Output Format]  Table with columns:
Strategy
Best For
Caution

10. Campaign Budget Allocator

Split a fixed budget across campaigns based on priority and performance. The task is to allocate budget percentages to each campaign based on historical ROI, strategic priority, and growth potential. The output should recommend higher spend for proven converters and testing budgets for new initiatives, justifying each split with one sentence. The prompt also reminds the user to consider daily pacing rules and portfolio bidding strategies.

[Input Data]  Total budget: [INSERT TOTAL MONTHLY BUDGET] 
Campaigns: [INSERT LIST OF 3–6 CAMPAIGNS WITH GOALS]
Performance data: [INSERT PAST ROAS OR CPA PER CAMPAIGN, IF AVAILABLE]
[Goal Description]  Split a fixed budget across campaigns based on priority and performance.
[Task Description]  Allocate budget percentages to each campaign based on historical ROI, strategic priority, and growth potential. Recommend higher spend for proven converters and testing budgets for new initiatives. Justify each split with one sentence.
Google may exceed daily budgets by up to ~15 percent due to daily pacing rules.
Consider whether shared budgets or portfolio bidding strategies apply across your campaigns.
[Output Format]  Table with columns:
Campaign
Budget %
Amount
Reasoning

Search Query Mining

11. Search Term Negative Identifier

Clean up search query reports by flagging wasteful terms. The task is to review the search terms and identify five to 10 that should be added as negatives. The prompt asks the user to look for irrelevant intent, low commercial value, or terms triggering ads incorrectly, explaining why each term wastes spend and suggesting the correct match type (phrase or exact negative).

[Input Data]  Search terms: [INSERT LIST OF 20–30 RECENT SEARCH TERMS] 
Performance data: [INSERT COST AND CONVERSION DATA, IF AVAILABLE] 
Campaign objective: [INSERT CAMPAIGN OBJECTIVE]
[Goal Description]  Clean up search query reports by flagging wasteful terms.
[Task Description]  Review the search terms and identify 5–10 that should be added as negatives. Look for irrelevant intent, low commercial value, or terms triggering ads incorrectly. Explain why each term wastes spend and suggest match type (phrase or exact negative).
[Output Format]  Table with columns:
Search Term
Add as Negative?
Reason
Match Type

12. High-Opportunity Query Promoter

Find search queries worth promoting to dedicated keywords or ad groups. The task is to identify three to five search queries with strong click-through rate or conversion rate that aren’t yet standalone keywords. The output should recommend promoting them to exact or phrase match with custom ad copy, and estimate the potential impact if given more budget and ad relevance.

[Input Data]  
Search term report: [INSERT REPORT WITH IMPRESSIONS AND CONVERSIONS] 
Current keywords: [INSERT CURRENT KEYWORD LIST]
Budget availability: [INSERT BUDGET AVAILABILITY]
[Goal Description]  Find search queries worth promoting to dedicated keywords or ad groups.
[Task Description]  Identify 3–5 search queries with strong CTR or conversion rate that aren't yet standalone keywords. Recommend promoting them to exact or phrase match with custom ad copy. Estimate potential impact if given more budget and ad relevance.
[Output Format]  Table with columns:
Query
Current Performance
Promotion Recommendation
Expected Lift

Landing Pages & CRO

13. Ad-To-Page Relevance Checker

Spot mismatches between ad promises and landing page content. The task is to compare the ad’s main claim with the landing page headline, imagery, and CTA, flagging any gaps where the page doesn’t deliver on the ad’s promise. The output should suggest two to three quick fixes to improve message match and reduce bounce rate. Note that the AI cannot visit URLs, so the user must paste the landing page text.

[Input Data]  
Ad copy: [INSERT AD HEADLINE AND DESCRIPTION]
Landing page: [INSERT LANDING PAGE URL OR SUMMARY] 
Conversion goal: [INSERT PRIMARY CONVERSION GOAL]
Note:  AI cannot visit URLs unless a browsing tool is enabled. Paste the landing page text instead.
[Goal Description]  Spot mismatches between ad promises and landing page content.
[Task Description]  Compare the ad's main claim with the landing page headline, imagery, and CTA. Flag any gaps where the page doesn't deliver on the ad's promise. Suggest 2–3 quick fixes to improve message match and reduce bounce rate.
[Output Format]  Report with:
Summary paragraph
Bulleted list of gaps and fixes

14. Landing Page CTA Optimizer

Create clear, compelling CTAs aligned with each ad angle. The task is to propose three CTA options that match the ad’s tone and promise. One option should emphasize urgency, one should reduce friction, and one should reinforce value, keeping CTAs short (two to five words) and action-oriented.

[Input Data]
Ad angle:  [INSERT AD MESSAGING OR ANGLE]
Offer type:  [INSERT PRODUCT/SERVICE AND OFFER TYPE]
Desired action:  [INSERT "SIGN UP", "BUY", OR "CALL"]
Landing page details:  [PASTE TEXT, SUMMARY, OR UPLOAD A SCREENSHOT OF THE LANDING PAGE]
[Goal Description]  Create clear, compelling CTAs aligned with each ad angle.
[Task Description]  Propose 3 CTA options that match the ad's tone and promise. One should emphasize urgency, one should reduce friction, and one should reinforce value. Keep CTAs short (2–5 words) and action-oriented.
[Output Format]  Numbered list with:
CTA text
Brief explanation for each

Reporting & Insights

15. Client-Friendly Performance Snapshot

Turn raw metrics into a one-slide summary clients actually understand. The task is to write a three-to-four-sentence narrative explaining overall performance, highlighting wins and flags. The summary must include one insight about what’s working and one recommendation for next steps, keeping the language simple and avoiding jargon.

[Input Data]  
Current metrics: [INSERT CTR, CPC, CONVERSION RATE, AND CPA]
 Spend data: [INSERT BUDGET SPENT AND CONVERSIONS DELIVERED]
Comparison period: [INSERT "LAST MONTH", "LAST QUARTER", ETC.]
[Goal Description]  Turn raw metrics into a one-slide summary clients actually understand.
[Task Description]  Write a 3–4 sentence narrative explaining overall performance, highlighting wins and flags. Include one insight about what's working and one recommendation for next steps. Keep language simple and avoid jargon.
[Output Format]  Report with:
Short paragraph summary
2–3 key takeaway bullets

16. Metric Change Explainer

Translate performance shifts into clear, actionable insights. The task is to write three to five sentences explaining why the metric changed, considering factors like competition, bid adjustments, ad fatigue, seasonality, targeting shifts, or platform changes. The explanation must end with one recommended action to sustain gains or fix declines.

[Input Data]  
Metric changed: [INSERT "CTR", "CPC", OR "CONVERSIONS"] 
Values: [INSERT BEFORE AND AFTER VALUES] 
Context: [INSERT SEASONALITY, CHANGES MADE, OR EXTERNAL FACTORS]
[Goal Description]  Translate performance shifts into clear, actionable insights.
[Task Description]  Write 3–5 sentences explaining why the metric changed. Consider factors like competition, bid adjustments, ad fatigue, seasonality, or targeting shifts. End with one recommended action to sustain gains or fix declines. 
Also consider platform changes such as Google algorithm updates or privacy-related shifts (e.g., iOS 14.5 on Meta), which commonly impact performance metrics.
[Output Format]  Short paragraph formatted for reporting or client email

Competitive Analysis

17. Competitor Ad Messaging Scanner

Summarize competitor ad strategies to find differentiation opportunities. The task is to analyze competitor ads for recurring themes, offers, CTAs, and emotional triggers. The output should identify two to three messaging gaps or angles competitors aren’t using and suggest how to position your ads differently while staying relevant to searcher intent.

[Input Data]  
Competitor ads: [INSERT 3–5 AD EXAMPLES WITH HEADLINES AND DESCRIPTIONS] 
Your product: [INSERT YOUR PRODUCT OR SERVICE] 
USPs: [INSERT YOUR UNIQUE SELLING POINTS]
[Goal Description]  Summarize competitor ad strategies to find differentiation opportunities.
[Task Description]  Analyze competitor ads for recurring themes, offers, CTAs, and emotional triggers. Identify 2–3 messaging gaps or angles competitors aren't using. Suggest how to position your ads differently while staying relevant to searcher intent.
[Output Format]  Report with:
Summary paragraph
Bulleted list of differentiation ideas

18. Gaps & Differentiators Finder

Identify unique value propositions competitors aren’t claiming. The task is to list four to six ad angles, offers, or value props that your brand can own but competitors aren’t emphasizing. The focus should be on authentic differentiators like guarantees, speed, customization, support quality, or niche expertise, with an explanation of why each gap matters to buyers.

[Input Data]  
Your features: [INSERT PRODUCT/SERVICE FEATURES AND BENEFITS] 
Competitor messaging: [INSERT THEMES FROM COMPETITOR ADS OR WEBSITES] 
Audience needs: [INSERT TARGET AUDIENCE NEEDS OR PAIN POINTS]
[Goal Description]  Identify unique value propositions competitors aren't claiming.
[Task Description]  List 4–6 ad angles, offers, or value props that your brand can own but competitors aren't emphasizing. Focus on authentic differentiators like guarantees, speed, customization, support quality, or niche expertise. Explain why each gap matters to buyers.
[Output Format]  Table with columns:
Differentiator
Why Competitors Miss It
Buyer Appeal

Advanced PPC Prompts

19. Enhanced PPC Keyword Research Suggestion Prompt

This advanced prompt template is designed to help a PPC keyword research specialist build a comprehensive and high-performing keyword strategy. It guides the model through keyword discovery, match type strategy, negative keyword generation, and campaign organization.

You are a PPC keyword research specialist. Help me build a high-performing keyword strategy.
Campaign Context
Product/Service:  [DESCRIBE WHAT YOU'RE ADVERTISING]
Landing Page URL:  [YOUR LANDING PAGE]
Target Audience:  [WHO ARE YOUR CUSTOMERS]
Campaign Goal:  [LEADS/SALES/BRAND AWARENESS]
Monthly Budget:  [YOUR BUDGET]
Geographic Target:  [LOCATION IF APPLICABLE]

Task 1: Keyword Discovery & Expansion
Generate 25-30 keywords organized into  4 keyword categories :
A) Brand Terms  - Keywords with my brand name  B) Generic Terms  - Product/service related keywords  C) Related Terms  - Adjacent topics my audience searches for  D) Competitor Terms  - Major competitor brand names (if budget allows)
For each keyword:
Include  long-tail variations  (5+ words) - these are less competitive and convert better
Add  synonyms and variations  (plurals, abbreviations, alternate spellings)
Consider  voice search patterns  (how people speak vs type): "where can I find...", "what's the best...", "how do I..."
Balance  broad terms  (high volume) with  specific terms  (high intent)
Output as:
BRAND TERMS: 
- [keyword 1] 
- [keyword 2] 

GENERIC TERMS: 
- [keyword 1] 
- [long-tail variation] 

RELATED TERMS: 
- [keyword 1] 

COMPETITOR TERMS: 
- [keyword 1] 

Task 2: Match Type Strategy
For each keyword group, assign match types with reasoning:
Match Type Logic:
Exact Match  [keyword] = Highest intent, tight control, proven converters
Phrase Match  "keyword" = Moderate intent, balanced reach & control
Broad Match:  Uses Smart Bidding signals and works best when you have accurate conversion tracking and consistent conversion volume. Avoid Broad Match if you don’t have enough conversion data or if Smart Bidding isn’t enabled.
Include estimated: 
Competition level (High/Medium/Low)
Identify the  "sweet spot" keywords  (high volume + low competition)
Output as table:
| Keyword | Match Type | Competition | Why This Match Type | 
|---------|-----------|--------|-------------|---------------------| 

Task 3: Negative Keywords
Generate 15-20 negative keywords in these categories:
Common Categories:
Job/Career terms (jobs, hiring, salary, career)
Free/Cheap terms (free, cheap, discount) -  unless you sell budget products
DIY/How-to (tutorial, diy) -  unless you offer educational content
Wrong intent terms (specific to your industry)
Competitor names (if not running conquest campaigns)
Output as:
Job-Related: [terms] 
Cost-Related: [terms]  
Wrong Audience: [terms] 
[Other Category]: [terms] 

Task 4: Organization & Structure
Group keywords into  tight, focused ad groups  that mirror my website structure. Each ad group should contain 5-15 closely related keywords.
Example structure:
Campaign: [Product Category] 
|---  Ad Group 1: [Specific Product A] 
|     |---  Keywords: [5-15 related terms] 
|---  Ad Group 2: [Specific Product B] 
|     |---  Keywords: [5-15 related terms] 
Important Guidelines:
Think like the customer  - What would THEY type to find my product?
Prioritize long-tail keywords  - "women's black running shoes size 8" converts better than "shoes"
Flag any trademark concerns  in competitor keywords
Explain your reasoning  for each recommendation step-by-step
Identify quick wins  - keywords I should bid on immediately
Note ongoing optimization  - this is an iterative process, not one-and-done
Show your work and explain the logic behind each recommendation.

20. Enhanced Funnel-Based Ad Copy Generator

This advanced prompt template instructs a PPC copywriting expert to create high-performing ad copy for responsive search ads, Meta, and LinkedIn, specifically optimized for different customer journey stages (top, middle, bottom of funnel).

Your Role
You are a PPC copywriting expert specializing in Google Ads responsive search ads, Meta ads, and LinkedIn ads. Create high-performing ad copy optimized for different customer journey stages.
What I Need From You
Before starting, collect this campaign context:
Product/Service:  [DESCRIBE WHAT YOU’RE ADVERTISING]
Target Audience:  [WHO YOU’RE REACHING]
Funnel Stage:  [TOP, MIDDLE, BOTTOM, OR ALL THREE]
Platform:  [GOOGLE ADS, FACEBOOK/INSTAGRAM, OR LINKEDIN]
Unique Differentiator:  [WHAT SETS YOU APART]
Keywords (Google Ads only):  [ANY MUST-INCLUDE TERMS]
Context:  [DESCRIBE GOAL, SEASONALITY, PROMO PERIODS, TIME-SENSITIVE EVENTS]

The 3 Funnel Stages Explained
Top of Funnel (Awareness)
Audience: Just learning about the problem or category Goal: Educate and grab attention Tone: Helpful, curious, no pressure Copy Focus: Problem-focused, educational content CTA Style: Soft (Learn More, Discover, See How) Example: “Struggling with data security? Learn the top 5 risks.”
Middle of Funnel (Consideration)
Audience: Comparing solutions, evaluating options Goal: Show differentiation and build trust Tone: Trustworthy, confident, proof-driven Copy Focus: Benefits over features, social proof, comparisons CTA Style: Moderate (Try Free, Compare, Get Demo) Example: “Join 10,000+ teams using our platform. See why we’re rated #1.”
Bottom of Funnel (Conversion)
Audience: Ready to buy, needs final push Goal: Drive immediate action Tone: Direct, urgent, action-oriented Copy Focus: Specific offers, risk removal, time sensitivity CTA Style: Strong (Start Now, Buy Today, Get Started Free) Example: “Start your free trial today. No credit card required.”

Google Ads Responsive Search Ads Requirements
CRITICAL for Google Ads:
Provide at least 10–15 unique headlines (max 15)
Provide at least 4 unique descriptions (max 4)
Include keyword variations in multiple headlines
Vary headline lengths (short, medium, long)
Aim for “Good” or “Excellent” Ad Strength
Google Ads recommendation:  Include at least 5 unique headlines to reach “Good” Ad Strength
Tie headlines to user search intent and keywords
Focus on user benefits, not just features
Tip:  When appropriate, test Dynamic Keyword Insertion (DKI) to match ads more closely to user search intent.
Why:  Google’s ad systems test combinations automatically, and improving Ad Strength helps the system find higher-performing variations. According to Google Ads Help (“About the customer journey,” 2024), advertisers who improve Ad Strength from “Poor” to “Excellent” see  12% more conversions on average .

Core Copywriting Principles
User Benefits First  * “Save 3 hours per day on admin tasks” X “Advanced automation features”
Keyword Integration (Google Ads)  Include target keywords naturally in headlines. Align copy with user search intent.
Specificity Over Generic  * “Get results in 10 minutes or less” X “Get fast results”
Social Proof & Trust  Use proof points: “10,000+ customers,” “4.9/5 rating,” “Used by Fortune 500.”
Remove Friction (BOFU)  Examples: “No credit card needed,” “Cancel anytime,” “30-day money-back guarantee.”
Test Different Angles  Try emotional vs. rational, question vs. statement, offer vs. value, short vs. long.

Output Format
For Google Responsive Search Ads:
Headlines (10–15):
[30 chars max – keyword-rich, benefit-focused]
[30 chars max – social proof angle]
[30 chars max – specific benefit]
[Short, punchy angle]
[Question format]
6–15. Continue with unique angles
Descriptions (4):
[90 chars – primary value proposition]
[90 chars – differentiation + CTA]
[90 chars – social proof + benefit]
[90 chars – risk removal + urgency]
Expected Ad Strength: [Good/Excellent] Primary Keywords Included: [List]

For Meta Ads (Facebook/Instagram)
Headlines (3–5):
[40 characters max]
Primary Text (2–3 variations):
[First 125 characters should include the key message]  Note:  Meta primary text often truncates after ~125 characters on mobile (“See More” appears).
Call-to-Action Button:
[Platform CTA option]

For LinkedIn Ads
Headlines (3 variations):
[70 chars recommended, 200 max]
Descriptions (2 variations):
[150 chars focus, up to 600 max for Sponsored Content; other formats may differ]

Character Limits Reference

Platform ,Headline ,Description 
Google Search,30 chars (15 headlines max),90 chars (4 descriptions max)
Facebook/Instagram,40 chars max,125 chars primary text
LinkedIn,70 chars (200 max),150 chars focus (600 max Sponsored Content)


Power Words by Stage
Top Funnel:  Discover, Learn, Guide, Free, Simple, Understand  Middle Funnel:  Proven, Trusted, Compare, Better, Results  Bottom Funnel:  Now, Today, Get, Start, Instant, Guaranteed

Common Testing Frameworks
Discount vs. Value
Urgency vs. Evergreen
Question vs. Statement
Short vs. Long
Emotional vs. Rational

Quality Checklist
* Unique headlines
* Keywords included (Google Ads)
* Clear benefits
* Specific proof
* Correct character limits
* Funnel alignment
* Strong CTAs
* “Good” or better Ad Strength

Example Request
“Create Google responsive search ads for my CRM software targeting small business owners at the bottom of funnel. Target keywords: ‘CRM software,’ ‘customer management tool,’ ‘sales tracking software.’ Differentiator: 50% cheaper than Salesforce with the same features. Include a free 14-day trial.”

Keep Refining Your Prompts As Models Evolve

Good prompts don’t stay good forever. AI models will keep evolving, and the way they interpret your instructions will update, too. This means that refining your prompts is an ongoing process to stay aligned with how modern LLMs work. Our in-house LLM expert, Brent Csutoras, stresses that prompting today is less about how you phrase things and more about understanding how the machine interprets your instructions.

Brent puts it bluntly:

“As much as this might feel like a human … you’re talking to a machine. The problem you have is that you are asking a prediction engine to give you the answer it thinks you want based on some rules that you’ve given it.”

He also warns that the structure of your prompt changes how the model behaves:

“The way your prompt is structured and the way you type it actually has a massive effect on how your output’s going to come. It will skip certain things and ignore certain things, if it’s not written well.”

So, instead of treating prompts as fixed templates, treat them as living documents. Every time you revise output, ask your model where your prompt caused confusion and how it would rewrite the instructions to avoid that issue in the future. Over time, this becomes a feedback loop where the model helps refine the instructions you give it. Brent even updates his own prompts monthly for this reason.

To sum it all up, it’s important to keep testing, adjusting, and pressure-checking your prompts. Here’s his advice to make your prompts sharp and reliable:

How To Audit And Improve Your Prompts

  • Cross-model testing: Run prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, and others. Ask each model what it would change about your prompt.
  • Self-critique loops: Ask the AI how it interpreted your instructions, which steps it skipped, and where it found conflicts.
  • Priority mapping: Have the AI list the steps in your prompt in the order it believes they matter most. This shows you how it “reads” your request.
  • Project-based prompting with artifacts: Build structured projects where instructions, templates, tone guides, product docs, and datasets are predefined. Models stay consistent because they draw from the same controlled materials every time.
  • Data filtering: Remove emotional language or subjective tone from research inputs before adding them to a project. Cleaner data produces cleaner output.
  • Continuous improvement: Regularly ask the AI to adjust your instructions based on your edits. Update your prompt monthly to keep it evolving with your workflow.

We will be updating this list on a regular basis with more prompt ideas and examples to make your PPC more efficient.

Disclaimer: These PPC-focused prompts are not designed to be “one-size-fits-all” because results generated may contain inaccuracies or incomplete data. Always fact-check your outputs against primary sources, review for compliance and accuracy.

More Resources:


Featured Image: ImageFlow/Shutterstock

Why Every Google Ads Account Needs To Run Scripts

Most PPC marketers love talking about automation, Smart Bidding, and the latest AI-powered magic Google rolls out. But the truth is that none of those shiny features can save your account from the actual threats: human error, broken websites, overspending budgets, bad conversion data, brand safety violations … the list goes on and on.

That’s where Google Ads scripts come in.

Scripts are the unglamorous robots behind the scenes. They automate grunt work, protect your budget, enforce account hygiene, and alert you before a minor issue becomes a five-figure disaster. They’re free, easy to use, safe to test, and thanks to modern large language models, anyone can build or customize them – even without coding skills!

If you manage Google Ads accounts and you’re not using scripts, you’re working too hard and taking unnecessary risks.

I am here to tell you today: Every account should have Google Ads scripts running. Here’s why:

1. Automate The Grunt Work (The Tedious Tasks That Eat Your Life)

Every PPC professional has a short list of tasks they love … and a very long list of tasks they tolerate out of necessity. Scripts exist for that second list – the repetitive, time-draining, soul-evaporating work that must get done but doesn’t require human creativity.

Let’s look at some examples and include some free scripts.

Budget Pacing

Google has a very relaxed attitude toward daily budgets. One day, it only spends 60% of your daily budget; the next day, it decides to impress you with a 180% increased spend. Great. But not if your client expects a steady pace and has strict budget requirements.

A pacing script brings sanity by monitoring both daily and month‑to‑date spend, projecting where your budget will land by the end of the period, and alerting you whenever Google begins to overspend or drift off pace. It highlights pacing issues early and gives you room to adjust budgets proactively – or even automate those adjustments entirely.

Instead of hoping Google behaves, pacing scripts make sure your budget does.

Fixing Your Product Feeds

Any ecommerce manager will tell you: Feeds break constantly, usually at the worst possible moment (think Black Friday, or Christmas, anyone?).

Instead of leaving you to manually sift through thousands of items, scripts take on the heavy lifting. They can flag missing or invalid GTINs long before they cause disapprovals, detect broken product URLs that quietly tank performance, and surface best-selling items that have suddenly been disapproved.

Scripts also help uncover missing attributes such as sizes or colors (details that matter for relevance), and can even rewrite product titles dynamically using real search term data to improve impression quality and match user intent more effectively.

In short, Google Ads scripts help you maintain a clean, high-performing product feed that supports both Shopping and Performance Max success.

Automated Reporting

Manual reporting is tolerable for one account. Maybe two. Beyond that? No thanks.

The PPC Manager who screams “I love creating client reports” … be sure to tell me when you find one.

Instead of forcing you to manually assemble slides, screenshots, and spreadsheets, scripts take over the entire reporting pipeline. They can automatically export daily, weekly, and monthly performance reports, push the data directly into Google Sheets, and generate clean performance summaries without you lifting a finger. They also build trend dashboards that stay updated in real time, and can even work alongside an LLM to prepare and send a client email that includes the report, along with a short, auto‑generated overview of the key highlights.

You get reporting consistency without sacrificing your weekends.

2. Boost Account Performance & Cut Wasted Spend

Scripts don’t just save time; they actively improve performance. They reveal inefficiencies humans overlook and take action instantly.

Search Term Analysis & N-Gram Exclusions

N-gram analysis is one of the most underrated PPC tactics. It breaks queries into word chunks so you can identify patterns of waste.

Instead of manually combing through endless search term reports, a script can take over the entire process by pulling all queries, breaking them into n‑grams (small one‑, two‑, or three‑word patterns) and analyzing which of those patterns consistently fail to convert. It then identifies common waste phrases and can even auto‑suggest or apply negative keywords based on what it finds.

If “free,” “DIY,” or “near me” is burning budget across thousands of queries, you’ll know. And you’ll fix it.

Pausing Non-Converting Products in Shopping & PMax

No one has time to manually audit thousands of SKUs.

Scripts can automatically pause products after X spend without conversions, or down-bid poor performers by automatically placing them in a different campaign with higher tROAS and lower max CPC bids.

This is especially critical for PMax, which happily spends on products you wish it wouldn’t.

Excluding Bad Display Placements

Display inventory is unpredictable, and if you’ve ever taken a serious look at your placements report, you already know how messy it can get.

Click fraud, lead fraud, and brand safety violations are, unfortunately, daily realities in the Display ecosystem.

This is exactly where scripts earn their keep. Instead of leaving you to manually sift through questionable placements, a script can automatically detect low-quality inventory and remove it from your campaigns. It can identify and exclude MFA sites, pages associated with CSAM or malware risks, and the endless parade of children’s apps that chew through budget without producing meaningful leads. By continuously filtering out these problem areas, scripts can reduce Display waste anywhere from 20% to 60%, depending on your country and account setup.

Your brand will thank you.

3. Prevent Costly Mistakes Before They Burn Money

Scripts excel at catching issues early – before your budgets vanish or Smart Bidding crashes.

Broken Link Checker

A broken URL instantly tanks performance, and this is exactly where a link-checker script proves invaluable.

Instead of relying on manual checks, the script automatically crawls all your final URLs, scanning them for issues such as 404 errors, unexpected redirects, or pages that load so slowly they might as well be broken. When it detects a problem, it alerts you immediately, long before wasted spend or frustrated users pile up.

You avoid burning budget and annoying potential customers.

Out-Of-Stock Ad Pausing

Buying clicks to products that aren’t available is classic ecommerce pain.

Yes, a well-managed Shopping feed usually prevents this, but for standard Search ads, you’re on your own unless you automate the checks.

This is where scripts step in. They continuously monitor your product pages to detect when items go out of stock, when certain variants become unavailable, or when products are fully discontinued. Once a problem is spotted, the script automatically pauses the affected ads and then resumes them the moment stock returns, protecting both your budget and user experience.

Conversion Tracking Monitor

When conversion tracking breaks, everything breaks – and this is especially true for Google’s Smart Bidding, which becomes completely misaligned the moment your tracking data goes off.

A monitoring script can catch these issues early by watching for sudden drops in conversions, or unexpected spikes caused by duplicates. The script detects missing enhanced conversions, offline conversions that stop importing, or irregularities in how your tags are firing. It flags these problems the moment they appear, so you can intervene before Smart Bidding optimizes itself into chaos.

Trust me: When conversion tracking breaks, you want to be the first to know.

Some Personal Real-Life Examples

If the examples above haven’t convinced you yet, let me share some personal examples of how scripts saved my neck.

Account Down Alerts (The Friday 4:55 PM Nightmare Scenario)

Every PPC manager has lived this.

A real account alert in one of my clients’ accounts: “Your ads have stopped running – You reached your monthly account spend limit. To get your ads running again, increase your ad spend.”

This message arrived late on a Friday. No one was looking at the account at that time. Google didn’t send out an email.

If it weren’t for my script, we wouldn’t have noticed the issue until Monday, and the client would lose out on the weekend revenue.

Scripts can also act as “real-time account-down watchdogs” by alerting you when your ads suddenly stop serving, when billing fails, and payments can’t be processed, or when monthly or campaign-level spend caps are unexpectedly hit. They also catch situations where Google’s suspension policies kick in or when campaigns shut off without warning for any number of reasons. Instead of discovering these issues hours (or days!) later, scripts make sure you know the moment something breaks.

Here’s the thing: Google’s notifications aren’t always timely. Script alerts are.

Change History Monitoring (Protecting Your Account From Humans)

Some of the most dangerous changes made inside a Google Ads account come from people who shouldn’t have access, from automated third-party tools, or simply from changes that happen unnoticed over a weekend by some auto-applied suggestion.

A real-life example illustrates this perfectly: One of my clients installed a third-party tracking tool on a Saturday, and the tool quietly modified the account’s tracking templates. Those seemingly small edits broke conversion tracking entirely. If it had gone unnoticed, OCI would have been misaligned and Smart Bidding would’ve optimized against faulty conversion data, performance would certainly go down the drain. This is exactly the kind of situation scripts help prevent.

My Change History alert script flagged the edit instantly and luckily warned us before real damage was done.

Monitoring changes in your account is not paranoia. This is survival.

No Excuse Not To Use Scripts

There is literally no downside to using scripts, and they’re completely free to run. Scripts are safe because Google’s built-in Preview mode lets you test everything before making actual changes. They’re also incredibly easy to use since most scripts require nothing more than a simple copy-paste to get started. And if you want to customize them, they’re flexible as well; you can modify or extend almost any script with the help of AI in just a few seconds.

Between Google’s documentation, open‑source script libraries, LLMs, and other tools, creating or customizing scripts has never been easier.

Final Takeaway: Scripts Are Now Essential PPC Infrastructure

Running Google Ads without scripts is like flying a plane with half your instruments turned off. Sure, you might land safely – but why take that chance?

If you care about PPC performance, reliability, or sanity, Google Ads scripts aren’t optional. They’re your watchdog, your analyst, your QA system, and your 24/7 protection against angry clients/bosses.

Stop wasting budget. Stop working harder than you need to. Start scripting.

More Resources:


Featured Image: Accogliente Design/Shutterstock

PPC Pulse: More Apple Search Inventory, Exact Match Limits In AI Overviews via @sejournal, @brookeosmundson

In this week’s PPC Pulse: updates include an inventory expansion for Apple Ads, and Google confirms that Exact match keywords are not eligible to serve for Ads in AI Overviews.

Apple announced additional ad placements coming to App Store search results in early 2026.

Google confirmed that exact match keywords cannot serve in AI Overviews, even when identical broad match keywords exist in an account.

Both updates reinforce an ongoing shift. Search inventory is growing across new surfaces, but the level of control advertisers once relied on is changing.

Read on for more details and why they matter for advertisers.

Apple Search Ads Will Add New Search Placements In 2026

Apple officially announced that it will introduce additional ads within App Store Search Results starting in 2026. Today, advertisers can appear only in the top position. Beginning next year, ads will also show further down the results page across more queries, expanding total available inventory.

In its email announcement, Apple shared several supporting data points in its announcement:

  • Nearly 65% of App Store downloads occur directly after a search.
  • The App Store sees 800 million weekly visitors.
  • More than 85% of visitors download at least one app during their visit.
  • Current Search Results ads see 60% or higher conversion rates at the top of results.
Screenshot taken via email by author, December 2025

Per the announcement, advertisers will not need to adjust campaigns to qualify for the new placements. Apple noted that ads will be automatically eligible and cannot be targeted or bid separately by position. The format and billing model will remain the same.

Expanding On An Already Big Year For Apple

Apple has consistently rolled out upgrades and expansions throughout 2025, including:

  • Custom Product Page expansion (March 2025): Apple expanded testing capabilities by allowing more CPP variants tied to specific keywords, improving message alignment.
  • Reporting enhancements (June 2025): Apple introduced clearer diagnostics around impression share, keyword performance, and CPP impact. These updates made it easier to identify friction points in search campaigns.
  • Creative refinements for Today Tab and Search Tab (August 2025): Apple improved visual consistency and added support for higher-funnel experimentation, hinting at broader expansion across App Store surfaces.

These updates all point toward a more robust Apple Ads marketing platform, making the 2026 inventory expansion feel like a natural progression.

Why This Matters For Advertisers

More placements signal higher reach, but also more variability. Top-position performance is unlikely to change, but additional placements may bring new traffic patterns as more users scroll past the first result.

Advertisers should expect incremental installs paired with slightly wider performance swings.

This also means that metadata, product page quality, and CPP strategy will influence performance more than before, since every placement will rely on the same creative foundation.

Read More: An In-Depth Guide To Apple Search Ads

Google Confirms Exact Match Keywords Not Eligible For AI Overviews

A few questions came in to Google Ads Liaison, Ginny Marvin, this week on X (Twitter) regarding the eligibility of exact match keywords for ads in AI Overviews.

Marvin confirmed via a thread on X (Twitter) that exact match ads are not eligible to serve ads inside Google’s AI Overviews. This clarification explains a pattern many advertisers have seen over the last year. Even if an account contains the same query in both exact and broad match, only broad match can enter AI Overview auctions.

Screenshot taken by author, December 2025

The update circulated quickly after Arpan Banerjee shared it on LinkedIn, giving the topic more visibility among PPC practitioners.

Screenshot taken by author, December 2025

This means advertisers may see broad match triggering queries that they assumed would be handled by exact match. It also means AI Overview impressions are routed through a different layer of Google’s system with its own eligibility rules. Since Google does not provide separate AI Overview reporting, changes in performance may not be clearly attributed to this shift.

Why This Matters For Advertisers

This update makes it clear that match types do not operate the same way inside AI-driven surfaces.

The long-standing assumption that exact match provides clean, isolated coverage does not apply within AI Overviews. Broad match becomes the only entry point, which could influence spend allocation, campaign structure, query mapping, and performance diagnostics.

Advertisers should expect shifts in query distribution on terms where they rely heavily on exact match control.

Read More: AI-Enhanced Keyword Selection In PPC

This Week’s Theme: Search Control Looks Different Than It Used To

Both updates highlight a similar pattern. Platforms are expanding search inventory, but advertisers have less control over how placements are allocated.

Apple is opening new ad positions without letting advertisers bid separately for them. Google is routing some search coverage through AI Overviews, where exact match does not participate. In both cases, the legacy structure of “keyword plus bid plus placement” is giving way to a more interpretive system.

This does not mean advertisers lose influence. It means influence shifts to metadata quality, creative alignment, first-party data, and smart segmentation. Both updates remind advertisers to stay flexible because new surfaces will continue to emerge.

More Resources:


Featured Image: Pixel-Shot/Shutterstock

Google-Engaged Audience: Worry-Free Remarketing, Or A Waste Of Money?

Are you tired of remarketing headaches in your Google Ads account? In a time when we’re all facing increasing privacy restrictions, browser setting changes, and complex tracking setups, building reliable audiences can feel overwhelmingly difficult. What you may not know is that Google quietly launched a new type of “Your data segment” called the Google-engaged audience last year – and it’s still so underrated.

Available to every Google Ads account, this segment represents an elegant solution to a complicated problem. But for advanced Google Ads specialists who typically demand granular control and deep data insights, the simplicity of this audience raises a pivotal question: Is this worry-free segment a reliable source of high-quality traffic? Or will the Google-engaged audience potentially waste your time and budget?

In this article, I’ll share exactly what the Google-engaged audience is and how it works, original data comparing the Google-engaged audience to other website-based remarketing solutions, and when this segment may (or may not) make sense for your Google Ads strategy.

What Is The Google-Engaged Audience?

The Google-engaged audience is the newest type of “Your data segment” available in Google Ads. I love using and recommending this audience segment because it elegantly solves many of the complex implementation issues associated with traditional remarketing solutions.

Here’s how it works: Every Google Ads account is automatically populated with one Google-engaged audience segment. You can find yours under Tools > Shared Library > Audience Manager > Your data segments. Critically, the Google-engaged audience requires no Google tag, no account linking, and no data uploads.

Instead, this segment populates whenever a user clicks to your website from a Google property. For example, when they click from:

Why The Google-Engaged Audience Is So Powerful

The Google-engaged audience is helpful for small business owners because they don’t need to install the Google tag, connect Google Analytics, or sync their CRM with Google in order to start remarketing. It’s just there, there’s just one, it just works.

But small business owners aren’t the only ones who should be looking into using this audience type. Since users join this list when they click to your website from a Google-owned property, Google knows exactly who these users are (most are signed in to Google). Google has a first-party relationship with these users.

Because Google handles user consent and tracking within its own ecosystem, and “captures” those users for you before they leave the Google ecosystem, you get a high-quality audience that is generally more reliable and robust than third-party solutions, which suffer from challenges around browser settings, privacy controls, and consent management frameworks.

In short, it’s an easy-to-use, high-quality audience of people who visited your website from Google.

Where The Google-Engaged Audience Falls Short

Despite its clear benefits in data quality and ease of implementation, the Google-engaged audience does have some limitations that may make it unsatisfying for you to use.

The first constraint is the obvious one: This audience segment only tracks people who click to your website from Google-owned properties. This means that your Google-engaged audience will not capture everyone who visits your website from other sources, such as:

  • Direct traffic.
  • Social media traffic.
  • Non-Google paid ads (Meta, TikTok, etc.).
  • Email traffic.
  • etc.

If a significant portion of your website traffic is not coming from Google, then your Google-engaged audience may not be as useful for your campaigns.

Next, the Google-engaged audience is not compatible with the Google Display Network (GDN). This is because the GDN is mostly made up of non-Google-owned properties, so Google doesn’t have as robust audience data about those users. This means that you can’t use this audience in a standard Display campaign, and you can’t use it on Display inventory within other campaign types, such as Search, Demand Gen, or Video campaigns. Keep this in mind if a significant portion of your Google Ads investment is going towards the GDN.

Finally, while the simplicity of one single Google-engaged audience may be welcomed by small business owners, it doesn’t afford the granularity that large advertisers may crave. Since every account receives only one Google-engaged audience segment, there is no built-in mechanism to create specific segments based on when the user visited, what pages they visited, what actions they took, etc., unlike the granular options available with tag-based lists or Google Analytics lists.

How Does The Google-Engaged Audience List Size Compare To Other Types Of Remarketing Lists?

To provide a data-driven perspective on the usefulness of the Google-engaged audience, I conducted an original study comparing the size of the Google-engaged audience to two other types of “Your data segments” across a dozen advertisers: the “All Visitors” list from the Google Ads tag, and the standard “All Users” list from Google Analytics 4 (GA4). When comparing all three lists for the same advertiser, which list was the largest? Which was the smallest? How did this vary across Google’s inventory?

Google-Engaged Audiences Are Generally Larger Than Google Tag-Based Audiences

In my study, I found that the tag-based All Visitors list was usually significantly smaller than the Google-engaged audience, across all eligible inventory.

On average, the Google tag-based remarketing audience was:

  • 62% smaller than the Google-engaged audience for Search inventory.
  • 61% smaller on YouTube inventory.
  • 90% smaller on Gmail inventory.

The takeaway: If you’re relying exclusively on the Google tag for your remarketing, you are likely missing out on a lot of users. This issue is likely exacerbated if you are not using data-preserving solutions like enhanced conversions or Consent Mode.

Google-Engaged Audiences Are Generally Smaller Than Google Analytics Audiences

My study found that the Google-engaged audience was smaller in size than the Google Analytics default “All Users” list, but not on Gmail.

On average, the GA4 “All Users” audience was:

  • 28% larger than the Google-engaged audience for Search inventory.
  • 46% larger on YouTube inventory.
  • 10% smaller on Gmail inventory.

This is more in line with what I would have expected, since GA4 captures audiences from all sources, not just from Google-owned properties. In fact, I would have expected the difference to be even larger, and was surprised by how robust the Google-engaged audience is on Gmail inventory.

Remember, the “size by inventory” looks at how many active matched records Google can find on Search, on YouTube, on Gmail, and on the Display network. While Google seems to match users quite nicely in Search and YouTube, it seems more difficult for the system to match users on Gmail – unless, of course, they’re coming from the Google-engaged audience, where Google already knows exactly who they are. I call this the “Gmail dropoff.”

The takeaway: The Google Analytics audience makes a good default for website-based remarketing. If you are running a Demand Gen campaign, however, and are explicitly looking to remarket to users via Gmail, consider adding the Google-engaged audience to your audience targeting alongside your Google Analytics audience.

Is The Google-Engaged Audience A Waste Of Money?

Absolutely not! I’ve seen dozens of my Google Ads coaching clients see great results when targeting the Google-engaged audience, specifically in Demand Gen campaigns where the focus is on Google-owned inventory. I’ve seen this audience segment be especially useful for freelancers and agencies working with local service providers, since they can just check a box and get remarketing live without having to worry about tags or integrations.

You can also consider targeting, observing, or excluding your Google-engaged audience in Search and Shopping campaigns, as either a complement or replacement for how you would use a website-based remarketing list in your strategy.

I would not, however, recommend using the Google-engaged audience in your Performance Max audience signals, or as the seed list for a Lookalike, as it is too broad to be useful in those scenarios. In fact, I don’t recommend using any website-based remarketing in these scenarios; in my opinion, for an audience signal or seed list, you should only use an actual customer list.

To conclude, the Google-engaged audience is a clear example of worry-free remarketing. It is built on a durable foundation of Google’s own first-party data, bypassing the technical headaches and privacy challenges associated with traditional tag-based remarketing. It is especially useful for small business owners, but can also be helpful for all practitioners running Demand Gen campaigns due to its advantages on Gmail inventory. When in doubt, layer the Google-engaged audience alongside your existing Google tag or Google Analytics-based website remarketing segments in your Search, Shopping, Demand Gen, or Video campaigns.

More Resources:


Featured Image: Roman Samborskyi/Shutterstock