PPC Pulse: AI Max Insights, Cyber Monday Trends & A New Google Asset via @sejournal, @brookeosmundson

The conversations shaping PPC this week focused on how AI interprets intent, how holiday demand played out across Shopping and Performance Max, and how Google is adding more automated language directly into ads.

Google shared more clarity around AI Max, while Adalysis shared AI Max match type behavior, retail analysts broke down early Cyber Monday performance trends, and a potential new Google automated ad asset surfaced that raises questions about brand control.

Here is what stands out for advertisers this week and where you should pay attention.

AI Max Clarifications & New Insights On Match Types

The conversation around AI Max is not slowing down.

A YouTube short circulating this week highlighted Google reaffirming a key message. Match types still serve a purpose, even as AI takes on more interpretation of intent.

This also aligns with a LinkedIn post from two weeks ago where Google Ads Liaison, Ginny Marvin, clarified some misconceptions around the use and functionality of AI Max. Specifically, around:

  • What AI Max is designed to do.
  • If AI Max repackages existing features.
  • What users should expect based on their current keyword match type setup.
  • How to measure incremental lift.
Screenshot taken by author from LinkedIn, December 2025

The post got a lot of chatter in the comments, specifically around Brad Geddes’s comment, with refuting information, stating:

We’re seeing many instances of AI max matching to exact match keywords or exact match variants. So when you look at your totals, the AI max column is a mixture of the AI max matches along with search terms your exact match keywords would have matched to if AI max didn’t exist.

This led Adalysis to publish a thoughtful breakdown of search term behavior within AI Max. The post shows clear examples where the model expands into adjacent intent that still feels relevant, but not necessarily tied to the exact keyword chosen.

This mirrors what many practitioners are already seeing. Search terms look broader. Relevance varies. The model relies on intention, not precision, which shifts how advertisers think about coverage.

Why This Matters For Advertisers

The bigger takeaway here is that your structure still steers the model. AI Max may evaluate intent more flexibly, but it is not inventing direction on its own.

It relies on the signals you set through match types, keyword groupings, and the guardrails you place around your campaigns. When advertisers downplay match types or assume AI will sort everything out, query quality usually becomes harder to manage.

A thoughtful keyword strategy gives the model clearer boundaries to work within. It also helps you understand why certain queries show up and how the system interpreted them.

The more intentional your structure, the more predictable your outcomes. This is the difference between AI supporting your strategy and AI creating a strategy for you.

Cyber Monday PPC Trends Across Shopping And PMax

Cyber Monday data and insights came in quickly this year. Optmyzr shared performance highlights from accounts it manages, showing steady results and more predictable cost patterns than many expected.

Some of its main findings included:

  • Brands spent more YoY to stay visible, even though impressions declined.
  • Clicks and CTR increased YoY.
  • Early conversion data reports decreased ROAS and increased CPA, but noted this isn’t final

Optmyzr reiterated that they would share more final details around conversions and ROAS at a later time due to conversion lag.

Mike Ryan also reviewed more than 2.5 million euros spent on Black Friday in PMax and Shopping spend across retailers and reported noticeable differences from previous years. Some of his findings were similar to Optmyzr, including that advertisers spent 31% more, but average order value (AOV) decreased 6%.

Essentially, advertiser spend efficiency decreased significantly YoY.

As he observed hourly trend data, he noted revenue peaked during early evening hours, advocating to keep budget healthy all throughout the day to capitalize on that intent.

Lastly, he found unique competition up 12%, and confirmed that Amazon still runs Shopping ads in Europe (while they’ve stopped running in the United States earlier this year).

Why This Matters For Advertisers

The data tells a consistent story. Attention is still there, but it is more expensive to earn. Optmyzr’s numbers show higher spend year over year, even as impressions dipped, which reinforces that visibility continues to cost more. Clicks and CTR were up across both ecommerce and lead gen, which signals that people were still shopping and comparing options. The interest is not gone. The price of reaching that interest simply climbed.

The bigger takeaway for advertisers is that strong engagement does not solve the efficiency problem. Costs rose across the board, which puts even more pressure on the post-click experience. When attention is not the constraint anymore, landing page clarity, offer strength, and conversion flow become the real differentiators. The accounts that invested in those areas will feel less of the margin squeeze that defined this year’s shopping window.

New Automated Ad Asset Appears In Google Ads

A new automated asset gained attention this week when Anthony Higman shared a screenshot showing Google testing a “What People Are Saying” asset.

Screenshot taken by author from LinkedIn, December 2025

The asset included AI-generated summary text that looked more like a sentiment recap than a traditional review snippet. What stood out is that the text did not appear to be pulled from the advertiser’s site or from structured reviews. It looked generated by Google based on potential store ratings and reviews.

This is another example of Google introducing language directly into ads, even before advertisers get official documentation or a clear explanation of how the text is produced. The extension reads confidently, but the source of the claims is not obvious.

That has already sparked discussion about accuracy, oversight, and how much creative control advertisers may lose as automated assets continue to expand.

Why This Matters For Advertisers

This asset signals that Google is continuing to explore new ways to surface AI-generated supporting text in ads. That makes oversight more important, simply because advertisers may see language that does not come directly from their own assets.

While the goal is to enhance relevance and provide helpful context to users, it also means brands should keep an eye on auto-applied assets to ensure the messaging aligns with how they want to show up in search. A quick review process can go a long way in avoiding surprises and keeping ad copy consistent with your broader strategy.

Theme Of The Week: Context Shapes Performance

Across all three updates, the common thread is how context influences outcomes.

AI Max decisions depend heavily on the structure you set. Cyber Monday performance reflected a market where attention remained strong but came at a higher cost, putting more weight on what happens after the click. The new automated extension shows Google continuing to experiment with ways to add context inside ads.

Together, these updates point to a simple reality. The more intentional you are with structure, creative, and user experience, the more predictable your results become, even as automation takes on a larger role.

More Resources:


Featured Image: Pixel-Shot/Shutterstock

2026 Marketing Forecast for PPC Leaders [Webinar] via @sejournal, @hethr_campbell

The strategies that worked in 2025 will not carry your campaigns through the new year.

Buyer behavior is evolving, budgets demand tighter discipline, and channels like calls, text, and voice agents are becoming essential conversion paths. As the marketing landscape shifts, the question is no longer whether you should adapt but how fast.

The Strategic Shifts Every Marketer Needs To Refine By Q2

Join Emily Popson, VP of Marketing at CallRail, for a clear and data-driven look at the five marketing priorities that will shape performance in 2026 and what PPC teams must adjust now to stay competitive.

You’ll Learn How To

  • Allocate marketing and advertising budgets in ways that drive measurable revenue
  • Use your audience’s real words to build stronger ads and landing pages
  • Create campaigns that meet buyers where they are in 2026
  • Evaluate text, call, and voice channels within your optimization mix
  • Build operational confidence that supports scale into Q2

Why Attend?

This session gives you a grounded view of what top-performing marketers are doing differently and where outdated assumptions are slowing teams down.

You will gain practical frameworks, real-world examples, and data-backed insights to refine your PPC strategy and prepare for the months ahead.

Register now to secure your seat and strengthen your 2026 marketing strategy.

🛑 Cannot make it live? Register anyway and the full recording will be sent to you after the event.

Should Your PPC Strategy Focus On The Lead Pipeline Or Revenue? via @sejournal, @brookeosmundson

Marketing leaders often believe they have a performance problem when, in reality, they have a goal problem.

A PPC strategy built around generating leads behaves very differently than one optimized for revenue.

The campaigns you choose, how you measure success, and even how your sales team operates all depend on which objective governs the budget.

For B2B organizations, this choice defines the relationship between marketing and sales. This decision moves past traffic metrics and focuses on defining whether PPC’s role is to build opportunity or generate revenue impact.

The Tradeoff Behind Pipeline And Revenue Goals

Focusing on pipeline means optimizing for potential deals. The intent is to create qualified conversations, fill sales calendars, and give teams more at-bats. The success metric is typically cost per qualified lead or cost per opportunity.

Focusing on revenue means optimizing for outcome. The intent is to turn opportunities into booked business and prove marketing’s direct impact on the bottom line. The metric is return on ad spend or cost per acquisition.

Neither is wrong. But, treating them as interchangeable creates confusion.

Pipeline growth without strong sales follow-up inflates cost and hides inefficiency. Revenue-only optimization without top-funnel activity stifles learning and can lead to short-term thinking.

Each goal exposes a different bottleneck. Pipeline focus reveals whether you can attract quality interest. Revenue focus reveals whether you can close it. The right answer depends on where your business struggles most.

Pipeline Metrics Often Hide Sales Inefficiency

Marketers often celebrate growing lead volumes.

On the surface, increased lead volume looks like success. But when those leads stall in the CRM or die in early qualification, pipeline efficiency is exposed as illusion.

If PPC campaigns are judged by form fills alone, marketing gets rewarded for quantity, not quality. This disconnect fuels friction between teams: sales claims the leads are weak, and marketing insists the follow-up is slow.

Both can be true.

Healthy pipeline strategies require alignment on the following:

  • What “qualified” means for leads.
  • How fast leads must be contacted.
  • How performance is measured after the click.

Without that rigor, pipeline-focused PPC becomes a reporting exercise, not a growth driver.

The fix isn’t more leads. It requires better accountability.

Audit how many paid leads convert into sales-accepted opportunities and how long it takes to reach them. If it takes more than 24 hours to follow up, the bottleneck isn’t the ad platform. It’s the underlying sales process.

Revenue Targets Expose What The Business Really Values

Optimizing for revenue forces a company to define value clearly. It requires clean CRM data, accurate conversion imports, and disciplined attribution practices.

Revenue-centric marketers must work with finance to determine what a closed deal is worth and with sales to ensure those values reflect reality.

This approach usually reveals operational truth. It shows which campaigns truly impact profit and which only create activity.

But, it also makes experimentation harder. When every dollar is tied to short-term return on investment (ROI), the incentive to test new audiences or messaging weakens.

The strength of a revenue goal is accountability. The weakness is tunnel vision. Leaders must guard against starving early-stage demand just because it doesn’t pay back this quarter.

The best teams track revenue, but they also understand that sustainable growth requires a healthy flow of qualified leads entering the system. Without it, future quarters run dry.

Your PPC Strategy Should Mirror Business Maturity, Not Ambition

Early-stage or growth-phase companies benefit from pipeline goals. They need to identify who their buyers are, what messaging resonates, and how long sales cycles actually take.

At this stage, the objective is learning: understanding your buyer’s behavior, sales cycles, and message fit.

Mature organizations with stable win rates and predictable close processes can afford to optimize for revenue. They typically have enough historical data to assign accurate value to each lead and to let algorithms bid toward true profit.

The problem arises when leadership chooses a revenue goal before the business infrastructure is ready for it.

Without reliable data, automated bidding and attribution models will chase signals that don’t represent real revenue.

The reverse is also true. If you continue to stick with pipeline goals after sales maturity, it could mean you’re leaving efficiency on the table.

Your PPC strategy must evolve as the company evolves. Ambition without readiness is expensive.

Choosing Platforms And Campaign Types That Match The Goal

Pipeline-focused PPC leans on platforms that build awareness and nurture intent.

Search campaigns that target problem-focused queries, LinkedIn lead gen ads for mid-funnel education, or YouTube video campaigns that spark curiosity. The goal is to drive qualified hand-raisers, not instant conversions.

Revenue-focused PPC leans on channels closer to purchase intent.

These include exact match search targeting competitor or solution terms, or Performance Max campaigns tied to bottom-funnel content, and remarketing strategies that capture existing demand.

Mixing both goals in the same campaign infrastructure could lead to confusing machine learning. For example, if your conversion actions mix “ebook downloads” with “booked demos,” the system doesn’t know what success looks like.

Separate campaigns by goal. Let each optimize toward its true signal.

The Metrics That Matter When You Pick A Side

Pipeline-driven PPC programs should live and die by downstream metrics: lead-to-opportunity conversion rate, cost per qualified meeting, and time to first contact. Reporting should start in the ad platform but end in the CRM.

Revenue-driven PPC programs should focus on cost per acquisition, return on ad spend, and contribution margin. These numbers link directly to the income statement, not the lead dashboard.

Blending both in one key performance indicator (KPI) report creates false comfort. When leadership sees total leads up but revenue flat, it’s not a mystery; it’s mixed measurement. Align metrics with the goal and accept that fewer, cleaner numbers are better than an overstuffed dashboard.

When Is It Time To Shift Gears?

If we, PPC marketers, know anything, it’s that nothing ever stays the same for long.

Markets change. Sales teams grow or shrink. Financial pressure shifts quarterly targets. Knowing when to pivot between pipeline and revenue is what separates reactive marketers from strategic ones.

If lead volume is high but win rates are stagnant, it’s time to transition to a revenue goal. The company has awareness, but now it needs conversion discipline.

If close rates are strong but opportunity flow is inconsistent, the bottleneck is likely at the top of funnel. Revert to pipeline focus until sales capacity stabilizes.

No strategy should stay fixed forever. PPC performance must mirror business conditions, not personal preference.

Great Teams Measure Progress Alongside Output

Effective teams approach PPC with the discipline of an investment program, focused on long-term gain rather than quick wins.

They know some campaigns exist to generate qualified opportunities that pay off in future quarters, while others are designed to drive revenue right now.

They hold themselves accountable to both sets of numbers, but they know which KPI or goal is steering the ship. They challenge their own assumptions.

If paid media performance looks good but sales growth lags, they dig deeper. If campaigns drive profit but new logo acquisition stalls, they test top-funnel messaging again.

This mindset separates tactical advertisers from strategic marketers. The former chase metrics. The latter tie PPC to business health.

Stronger leaders align their marketing systems to shift focus between pipeline and revenue with clear intent and timing.

They know that PPC cannot fix a broken sales process or replace disciplined follow-up. But, it can magnify what already works and identify what doesn’t, faster than any other channel.

More Resources:


Featured Image: Remo_Designer/Shutterstock

Paid Ad Scheduling Across Time Zones That Actually Works via @sejournal, @brookeosmundson

Scheduling ads in Google or Microsoft Ads sounds simple until you realize how many hours you’re wasting showing them at the wrong time.

A campaign that performs well in one market might fall flat in another, not because your targeting or creative is off, but because of when your ads appear.

Managing time zones is one of the easiest ways to improve efficiency and stop unnecessary spend. Yet, many PPC managers still rely on default settings or assume their ad platform will “figure it out.”

In reality, effective ad scheduling requires strategy, testing, and an understanding of how local behavior differs across regions.

This guide breaks down how to identify true peak hours, segment campaigns by region, and use automation tools to make scheduling work in your favor, no matter where your audience is.

Understanding Time Zone Challenges In PPC

When advertising across multiple regions, time zone discrepancies can create challenges that impact ad delivery, engagement, and conversions.

A common pitfall is assuming that a single campaign schedule will work universally. In reality, what works in one location might be completely ineffective in another.

For example, if your Google Ads account is set to Eastern Time but your target audience is primarily on the West Coast, your ads might be running during off-hours, leading to suboptimal performance.

International campaigns require even more diligence to consider local business hours and consumer behavior patterns.

Another factor is peak engagement hours. While lunchtime or evening hours may be prime time in one country, those same hours could be completely irrelevant in another.

Understanding these nuances is essential for optimizing your ad scheduling strategy.

Advanced Strategies For Scheduling Ads Across Time Zones

Successfully managing ad scheduling across time zones requires a thoughtful approach that goes beyond the basics.

While many advertisers set simple schedules and hope for the best, the real wins come from leveraging automation, data-driven insights, and strategic segmentation.

Whether you’re running campaigns domestically across U.S. time zones or managing international PPC efforts, applying advanced techniques can help ensure your ads are served at the right time for the right audience.

Segmenting Campaigns By Time Zone For Better Control

If you’re running campaigns across multiple time zones, one of the best ways to stay in control is by creating separate campaigns for different regions.

This lets you adjust ad schedules, budgets, and bidding strategies based on local peak performance times rather than forcing a single schedule to work for every location.

For example, an ecommerce brand serving customers in the U.S. and Europe might run separate campaigns for each region.

The U.S. campaign can focus on morning and evening hours when engagement peaks, while the European campaign targets prime shopping hours in local time zones.

While this approach adds complexity, the benefits far outweigh the extra management effort. Automating adjustments with rules and scripts can help streamline this process, ensuring each campaign is optimized without constant manual oversight.

Leveraging Automated Bidding Over Fixed Schedules

Manual ad scheduling has its place, but automated bid strategies like Target ROAS or Maximize Conversions allow you to optimize bids dynamically rather than setting fixed hours.

These AI-driven approaches adjust bids in real time, ensuring ads appear when conversion probability is highest, regardless of time zone differences.

For instance, if data shows that users in one region convert at a higher rate between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. but another region performs better in the evening, automated bidding will allocate more budget when it matters most.

Instead of manually adjusting bids every few weeks, let machine learning do the heavy lifting.

Optimizing Scheduling Based On Market-Specific Peak Hours

Different markets have different user behaviors, so it’s crucial to base your scheduling decisions on actual performance data rather than assumptions.

Google Ads’ ad schedule reports and Microsoft Ads’ time-of-day insights can help you identify when users in each region are most active.

For example, if analytics reveal that North American users are most engaged in the evening while European users peak in the morning, your campaigns should reflect that.

Instead of blanketing all markets with a generic ad schedule, tailor your approach based on real-time engagement trends.

Using Labels To Manage And Adjust Scheduling

One often overlooked yet powerful feature in Google and Microsoft Ads is the use of labels.

Labels let you group campaigns, ad groups, or keywords into easily manageable categories, making it simpler to track and adjust schedules.

For example:

  • Tagging campaigns by region allows for easy bulk adjustments when shifting schedules due to seasonal changes or promotional events.
  • Labeling time-sensitive ads ensures that you can quickly pause or resume campaigns as needed without sifting through dozens of settings.
  • Using automation scripts with labels enables automatic bid adjustments or scheduling changes based on real-time performance.

By applying labels effectively, you can streamline scheduling changes without manually editing each campaign, saving time and reducing errors.

Automating Scheduling Adjustments With Scripts

If you’re managing multiple time zones, Google Ads scripts can be a game-changer.

Rather than manually adjusting schedules, scripts can dynamically modify bids based on real-time performance data.

For example, a script could be set up to boost bids by 20% during high-converting hours and reduce them by 10% when conversions drop. This keeps campaigns optimized while freeing up time to focus on strategy rather than daily bid adjustments.

Scripts also work well with labels. You can program scripts to modify bid strategies for campaigns tagged with specific labels, ensuring changes are applied only to relevant ads.

Adjusting For Daylight Saving Time Changes

Another scheduling headache is Daylight Saving Time (DST), which varies by country and can cause misalignment in ad schedules.

A campaign that ran perfectly last month might suddenly be off by an hour if a region switches to DST.

To avoid this, maintain a calendar of DST changes in key markets and adjust schedules proactively.

Another option is using automated rules or machine learning-based bid adjustments to handle these shifts without manual intervention.

Budget Allocation Based On Regional Performance Trends

Rather than splitting your budget evenly across all time zones, consider allocating more spend to the highest-performing regions based on historical data.

By analyzing performance reports, you can determine which locations deliver the best ROI and adjust budgets accordingly.

For instance, if your data shows that conversions peak in the late evening for Pacific time zone users but decline in the early morning for Eastern time users, shift more budget toward the stronger-performing time periods.

This approach ensures ad spend is being used effectively rather than wasted on time slots that don’t generate conversions.

Turning Time Zones Into An Advantage

Ad scheduling is just one of many levers that can make or break your campaign performance. When your ads align with local customer behavior, your budget works harder, and engagement improves.

Use data to pinpoint when conversions actually happen, then adjust delivery windows to match those trends.

Lean on automation to keep schedules consistent, especially across multiple markets, and review reports often enough to spot shifting patterns.

Treat time zone planning as part of your optimization routine, not a one-time setup. The more precisely your ads reflect when people are active, the stronger your results will be.

More Resources:


Featured Image: Roman Samborskyi/Shutterstock

What Optmyzr’s Three-Year Study Reveals About Seasonality Adjustments During BFCM via @sejournal, @brookeosmundson

Every Q4, the same message shows up in our accounts:

“Use seasonality adjustments to get ready for Black Friday and Cyber Monday.”

On paper, it sounds reasonable. You expect conversion rates to rise, so you give Smart Bidding a heads up and tell it to bid more aggressively during the peak.

Optmyzr’s latest study puts a pretty big dent in that narrative.

Over three BFCM cycles from 2022 through 2024, Fred Vallaeys and the Optmyzr team analyzed performance for up to 6,000 advertisers per year, split into two cohorts: those who used seasonality bid adjustments and those who did not.

The question was simple: do these adjustments actually help during Black Friday and Cyber Monday, or are we just making Google bid higher for no meaningful gain?

Based on the data, seasonality adjustments often hurt efficiency and rarely deliver the breakthrough many advertisers expect.

Below is a breakdown of the study and what it means for PPC managers heading into peak season.

Key Findings from Optmyzr’s BFCM Seasonality Study

The study compared performance across three BFCM periods (2022–2024), defined as the Wednesday before Black Friday through the Wednesday after Cyber Monday. Each year’s results were then measured against a pre-BFCM baseline.

The accounts were grouped into:

  • Advertisers who did not use seasonality bid adjustments
  • Advertisers who did apply them

Across all three years, consistent patterns emerged from their study.

#1: Smart Bidding already adjusts for BFCM without manual prompts

For advertisers who skipped seasonality adjustments, Smart Bidding still responded to the conversion rate spike:

  • 2022: Conversion rate up 17.5%
  • 2023: Conversion rate up 11.9%
  • 2024: Conversion rate up 7.5%

In other words, the algorithm did exactly what it was designed to do. It detected higher intent and increased bids without needing an external nudge.

#2: Seasonality adjustments inflated CPCs far more than necessary

Seasonality adjustments tell Google’s system to raise bids based on your predicted conversion rate increase.

Optmyzr notes that:

When you apply a seasonality adjustment, you are effectively telling Google: ‘I expect conversion rate to increase by X%. Raise bids immediately by X%.

And Smart Bidding acts as if you’re exactly right. It usually doesn’t soften that prediction or test into it.

The study showed that this is why CPCs climbed much faster for advertisers who used adjustments:

CPC inflation (no adjustment vs. with adjustment)

  • 2022: +17% vs. +36.7%
  • 2023: +16% vs. +32%
  • 2024: +17% vs. +34%

Adjustments consistently doubled CPC inflation, even though Smart Bidding was already raising bids based on real-time conversion signals.

#3: ROAS dropped for advertisers using seasonality adjustments

When CPC increases outpace conversion rate increases, ROAS inevitably suffers.

ROAS change (no adjustment vs. with adjustment)

  • 2022: -2% vs. -17%
  • 2023: -1.5% vs. -10%
  • 2024: +5.7% vs. -15.7%

The “no adjustment” group maintained stable ROAS, even improving in 2024. The “with adjustment” group saw steep declines every year.

Why Do Seasonality Adjustments Struggle During BFCM?

Optmyzr explains this dynamic as a precision issue.

When you apply a seasonality adjustment, you are making a specific prediction about the conversion lift. If you estimate the lift at +40% and the real lift ends up being +32–35%, that gap translates directly into overbidding.

Fred Vallaeys writes:

Smart Bidding takes this literally. It does not hedge your bet. It assumes you have perfect foresight.

That’s the core problem.

Black Friday and Cyber Monday are also in the category of highly predictable retail events. Google has years of historical BFCM data to model expected shifts. As a result, Optmyzr concludes:

Seasonality adjustments work best when Google cannot anticipate the spike.

BFCM is not one of those situations. It’s practically encoded into Google’s models.

The Trade-Off: More Revenue, Lower Efficiency

The study did show that advertisers using seasonality adjustments often drove higher revenue growth:

Revenue growth (no adjustment vs. with adjustment)

  • 2022: +25% vs. +50.5%
  • 2023: +30.3% vs. +52.8%
  • 2024: +33.8% vs. 39.9%

In 2022 and 2023, the incremental revenue jump was significant. But again, those gains came with notable ROAS declines.

This supports a practical interpretation:

  • If your brand’s priority is aggressive market share capture, top-line revenue or inventory liquidation, seasonality adjustments can deliver more volume.
  • If your brand’s priority is profitable performance, adjustments tend to work against that goal during BFCM.

When Seasonality Adjustments Do Make Sense

In the study, Optmyzr made it very clear: seasonality adjustments themselves aren’t the problem. The misuse of them is.

They work well in scenarios where you genuinely have more insight into the spike than the platforms do, such as:

  • A short flash sale
  • A new one-time promotion with no historical precedent
  • A large, concentrated email push
  • Niche events with little global relevance

Situations where they may not make the most sense:

  • Black Friday and Cyber Monday (supported by their data study)
  • Christmas shopping windows
  • Valentine’s Day for gift categories

These events are already modeled extensively by Google’s bidding systems.

What Should PPC Managers Do With This Data?

If you’re looking to make some changes into your PPC accounts this holiday season, here’s a few ways to apply these findings in a practical way.

#1: Default to not using seasonality adjustments for BFCM

For the majority of advertisers, letting Smart Bidding handle the conversion rate spike naturally leads to steadier ROAS and fewer surprises.

The data supports this approach across three consecutive years.

#2: If leadership insists on volume, be explicit about the trade-off

You can lean on Optmzyr’s findings to set expectations, not just express an opinion.

For example:

  • “Optmyzr’s three-year analysis shows that seasonality adjustments can increase revenue but typically reduce ROAS by 10-17 percentage points.”
  • “We can use them if revenue volume is the priority, but we will need to prepare for much lower cost efficiency.”

These examples keep the conversation focused on the business, not just the tactical levers you pull.

#3: Spend your energy on guardrails, not the predictions

In the study, Optmzyr reminds advertisers that trusting the algorithm doesn’t mean blindly letting it run without any oversight.

Instead of guessing the exact uplift, your value during peak season come from:

  • Smart budget pacing
  • Hourly monitoring (with automated alerts, of course!)
  • Bid caps when necessary
  • Audience and device segmentation checks
  • Creative and offer readiness

These are some of the key areas where human judgment beats prediction.

Final Thoughts On Optmyzr’s Study

Optmyzr’s study doesn’t argue that seasonality bid adjustments are bad. What it does argue is that context is everything.

For predictable, high-volume retail events like BFCM, Google’s bidding systems already have the signal they need. Adding your own forecast often leads to overshooting, inflated CPCs, and unnecessary efficiency loss.

For unique or brand-specific spikes, adjustments remain valuable.

This research gives PPC managers something we rarely get during BFCM: solid data to support a more measured, less reactive approach. If nothing else, it gives you the backup you need the next time someone asks:

“Should we turn on seasonality adjustments this Black Friday?”

Your answer can be confident, data-driven, and clear.

The Behaviors And Mindset Of Marketers Who Win With Performance Max via @sejournal, @MenachemAni

Performance Max (like the more upper-funnel Demand Gen) is different enough from other Google Ads campaigns that it requires a different approach, even if the underlying search behavior and marketing principles are the same as they’ve always been.

For what it’s worth, Performance Max is typically not the first campaign to launch in any account. We typically start with Search and/or Shopping before layering on Performance Max when it makes sense, e.g., testing and scaling.

But when the time comes to make it work, it takes a specific mindset. And if your Google Ads methods and principles are still stuck in 2015, you’re not going to get very far.

Here’s how to tailor your approach and become a mentality monster for Performance Max.

Performance Max At Its Most Basic Level

A strong mindset for modern PPC begins with knowledge and education. If you still don’t understand the fundamental differences between Performance Max and legacy campaign types (like Search and Shopping), that’s step one.

The TL;DR is simple: Performance Max is driven by algorithms, not inputs or controls. There’s a certain degree of surrendering to the system that goes with it, and trying to exert control when there’s none to claim will only end up with a large chunk of wasted spend.

If you think you can be the exception to the rule and force Performance Max into traditional campaign structures, all you’ll do is choke the algorithm and spend money on poor-quality conversions. This has a compounding effect where the system then believes those are valid conversions and will try to bring you more of the same.

Here are five core truths to keep in mind:

1. You don’t control targeting. Performance Max simply does not go where you tell it to. At best, you can provide initial direction in the form of audience signals. But it will eventually start to make its own decisions about which channels to show your ads on and which audiences to pursue. Even keywords are more about guidance than a guideline to be followed strictly.

2. You don’t decide which headlines get paired with which creatives. With Performance Max, you’ll still need to build all the pieces of your ads: responsive search ads, video and static creatives, product feeds with robust descriptors, and so on. But how those get mixed and matched isn’t up to you. Google’s system will test different combinations with different audiences before settling on what works best.

3. You don’t get full visibility into every query or placement. There’s no question that Performance Max is capable of delivering great results. If you want that, then you simply have to accept that you must give up a certain degree of visibility into where your ads show and why. You may not like it, but this campaign only works when you set things up properly and trust the system (while still supervising and verifying its output).

4. Data, not content, is king. Performance Max runs on data, and Google expects you to provide far more data than it will. Accounts with more conversion data will perform better because Google has more user signals to decode. With clearer first-party inputs, Performance Max is more likely to deliver the conversions you want. The clearer your audience signals are, the easier it is to quickly move out of the learning phase. And a more complete and accurate product feed will go a long way in getting your products in front of people who want them.

5. That being said, reporting is getting better but can still be frustrating. We only recently got access to things like asset group reporting, search terms reports and negative keywords for Performance Max. It’s far more visibility than we had a few years ago, but Google is still some distance off the ideal balance. I’d advise you to make peace with the fact that reporting won’t be perfect and attribution will be even murkier than usual.

Fortunately, there’s plenty that you can control. Those factors just happen to be broader marketing principles and strategic direction:

  • Positioning, offer, and messaging strategy.
  • Quality and depth of your product feed.
  • Strength of your audience signals.
  • Depth of your first-party data inputs, e.g., conversion tracking, customer lists, data feeds.
  • Relevance of your ad copy, creatives, and landing pages.
  • Bidding strategy and goals.
  • Campaign and asset group structure at a high level.

Screenshot from X (Twitter), November 2025

Read more: Should Advertisers Rethink The ‘For Vs. Against’ Stance On Performance Max?

Traits Of PPC Managers Who Struggle With Performance Max

I see PPC managers every day who are so set in their ways that all they can do is complain about some part of Google’s machine learning. While it’s perfectly fine to stick with Search and Shopping, what’s not okay is bringing that mindset to Performance Max and expecting results anyway. And there are some behaviors that show up most frequently.

  • They require granular control over everything. Wanting to dictate exactly how the system should operate is a red flag when managing Performance Max. These managers have a natural distrust of all things machine learning and want to deploy perfect Exact Match keywords, complicated manual bidding strategies, and specific traffic sculpting techniques.
  • They believe their experience is a guarantee of success. But they don’t put in the effort to stay up-to-date on market and technological developments. These are typically old school marketers (like me) who haven’t kept up with the modern pace of Google Ads or feel entitled to success because of their tenure (unlike me).
  • They specialize in Google Ads account management and little else. Modern PPC demands that account managers have a basic level of skill in areas like copywriting, landing page theory, conversion rate optimization, product feed management, market and audience research, and offer positioning. People who refuse to treat Google Ads as one piece of a wider marketing puzzle are learning this the hard way.
  • They don’t have the diamond hands needed to trust their strategy. “Eyes on, hands off” is our approach. People who push back at the first sign of below-average output tend to make changes that reset the learning period, which only delays Google’s ability to start delivering good conversions. Since it can take three to six weeks (in my experience) to get to a good position with Performance Max, you need to know when not to make changes. Get early buy-in from clients (and the budget needed to ride it out) as you work through this early period.
  • They take a “set it and forget it” approach to automation and machine learning. Part of exiting the learning period in Performance Max quickly is keeping an eye on early results and providing data inputs so the system learns what you want more/less of. Don’t just ride out the post-launch period without tracking what Google’s bringing to the plate.
  • They expect the system to magically understand what the client wants. One of the toughest parts of modern PPC is persuading clients to provide access to data that Google needs in order to understand what success looks like on the business side. The flipside is that without this input, Google will simply make guesses until it finds something you like. This is especially true for lead-gen brands like plumbers and contractors.

Quick disclaimer: Some industries require a granular level of control, either due to regulatory and compliance mandates or because Google simply doesn’t have enough search and user volume to make informed decisions in that niche. Accounts operating in areas like pharmaceuticals, legal services, and similar niches need a higher level of control than mass market verticals like apparel or beverages.

The PPC Manager Who Wins With Performance Max

Algorithmic campaigns aren’t suitable for every account. Sometimes, it’s just better to stick to Search and Shopping. But when there is an opportunity to scale with Performance Max, there’s a specific type of person you want in charge of the process.

  • They know where they’re more useful. Marketers who are willing to hand over control of ad operations to the system are able to focus on impactful areas where machines still struggle to create differentiated output: creative, ad copy, landing pages, and their UX, strategy, data sourcing and interpretation, etc.
  • They accept that they’re only as good as their last campaign. Good PPC managers in the modern era don’t just treat Performance Max as its own campaign. They understand that just because one campaign worked a certain way doesn’t mean the next one will, too. What you want is someone who’s ready and willing to learn with every new project and iteration.
  • They understand the value of data and how to source it. Marketers who focus on building an ecosystem of data inputs and learning get better results with Performance Max because they give Google more information to base its decisions on. Someone who knows where to find those and how to convince clients that they’re mission-critical is worth their weight in gold.
  • They know how to stick to the plan. When you put in work only for a campaign to return poor results in the first week, it’s tempting to burn everything down and try something new. Marketers who build a plan for those first weeks and stick to it have the patience and confidence needed to eventually get Performance Max to a position of power.
  • They excel at client communication. A lead-gen client that refuses to share its customer data is never going to get good results from Performance Max. Good marketers can see that and will recommend traditional Search instead of creating additional friction by pushing for CRM access. Another underrated trait is proactively setting expectations with clients and communicating with them throughout the campaign.
Screenshot from X (Twitter), November 2025

PPC-Adjacent Skills To Develop For Performance Max Success

With Google Ads demanding a more holistic marketing approach, so much of your success with Performance Max begins outside of the ad account. With the system taking over much of the button-pushing that we used to do, here’s where you should be upskilling in order to cement your future in PPC.

Why I’m Bullish: Performance Max Is The Start Of The Future

Added balance between machine learning and human control is Google telling us that we only have one choice: learn to work together on these algorithmic campaigns. Performance Max has changed significantly from when it was first released, and so has Google’s attitude.

Newer features in Performance Max, like negative keywords and improved reports, help refine campaigns and offer advertisers more of what we’ve been asking for. But this can be dangerous if you don’t make the right decisions – you might see that video ads are not performing as well and remove them, only to find that their role is to push certain conversions down the line.

As it stands, Performance Max today is perfectly viable for virtually any type of business – a far cry from its early use case being limited to big-budget ecommerce and retail (how viable it is for a specific business still depends on factors such as budget, expertise, risk tolerance, and data availability).

So, while you may not necessarily need it today or every day, you should be adapting to this new direction if your top priority is to protect your business, career, and clients.

More Resources:


Featured Image: Master1305/Shutterstock

PPC Pulse: Nano Banana Pro, Image Animation & The Top PPC Influencers via @sejournal, @brookeosmundson

PPC news this week focused on creative tool updates and the people shaping how we use them. Google Ads brought Nano Banana Pro into its creative workflow, giving advertisers sharper, more flexible options for generating images.

Microsoft Ads introduced Image Animation and new Performance Comparison features in Copilot, so turning static assets and raw numbers into something usable feels less painful. And the Top 100 PPC Influencers shortlist sparked a wave of personal posts, especially from people like Jyll Saskin Gales, about what real influence actually feels like.

Here is a closer look at what changed and how it might affect your accounts.

Nano Banana Pro Arrives In Google Ads

Google introduced Nano Banana Pro, a new image generation and editing model built on Gemini 3 Pro and now available across products like Gemini, Workspace, and Google Ads.

Compared with the earlier Nano Banana model, this version focuses on sharper reasoning, better text rendering inside images, and stronger brand consistency. It is designed to turn rough ideas into studio-quality visuals while keeping on-brand details intact.

From a Google Ads standpoint, Google Ads Liaison positioned Nano Banana Pro as a creative engine inside Asset Studio and campaign setup flows. Advertisers can create and edit high-resolution images, adjust details like lighting and camera angles, and even showcase multiple products in a single scene for formats like Performance Max and Demand Gen.

Per Ginny Marvin’s post, advertisers can expect:

  • Better brand alignment.
  • More creative control.
  • Higher-quality output and multi-product showcasing.
  • Easier iteration and testing.

The big promise is speed with control. You can work in a conversational way with assets rather than rewriting prompts every time you want a version with a new background or seasonal setting.

Why Advertisers Should Pay Attention

Most teams feel constant creative pressure to keep up with the volume and scale of testing. For visual-focused campaigns like Performance Max, Shopping, and Demand Gen, those campaigns need a steady stream of fresh assets. As a result, many brands struggle to keep up without sacrificing quality.

Nano Banana Pro aims to ease that bottleneck. If it does what Google claims, it should help you:

  • Scale image production while staying closer to your brand guidelines.
  • Produce on-brand “sets” of images for seasonal pushes or product bundles.
  • Improve text inside images for promos, headlines, and localized creative.

There are tradeoffs to keep in mind. You still need clear brand rules, review steps, and legal guardrails. Watermarked AI visuals do not replace proper approvals, especially in regulated categories.

If you want to test Nano Banana Pro in Google Ads, start with a structured plan: pick a few PMax or Demand Gen campaigns, create AI-only asset groups, and compare performance to your current best creatives. Treat it as a creative accelerator, not a replacement for your existing brand work.

Microsoft Announces Image Animation And Performance Comparison

In the same week, Microsoft announced its own updates to image creative: Image Animation.

Image Animation lets you turn static images into short videos using templates in Ads Studio. The feature is in global pilot, with the exception of mainland China, and is meant to extend the life of existing image assets across video inventory on the Microsoft network.

Microsoft also announced a new feature called Performance Comparison. Per the Microsoft Liaison’s LinkedIn post, the feature is meant to allow you to “have meaningful conversations with your data.”

For example, you can now ask Copilot to compare periods, A/B tests, campaigns, or top keywords and get a narrative summary plus charts, instead of building everything manually in spreadsheets.

Finally, Microsoft highlighted new API-powered generation features. Background images, display ads, videos, and brand kits can all be created at scale through Copilot in the Campaign Management API. That piece is aimed squarely at high-volume advertisers and agencies who rely on automation to keep assets fresh.

Why Advertisers Should Pay Attention

If your team has wanted more video but never had the time or budget, Image Animation is worth a look. Converting top static assets into simple motion can help improve engagement without a full production effort.

The risk is lazy creative. Video built on weak images will not magically perform. Use this feature on proven winners first, then expand.
Performance Comparison is the more quietly powerful update. Many PPC managers still spend a lot of time exporting data, slicing it, and trying to tell a story in slides. Letting Copilot handle first-draft comparisons can save hours and surface trends you might miss.

You still need to validate your data and sense-check the narrative. Automation can speed up analysis, but it cannot know your client’s politics, internal benchmarks, or the context behind a bad week.

For larger accounts, the API updates could be significant. Teams with many markets, feeds, or brands can generate creative variations programmatically and keep evergreen campaigns from going stale. This is one of those features that rewards advertisers who have clean feeds, strong brand kits, and consistent naming structures already in place.

Top 100 PPC Influencers Shortlist Sparks Conversation

At the beginning of the week, PPC Survey launched its shortlist of the Top 100 PPC Influencers of 2025. The list serves as an alphabetical pool for the final Top 50 ranking, which is decided partly through votes in the State of PPC survey and other ranking factors.

To make the shortlist, most experts need at least 2,500 LinkedIn followers, though PPCsurvey notes that some exceptions are made for influence through speaking, content, or podcasts. Industry reporters and ad platform employees are excluded from the ranking itself, even though the organizers encourage people to follow them.

Voting is open until late December, and many shortlisted experts shared their nominations with gratitude, humor, or a bit of imposter syndrome.

In my opinion, one post stood out in particular amongst the noise of the announcements. In Jyll Saskin Gales’ LinkedIn post, she shared honest, mixed feelings about lists like this and how she defined influence.

She explained that the external recognition came first: speaking invites, writing opportunities, brand deals. The feeling of real influence came later, when people started sharing very personal outcomes tied to her work. Job offers they landed because of her content. Careers they felt more secure in. Emotional moments when readers met her in person and talked about how her book or resources changed their approach to Google Ads.

Jyll also used the post to talk about responsibility. She encouraged people to look at their voting choices and ask whether they are supporting diverse voices and asked readers to consider their own influence.

Why Advertisers Should Pay Attention

On the surface, a “Top 100” list can feel like industry inside baseball. But lists like this shape who teams follow, whose frameworks get repeated in decks, and which case studies clients see.

If your feed is filled with posts about this shortlist, it is a good moment to audit your inputs. Ask yourself:

  • Do I follow people who work on similar problems as me, or only the most visible names?
  • Do the voices in my feed reflect different markets, backgrounds, and company sizes?
  • Am I sharing ideas from a small circle, or highlighting newer experts who have helped my work?

You do not need a badge to be influential. If you teach a junior teammate, write a clear client email, or share a thread that helps someone understand a platform change, you are shaping how PPC is practiced in your circles.

The list is simply a guide or another tool to find useful PPC information. Use it to discover new people, yes, but also to reflect on how you wield your own influence.

This Week In PPC: Creativity And Influence

On one side, Google and Microsoft are racing to make creative and analysis more automated. Nano Banana Pro promises faster, more on-brand visuals inside campaign workflows. Microsoft’s new features aim to turn static images into video and compress reporting time into simple chat prompts.

On the other side, the Top 100 shortlist and posts like Jyll’s remind us that tools do not drive strategy. People do. The frameworks you share, the way you explain changes to stakeholders, and the care you show in your content have a long tail that no platform roadmap can replicate.

As you test new creative models and Copilot features, it may help to ask a simple question: Are you giving as much attention to the influence you have on others as you give to the tools you use every day?

Top Stories Of The Week:

More Resources:


Featured Image: eodora ART/Shutterstock

How To Manage Demand Fluctuation During Key Ecommerce Shopping Seasons via @sejournal, @brookeosmundson

Ecommerce demand doesn’t rise and fall in a straight line throughout the years.

It can build gradually, spike hard, stall, or drop with little-to-no warning. During peak shopping periods like Black Friday, Cyber Monday, Prime Day(s), Back-to-School, these swings become even more intense.

For PPC marketers, that volatility affects far more than just traffic or CPCs. It influences bidding strategies, budgets, inventory planning, campaign structures, and even internal operations.

Managing demand fluctuation isn’t just about “spending more when demand is high.” It’s also about knowing when demand is coming, preparing your accounts before the surge, staying in control while competition rises, and stabilizing performance after the peak ends.

It means understanding that marketing decisions affect logistics and profitability, not just vanity metrics like impression share.

This article will walk you through how to manage demand in a way that improves performance and protects the business across each phase of the season.

1. Understand And Anticipate Seasonal Demand

Predictable seasonal spikes are only predictable if you know what to look for.

Demand rarely appears out of nowhere. It ramps up gradually. The marketers who recognize early changes in behavior are the ones who scale at the right time instead of reacting too late.

Start with historical data from your own account. Look at when impressions and clicks began to rise last year, not just when the holiday officially started.

Compare year-over-year and week-over-week trends to identify whether demand is starting earlier. In many industries, consumers begin researching long before they’re ready to buy, which means waiting until “the big day” is too late to build momentum.

Conversion lag is another signal. If your data shows it normally takes five days from first click to purchase, and your promo begins on Friday, you need to start increasing budget earlier in the week. Otherwise, you’ll miss buyers who started the journey before the event.

Don’t ignore external factors. Shipping cutoff dates, competitor promotions, weather trends, and even economic sentiment can accelerate or delay demand. The data in the platform only shows part of the picture, while market behavior provides the context.

Forecasting is also critical. Even a simple model based on past revenue, impression share, and growth targets can help you determine expected demand and budget requirements.

This helps create a baseline so you can recognize when performance is ahead or behind expectations and adjust accordingly.

2. Align Bids And Budgets With Demand

Once demand starts building, your bidding and budgeting strategy must evolve with it. This is where many marketers either scale too slowly and miss opportunity. On the opposite side, you scale too aggressively and burn through budget prematurely.

If you’re using Smart Bidding, seasonality adjustments in Google Ads or Microsoft Ads can help the algorithm prepare for a short-term spike that differs from typical trends. These are best used for specific, limited windows (e.g., a 3-day flash sale) rather than entire multi-week seasons.

When demand returns to normal, remove the adjustment so the system doesn’t keep bidding too high in a softening market.

Target settings also matter. A tROAS (Target Return on Ad Spend) goal that works during regular pricing may be too restrictive during steep discounts. Likewise, a CPA goal may need to be relaxed slightly if conversion rates are temporarily lower but lifetime value remains strong.

In some cases, switching to a “Maximize” strategy gives the system more flexibility to capture demand efficiently, especially when intent is high and margin is acceptable.

If using “Maximize Conversions” (or Conversion Value), you could set more flexible bid limits to let the algorithm know you’re willing to pay more for conversions without letting it go haywire and have a mind of its own.

Budgets require just as much attention as bids. If campaigns are capping out early in the day, you’re likely missing high-intent shoppers later. Increasing budgets, reallocating across campaigns, or adjusting bids to stretch delivery can help you maintain visibility during peak hours. Shared budgets can also allow strong-performing categories to pull in more spend without manual intervention.

Scaling back after the surge is equally important. Abrupt budget cuts or major bid changes can disrupt algorithmic learning. Gradual reductions give the system time to recalibrate as demand normalizes.

3. Keep Product Availability And Campaign Structures Aligned

Even the best campaign strategy falls apart if product availability isn’t properly managed.

During peak shopping seasons, inventory can change rapidly. If feeds don’t update quickly, ads may continue promoting items that are low or out of stock. This leads to wasting spend and hurting customer experience.

Be sure to increase your feed update frequency during high-demand periods. This could mean multiple syncs per day if possible.

Ensure that price, availability, and shipping information are accurate. If your platform or feed tool allows real-time inventory updates, take advantage of it.

Custom labels in your feed are one of the most valuable seasonality tools. Try labeling your products by margin, best seller status, promotion type, limited stock, or seasonality. This allows you to structure campaigns around business priorities, not just categories or sub-types.

For example:

  • Increase bids on high-margin or high-conversion products
  • Lower bids or pause products with low inventory
  • Separate promotional items so they receive dedicated budgets and messaging

Performance Max and Shopping campaigns require even more attention. In my experience, it’s common to see PMax concentrate budget on a narrow slice of the catalog while other SKUs receive little to no impression share.

If that pattern doesn’t match your merchandising goals, segmenting high-priority product groups and tightening feed signals usually helps. If you don’t segment campaigns thoughtfully or monitor product-level performance, the algorithm may stall.

Consider using a mix of Standard Shopping and PMax when you need more control over key seasonal categories. Standard Shopping can provide the structure you need, while PMax can help with scaling.

Just make sure they serve different roles to avoid internal competition.

Campaign structure should work hand-in-hand with inventory strategy. The goal is to ensure your best products get visibility when demand spikes and that you don’t waste spend on items you can’t fulfill.

4. Work With Internal Teams During Peak Demand

In normal months, PPC managers can operate with relative independence.

During major retail seasons, that approach can create problems.

Demand fluctuation affects far more than media spend. It touches logistics, merchandising, pricing, site operations, and customer experience.

For example, if marketing pushes a product heavily but the warehouse can’t fulfill orders quickly enough, conversion rates could drop, and customer complaints can arise.

If a PPC offer launches a “50% off” ad before the site reflects the discount, you’ll likely pay for unqualified clicks or see conversions drop.

If inventory runs low but product promotions continue, you’ll burn budget on products that can’t convert.

During peak periods, cross-functional alignment is necessary for optimal performance. Be sure to establish regular communication with:

  • Inventory and fulfillment (stock levels, restock timelines, shipping delays).
  • Merchandising (featured products, bundles, hero SKUs).
  • Pricing and promotions (exact discount timing and margin impact).
  • Creative (messaging changes, urgency vs. value).
  • Site operations (traffic capacity, potential downtime, landing page readiness).
  • Customer service (policy changes, support volume expectations).

Even short daily syncs with these teams can prevent costly mistakes. Something as simple as a delayed shipment or pricing error can change campaign performance within hours.

When teams are aligned, marketing decisions become less reactive and more strategic.

Also, be prepared to change messaging quickly. If shipping times increase, adjust ad copy or landing page expectations. If a product is selling out fast, highlight “limited availability” or shift spend to similar in-stock alternatives.

5. Plan For Post-Peak Performance And Future Seasons

When the surge ends, the work isn’t over.

The post-peak period can feel unstable. After peak periods, I’ve experienced many advertisers observe a short re-balancing window: Conversion intent normalizes faster than bidding pressure does. This is where many marketers overreact and cut budgets too aggressively, causing campaigns to lose momentum.

Instead, treat the cooldown as a transition phase. Reset any seasonality bid adjustments. Reevaluate ROAS or CPA targets. Gradually adjust budgets to align with current demand, rather than slashing them immediately.

Shift campaign focus to retention and LTV where appropriate. Remarketing, post-purchase offers, loyalty initiatives, and subscription promotions can help turn seasonal traffic into long-term value. The conversion window doesn’t always end when the sale does.

This is also the most important time to analyze. Don’t wait weeks to reflect; be sure to capture key insights while the data is fresh.

When analyzing, ask questions like:

  • Which categories or SKUs exceeded (or missed) expectations?
  • Were budgets or bids too slow to adjust?
  • Did any campaigns cap too early in the day?
  • Were there inventory issues that hurt performance?
  • How did different bidding strategies respond under pressure?
  • What messaging/ad copy resonated best with users?
  • What would you start earlier or stop entirely next time?

Document everything. Don’t assume you’ll remember next year.

Seasonality repeats, but consumer behavior and the corresponding algorithm responses evolve every year. The teams that improve each cycle are the ones who treat post-peak as planning time, not recovery time.

Then, build your playbook for the next season. Define earlier ramp-up timing if needed. Establish bidding and budget frameworks. Create inventory and messaging coordination workflows.

When the next seasonality surge comes, you’ll be ready to scale strategically.

Sustain Stability Through Every Season

Managing demand fluctuation is more about staying in control when the market becomes unpredictable. That requires preparation, data awareness, cross-team coordination, flexible bidding and budgeting, and deliberate post-peak analysis.

Demand shifts will always happen. The difference between chaotic seasons and successful ones comes down to how well you anticipate, adapt, and learn from each cycle.

The marketers who treat seasonality as a workflow system (not an event) are the ones who can turn volatility into growth.

More Resources:


Featured Image: Roman Samborskyi/Shutterstock

Should Advertisers Be Worried About AI In PPC?

One scroll through LinkedIn and you’d struggle not to see a post, video, or ad about AI, whatever the industry you work in.

For digital marketing, it’s completely taken over, and it has woven itself into nearly every aspect of day-to-day life, especially within PPC advertising.

From automated bidding to AI-generated ad creative, platforms like Google Ads and Microsoft Advertising have been doubling down on this for years.

Naturally, this shift raises questions and concerns among advertisers, with one side claiming it’s out of control and taking over, the other side boasting about time saved and game-changing results, and then you’ve got the middle ground trying to figure out exactly what the impact is and where it is going.

It’s a difficult topic to answer with a simple yes or no, with so many opinions and platforms for sharing them; it’s everywhere, and although certainly not a topic that is in its infancy, it does feel that way in 2025.

In this article, we’ll explore how AI is used in PPC today, the benefits it offers, the concerns it brings, and how advertisers can best adapt.

What Role Does AI Play In PPC Today?

The majority of advertisers are already using some form of AI-driven tool in their workflow, with 74% of marketers reported using AI tools last year, up from just 21% in 2022.

Then, within the platforms, PPC campaigns are heavily invested in artificial intelligence, both above and below the hood. Key areas being:

Bid Automation

Gone are the days of manual bidding on hundreds of keywords or product groups (in most cases).

Google’s and Microsoft’s Automated Bidding use machine learning to set optimal bids for each auction based on the likelihood to convert.

These algorithms analyze countless signals (device, location, time of day, user behavior patterns, etc.) in real-time to adjust bids far more precisely than a human could.

In this scenario, the role of the advertiser is to feed these bidding strategies with the best possible data to then take forward in making decisions.

Then at a strategic level, advertisers will need to determine the structure, targeting, goals, etc, and this is where Google has further pushed AI into the hands of PPC teams.

From Google’s side, it’s an indication of trust that the AI will find relevant matches and handle bids for them, and I have seen this work incredibly well, but I’ve also seen this work terribly, and it’s all context-dependent.

Dynamic Creative & Assets

Responsive Search Ads (RSAs) allow advertisers to input multiple headlines and descriptions, which Google’s AI then mixes and matches to serve the best-performing combinations for each query.

Over time, the algorithm learns which messages resonate most.

Google has even introduced generative AI tools to create ad assets (headlines, images, etc.) automatically based on your website content and campaign goals.

Similarly, Microsoft’s platform now offers a Copilot feature that can generate ad copy variations, images, and suggest keywords using AI.

Of all the AI-related changes in Google Ads, in my experience, this was one that advertisers welcomed the most, as it is a time saver and created a nice way to test different messaging, call to actions, etc.

Keyword Match Types

The recipe for Google Ads in 2025 that advertisers are given from Google is to blend broad match and automated bidding.

Why is this? According to Google, machine learning attempts to understand user intent and match ads to queries that aren’t exact matches but are deemed relevant.

Think about it this way: You’ve done your research for your new search campaign, built out your ad groups, and are confident that you have covered all bases.

How will this change over time, and how can you guarantee you’re not missing relevant auctions? This is rhetoric Google runs with for broad match as it leans into the stats with billions of searches per day, with ~15% being brand new queries, pushing advertisers to loosen targeting to allow machine learning to operate constraint-free.

There is certainly value in this, and it’s reported that 62% of advertisers using Google’s Smart Bidding have made broad match their primary keyword match type, a strategy that was very much a no-go for years; however, handing all control over to AI doesn’t fully align with what matters most (profitability, LTV, margins, etc) and there has to be a middle ground.

Audience Targeting And Optimization

Both Google and Microsoft leverage AI to build and target audiences.

Campaign types like Performance Max are almost entirely AI-driven; they automatically allocate your budget across search, display, YouTube, Gmail, etc., to find conversions wherever they occur.

Advertisers simply provide creative assets, search themes, conversion goals, etc, and the AI does the rest.

The better quality the data inputted, the better the performance to a large degree.

Of all the AI topics for Google Ads, PMax is very much debated within the industry, but it’s telling that 63% of PPC experts plan to increase spend on Google’s feed-based Performance Max campaigns this year.

Recommendations, Auto Applies, And Budget Optimization

If you work within/around PPC, you’ll have seen, closed, shouted at, and maybe on a rare occasion, taken action off the back of these.

The platforms continuously analyze account performance and suggest optimizations.

Some are basic, but others (like budget reallocation or shifting to different bid strategies) are powered by machine learning insights across thousands of accounts.

As good as these may sound, they are only as good as the data being fed into the account and lack context, which, in some cases, if applied, can be detrimental to account performance.

In summary, advertisers have had to embrace AI to a large extent in their day-to-day campaign management.

But with this embrace comes a natural question: Is all this AI making things better or worse for advertisers, or is it just a way for ad platforms to grow their market share?

What Are The Benefits Of AI In PPC?

AI offers some clear advantages for paid search marketers.

When used properly, AI can make campaigns more efficient, effective, and can save a great deal of time once spent on monotonous tasks.

Here are some key benefits:

Efficiency And Time Savings

One of the biggest wins is automation of labor-intensive tasks.

AI can analyze massive data sets and adjust bids or ads 24/7, far faster than any human.

This frees up marketers to focus on strategy instead of repetitive tasks.

Mundane tasks such as bid adjustments, budget pacing, creative rotation, etc, can be picked up by AI to allow PPC teams to focus on high-level strategy and analysis, looking at the bigger picture.

It’s certainly not a case of set-and-forget, but the balance has shifted.

AI can now take care of the executional heavy lifting, while humans guide the strategy, interpret the nuance, and make the judgment calls that machines can’t.

Structural Management

A clear benefit of AI in many facets of paid search is the consolidation of account structures.

Large advertisers might have millions of keywords or hundreds of ads, which at one time were manually mapped out and managed group by group.

With automated bidding strategies adjusting bids in real time, serving the best possible creative and doubling down on the keywords, product groups, and SKUs that work, PPC teams are able to whittle down overly complex account structures into consolidated themes where they can feed their data.

Campaigns like Performance Max scale across channels automatically, finding additional inventory (like YouTube or Display) without the advertiser manually creating separate campaigns, further making life easier for advertisers who choose to use them.

Optimization Of Ad Creative And Testing

Rather than running a handful of ad variations, responsive ads powered by AI can test dozens of combinations of headlines and descriptions instantly.

The algorithm learns which messages work best for each search term or audience segment.

Additionally, new generative AI features can create ad copy or image variations you hadn’t considered, expanding creative possibilities, but please check these before launch, and if set to auto apply, maybe remove and review first, as these outputs can be interesting.

The overarching goal from the ad platforms is to work towards solving the problem many teams face regarding getting creatives produced and fast, which they do to an extent, but there’s still a way to go.

Audience Targeting And Personalization

AI can identify user patterns to target more precisely than manual bidding.

Google’s algorithms might learn that certain search queries or user demographics are more likely to convert and automatically adjust bids or show specific ad assets to those segments, and as these change over time, so do the bidding strategies.

This kind of micro-optimization of who sees which ad was very hard to do manually, and has great limitations.

In essence, the machine finds your potential customers using complex signals that adjust bids in real time based on the user vs. setting a bid for a term/product group to serve in every ad set, essentially treating each auction the same.

What Are The Concerns Of AI In PPC?

Despite all the promise, it’s natural for advertisers to have some worries about the march of AI in paid search.

Handing over control to algorithms and black box systems comes with its challenges.

In practice, there have been hiccups and valid concerns that explain why some in the industry are cautious.

Loss Of Control And Transparency

A common gripe is that as AI takes over, advertisers lose visibility into the “why” behind performance changes.

Take PMax, for example. These fully automated campaigns provide only limited data when compared to a segmented structure, making it hard to understand what’s driving conversions and putting advertisers in a difficult position when feeding back performance to stakeholders who once had a wealth of data to dig through.

Nearly half of PPC specialists said that managing campaigns has become harder in the last two years because of the loss of insights and data due to automated campaign types like PMax, with one industry survey finding that trust in major ad platforms has declined over the past year, with Google experiencing a 54% net decline in trust sentiment.

Respondents cited the platforms’ prioritization of black box automation over giving users control as a key issue, with many feeling like they are flying partially blind, a huge worry considering budgets and importance of Google Ads as an advertising channel for millions of brands worldwide.

Performance And Efficiency Trade-Offs

I’ve mentioned this a couple of times so far, but as with most AI in the context of Google Ads, the data being fed into the platform determines how well the AI performs, and adopting AI in PPC does not result in immediate performance improvements for every account, however hard Google pushes this narrative.

Algorithms optimize for the goal you set (e.g., achieve this ROAS), sometimes at the expense of other metrics like cost per conversion or return on investment (ROI).

Take broad match keywords combined with Smart Bidding; this might bring in more traffic, but some of that traffic could be low quality or not truly incremental, impacting the bottom line and how you manage your budgets.

To be taken with a pinch of salt due to context, however, an analysis of over 2,600 Google Ads accounts found that 72% of advertisers saw better return on ad spend (ROAS) with traditional exact match keyword targeting, whereas only ~26% of accounts achieved better ROAS using broad match automation.

Advertisers are rightly concerned that blindly following AI recommendations could lead to wasted spend on irrelevant clicks or diminishing returns.

Then, you have the learning period for automated strategies, which can also be costly (but necessary) where the algorithm might spend a lot figuring out what works, something not every business can afford.

Mistakes, Quality, And Brand Safety

AI isn’t infallible.

There have been instances of AI-generated ad copy that miss the mark or even violate brand guidelines.

For example, if you let generative AI create search ads, it might produce statements that are factually incorrect or not in the desired tone.

Having worked extensively in paid search for luxury fashion brands, the risk of AI producing off-brand creative and messaging is often a roadblock to getting on board with new campaign types.

In a Salesforce survey, 31% of marketing professionals cited accuracy and quality concerns with AI outputs as a barrier.

To add further complexity to this, many of the features, such as auto applies in Google Ads, are not the easiest to spot within the accounts and are dependent on the level of expertise within the team managing PPC; certain AI-generated assets or enhancements could be live without teams knowing, which can lead to friction within businesses with strict brand guidelines.

Over-Reliance And Skills Erosion

Another subtle worry is that marketers relying heavily on AI could see their own skills become redundant.

PPC professionals used to pride themselves on granular account optimization, but if the machine is doing everything, how will their jobs change?

A study by HubSpot found that over 57% of U.S. marketers feel pressure to learn AI tools or risk becoming irrelevant in their careers.

With PPC, all this means is that less and less time is spent within the accounts undertaking repetitive tasks, something that I’ve championed for years.

Every paid search team is different and is built from different levels of expertise; however, the true value that PPC teams bring shouldn’t be the intricacies of campaign management, it’s the understanding of the value their channel is driving and everything around this that influences performance.

So, Should Advertisers Be Worried About AI In PPC?

As with most topics in PPC (and most articles I write), there isn’t a simple yes or no answer, and it’s very much context dependent.

PPC advertisers shouldn’t panic; they should be aware, informed, and prepared, and this doesn’t mean knowing the exact ins and outs of AI models, far from it.

Rather than asking if you trust it or not, or if you really should give up the reins of manual campaign management, ask yourself how you can use AI to make your job easier and to drive better results for your business/clients.

Over my last decade and a half in performance marketing, working in-house, within independents, networks, and from running my own paid media agency, I’ve seen many trends come and go, each one shifting the role of the PPC team ever so slightly.

AI is certainly not a trend, and it’s fundamentally changing the world we live in, and within the PPC world, it’s changing the way we work, pushing advertisers to spend less time in the accounts than they once did, freeing up time to allocate to what really moves the needle when managing paid media.

In my opinion, this is a good thing, but there is definitely a balance that needs to be struck, and what this balance looks like is up to you and your teams.

More Resources:


Featured Image: Roman Samborskyi/Shutterstock

PPC Pulse: PMax Expands, Clarity Now Mandatory & AI Max Data Debate via @sejournal, @brookeosmundson

This week, the paid media world focused less on new tools and more on what’s changing beneath the surface.

Google expanded Performance Max into a new channel and offered long-awaited reporting visibility. Microsoft took a firm stance on brand safety by requiring Clarity across its publisher network. And one viral LinkedIn post questioned the effectiveness of Google’s newest “AI-powered” campaign model.

Each of these stories points to the same theme: Platforms are redefining what control and accountability mean for advertisers.

Performance Max Expands To Waze And Adds Channel Reporting

Google confirmed two changes for Performance Max campaigns.

The first notable update is that for PMax campaigns using “Store Visits” as a campaign goal, your business can now show up on Waze ads inventory. The business will show up as a “Promoted Places in Navigation” pin for users.

This update is for all advertisers in the United States, and no additional setup is required.

The second update is that Google rolled out Channel Reporting for all PMax campaigns. While this has been rolling out for a few months now, not every advertiser had this available.

Why Advertisers Should Pay Attention

Local intent now includes the navigation moment. If your brand depends on foot traffic, showing up while someone is driving near a location adds a fresh, real-world touchpoint.

The channel reporting update matters just as much. It helps shift PMax conversations from “trust the system” to “here’s where the system actually worked.”

In my opinion, this is progress on transparency and reach. It also adds variables you’ll be asked to explain.

The win isn’t “more placements.” The win is being able to connect surfaces to outcomes with fewer leaps of faith.

Microsoft Clarity Now Mandatory For Third-Party Publishers

Microsoft Ads Liaison, Navah Hopkins, shared an important announcement for all 3P publishers on Microsoft:

Screenshot taken by author, November 2025

In her post, she mentions that all Microsoft Ads clicks need to make sure those pages have Microsoft Clarity enabled.

Her post got attention from the PPC industry, where she clarified in the comments that an official announcement from Microsoft will be coming out shortly. All Microsoft Ads partners have already been notified via email.

The post also sparked some questions and potential confusion about how Microsoft Ads wouldn’t be charged if they weren’t running Clarity.

Andy Hawes asked:

Thanks for this Navah Hopkins, but when you say “Any Microsoft Advertising clicks that do not have Clarity will be filtered out and result in nonbillable impressions/clicks.” Are you suggesting that if you don’t run clarity then you’re Microsoft Ads won’t cost anything? I’m assuming that is not the case? So could you explain that part please?

Hopkins clarified during the exchange:

Screenshot taken by author, November 2025

Why Advertisers Should Pay Attention

Microsoft seems to be taking a quality stance, not just making a tracking footnote.

Based on the conversation on LinkedIn, Microsoft is tying billable media to verifiable on-site experience. In theory, that should reduce questionable placements and give brands greater confidence that their ads appear in environments that meet baseline standards.

I see this as Microsoft is trading raw reach for higher trust. Advertisers should expect fewer gray-area placements and stronger conversations with brand-safety teams.

It also nudges the market toward a new normal where “transparency” includes a window into on-site behavior, not just a placement report.

The Industry Reacts To AI Max Performance Data

AI Max was another hot topic on LinkedIn this past week.

Xavier Mantica shared four months of results comparing AI Max to traditional match types.

Screenshot taken by author, November 2025

His data showed AI Max at $100.37 per conversion versus $43.97-$61.65 for most non-AI setups (and $97.67 for phrase close variants). His view: AI Max behaves like broad match with a new label, expanding beyond intended relevance and driving up cost.

As of this writing, the post has 991 engagements with over 170 comments from the PPC industry.

How Advertisers Are Reacting

Looking at the comments, it appears that many PPC pros agree that AI Max isn’t living up to the hype that Google made it out to be when originally announced.

Collin Slatterly, Founder of Taikun, shared his skeptical optimism by not just dismissing AI Max entirely, but shared it may just not be ready for its full potential:

Give it a year, and it’ll probably be ready to deploy. Feels like PMax all over again.

One of the top comments to Xavier’s post came from Mike Ryan, who agreed after analyzing 250 campaigns of his own:

Screenshot taken by author, November 2025

There were others in the comments that had the opposite take of Xavier. Denis Capko replied in the comments, stating:

Screenshot taken by author, November 2025

Why Advertisers Should Pay Attention

This debate goes beyond one account. It reflects a wider tension between volume and control.

“AI increases conversions” is only persuasive if cost, relevance, and repeatability hold up under scrutiny.

While the comments seemed overly negative to AI Max, I see it as AI Max feels more like growing pains than failure.

Automation continues to move faster than the frameworks we use to evaluate it, and advertisers are still learning how to guide it effectively.

When data quality, conversion accuracy, and negative signals are strong, AI Max can deliver meaningful scale. But without clear visibility into how the system interprets intent, results can vary widely.

Posts like Xavier’s highlight the need for transparency as much as performance. Google also benefits from that same openness: It builds trust, helps advertisers use automation more responsibly, and ultimately makes the technology stronger for everyone.

Theme Of The Week: Accountability

The updates and discussions this past week all share one thread: accountability.

Google is expanding where automation can go, Microsoft is tightening the standards for who gets to monetize it, and advertisers are rethinking how much control they’re willing to trade for convenience.

As platforms lean further into automation, the real advantage won’t come from who adopts it first. It will come from who understands it best.

Are you confident in what your automation is doing, or just comfortable letting it run?

Top Stories Of The Week:

More Resources:


Featured Image: Roman Samborskyi/Shutterstock