Google Case Study Reveals Search Console Evolution Via APIs via @sejournal, @martinibuster

New Google case study shows how Search Console APIs allows data to be reviewed and manipulated within a CMS or a proprietary SEO dashboard. While the article is a case study, a call to action at the end of the article reveals how Google is using APIs to transform search console from a SaaS to a data stream that can be manipulated in the GUI of your choice.

Application Programming Interface (API)

API is a widely used technology that acts as a bridge between two applications that enables one to manipulate the other. It’s use is everywhere, particularly in WordPress where an API can allow a plugin to access and manipulate the website information contained in the database.

Wix Case Study

The collaboration between Google and Wix embedded Google’s Search Console APIs within the Wix dashboard, streamlining the SEO process for millions of Wix users globally.

Users benefit by gaining easy access to useful insights and functionalities of Google Search Console within the familiar Wix dashboard, keeping a unified experience within Wix without having to learn a different user interface.

Implementation and User Benefits

Wix’s integration strategy focused on leveraging Google APIs to enhance its own SEO tools that users are already familiar with. The process involved choosing and integrating specific Google functionalities that complement Wix’s user interface (dashboard UI), resulting in a more intuitive experience of Google’s search console features.

The case study reports that users who integrated search console APIs experienced an average increase in traffic of 15% over the course of one year.

Ecommerce sites experienced a 24% increase in Gross Product Value compared to Wix similar Wix ecommerce sites that did not use the search console API integrations.

According to the case study:

“So far, over 2 million Wix sites connected their Search Console account and submitted a sitemap to Google through the new integration. They also regularly used the new features, such as Site Inspection and Analytics Reports to troubleshoot indexing errors, fix them and get insights on resulting changes in performance. “

APIs Enables Evolution Of Search Console

The successful integration of Google’s APIs into Wix’s platform demonstrates the value of collaborations between Google and companies that offer content management systems, including webhosts that develop their own point and click web builders based on WordPress.

But another goal of the case study is to show how inhouse SEO tools and dashboards can integrate Google Search Console functionalities through the use of APIs.

It’s not until the end of the case study that Google discretely makes a call to action soliciting organizations to contact them through a web form or Twitter.

The article writes:

“If you’re a CMS and interested in collaborating with us, reach out using this form or through our social media.”

The call to action shows how the API is changing how Google’s search console data is accessed and pointing toward a trend where it’s less about signing in to search console to view data within Google’s user interface.

APIs already enable importing search console data into Screaming Frog to combine it with crawl data and of course there are WordPress plugins that can use it, too. The Wix case study shows a novel application that showcases the flexibility of how search console data can be used in the future beyond how it’s currently accessed.

Read Google’s Wix case study:

How Wix generated value for their users by integrating stats and functionality via Google APIs directly into the Wix UI

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Catalyst Labs

Google Maps Launches AI-Powered Local Business Search via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

Google is introducing an experimental feature in Google Maps that uses AI to help users discover local businesses that meet specific needs.

AI-Powered Discovery

The new feature utilizes large language models to analyze Google Maps’ database of over 250 million places, photos, ratings, reviews, and more.

After entering a conversational search query, Google Maps will suggest personalized recommendations for businesses, events, restaurants, and activities in the area.

For example, you can ask Maps to recommend “places with a vintage vibe in San Francisco,” and it will return suggestions like clothing boutiques, record stores, and flea markets.

The results are categorized with photos and review highlights to explain why they meet your criteria.

You can refine your search by asking follow-up questions like “How about lunch?,” which will return recommendations for eateries with a vintage ambiance. Suggested places can also be saved into lists for future reference.

According to Google, the technology is helpful for managing spontaneous or changing itineraries. You can ask for “activities for a rainy day” and immediately get indoor options tailored to the current weather and location.

The feature also takes group dynamics into account. Families can request “options for kids” to see curated suggestions for child-friendly places like children’s museums, arcades, and indoor playgrounds.

Early Access Experiment With Local Guides

For this early preview, Google is soliciting feedback from a select group of Local Guides. Their input will help shape the AI technology before a wider rollout.

The launch represents Google’s latest effort to integrate generative AI into Maps and transform how users find and explore local businesses. By combining large language models with Maps’ expansive database, Google aims to provide ultra-personalized recommendations to match any need or interest.

Implications For Local Search

The implications for local search and customer discovery could be significant, potentially driving more qualified traffic to niche businesses or lesser-known attractions and events.

As Google continues honing its AI capabilities, businesses may need to optimize online information in new ways to rank for conversational searches and take advantage of the technology.


Featured Image: Screenshot from blog.google/products/maps/google-maps-generative-ai-local-guides/, February 2024. 

5 Takeaways From Google’s Revised SEO Starter Guide via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Google completely revamped their SEO Starter Guide in a way that shows five ways to create a focused webpage that inspires trust and a positive user experience.

1. Topic-Rich Links

Being useful to readers is a practical approach to web content. The recent Google anti-trust trial revealed that user interactions are a strong ranking influence in Google’s algorithm that is known as Navboost. A patent that may be about Navboost describes how user interactions create a document-level score that can help a site rank better. That means creating a document that encourages positive user interaction signals may help a site rank better (read about what may be the Navboost patent).

The old version of the document had sentence-level internal links to other webpages but they weren’t always semantically relevant within the context and didn’t use anchor text that adequately described the linked-webpage.

Here’s an example of how a link to a site map explainer webpage was improved.

The old version linked to the explainer with this entire sentence:

“Learn more about how to build and submit a sitemap.”

The new version links to the same page like this (linked words in bold):

“If you’re open to a little technical challenge, you could also submit a sitemap—which is a file that contains all the URLs on your site that you care about.”

Topic-rich internal links are a useful way to create an internal link to another webpage that is useful to readers because the context of the link is the topic which makes more sense than linking to another webpage that lacks the context. .

2. Orderly Page Structure

The most obvious change is how much shorter the starter guide is compared to the old version. The original webpage contained approximately 8,639 words. The updated document contains about 4,058 words. The new version of the SEO starter guide is 53% smaller than the original one.

Further, the original contained 92 heading elements, from H1 to H5. The updated document contains 27 heading elements ranging from H1 to H3.

The interesting part is that the starter guide shrunk by 53%, but the use of heading elements declined by 71%. That means that if the rate of heading use had stayed the same, the updated document would have contained a relatively equal percentage of headings (53%) but it didn’t stay the same.

The actual percentage of change was 71% less, which represents and absolute difference of 18% but is almost twice that in relative terms, which is the most important measure. The relative difference in use of headings reveals that Google used 34% less headings in the new version.

These changes have the effect of giving the entire document cohesiveness, with all the parts logically flowing one into the other.

3. Topic-Focused

The reason why there are less headings used in the revised SEO starter guide is because it no longer covers granular sub-sub-sub-topics. The old version used 31 H4 heading elements and 12 H5 heading elements.

A consequence of the new webpage structure is that the updated version is more tightly focused on the topic, giving the absolute necessary information while providing readers with the option of following a contextually relevant link to another webpage with more information.

The shorter format makes it easier for a reader to understand the topic in its entirety as one focused-document.

The number of topics covered in the new webpage is roughly the same as the old webpage (new = 11 topics/old = 12 topics). The main difference is in the tighter focus on the topic.

These are the main topics of the new webpage:

[H2] How does Google Search work?
[H2] How long until I see impact in search results?
[H2] Help Google find your content
[H2] Organize your site
[H2] Make your site interesting and useful
[H2] Influence how your site looks in Google Search
[H2] Add images to your site, and optimize them
[H2] Optimize your videos
[H2] Promote your website
[H2] Things we believe you shouldn't focus on
[H2] Next steps

Here are the main topics of the previous webpage version:

[H2] Who is this guide for?
[H2] Getting started
[H2] Help Google find your content
[H2] Tell Google which pages you don't want crawled
[H2] Help Google (and users) understand your content
[H2] Manage your appearance in Google Search results
[H2] Organize your site hierarchy
[H2] Optimize your content
[H2] Optimize your images
[H2] Make your site mobile-friendly
[H2] Promote your website
[H2] Analyze your search performance and user behavior

Only five topics were carried over to the new starter guide:

    1. Help Google find your content
    2. Organize your site
    3. Make your site interesting and useful (subtopic in old version)
    4. Avoid distracting advertisements (subtopic in old version)
    5. Promote your website

These are the discarded as main topics:

[H2] Who is this guide for?
[H2] Getting started
[H2] Tell Google which pages you don't want crawled
[H2] Help Google (and users) understand your content
[H2] Manage your appearance in Google Search results
[H2] Optimize your content
[H2] Optimize your images
[H2] Make your site mobile-friendly
[H2] Analyze your search performance and user behavior
[H2] Additional Resources

4. Concise Is Sometimes Better Than Comprehensive

The context of reading an article on a mobile device has completely changed how content is consumed. Content is consumed on a need-to-know basis. Pre-mobile, it was impossible to look something up on the Internet without having to get up and walk to the nearest desktop computer or laptop. Now, whatever information is needed, no matter how trivial, is just a few clicks away and what’s needed isn’t always a comprehensive article.

Leaving aside the convenience of anytime/anywhere content, it’s inconvenient to scroll over a hundred times to read a long article.

What the new webpage accomplishes is a compromise of providing a precisely on-topic webpage that is also comprehensive without being unrealistically long.

5. Similar Image Elements

Lastly, the images on the new webpage share similar colors and design. The old version had colors that varied widely, with one that’s yellow, another bright red, another had photos in it. Many of the images felt like they were players from different teams, like teammates wearing different uniforms.

Even if you’re using stock images, picking images from the same artist will help promote a sense of cohesiveness to the webpage.

The new webpage, because the images feature similar colors, makes the entire webpage more focused and confers a professionalism which in turn can inspire trust.

Takeaways

There are probably more takeaways but these are what stand out for me:

1. Topic-Rich Links
Enables a concise reading experience and provides links where they make sense for a reader.

2. Orderly Page Structure
Topic order provides a logical progression from one topic to the next, like doors opening onto the next room one after the other in a linear manner, which makes it easier to consume the entire document as a whole.

3. Keep Tightly Focused On The Topic
Off-topic segues are distracting. Keeping to the topic creates a better reading experience and might increase comprehension of the overall topic.

4. Concise Is Sometimes Better Than Comprehensive
Too much information can be confusing, especially when it’s more than is needed for a given topic.

5. Similar Image Elements
Attention to details like the images and graphics within the webpage confers a professional presentation which may encourage trust. Even when using stock images, keeping to the same artist portfolio will enforce visual similarity.

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Kues

Google Retires Cached Site Links, Pushing Users Towards Internet Archive via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

Google has officially retired the “cached” link feature that allowed users to access archived backups of websites.

The cached links were a longtime staple of Google Search, functioning as a way to view unavailable or changed webpages.

“It was meant for helping people access pages when way back, you often couldn’t depend on a page loading. These days, things have greatly improved. So, it was decided to retire it,” said Google Search Liaison Danny Sullivan in a statement confirming the change.

Sullivan mentioned the possibility of Google partnering with the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine to show historical versions of web pages in Google’s “About This Result” feature. However, he clarified that these discussions are ongoing and any collaboration is unconfirmed.

For website owners and developers who want to see how Google’s crawler interprets their pages, Sullivan recommended using the URL Inspector tool in Google Search Console, which remains available as a resource.

The Cost Of Data Storage

Previously, cached links were accessible via a dropdown menu next to every search result. As Google’s web crawler indexed the internet, it created backups of websites – amounting to an archive of much of the internet’s content.

With Google’s recent focus on cost savings, deleting this cache data will free up computing resources.

The cached link feature has been sporadically disappearing over the past few months. Currently, no cache links are visible in Google Search results. All Google support pages regarding cached links have also been removed.

The Internet Archive’s Increasing Role

With Google retiring cached links, archiving websites largely falls to the Internet Archive and its Wayback Machine.

Browser extensions like the Official Wayback Machine Extension allow users to view archived copies of sites easily.

The Wayback Machine Extension provides features to save webpages, restore missing pages, read digitized books, share archived links on social media, and more. Most features work without needing an account.

Building Personal Cache Links

An alternative exists for users who still wish to access cached pages. Typing “cache:” plus a URL into Google Search can still reveal some cached versions.

Additionally, you can create your own cache links by appending a website URL to “https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:”

Looking Ahead

Google’s decision to discontinue its web caching service signals a change in how online content is stored and made available over time. With Google removing this feature, the responsibility for preserving old versions of webpages and keeping Internet history intact falls more heavily on groups like the Internet Archive.

As the online world keeps developing rapidly, entities like the Archive that intentionally maintain caches of websites and data will only grow more important for retaining a record of the internet’s past.


Featured Image: Sharaf Maksumov/Shutterstock

Could This Be The Navboost Patent? via @sejournal, @martinibuster

There’s been a lot of speculation of what Navboost is but to my knowledge nobody has pinpointed an adequate patent that could be the original Navboost patent. This patent from 2004 closely aligns with Navboost

So I took the few clues we have about it and identified a couple likely patents.

The clues I was working with are that Google Software Engineer Amit Singhal was involved with Navboost and had a hand in inventing it. Another clue is that Navboost dated to 2005. Lastly, the court documents indicate that Navboost was updated later on so there may be other patents in there about that, which we’ll get to at some point but not in this article.

So I deduced that if Amit Singhal was the inventor then there would be a patent with his name on it and indeed there is, dating from 2004.

Out of all the patents I saw, the two most interesting were these:

  • Systems and methods for correlating document topicality and popularity 2004
  • Interleaving Search Results 2007

This article will deal with the first one, Systems and methods for correlating document topicality and popularity dating from 2004, which aligns with the known timeline of Navboost dating to 2005.

Patent Does Not Mention Clicks

An interesting quality of this patent is that it doesn’t mention clicks and I suspect that people looking for the Navboost patent may have ignored it because it doesn’t mention clicks.

But the patent discusses concepts related to user interactions and navigational patterns which are references to clicks.

Instances Where User Clicks Are Implied In The Patent

Document Selection and Retrieval:
The patent describes a process where a user selects documents (which can be inferred as clicking on them) from search results. These selections are used to determine the documents’ popularity.

Mapping Documents to Topics:
After documents are selected by users (through clicks), they are mapped to one or more topics. This mapping is a key part of the process, as it associates documents with specific areas of interest or subjects.

User Navigational Patterns:
The patent frequently refers to user navigational patterns, which include how users interact with documents, such as the documents they choose to click on. These patterns are used to compute popularity scores for the documents.

It’s clear that user clicks are a fundamental part of how the patent proposes to assess the popularity of documents.

By analyzing which documents users choose to interact with, the system can assign popularity scores to these documents. These scores, in combination with the topical relevance of the documents, are then used to enhance the accuracy and relevance of search engine results.

Patent: User Interactions Are A Measure Of Popularity

The patent US8595225 makes implicit references to “user clicks” in the context of determining the popularity of documents. Heck, popularity is so important to the patent that it’s in the name of the patent: Systems and methods for correlating document topicality and popularity

User clicks, in this context, refers to the interactions of users with various documents, such as web pages. These interactions are a critical component in establishing the popularity scores for these documents.

The patent describes a method where the popularity of a document is inferred from user navigational patterns, which can only be clicks.

I’d like to stop here and mention that Matt Cutts has discussed in a video that Popularity and PageRank are two different things. Popularity is about what users tend to prefer and PageRank is about authority as evidenced by links.

Matt defined popularity:

“And so popularity in some sense is a measure of where people go whereas PageRank is much more a measure of reputation.”

That definition from about 2014 fits what this patent is talking about in terms of popularity being about where people go.

See Matt Cutts Explains How Google Separates Popularity From True Authority

Watch the YouTube Video: How does Google separate popularity from authority?

How The Patent Uses Popularity Scores

The patent describes multiple ways that it uses popularity scores.

Assigning Popularity Scores:
The patent discusses assigning popularity scores to documents based on user interactions such as the frequency of visits or navigation patterns (Line 1).

Per-Topic Popularity:
It talks about deriving per-topic popularity information by correlating the popularity data associated with each document to specific topics (Line 5).

Popularity Scores in Ranking:
The document describes using popularity scores to order documents among one or more topics associated with each document (Line 13).

Popularity in Document Retrieval:
In the context of document retrieval, the patent outlines using popularity scores for ranking documents (Line 27).

Determining Popularity Based on User Navigation:
The process of determining the popularity score for each document, which may involve using user navigational patterns, is also mentioned (Line 37).

These instances demonstrate the patent’s focus on incorporating the popularity of documents, as determined by user interaction (clicks), into the process of ranking and correlating them to specific topics.

The approach outlined in the patent suggests a more dynamic and user-responsive method of determining the relevance and importance of documents in search engine results.

Navboost Assigns Scores To Documents

I’m going to stop here to also mention that this patent mentions assigning scores to documents, which is how Google executive Eric Lehman described in the trial how Navboost worked:

Speaking about the situation where there wasn’t a lot of click data, Lehman testified:

“And so I think Navboost does kind of the natural thing, which is, in the face of that kind of uncertainty, you take gentler measures. So you might modify the score of a document but more mildly than if you had more data.”

That’s another connection to Navboost in that the trial description and the patent describe using User Interaction for scoring webpages.

The more this patent is analyzed, the more it looks like what the trial documents described as Navboost.

Read the patent here:

Systems and methods for correlating document topicality and popularity

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Sabelskaya

WordPress Website Builder Vulnerability Affects Nearly 1 Million Websites via @sejournal, @martinibuster

A significant vulnerability has been patched in the Website Builder by SeedProd that has over 900,000 installations. This vulnerability, present in versions up to and including 6.15.21, poses a risk for unauthorized data modification on WordPress sites.

Vulnerability Details: Missing Capability Check

The vulnerability that was discovered is called a missing capability check within the ‘seedprod_lite_new_lpage’ function.

Capabilities are specific actions that users or roles are allowed to perform. A capability check is an important security feature in WordPress for managing permissions and access controls. They determine if a user has the authority to perform specific action.

It’s similar to a role check in that a role check verifies the user’s role (like administrator, editor, etc.), while a capability check verifies whether the user has specific permissions. A capability check provides a more granular control over permissions compared to a role check.

The missing capability check allows unauthenticated attackers to potentially modify the content of various pages created using the plugin, such as coming-soon or maintenance pages. The absence of this security feature exposes websites to risks of data tampering.

Unauthorized Data Modification

Unauthorized modification of data is a serious security issue. It arises from a flaw where unauthorized individuals can alter data, leading to potential exploits. Addressing this kind of vulnerability in the Website Builder plugin is highly recommended.

Severity and Impact: High-Risk Exposure

The vulnerability is rated 8.2 out of a scale of 1- 10, with a severity rating classified as ‘High’ according to the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS). The high rating indicates how serious the potential impact is.

This vulnerability is so new that there is currently no entry in the National Vulnerability Database for the assigned CVE number CVE-2024-1072.

However, Wordfence WordPress security researchers emphasized the seriousness of the Website Builder by SeedProd vulnerability:

“This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the contents of coming-soon, maintenance pages, login and 404 pages set up with the plugin.”

Recommendation For Website Builder Plugin Users

The publisher of the Website Builder by SeedProd has responded by releasing an updated version, 6.15.22, which addresses this vulnerability. The update includes a security nonce to mitigate the risk, and users of the plugin are strongly advised to update immediately to secure their website against attacks.

Regarding the nonce, WordPress explains what it is:

A nonce is a “number used once” to help protect URLs and forms from certain types of misuse, malicious or otherwise.

…They help protect against several types of attacks…”

Read the announcement by Wordfence:

Website Builder by SeedProd — Theme Builder, Landing Page Builder, Coming Soon Page, Maintenance Mode <= 6.15.21 – Missing Authorization via seedprod_lite_new_lpag

Read the official SeedProd Changelog

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Nikulina Tatiana

YouTube Announces 4 New Studio Features For Creators via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

YouTube unveiled several new features for YouTube Studio offering creators more insights and customization for their channels.

1. Enhanced Research Tab Coming To Desktop

Last year, YouTube Studio added an improved research tab on mobile, including content gaps for Shorts.

The research tab gives creators a summary of what viewers are searching for on YouTube. Content gaps highlight video ideas and topics that currently need more quality results on the platform.

YouTube has now brought the enhanced research tab to the desktop version of Studio. The refreshed design highlights data, including top queries, rising searches, and potential gaps in content quality.

YouTube said it has improved the algorithm that detects these content gaps to provide creators with higher-likelihood opportunities tailored to their niche and audience.

2. Community Clips Now Publicly Shareable

Many viewers discover short clips cropped from longer YouTube videos on external platforms like Reddit and Discord. These snippets often go viral elsewhere but aren’t easily discovered on YouTube.

Now, creators can activate a “Community Clips” section on their YouTube channel. This will publicly showcase up to five top clips of their videos made by viewers, organized by the most popular first.

YouTube believes making these clips discoverable directly on the platform will drive more viewership and engagement. Clips featured on a channel also provide another potential revenue opportunity for creators by driving viewership of the full video.

3. New Analytics Offer More Insights On Playlists

YouTube is adding more metrics and insights for playlists.

A new playlist analytics section in YouTube Studio allows a side-by-side comparison of top playlists with grouped data on the videos within each one.

This includes stats like total views, watch time, traffic sources, and more.

These additional metrics aim to help creators better attribute views, watch time, and traffic to playlists themselves. YouTube says it’s similar to the analytics groups in advanced mode but specialized for playlist-level insights.

4. Scheduled Publishing For Members-Only Content

A new option will let YouTube creators schedule members-only videos to automatically publish publicly at a later date.

This means creators can upload content and designate it as members-only while choosing a date for public release. Members will get notifications at both publish times.

YouTube hopes this improvement will streamline workflows around member perks and early access.

In Summary

The updates announced offer more control and insights in YouTube Studio.

With the research tab, creators can tap into more relevant search data to inspire topical content.

The new community clips feature lets creators showcase engaging viewer highlights. And the scheduled publishing and playlist analytics provide more ways to optimize content and evaluate performance.

For any YouTube creator looking to grow their channel, these features can help make that easier.


Featured Image: photosince/Shutterstock

Google Updates Core Web Vitals With Interaction To Next Paint (INP) via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

Google has announced that its new Interaction to Next Paint (INP) metric will officially replace First Input Delay (FID) as a Core Web Vital on March 12.

INP measures when a user interacts with a page (e.g., clicking a button) to when the browser can render the changed pixels to the screen. It aims to capture aspects of interactivity that FID didn’t.

Evolving Web Metrics

FID, which measured the time to first paint after a user’s first interaction, was introduced in 2018 as part of Google’s Web Vitals initiative. Web Vitals provides metrics to help web developers optimize critical aspects of the user experience.

Over time, Google realized FID’s limitations in assessing interactivity, leading to INP’s introduction as an experimental metric in May 2022. After a transition period as a ‘pending metric,’ Google has confirmed that INP will officially replace FID in March.

Preparing For Change

As the INP transition approaches, developers should verify if their website’s INP meets the “good” threshold, which reflects performance at the 75th percentile of page loads.

For sites not currently meeting the “good” INP threshold, Google recommends taking these steps to optimize for the transition:

Evaluate current INP performance using tools like PageSpeed Insights and Chrome’s User Experience Report.

Diagnose issues slowing down INP, like long JavaScript tasks, too much main thread activity, or a large DOM.

Optimize problematic areas following Google’s optimization guides. This may involve streamlining JavaScript, reducing input delay, simplifying the DOM structure, or refining CSS selectors.

Broader Implications For Web Development

Google’s implementation of INP as a Core Web Vital could impact web development and user experience in several ways:

  • INP scores may influence websites’ search engine rankings and user engagement, as Google uses Core Web Vitals in its ranking algorithm.
  • Web development practices may evolve to focus more on optimizing interaction readiness, which could require application architecture and code changes.
  • Performance monitoring tools and strategies may need to be updated to track and analyze the new INP metric.

In Summary

As Google transitions to the INP metric in March, web developers should evaluate their site’s performance and take steps to optimize areas impacting interactivity.

With interactivity becoming a more significant factor in search rankings and user engagement, developers should prepare now to ensure a smooth changeover.


Featured Image: salarko/Shutterstock

Google’s ‘Circle To Search’ Now Rolling Out To Select Android Phones via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

Google has announced the rollout of a new search feature called “Circle to Search” that allows users to quickly look up information on their mobile devices with simple gestures like circling, highlighting, or scribbling.

The feature is launching globally on the new Pixel 8 and 8 Pro phones and the Samsung Galaxy S24 series.

With Circle to Search, you can search for more details on anything you see while browsing the web or social media.

You can find related information without switching apps or typing a search query by long-pressing the home button and circling or scribbling an item.

In a blog post, Google outlines five key ways Circle to Search can be used.

1. Shopping For Items Seen Online

You can circle or scribble over images of products to find shopping options from across the web.

This allows easy price comparisons and purchasing of items spotted on social media or in videos.

2. Looking Up Definitions

Words or phrases can be highlighted to pull up definitions and relevant background information without leaving the app you’re currently in.

3. Travel Inspiration

Interesting buildings or landmarks spotted in videos or posts can be circled to identify them and get more details that may inspire travel plans.

4. Comparing Options

Names of restaurants, stores, or other options mentioned in texts or chats can be highlighted to view information like menus, reviews, and locations to compare choices.

5. Asking Complex Questions

Circle to Search uses AI to provide an overview, answering broader questions about trending topics or items that have sparked curiosity.

In Summary

Google’s Circle to Search offers an intriguing new way to look up information while browsing on their mobile devices.

For content creators and SEO professionals, this feature presents an opportunity to optimize written and visual content to be more discoverable by gesture searches.

As Circle to Search rolls out more broadly, it will be interesting to see how it shapes search behavior and the strategies used to meet evolving user needs. For now, developing mobile-friendly content anticipating people’s desire for quick access to knowledge could provide a competitive advantage.