Google On Traffic Metric & SEO via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Google’s recent Search Off the Record podcast discussed the important details of SEO, including a thought provoking segment about how SEOs can benefit from realign their thoughts about traffic with other possibly more important goals.

Traffic As A Measure Of Success?

One of the most misinformed things that search marketers do is measure their success by citing traffic statistics. We’ve all seen the posts on Facebook or the articles on blogs, where a search marketer relates how they did X for a client and traffic exploded exponentially within months.

Link builders use traffic as a metric of success, content writers do it, SEOs do it.

The question that goes through my mind when I see that is, well, what effect did that have on sales or ad clicks?

Because if earnings remain flat then the traffic increase probably doesn’t matter and probably neither did the SEO work done for that traffic.

Ask any Pay Per Click expert or any affiliate marketer about the importance of conversions versus traffic and the response is clear: conversions are everything, not traffic.

Adam J Humphreys, CEO of search marketing and design consultancy Making 8 (LinkedIn profile) said this about success metrics:

“I focused on analytics early on and learned the language of business which is ROAS. This is all executives care about other than awareness.

Our job is to grow their business first as well as awareness second.

Many don’t know how to measure attribution from SEO.

Things like form fills and calls are almost always unmeasured and unreported. Clients get super excited when I talk about this because it’s almost like nobody ever cared about their success.”

What Google Says About SEO & Traffic

Martin Splitt asked the question about the business impact of traffic.

Martin asked:

“…when you say traffic drops, what does that mean to you? Is it impressions?

Are you going to Search Console and click on the Performance report and you just look at the impressions going down or clicks?

Or do you actually measure a real business impact? Like you’re selling only half as many things as you used to sell last month?”

John Mueller added his thoughts on the topic. He tried to explain why SEOs don’t focus on return on investment (ROI) or the impact of SEO on earnings.

He offered his guess that maybe it’s the time between doing SEO versus the impact of it.

He commented:

“Usually what I see from people is that they focus on the traffic on their site.

And they look at something like Analytics and they say, ‘Oh, I get so many visitors and so many visitors from search engines. And that number went down significantly.’

…And the aspect of ROI or kind of the value of that traffic, I see that as something that a lot of these SEOs tend not to focus on primarily, because my assumption is it’s just a very long lead time there.

Like you can turn your website off now, but you might still have people who are kind of like paying for something for a while.

And then, it’s like, wow…”

Mueller followed up is thoughts on why SEOs might not focus on earnings by discussing how website traffic can be a misleading metric because it doesn’t tell a lot about why something happened, it only shows what happened.

He continued:

“But I do think it’s something where I sometimes feel it’s misleading to just purely focus on the traffic.

And I see that with our sites as well. A year or two ago, we would rank for the word “Google” in Canada or something like that, the search documentation, of course.

I hope the Google website ranks for the word Google. But like the Search documentation would rank for the word Google somewhere on the first page.

And we got tons of traffic there, but all of that traffic was basically irrelevant.

And then if you only look at the traffic and all of that irrelevant traffic goes away, then it might look like you lost a lot of traffic, but actually it’s like all of those things are people that weren’t relevant for your site anyway.

So you almost need to look at the bigger picture of all of the traffic that’s gone, but also keep in mind like, well, a lot of this was useless and I should maybe focus on the queries that people use, and then clicks and impressions for those, or individual like lower level pages of the site and kind of track those a little bit more.”

Traffic And SEO

SEOs promote themselves through case studies showing all the traffic their efforts brought. But those studies are hollow and maybe even deceptive if there’s absolutely no reference to how much sales lift resulted after their effort.

Link builders do a similar thing where they promote all the hundreds or thousands of links they acquired for a client and sometimes mention the lift in traffic. Just as consistently as SEOs, they always leave out the effect on sales or earnings.

Why do they do that? I suspect that many of those SEOs have never actually built a business around monetizing affiliate sales or ad clicks and thus don’t have first hand experience from that side of the SEO fence.

A lot of the old school SEOs like myself learned what we know from building and monetizing websites, maybe because client work for SEO wasn’t really as much of a thing then as it is now.

Using traffic as a metric is useful for measuring the impact of SEO but traffic should not be the goal of SEO. The reason is because there are different kinds of traffic.

Some traffic converts into sales. Some traffic has a lead time from the first visit to the sales. Some traffic is useful for building a brand name.

But some traffic is not relevant or useful.

When it comes to diagnosing traffic drops related to ranking changes, it may be helpful to understand if there’s any impact on sales and if not, to understand why the traffic drop had no monetary impact and if content and SEO efforts might be better directed in a different direction.

Listen to the Google podcast, Search Off the Record: SEO Is In The Details.

Google: What If Site Quality Is Simpler Than People Think? via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Google’s John Mueller, Martin Splitt and Gary Illyes discussed site quality in a recent podcast, explaining the different ways of thinking about site quality and at one point saying it’s not rocket science. The discussion suggests that site quality could be simpler than most people know.

Site Quality Is Not Rocket Science

The first point they touched on is to recommend reading site quality documentation, insisting that site quality is not especially difficult to understand.

Gary Illyes said:

“So I would go to a search engine’s documentation.

Most of them have some documentation about how they function and just try to figure out where your content might be failing or where your page might be failing because honestly, okay, this is patronizing, but it’s not rocket science.”

No Tools For Site Quality – What To Do?

Gary acknowledged that there’s no tool for diagnosing site quality, not in the same way there are tools for objectively detecting technical issues.

The traffic metrics that show a downward movement don’t explain why, they just show that something changed.

Gary Illyes:

“I found the up-down metric completely useless because you still have to figure out what’s wrong with it or why people didn’t like it.

And then you’re like, “This is a perfectly good page. I wrote it, I know that it’s perfect.”

And then people, or I don’t know, like 99.7% of people are downvoting it. And you’re like, ‘Why?’”

Martin Splitt

“And I think that’s another thing.

How do I spot, I wrote the page, so clearly it is perfect and helpful and useful and amazing, but then people disagree, as you say.

How do you think about that? What do you do then?

How can I make my content more helpful, better, more useful? I don’t know.

…There’s all these tools that I can just look at and I see that something’s good or something’s bad.

But for quality, how do I go about that?”

Gary Illyes

“What if quality is actually simpler than at least most people think?

…What if it’s about writing the thing that will help people achieve whatever they need to achieve when they come to the page? And that’s it.”

Martin Splitt asked if Gary was talking about reviewing the page from the perspective of the user.

Illyes answered:

“No, we are reframing.”

Reframing generally means to think about the problem differently.

Gary’s example is to reframe the problem as whether the page delivers what it says it’s going to deliver (like helping users achieve X,Y,Z).

Something I see a lot with content is that the topic being targeted (for example, queries about how to catch a trout) isn’t matched by the content (which might actually be about tools for catching trout) which is not what the site visitor wants to achieve.

Quality In Terms Of Adding Value

There are different kinds of things that relate to site and page quality and in the next part of the podcast John Mueller and Gary Illyes discuss the issue about adding something of value.

Adding something of value came up in the context of where the SERPs offer good answers from websites that people not only enjoy but they expect to see those sites as answers for those queries.

You can tell when users expect specific sites for individual search queries when Google Suggests shows the brand name and the keyword.

That’s a clue that probably a lot of people are turning keywords into branded searches, which signals to Google what people want to see.

So, the problem of quality in those situations isn’t about being relevant for a query with the perfect answer.

For these situations, like for competitive queries, it’s not enough to be relevant or have the perfect answer.

John Mueller explains:

“The one thing I sometimes run into when talking with people is that they’ll be like, “Well, I feel I need to make this page.”

And I made this page for users in air quotes…

But then when I look at the search results, it’s like 9,000 other people also made this page.

It’s like, is this really adding value to the Internet?

And that’s sometimes kind of a weird discussion to have.

It’s like, ‘Well, it’s a good page, but who needs it?’

There are so many other versions of this page already, and people are happy with those.”

This is the type of situation where competitive analysis to “reverse engineer” the SERPs  works against the SEO.

It’s stale because using what’s in the SERPs as a template for what to do rank is feeding Google what it already has.

It’s like, as an example, let’s represent the site ranked in Google with a baseline of the number zero.

Let’s imagine everything in the SERPs has a baseline of zero. Less than zero is poor quality. Higher than zero is higher quality.

Zero is not better than zero, it’s just zero.

The SEOs who think they’re reverse engineering Google by copying entities, copying topics, they’re really just achieving an imperfect score of zero.

So, according to Mueller, Google responds with, “it’s a good page, but who needs it?”

What Google is looking for in this situation is not the baseline of what’s already in the SERPs, zero.

According to Mueller, they’re looking for something that’s not the same as the baseline.

So in my analogy, Google is looking for something above the baseline of what is already in the SERPs, a number greater than zero, which is a one.

You can’t add value by feeding Google back what’s already there. And you can’t add value by doing the same thing ten times bigger. It’s still the same thing.

Breaking Into The SERPs By The Side Door

Gary Illyes next discusses a way to break into a tough SERP, saying the way to do it is indirectly.

This is an old strategy but a good one that still works today.

So, rather than bringing a knife to a gunfight, Gary Illyes suggests choosing more realistic battles to compete in.

Gary continued the conversation about competing in tough SERPs.

He said:

“…this also is kind of related to the age-old topic that if you are a new site, then how can you break into your niche?

I think on today’s Internet, like back when I was doing ‘SEO’, it was already hard.

For certain topics or niches, it was absolutely a nightmare, like ….mesothelioma….

That was just impossible to break into. Legal topics, it was impossible to break into.

And I think by now, we have so much content on the Internet that there’s a very large number of topics where it is like 15 years ago or 20 years ago, that mesothelioma topic, where it was impossible to break into.

…I remember Matt Cutts, former head of Web Spam, …he was doing these videos.

And in one of the videos, he said try to offer something unique or your own perspective to the thing that you are writing about.

Then the number of perspective or available perspectives, free perspectives, is probably already gone.

But if you find a niche where people are not talking too much about, then suddenly, it’s much easier to break into.

So basically, this is me saying that you can break into most niches if you know what you are doing and if you are actually trying to help people.”

What Illyes is suggesting as a direction is to “know what you are doing and if you are actually trying to help people.

That’s one of my secrets to staying one step ahead in SEO.

For example, before the reviews update, before Google added Experience to E-A-T, I was telling clients privately to do that for their review pages and I told them to keep it a secret, because I knew I had it dialed in.

I’m not psychic, I was just looking at what Google wants to rank and I figured it out several years before the reviews update that you need to have original photos, you need to have hands-on experience with the reviewed product, etc.

Gary’s right when he advises to look at the problem from the perspective of “trying to help people.”

He next followed up with this idea about choosing which battles to fight.

He said:

“…and I think the other big motivator is, as always, money. People are trying to break into niches that make the most money. I mean, duh, I would do the same thing probably.

But if you write about these topics that most people don’t write about, let’s say just three people wrote about it on the Internet, then maybe you can capture some traffic.

And then if you have many of those, then maybe you can even outdo those high-traffic niches.”

Barriers To Entry

What Gary is talking about is how to get around the barrier to entry, which are the established sites. His suggestion is to stay away from offering what everyone else is offering (which is a quality thing).

Creating content that the bigger sites can’t or don’t know to create is an approach I’ve used with a new site.

Weaknesses can be things that the big site does poorly, like their inability to resonate with a younger or older audience and so on.

Those are examples of offering something different that makes the site stand out from a quality perspective.

Gary is talking about picking the battles that can be won, planting a flag, then moving on to the next hill.

That’s a far better strategies than walking up toe to toe with the bigger opponent.

Analyzing For Quality Issues

It’s a lot easier to analyze a site for technical issues than it is for quality issues.

But a few of the takeaways are:

  • Be aware that the people closest to the content are not always the best judges of content is quality.
  • Read Google’s search documentation (for on-page factors, content, and quality guidelines).
  • Content quality is simpler than it seems. Just think about knowing the topic well and being helpful to people.
  • Being original is about looking at the SERPs for things that you can do differently, not about copying what the competitors are doing.

In my experience, it’s super important to keep an open mind, to not get locked into one way of thinking, especially when it comes to site quality. This will help one keep from getting locked into a point of view that can keep one from seeing the true cause of ranking issues.

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Stone36

ChatGPT Alpha Appearing Alongside High Demand Error Messages via @sejournal, @kristileilani

Some ChatGPT users are experiencing high-demand errors on the OpenAI systems, and “ChatGPT Alpha” appears in the model selection dropdown.

In addition to the new voice features available for all ChatGPT users, is OpenAI about to launch ChatGPT Alpha?

chatgpt alpha high demandScreenshot from ChatGPT, November 2023

OpenAI is working on elevated errors on the API and ChatGPT.

ChatGPT Alpha Appearing Alongside High Demand Error MessagesScreenshot from OpenAI, November 2023

Once the error disappears, the dropdown selection looks like this before switching to my typical options.

ChatGPT Alpha Appearing Alongside High Demand Error MessagesScreenshot from ChatGPT, November 2023

As a ChatGPT Plus subscriber, after the Alpha disappears, it goes back to the usual GPT-4, GPT-3.5, and Plugins options.

ChatGPT Alpha Appearing Alongside High Demand Error MessagesScreenshot from ChatGPT, November 2023

Featured image: photosince/Shutterstock

OpenAI Announces Free ChatGPT Voice Capabilities In Mobile App via @sejournal, @kristileilani

ChatGPT’s latest update brings voice interaction to all users for free. Learn how this could reshape your approach to content and SEO.

  • ChatGPT’s voice feature is now available to all users, marking a significant shift in AI and tech inclusivity.
  • This update offers fresh opportunities for brand marketers and SEO professionals to explore voice-optimized strategies.
  • The voice functionality enhances user engagement and accessibility, setting a new standard in AI-user interaction.
Google Downplays AI Threat To Human Content Creation via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

In a recent episode of Google’s Search Off The Record podcast, hosts Martin Splitt, Gary Illyes, and John Mueller from Google’s Search Relations team discuss the role of AI in content creation.

They see AI as something that can enhance and supplement human creativity rather than something that will make human creators obsolete.

During the podcast, the hosts provide insightful commentary about responsibly using AI to spark ideas and increase efficiency.

With rapid technological advances, perspectives like Google’s remind us to approach AI as an aid to human creators rather than an over-hyped replacement.

AI: A Useful Tool, Not an Overrated Replacement

The discussion started around the 21-minute mark, with the team expressing doubt and distrust about the possibility of AI taking over human creative abilities.

As Splitt points out:

“AI is great for certain things and is rubbish for others. It’s a tool like everything else. I feel like that’s an overrated thing.”

The discussion then shifted to technology not used to its full potential. In a funny comment, they jokingly brushed off the idea of posting on Google Plus, saying it would have been a great suggestion 20 years ago. This humorously emphasized how quickly technology evolves.

AI: An Antidote for Writer’s Block?

Google’s Search Relations team has a unique perspective regarding AI’s role in content creation.

They believe that AI tools can be helpful for writers struggling with writer’s block or facing pressing deadlines. For example, AI could offer frameworks and recommend phrasing and variations to expedite the writing process.

Illyes states:

“Generative AI tools are not that bad. It’s the how it’s used that’s the problem many times. It can be incredibly helpful when, for example, you have writer’s block and are trying to put out a page very fast.”

In other words, the Google team sees AI as a tool to spark creative ideas rather than something that can replace human creativity. They hinted at talking more about AI on a future show.

The Final Word

This discussion on the latest episode of the Search Off The Record podcast gives a new perspective on AI in content creation.

Instead of seeing AI as a threat to human creativity, Google suggests approaching it as a helpful tool that works with people.

As technology changes quickly, it’s important to use AI responsibly – to improve human creativity rather than replace it.


Featured Image: Stock-Asso/Shutterstock

OpenAI Board Removes CEO Sam Altman: Explore The Timeline Of Events via @sejournal, @kristileilani

On Bloomberg Live, Nadella reassured that Microsoft is still partnered with OpenAI and with Sam Altman, irrespective of what company Altman is with.

Nadella remains confident in Altman’s leadership capability and welcomes him to Microsoft to lead the new AI research team.

To continue its partnership with OpenAI, Microsoft would want governance changes at OpenAI to ensure there are no more “surprises.”

Nadella welcomes dialog about AI safety and celebrates both the innovations democratizing AI access to people globally and enhancing the guardrails against the risks.

Nadella reposted Altman’s post shortly after.

It may not be over just yet, as there is still a chance Altman may return to OpenAI if the board resigns, according to sources for The Verge.

msft microsoft stock at all time highScreenshot from Google, November 2023

Participants in an X space discussing the OpenAI saga brought up an interesting theory.

Quora’s Poe – founded by OpenAI board member Adam D’Angelo – introduced the ability to create custom bots with OpenAI models, including ChatGPT, a few months ago.

The timeline of events for the last two weeks:

  • November 6, at DevDay, Altman introduced custom GPTs and an upcoming monetized GPT store.
  • November 15, Microsoft announced the integration of GPTs and plugins.
  • November 19, the OpenAI board removed Altman as CEO.
  • November 20, Nadella announced Altman, Brockman, and other OpenAI colleagues to join Microsoft.
poe create a bot gptsScreenshot from Poe, November 2023

Emmett Shear, new interim CEO of OpenAI, previously the CEO of Twitch, accepts the position to drive significant changes and address current challenges, emphasizing the company’s importance and his commitment to its success and stability.

“Before I took the job, I checked on the reasoning behind the change. The board did *not* remove Sam over any specific disagreement on safety, their reasoning was completely different from that. I’m not crazy enough to take this job without board support for commercializing our awesome models.”

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella announced that Sam Altman and Greg Brockman (former President & Co-Founder at OpenAI) will be joining the company. Of note: Nadella identified Altman’s new role as CEO of an AI research “group” within Microsoft.

Rumors continue to surface that talks to reinstate Altman as OpenAI CEO are partially due to investor pressure, especially from Microsoft.

However, after having already named OpenAI CTO Mira Murati as interim CEO, the board then announced a new interim CEO: Emmett Shear, a co-founder of Twitch. Worth mentioning is that Shear’s Twitch co-founder, Kyle Vogt, resigned as CEO of Cruise the same day.

Curiously, at least one person in last night’s emoji stream had removed mentions of OpenAI in the bio.

But later posted this.

Over 100 OpenAI employees have reposted Altman’s message with various heart emojis.

According to sources for The Verge, the board missed a deadline of 5pm PST to resign, allowing Altman and Brockman to return. Reportedly, more OpenAI staffers were set to resign.

Near the deadline, some OpenAI staff posted similar messages:

From Bloomberg sources: “In one scenario under consideration, members of the current OpenAI board would step down.”

Khan Academy is featured as one of OpenAI’s customer success stories for GPT-4.

“The Senior Manager, Strategic Sourcing is a key player in OpenAI’s Finance division, responsible for elevating our non-technology procurement function.”

OpenAI Board Removes CEO Sam Altman: Explore The Timeline Of EventsScreenshot from OpenAI, November 2023

“It’s a good idea to keep enough control so that investors can’t fire you (there are a lot of different ways to do this), but beyond that, it’s important to bring in other people and trust them to help you build the company.”

Sources close to the NY Times shared that Sutskever countered views of it being a “hostile takeover” and emphasized its necessity for the the goal advancing AI for humanity’s benefit.

More information about OpenAI board members involved in yesterday’s shocking decision:

Bloomberg reports that Altman was dismissed from his position as CEO due to a series of disagreements with board members over fundamental aspects of AI development and commercialization.

Key points of conflict included the pace of generative AI development, strategies for commercializing products, and measures to mitigate potential public harm.

Altman’s clashes, particularly with board member and OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever, culminated in the board losing confidence in his leadership.

Additionally, Altman’s independent entrepreneurial ventures, such as seeking investments for an AI chip startup and concerns about diverging governance models, further strained his relationship with the board.

Micosoft’s CEO was not only “blindsided” by the news, but also furious according to Bloomberg’s sources close to the situation.

A look at OpenAI’s structure reveals:

  • OpenAI’s for-profit subsidiary is fully governed by the OpenAI Nonprofit through its ownership and control of OpenAI GP LLC.
  • The board, part of a Nonprofit, must prioritize safe, beneficial AGI development, with humanity as its main beneficiary, not OpenAI investors.
  • The board is predominantly independent, with no direct equity held by members, including CEO Sam Altman, whose stake is through Y Combinator.
  • Profits for investors and employees, including Microsoft, are capped, with excess value benefiting humanity through the Nonprofit.
  • The board decides if it has attained AGI – an autonomous system that surpasses human capabilities in work most valuable to society. AGI technology is not included in commercial deals with Microsoft.
openai structure agiScreenshot from OpenAI, November 2023

According to sources for The Information, three additional people at OpenAI have resigned in the wake of Altman and Brockman’s exit:

  • Jakub Pachocki, Director of Research at OpenAI, “gpt-4 lead.”
  • Aleksander Madry, Head of Preparedness, “Working on making AI more reliable and safe, as well as having a positive impact on society.”
  • Szymon Sidor, Research Scientist at OpenAI, “Building AGI one line of code at the time.”

The sequence of events began with Sam receiving a text from Ilya, leading to a Google Meet where he was informed of his termination, with the board present except for Greg.

Shortly after, Greg was similarly contacted by Ilya and removed from the board, though his role in the company was affirmed.

The management team, except for Mira who was informed earlier, learned of these developments soon after.

Also included in original announcement from OpenAI: “As a part of this transition, Greg Brockman will be stepping down as chairman of the board and will remain in his role at the company, reporting to the CEO.”

The (former) President & Co-Founder of OpenAI responded:

Microsoft reportedly found out about Altman’s removal a minute before the news was published according to Axios.

“We have a long-term agreement with OpenAI with full access to everything we need to deliver on our innovation agenda and an exciting product roadmap; and remain committed to our partnership, and to Mira and the team. Together, we will continue to deliver the meaningful benefits of this technology to the world.”

Microsoft’s CEO recently appeared on stage with Altman to announce an extended partnership.

Sam Altman of OpenAI and Satya Nadella of Microsoft

The timing appears to be shortly after the OpenAI announcement.

OpenAI Board Removes CEO Sam Altman: Explore The Timeline Of Events

The decision for Altman’s departure follows the board’s deliberation over his communication approach, which they found lacked the necessary candor for effective governance.

In the official statement, the board expressed gratitude for Altman’s contributions to OpenAI’s founding and growth but emphasized the need for new leadership to navigate the company’s future. They expressed full confidence in Murati’s capabilities to lead the company during this transitional phase.

The board, comprising independent directors such as Quora CEO Adam D’Angelo, entrepreneur Tasha McCauley, and Helen Toner of the Georgetown Center for Security and Emerging Technology, along with OpenAI chief scientist Ilya Sutskever, plays a crucial role in maintaining the company’s direction and mission integrity. Additionally, Greg Brockman, the chairman of the board, will be stepping down from his role but will continue his association with the company.

Stepping into the role of interim CEO is Mira Murati, the company’s Chief Technology Officer, known for her integral role in OpenAI’s growth and her deep understanding of the company’s operations and values.

Murati, a member of the OpenAI leadership team for five years, has been pivotal in shaping the company’s direction. Her expertise in AI governance and policy, coupled with her leadership in the company’s research, product, and safety functions, makes her an ideal candidate for the interim CEO position. The board anticipates a smooth transition as it embarks on a search for a permanent CEO.

OpenAI, Inc, a prominent name in the field of artificial intelligence, has announced a significant change in its leadership. Sam Altman, who has been at the helm as CEO, is set to depart from both his role and the board of directors. The announcement comes after a thorough review process by the board, which concluded a need for new leadership.

Story is breaking.

Google: Fix Technical Issues Before Chasing The ‘Next Big Thing’ via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

In search engine optimization (SEO), where the focus often swings toward the latest trends and advanced tactics, Google’s Search Off The Record podcast team recently reminded everyone to get the basics right first.

Martin Splitt, Gary Illyes, and John Mueller of Google’s Search Relations team explained that many websites still need help with basic technical SEO issues like site crawlability, indexing, and page rendering.

These foundational factors directly impact a site’s performance in search results. As such, they should be addressed before less critical optimizations.

Technical SEO: Foundation Before Innovation

Technical SEO involves optimizing a website’s architecture and infrastructure to improve crawling and indexing by search engines.

Unlike content creation or promotion, technical SEO focuses solely on the behind-the-scenes elements of a site.

Illyes explains why he often posts on social media about technical SEO:

“I like to post about technical things…because every now and then we notice that big site owners or big site SEOs will miss critical basic things.”

Illyes described his observations from conferences where attendees were captivated by the ‘next big thing.’

He argued:

“Just make sure your content is good first… looking at these websites that people put there, they are not helpful or useful to me as a user trying to find things.”

Further, he underlined the significance of technical aspects in SEO, saying:

“If Googlebot cannot reach your site, or rendering fails miserably, or there are no tokens (words) on the site or a page, then there’s not that much that Google can do for you.”

Splitt agreed, stating technical SEO “is still important – it’s like all of those basics.” He suggested troubleshooting with a site’s homepage, as search engines view this as the most vital page.

When these technical aspects are neglected, it may lead to critical issues, such as rendering failures or inaccessible sites, which can severely affect a website’s performance in search engine rankings.

Quality Over Quantity: Rethinking Traffic Metrics

Another key discussion point was the evaluation of content and the common misperception that high traffic equates to high-quality pages.

Mueller cautioned relying solely on analytics without considering user experience:

“I sometimes feel it’s misleading to just purely focus on the traffic.”

He recounted an example of a site ranking well for generic keywords but providing little value to users. When traffic from those low-quality keywords declined, the aggregate stats looked concerning – but the loss was irrelevant.

What Should You Pay Attention To?

The hosts emphasized that metrics beyond traffic, such as user engagement and satisfaction, are more accurate indicators of a page’s usefulness and quality.

Mueller states:

“You almost need to look at the bigger picture of all of the traffic that’s gone, but also keep in mind… a lot of this was useless.”

He encourages focusing on relevant queries and tracking lower-level pages to understand a site’s performance better.

How To Create High-Quality Content?

It’s not enough to churn out a high content volume; the content must serve a purpose and provide value to its intended audience.

However, Illyes suggests that creating high-quality content might be more straightforward than most people think.

The key is to focus on what will help people achieve their goals when they visit the page. This could mean providing comprehensive answers to common questions, solving problems, or sharing engaging and entertaining stories.

Illyes states:

“What if quality is actually simpler than most people think? What if it’s about writing the thing that will help people achieve whatever they need to achieve when they come to the page?”

Takeaways

This discussion between Google’s Search Relations team emphasizes two key takeaways.

First, mastering the basics of technical SEO is essential before delving into advanced tactics. Second, the quality of content and user engagement are more important than mere traffic numbers for evaluating a site’s success.

They advised that websites can significantly improve SEO performance by focusing on these areas.


Featured Image: LCV/Shutterstock

Anthropic Introduces Claude 2.1 With 200K Context Window via @sejournal, @kristileilani

Artificial intelligence startup Anthropic has released Claude 2.1, an upgraded version of its conversational AI assistant, touting significant improvements in areas like context length, accuracy, and integration capabilities.

The San Francisco-based firm says Claude 2.1 can now process up to 200,000 context tokens, equivalent to around 150,000 words or 500 pages of text content.

This allows users to upload and analyze entire technical documents, lengthy financial reports, or even long literary works.

Claude 2.1 aims to provide better summaries, question answering, trend forecasting, and other insights compared to the previous version by taking in more contextual information.

However, processing such long messages slows response times to a few minutes. Anthropic expects speeds to improve over time.

In addition to the larger context window, Claude 2.1 boasts a two-times reduction in false or hallucinated statements, enhancing reliability for real-world applications across enterprises. Specific use cases could include processing complex legal briefs or parsing lengthy technical specifications.

The upgrade also introduces early support for tool use, letting developers connect Claude to existing company APIs, databases, and web services.

The goal is to enable Claude to orchestrate and automate workflows by leveraging these existing processes and information sources.

For example, Claude 2.1 might answer a question by querying a private database rather than guessing, translating natural language requests into API calls, or pull product data to help users complete an online purchase.

This expanded interoperability aims to make Claude more useful for day-to-day business operations, although the tool use feature remains in beta.

On the developer side, the newly revamped console includes a “Workbench” for easily iterating on prompts, plus code snippet generation for Claude API integration.

There are also new settings and instructions, dubbed system prompts, to customize Claude’s tone, personality, and response structure as needed.

The Claude 2.1 upgrade is already live for Anthropic’s hosted chatbot interface at claude.ai and the paid Claude Pro API tier. The 200,000 token context limit is exclusive to Pro users for now.

Pricing has also been adjusted across tiers to improve efficiency.

Founded in 2021, Anthropic develops AI assistant technology focused on safety, honesty, and control.

Claude 2.1 represents the latest step toward advanced natural language capabilities tailored for enterprise and developer needs rather than consumer chatbots.

Featured image: Tada Images/Shutterstock

Microsoft Advertising Shares Holiday Season Marketing Playbook via @sejournal, @kristileilani

As the holiday shopping season approaches its zenith, advertisers are keenly preparing for the final rush of consumer spending. Microsoft Advertising provides insights and strategies to help businesses capitalize on the festive season in its Festive Season Marketing Playbook.

The focus is on understanding consumer behaviors and leveraging Microsoft’s advertising capabilities to maximize reach and revenue.

1. Revenue Peaks: A Matter of Timing

Despite some advertisers not yet seeing a peak in revenue, there is no cause for alarm.

Historically, significant revenue spikes are observed around Black Friday and Cyber Monday. This year, consumers are anticipated to spend more during these critical days.

The National Retail Federation predicts a 3-4% increase in holiday spending in the US, potentially reaching up to $966.6 billion. Similarly, high spending is forecasted in the UK and Germany, emphasizing the global impact of this season.

2. Shift in Consumer Behavior: The Rise of Deal-Seeking

A notable trend this year is the increased emphasis on deal-seeking.

Over two-thirds of US shoppers are spending more time looking for coupons and deals, particularly around the ‘Cyber-5’ period.

This period, including Thanksgiving, Black Friday, Small Business Saturday, Sunday, and Cyber Monday, has become a crucial window for consumer spending.

Advertisers must adapt to this trend and align their strategies accordingly.

3. The Central Role of Search in Purchasing Decisions

Search remains a crucial component in guiding both online and in-store purchases. It’s a pivotal tool for discovering new retailers, conducting pre-purchase research, and comparing prices.

Gen X consumers, for example, heavily rely on search to find the best prices. Additionally, the EMEA region sees deal-seekers spending 33% more time searching than average shoppers.

This trend provides a significant opportunity for targeted advertising, primarily through platforms like Microsoft Advertising, which taps into billions of global monthly searches.

4. Post Cyber-5 Opportunities: Maintaining Momentum

Even after the Cyber-5 period, search volumes remain high, presenting a continued opportunity for advertisers.

Microsoft’s research indicates that many holiday clicks and conversions happen during Cyber-5, with lower Cost Per Acquisition (CPA). Therefore, maintaining active advertising campaigns during this period can yield substantial benefits.

5. Planning For Returns: An Overlooked Aspect

Another critical aspect for businesses to consider is the post-holiday return period. Search volumes for returns peak shortly after Christmas and continue into the new year. Preparing for this influx and adjusting marketing strategies can help mitigate potential losses and maintain customer satisfaction.

6. Strategic Holiday Planning Checklist

To maximize the holiday season, Microsoft suggested that advertisers should:

  • Launch campaigns early to capture early shoppers.
  • Use remarketing and dynamic search ads to target holiday-specific products and promotions.
  • Emphasize value messages and promotions to attract deal-seekers.
  • Leverage AI for personalized offerings and responsive ad formats.
  • Utilize store support for profitable online growth, including Local Inventory Ads and Mobile Device Modifiers.

Microsoft Advertising offers more tips and comprehensive resources in its Festive Holiday Season Marketing Playbook and on-demand webcasts to assist advertisers in navigating this crucial period.


Featured image: Dmitry Melnikov/Shutterstock