TikTok US Deal Closes After Years Of Regulatory Uncertainty via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

A White House official said the US and China have finalized a deal to spin off TikTok’s US business to a consortium led by Oracle and Silver Lake, Fox Business reported Thursday. CNN reported the joint venture has been formally established and announced its leadership team.

The closing comes ahead of a January 23 deadline created by Trump’s September executive order, which set a 120-day enforcement pause on the divest-or-ban law.

What’s New

The joint venture has been formally established and announced its leadership team. TikTok said Adam Presser, previously the company’s head of operations and trust and safety, will be CEO. Will Farrell, who led privacy and security for the effort, will serve as Chief Security Officer.

TikTok CEO Shou Chew outlined the ownership structure in a December internal memo to employees after signing binding agreements with investors.

Under the new ownership structure, ByteDance retains just under 20% of the US business. Oracle, Silver Lake, and MGX, an Abu Dhabi-based AI investment firm, will each hold 15% stakes. Other investors in the consortium include Susquehanna, Dragoneer, and DFO, Michael Dell’s family office.

A new seven-member board of directors with an American majority will govern the entity. The board will oversee data protection, content moderation, and algorithm security for US operations.

Vice President JD Vance said in September the deal would value TikTok’s US operations at roughly $14 billion, though the final amount ByteDance received remains unclear.

The algorithm question remains murky in public reporting. TikTok’s recommendation algorithm has been the central point of contention between the US and Chinese governments throughout the negotiations. The September executive order described US oversight of the technology, including requirements for algorithm retraining and monitoring, but specific implementation terms have not been publicly disclosed.

Background

The deal closes a chapter that spans two presidential administrations and multiple reversal points.

President Biden signed a law in 2024 requiring ByteDance to divest TikTok’s US business or face a ban. The Supreme Court upheld that law in 2025. TikTok briefly went dark two days later before President Trump, on his first day in office, signed an executive order keeping the app running while his administration negotiated a sale.

The current deal structure emerged from a framework announced in September, when the White House outlined terms that would create a US entity with majority American ownership while allowing ByteDance to maintain a minority stake.

Why This Matters

This should end more than five years of regulatory uncertainty for the 170 million Americans the White House says use TikTok and the businesses that depend on the platform for marketing and commerce.

We first covered the TikTok ban timeline when the original executive order gave ByteDance 45 days to sell in August 2020. Then it was a potential Oracle deal that looked promising before falling apart. The pattern repeated through multiple administrations, executive orders, and court cases.

For marketers who built strategies around TikTok, the resolution removes a persistent source of planning uncertainty. TikTok Shop, creator partnerships, and advertising campaigns can proceed without the backdrop of a potential shutdown.

The ownership structure also creates a new dynamic. Oracle, which already provides data and computing services for TikTok’s US operations through Project Texas, now holds an equity stake and board-level oversight. That deeper integration could affect how the platform handles data practices and content policies going forward.

Looking Ahead

TikTok’s US operations will function as an independent entity responsible for data protection, algorithm security, and content moderation.

TikTok has told employees that users and advertisers should see no immediate changes to the platform experience. Chew’s December memo indicated Americans would continue using TikTok as before and advertisers would maintain access to global audiences, according to multiple outlets that reviewed the document.

The deal removes a sticking point in US-China relations at a time when tensions remain elevated on trade and technology issues. Whether this model becomes a template for other Chinese-owned platforms operating in the US remains to be seen.

10Web WordPress Photo Gallery Plugin Vulnerability via @sejournal, @martinibuster

A security advisory was published about a vulnerability in the Photo Gallery by 10Web plugin that has over 200,000 installations. The vulnerability affects how the plugin handles image comments, exposing some sites to unauthorized data modification by unauthenticated attackers (meaning that attackers do not need to register with the site).

The Photo Gallery by 10Web plugin is used by WordPress sites to create and display image galleries, slideshows, and albums in a variety of layouts. It is used by photography sites, portfolios, and businesses that rely on visual content.

About The Vulnerability

The flaw can be exploited by unauthenticated visitors, meaning anyone can trigger the issue without logging in. This significantly increases exposure because there is no barrier to entry such as having to register with the website or attain a higher permission level.

It is important to note that image comments, where the vulnerability exists, are only available in the Pro version of the plugin. Sites that do not use the comments feature are not affected by this specific issue.

What Went Wrong

The vulnerability is caused by a missing capability check in the plugin’s delete_comment() function.

The plugin does not verify whether a request to delete an image comment is coming from someone who is allowed to perform that action. Normally, WordPress plugins are expected to confirm that a user has the appropriate permissions before modifying site content. That check is missing with this plugin.

Because the plugin fails to perform this verification, it accepts deletion requests even when they come from unauthenticated users.

What Attackers Can Do

An attacker can delete arbitrary image comments from a site. This vulnerability has a severity level rating of 5.3, which is a medium threat level. This vulnerability does not enable a full website takeover or any other server compromise, but it does allow unauthorized deletion of image comments. For sites that rely on image comments for engagement, moderation history, or user interaction, this can result in data loss and disruption.

The official Wordfence advisory explains the vulnerability:

“The Photo Gallery by 10Web – Mobile-Friendly Image Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the delete_comment() function in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.36. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary image comments. Note: comments functionality is only available in the Pro version of the plugin.”

Which Versions Can Be Exploited

The vulnerability affects all versions of the plugin up to and including version 1.8.36.The issue is tied specifically to the comment deletion functionality. Since image comments are only available in the Pro version of the plugin, exploitation is limited to sites running that version with comments enabled.

No special server configuration or user interaction is required beyond the plugin being active and vulnerable.

What Site Owners Should Do

A patch is available. Site owners should update the Photo Gallery by 10Web plugin to version 1.8.37 or later, which includes a security fix addressing this issue. If updating is not possible, disabling the plugin or the comments feature will prevent exploitation until the site can be patched.

Keeping the plugin up to date is the only direct fix for this vulnerability.

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Roman Samborskyi

Google Launches Personal Intelligence In AI Mode via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

Google is rolling out Personal Intelligence, a feature that connects Gmail and Google Photos to AI Mode in Search, delivering personalized responses based on users’ own data.

The feature, announced in a blog post by Robby Stein, VP of Product at Google Search, is available to Google AI Pro and AI Ultra subscribers who opt in.

What’s New

Personal Intelligence lets AI Mode reference information from a user’s Gmail and Google Photos to tailor search responses. Google describes it as connecting the dots across Google apps to unlock search results that fit individual context.

The feature rolls out as a Labs experiment for eligible subscribers in the U.S. in English. It is available for personal Google accounts only, not for Workspace business, enterprise, or education users.

To enable Personal Intelligence, users can:

  1. Open Search and tap their profile
  2. Click on Search personalization
  3. Select Connected Content Apps
  4. Connect Gmail and Google Photos

In the settings menu, the Gmail connection appears under “Workspace,” though the feature itself is not available to Workspace business, enterprise, or education accounts.

Subscribers may also see an invitation to try the feature directly in AI Mode as the rollout progresses over the next few days.

How It Works

Personal Intelligence uses Gemini 3 to process queries alongside connected account data. When enabled, AI Mode may reference email confirmations, travel bookings, and photo memories to inform responses.

Stein offered examples in the announcement. A user searching for trip activities could receive recommendations based on hotel bookings in Gmail and past travel photos. Someone shopping for a coat could get suggestions that account for preferred brands, upcoming travel destinations from flight confirmations, and expected weather conditions.

Stein wrote:

“With Personal Intelligence, recommendations don’t just match your interests — they fit seamlessly into your life. You don’t have to constantly explain your preferences or existing plans, it selects recommendations just for you, right from the start.”

See an example in the screenshots below:

Screenshot from: blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/search/personal-intelligence-ai-mode-search/, January 2026.
Screenshot from: blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/search/personal-intelligence-ai-mode-search/, January 2026.

Privacy Controls

Google emphasizes that connecting Gmail and Google Photos is opt-in. Users choose whether to enable the connections and can turn them off at any time.

Google says AI Mode does not train directly on users’ Gmail inbox or Google Photos library. The company says training is limited to specific prompts in AI Mode and the model’s responses, used to improve functionality over time.

Google acknowledges that Personal Intelligence may make mistakes, including incorrectly connecting unrelated topics or misunderstanding context. Users can correct errors through follow-up responses or by providing feedback with the thumbs down button.

Why This Matters

This is the personal context feature Google teased at I/O in May 2025. Seven months later, in December, Google SVP Nick Fox confirmed in an interview that the feature was still in internal testing with no public timeline. Today’s rollout delivers what was delayed.

For the 75 million daily active users Fox reported in AI Mode in that December interview, this could reduce how much context you need to type in order to get tailored responses.

For publishers, the implications depend on how personalization affects which content surfaces in AI Mode responses. If the system prioritizes user-specific context over general search results, some informational queries may resolve without a click to external sites. Google has not shared data on how Personal Intelligence affects citation patterns or traffic flow.

The feature is currently limited to paid subscribers on personal accounts. Whether Google expands it to free users or Workspace accounts would change its reach.

Looking Ahead

Personal Intelligence is rolling out as a Labs feature over the next few days. Google says eligible AI Pro and AI Ultra subscribers in the U.S. will automatically have access as it becomes available.

Watch for whether Google provides analytics or attribution tools that let publishers track how personalized AI Mode responses affect visibility and traffic patterns.

A Breakdown Of Microsoft’s Guide To AEO & GEO via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Microsoft published a sixteen page explainer guide about optimizing for AI search and chat. While many of the suggestions can be classified as SEO, some of the other tips relate exclusively to AI search surfaces. Here are the most helpful takeaways.

What AEO and GEO Are And Why They Matter

Microsoft explains that AI search surfaces have created an evolution from “ranking for clicks” to “being understood and recommended by AI.” Traditional SEO still provides a foundation for being cited in AI, but AEO and GEO determine whether content gets surfaced inside AI-driven experiences.

Here is how Microsoft distinguishes AEO and GEO. The first thing to notice is that they define AEO as Agentic Engine Optimization. That’s different from Answer Engine Optimization, which is how AEO is commonly understood.

  • AEO (Answer/Agentic Engine Optimization) focuses on optimizing content and product information easy for AI assistants and agents to retrieve, interpret, and present as direct answers.
  • GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) focuses on making your content discoverable and persuasive inside generative AI systems by increasing clarity, trustworthiness, and authoritativeness.

Microsoft views AEO and GEO as not limited to marketing, but multiple teams within an organization.

The guide says:

“This shift impacts every part of the organization. Marketing teams must rethink brand differentiation, growth teams need to adapt to AI-driven journeys, ecommerce teams must measure success differently, data teams must surface richer signals, and engineering teams must ensure systems are AI-readable and reliable.”

AI shopping is not one channel, it’s really a set of overlapping systems.

Microsoft describes AI shopping as three overlapping consumer touchpoints:

  1. AI browsers that interpret what’s on a page and surface context while users browse.
  2. AI assistants that answer questions and guide decisions in conversation.
  3. AI agents that can take actions, like navigating, selecting options, and completing purchases.

The AI touchpoint matters less than whether the system can access accurate, structured, and trustworthy product information.

SEO Still Plays A Role

Microsoft’s guide says that the AEO and GEO competition changes from discovery over to influence. SEO is still important, but it is no longer the whole game.

The new competition is about influencing the AI recommendation layer, not just showing up in rankings.

Microsoft describes it like this:

  • SEO helps the product get found.
  • AEO helps the AI explain it clearly.
  • GEO helps the AI trust it and recommend it.

Microsoft explains:

“Competition is shifting from discovery to influence (SEO to AEO/GEO).

If SEO focused on driving clicks, AEO is focused on driving clarity with enriched, real-time data, while GEO focuses on building credibility and trust so AI systems can confidently recommend your products.

SEO remains foundational, but winning in AI-powered shopping experiences requires helping AI systems understand not just what your product is, but why it should be chosen.”

How AI Systems Decide What To Recommend

Microsoft explains how an AI assistant, in this case Copilot, handles a user’s request. When a user asks for a recommendation, the AI assistant goes into a reasoning phase where the query is broken down using a combination of web and product feed data.

The web data provides:

  • “General knowledge
  • Category understanding
  • Your brand positioning”

Feed data provides:

  • “Current prices
  • Availability
  • Key specs”

The AI assistant may, based on the feed data, choose to surface the product with the lowest price that is also in stock.  When the user clicks through to the website, the AI Assistant scans the page for information that provides context.

Microsoft lists these as examples of context:

  • Detailed reviews
  • Video that explain the product
  • Current promotions
  • Delivery estimates

The agent aggregates this information and provides guidance on what it discovered in terms of the context of the product (delivery times, etc.).

Microsoft brings it all together like this:

First, there’s crawled data:
The information AI systems learned during training and retrieve from indexed web pages, which shapes your brand’s baseline perception and provides grounding for AI responses, including your product
categories, reputation and market position.

Second, there’s product feeds and APIs:
The structured data you actively push to AI platforms, giving you control over how your products are represented in comparisons and recommendations. Feeds provide accuracy, details and consistency.

Third, there’s live website data:
The real-time information AI agents see when they visit your actual site, from rich media and user reviews to dynamic pricing and transaction capabilities. Each data source plays a distinct role in the shopping journey — traditional SEO remains essential because AI systems perform real-time web searches frequently throughout the shopping journey, not just at purchase time, and your site must rank well to be discovered, evaluated, and recommended.

Microsoft recommends A Three-Part Action Plan

Strategy 1: Technical Foundations

The core idea for this strategy is that your product catalog must be machine-readable, consistent everywhere, and up to date.

Key actions:

  • Use structured data (schema) for products, offers, reviews, lists, FAQs, and brand.
  • Include dynamic fields like pricing and availability.
  • Keep feed data and on-page structured data aligned with what users actually see.
  • Avoid mismatches between visible content and what is served to crawlers.

Strategy 2: Optimize Content For Intent And Clarity

This strategy is about optimizing product content so that it answers typical user questions and is easy for AI to reuse.

Key actions:

  • Write product descriptions that start with benefits and real use-case value.
  • Use headings and phrasing that match how people ask questions.

Add modular content blocks:

  • FAQs
  • specs
  • key features
  • comparisons

Add Contextual Information

  • Support multi-modal interpretation (good alt text, transcripts for video content, structured image metadata).
  • Add complementary product context (pairings, bundles, “goes well with”).

Strategy 3: Trust Signals (Authority And Credibility)

The takeaway for this strategy is that AI assistants and agents prioritize content that looks verified and reputable.

Key actions:

  • Strengthen review credibility (verified reviews, strong volumes, clear sentiment).
  • Reinforce brand authority through real-world signals (press, certifications, partnerships).
  • Keep claims grounded and consistent to avoid trust degradation.
  • Use structured data to clarify legitimacy and identity.

Microsoft explains it like this:

“AI assistants prioritize content from sources they can trust. Signals such as verified reviews, review volume, and clear sentiment help establish credibility and influence recommendations.

Brand authority is reinforced through consistent identity, real-world validation such as press coverage, certifications, and partnerships, and the use of structured data to clearly define brand entities.

Claims should be factual, consistent, and verifiable, as exaggerated or misleading information can reduce trust and limit visibility in AI-powered experiences”

Takeaways

AI search changes the goal from winning rankings to earning recommendations. SEO still matters, but AEO and GEO determine how well content is interpreted, explained, and chosen inside AI assistants and agents.

AI shopping is not a single channel but an ecosystem of assistants, browsers, and agents that rely on authoritative signals across crawled content, structured feeds, and live site experiences. The brands that win are the ones with consistent, machine-readable data, and clear content that contains useful contextual information that can be easily summarized.

Microsoft published a blog post that is accompanied by a link to the downloadable explainer guide: From Discovery to Influence: A Guide to AEO and GEO.

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Kues

56% Of CEOs Report No Revenue Gains From AI: PwC Survey via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

Most companies haven’t yet seen financial returns from their AI investments, according to PwC’s 29th Global CEO Survey.

The survey of 4,454 chief executives across 95 countries found that 56% report neither increased revenue nor lower costs from AI over the past 12 months.

What The Survey Found

About 30% of CEOs said their company saw increased revenue from AI in the last year. On costs, 26% reported decreases while 22% said costs went up. PwC defined “increase” and “decrease” as changes of 2% or more.

Only 12% of companies achieved both revenue gains and cost reductions. PwC called this group the “vanguard” and noted they had stronger AI foundations in place, including defined roadmaps and technology environments built for integration.

For marketing specifically, the numbers suggest early-stage adoption. Just 22% of CEOs said their organization applies AI to demand generation to a large or very large extent. The company’s products, services, and experiences showed similar numbers at 19%.

Separate from AI, CEO confidence in near-term growth has declined. Only 30% said they were very or extremely confident about revenue growth over the next 12 months. That’s down from 38% last year and a peak of 56% in 2022.

Why This Matters

The survey adds data to a pattern I’ve tracked over the past year. A LinkedIn report found 72% of B2B marketers felt overwhelmed by AI’s pace of change. A Gartner survey showed 73% of marketing teams were using AI, but 87% of CMOs had experienced campaign performance problems.

The 22% demand generation figure gives marketers a rough benchmark for how their AI adoption compares to the broader executive population. It’s self-reported CEO perception rather than measured deployment, but it suggests most organizations are still in early stages of applying AI to customer acquisition at scale.

PwC’s framing is direct:

“Isolated, tactical AI projects often don’t deliver measurable value.”

The report adds that tangible returns come from enterprise-scale deployment consistent with company business strategy.

Looking Ahead

PwC recommends companies focus on building AI foundations before expecting returns. That includes defined roadmaps, technology environments that enable integration, and formalized responsible AI processes.

For marketing teams evaluating their own AI investments, this survey suggests most organizations are still working through the same questions.


Featured Image: Blackday/Shutterstock

Five Things To Do That Will Increase Authoritativeness And Earn Links via @sejournal, @martinibuster

The following are five things that anyone can do to establish authoritativeness and trustworthiness that can be communicated quickly and contribute to earning more links. The trick to this technique is that you have to put some time into these tactics first but the rewards after you are done are links, lots of them.

The idea behind this tactic is to convince a web publisher to give you a free link, or to give you the opportunity to publish an article (with or without a customary byline and link).

In order to cut through the noise of all the other emails the web publisher receives, it is necessary to establish your authority in order to inspire trust. And you need to do it quickly. These are some touchstones I crafted, through trial and error, in order to accomplish a higher success level in link building campaigns.

I call this method, Establishing your Bona Fides. It works by creating trust with one to two sentences. Whether at the beginning, middle or end of the outreach is up to you, but I’ve enjoyed a good response rate by placing it near the beginning.

Here are the shortcuts to establishing bona fides:

  1. Awards
  2. Media appearances and mentions
  3. List of authoritative organizations that have published your work
  4. List of peers that have published your work
  5. Authority of your website’s authors

As you can see this isn’t really something you can fake your way through. But if you take the time to first establish your bona fides (what makes your legitimate and authoritative), you will see a higher percentage of positive response rates. People will take your emails more seriously.

There is no need to be annoying and badger people over and over the way some marketing agencies do. The success rate improvement from this method will cut the need for such aggressive pestering, something that I have never approved of.

The first two bona fides are self explanatory. But I will explain them quickly.

Awards
It’s always useful to obtain recognition in whatever field that you are in (if that’s a thing). Even if it’s recognition for volunteering for an organization and doing charitable work.  Other kinds of awards are the kind that local news might give out, like best whatever in whatever town your company is based out of.

Media Appearances And Mentions
Appearing in television news, being cited in respected news or online magazines are ways to establish signals of authoritativeness. Signals of authoritativeness aren’t just ranking signals, they are also the kinds of things that  humans respond to.

Organizations And Associations
The third bona fide relates to associations and organizations that your company is allied or partnered with, and any publications that are related to those organizations, both online and offline. Some organizations are always on the lookout for people to profile or publish articles by for their association publications. This kind of publishing is a great way to establish authoritativeness and trustworthiness. It’s truly earning recognition for your expertise.

Publishing articles in offline publications are a bonanza. While you likely won’t get a link, you will also be the rare online organization submitting a guest post in those publications. Most companies and marketing agencies aren’t doing this because there is no link associated with it. This this will be your advantage because as you’ll see, it will help to increase your link building success rate. When you publish an article in an authoritative space, even if it’s offline, it gives you the ability to rightfully say in your outreach email that you’ve been published in so and so magazine or newsletter. Associating your brand with the authoritative brand in this way instantly makes your brand authoritative to the person you’re communicating with. This is especially powerful if the person you’re communicating with is also a member of whatever association or organization that you have published an article with.

The reason this approach works is that it enables you to establish yourself as authoritative with a single sentence. With only a few words in your outreach email, you can quickly profile your site as not a spammer, and a legit organization that’s ultimately worthy of getting a link. In my experience this has worked exceedingly well for consistently earning instant trust from whoever you’re outreaching to.

You can get to number four  (list of peers that have published your work) without doing number three (list of organizations that have published your work). But you’ll have greater success if you put a good amount of number three projects behind you. Even if you don’t use all the projects in your initial outreach email, you may have to deploy them in follow up emails to doubting recipients who need more convincing. And you get add all of these to your About Us page.

Authority Of Website Authors
Point number five (authority of your website’s authors) is more or less self-explanatory. It helps if the person authoring your articles is someone who the outreach recipient can identify with, can think of as “one of us” when you list their credentials. For example, I once did an outreach in the educational space citing the writing talents of a math teacher who was also an education technology blogger. This person’s credentials and authority opened doors for my link building outreach and helped my client receive links from some truly prestigious education related websites.

Obviously, the success of this approach requires do some work ahead of time to get appearances in blogs, podcasts, video interviews, publishing in association and organization online and offline publications. Even taking a photo with someone who is well known and authoritative and putting that on your About Us page can be helpful. People who are considering giving you a link will go to your website’s About Us page to verify who this company is and if they’re as above board and authoritative as you say.

Using the above pre-campaign tactics will improve your trustworthiness and authoritativeness and have a positive impact on link building success rates.

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Krakenimages.com

Shopify Shares More Details On Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP) via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Harvey Finkelstein, the president of Shopify, was recently interviewed about their open source Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP), which enables agentic AI shopping. Co-developed with Google, he explains how UCP enables brands to be discovered by customers based on personalized recommendations, as opposed to advertising and classic search paradigms that are less personalized.

Finkelstein said that the Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP) is designed to enable AI agents to surface products in a manner that merchants can control, show consumers personalized recommendations based on users’ preferences, and deliver a shopping experience that’s as good as any ecommerce store platform.

Shopify is also opening agentic commerce access to brands that are not Shopify customers through their Agentic plan, which he briefly mentions. This plan is designed for enterprise brands and merchants who do not use Shopify to upload their product data to Shopify’s infrastructure so it can be discovered and purchased directly by AI agents.

This positions Shopify as infrastructure for agentic commerce, not just a hosted commerce platform. This makes it easier for brands to gain immediate access to agentic shopping channels without having to migrate platforms.

Finkelstein also points out that agentic commerce only works if consumers can access all brands, not just those on Shopify.

Shopify’s Finkelstein said that UCP will enable merchants to more effectively control how their products are shown. He also discussed their strategy of bringing agentic shopping to all brands, regardless of whether they are on Shopify or not.

He explained:

“We created this protocol called Universal Commerce Protocol which effectively is this universal language is open sourced so that all merchants can speak directly to every single one of the agents.

And the best way to explain it is up until now, it was really just about like a single transaction.

So I can buy something on ChatGPT or Gemini or Microsoft. there’s no concept of loyalty or subscription or bundling or, you know, if it’s furniture, for example, please don’t ship it to me on Thursday. I’m not home Thursday. Send it Friday.

So this idea of creating this universal protocol that we co-developed with Google means that now merchants can actually tell these agents exactly how to show their products on these agentic tools. And it should be as good as it is on the online store. So that was a really, really big one.

The second thing we announced also with Google is that now we’re actually expanding. You can sell everywhere commerce is happening from an agentic perspective.

So we’re going beyond the agentic storefronts of just ChatGPT, which is what we said, you know, in Q3. Now it’s also, we’re going to be working with Gemini, with AI mode in Google Search, and also with copilot.

And maybe the last one is that we’re actually bringing agentic commerce to every brand, whether or not they’re on Shopify.

So if you’re not on Shopify, but you want to have your product syndicated and indexed, you can do so with our agentic plan.”

Access To Many Brands Is Key

Finkelstein stressed that the key to the success of agentic AI is to be able to show the widest possible selection of brands. He said it’s a big opportunity.

He explained:

“I think if Agentic is going to do what a lot of us think it’s going to do from a commerce perspective, you have to give consumers all the brands.

We obviously want them all on Shopify, but there’s some brands that want to participate now, but it may take some time for them to migrate over.

So this idea of opening up to anyone, we think is a big opportunity.”

Who Will Be The Early Adopters?

Finkelstein was asked about who the early adopters will be. His answer was cautious, seemingly acknowledging that it’s likely not going to immediately be a big crush of people turning to AI to buy things.

He answered:

“I think it’ll likely be something that like most people use some of the time and some people use most of the time. I don’t think it’s going to cross the threshold of most most, the way e-commerce does now. It’s just going to take time. It’s going to take some time.”

AI Chat Reduces Friction

Finkelstein said that Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP) enables better shopping experiences, reducing the “friction” that AI shopping may have produced. He believes that once people start having good experiences shopping with an agent, they will start to get into the habit of using it for other kinds of shopping and begin relying on it.

Finkelstein explained:

“Once you have a good experience, I think the actual friction reduces. You’ll keep having it over and over again.

But the thing that we felt was missing, and this is the reason why I think this UCP protocol is so important, is it was very difficult to do merchandising inside of these applications.

And this protocol allows you to do a lot more… Well, up until UCP happened, you couldn’t actually do subscriptions. Now you can.

Or this idea of bundling, you know, for Gymshark, it’s a huge part of their business is if you buy these, you’ll also buy these as well. You can do that as well.

So I think all of these things are sort of in line with creating a much more delightful experience in the chat.”

Merit Based Shopping Versus SEO?

Finkelstein brought up the topic of merit-based shopping where products are recommended to a user because it is what they are looking for. He used the phrase “merit-based shopping” as a contrast to today’s online advertising ecosystems that prioritize products that pay to be shown as a recommendation. The main point is that shopping recommendations are made based on personalization.

Finkelstein explained:

“And I think ultimately what it leads to is like, this will be merit-based shopping, which will be different than I think some of the traditional retailers who were kind of leaning on their balance sheets to spend money on ads. You can’t really game the system in that that way.

You actually have to be, from a context perspective, the right product for the right consumer.”

What Happens To Creative Assets And SEO

One of the podcast hosts asked about what happens to creative assets like photos, saying that he noticed that shopping AI uses images. He asked how that was going to evolve. Finkelstein’s answer touched on SEO in the context of how agentic AI shopping is about showing products based on user preferences, a tighter form of relevance than in the advertising and classic search ecosystems.

Finkelstein explained:

“I think …the idea of SEO won’t exist in Agentic because again, it’s merit-based and it’s mostly based on the context history you’ve had.

But I do think though, you’re going to have… these brands are going to have people at their companies who are thinking a lot about like consistent updates to UCP, consistent updates to the catalog.

So they may pull something off the catalog and say, we don’t want to sell it anymore this way. So I think there’s going to be, I don’t know if they’re going to be actual jobs, but there’s going to be people inside of the company, potentially in the merchandising department, who say, actually, the way that we want to sell all this, the way we want to describe this to these agents is a particular way.

And then because of UCP and because of Shopify catalog, it gets easily disseminated across every single one of these agentic applications. So the experience just gets better and better.

I think you have to be a little bit of a techno optimist… as I am, to believe that even if the experience is not incredible right now, it’s likely just going to get better at this ridiculous pace.”

Cutting Out Incentivized Recommendations

When asked what’s the most exciting thing about Agentic AI, he returned to the concept of merit-based shopping, where LLMs have the ability to personalize responses by learning user preferences and therefore recommend a product that fits within that person’s requirements. He contrasted that with what happens in the real world, where a salesperson’s recommendations are influenced by commissions.

So what he is excited about is the idea of the playing field being leveled. He mentioned the possibility of lesser-known brands, like True Classic Tees, being surfaced in AI shopping because that kind of brand is a match for a specific consumer.

He responded:

“Most of the excitement is actually around this idea of like, is there a potential for this to level the playing field? Meaning, you know, if I’ve done a bunch of research historically on an agentic application …about the stuff that I love, the brands that I love. …It probably should not show me a generic pair of boots.

So the excitement actually is around like, is this going to introduce more brands that otherwise are unknown to more people or, you know, True Classic Tee, for example, which, you know, if you’re looking for a black t-shirt, I suspect on a search engine, you’re not going to see True Classic Tee come up that much, but it’s an incredible product and ultimately it can be found on these agentic tools in a way that it probably couldn’t historically.”

Agentic AI Will Accelerate Online Shopping

The other thing that Finkelstein is excited about is that he believes Agentic AI shopping will accelerate the amount of shopping that is done online. He compared using Agentic AI to the COVID moment, where people changed their work and shopping behavior in a major way that became permanent.

He then circled back to the idea that Agentic AI is less biased:

“I think it’s actually a better version of that because it’s an unbiased discussion, an unbiased conversation.”

Watch the video podcast interview at a few minutes after the 3 hour mark:

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Julien Tromeur

More Sites Blocking LLM Crawling – Could That Backfire On GEO? via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Hostinger released an analysis showing that businesses are blocking AI systems used to train large language models while allowing AI assistants to continue to read and summarize more websites. The company examined 66.7 billion bot interactions across 5 million websites and found that AI assistant crawlers used by tools such as ChatGPT now reach more sites even as companies restrict other forms of AI access.

Hostinger Analysis

Hostinger is a web host and also a no-code, AI agent-driven platform for building online businesses. The company said it analyzed anonymized website logs to measure how verified crawlers access sites at scale, allowing it to compare changes in how search engines and AI systems retrieve online content.

The analysis they published shows that AI assistant crawlers expanded their reach across websites during a five-month period. Data was collected during three six-day windows in June, August, and November 2025.

OpenAI’s SearchBot increased coverage from 52 percent to 68 percent of sites, while Applebot (which indexes content for powering Apple’s search features) doubled from 17 percent to 34 percent. During the same period, traditional search crawlers essentially remained constant. The data indicates that AI assistants are adding a new layer to how information reaches users rather than replacing search engines outright.

At the same time, the data shows that companies sharply reduced access for AI training crawlers. OpenAI’s GPTBot dropped from access on 84 percent of websites in August to 12 percent by November. Meta’s ExternalAgent dropped from 60 percent coverage to 41 percent website coverage. These crawlers collect data over time to improve AI models and update their Parametric Knowledge but many businesses are blocking them, either to limit data use or for fear of copyright infringement issues.

Parametric Knowledge

Parametric Knowledge, also known as Parametric Memory, is the information that is “hard-coded” into the model during training. It is called “parametric” because the knowledge is stored in the model’s parameters (the weights). Parametric Knowledge is long-term memory about entities, for example, people, things, and companies.

When a person asks an LLM a question, the LLM may recognize an entity like a business and then retrieve the the associated vectors (facts) that it learned during training. So, when a business or company blocks a training bot from their website, they’re keeping the LLM from knowing anything about them, which might not be the best thing for an organization that’s concerned about AI visibility.

Allowing an AI training bot to crawl a company website enables that company to exercise some control over what the LLM knows about it, including what it does, branding, whatever is in the About Us, and enables the LLM to know about the products or services offered. An informational site may benefit from being cited for answers.

Businesses Are Opting Out Of Parametric Knowledge

Hostinger’s analysis shows that businesses are “aggressively” blocking AI training crawlers. While Hostinger’s research doesn’t mention this, the effect of blocking AI training bots is that businesses are essentially opting out of LLM’s parametric knowledge because the LLM is prevented from learning directly from first-party content during training, removing the site’s ability to tell its own story and forcing the LLM to rely on third-party data or knowledge graphs.

Hostinger’s research shows:

“Based on tracking 66.7 billion bot interactions across 5 million websites, Hostinger uncovered a significant paradox:

Companies are aggressively blocking AI training bots, the systems that scrape content to build AI models. OpenAI’s GPTBot dropped from 84% to 12% of websites in three months.

However, AI assistant crawlers, the technology that ChatGPT, Apple, etc. use to answer customer questions, are expanding rapidly. OpenAI’s SearchBot grew from 52% to 68% of sites; Applebot doubled to 34%.”

A recent post on Reddit shows how blocking LLM access to content is normalized and understood as something to protect intellectual property (IP).

The post starts with an initial question asking how to block AIs:

“I want to make sure my site is continued to be indexed in Google Search, but do not want Gemini, ChatGPT, or others to scrape and use my content.

What’s the best way to do this?”

Screenshot Of A Reddit Conversation

Later on in that thread someone asked if they’re blocking LLMs to protect their intellectual property and the original poster responded affirmatively, that that was the reason.

The person who started the discussion responded:

“We publish unique content that doesn’t really exist elsewhere. LLMs often learn about things in this tiny niche from us. So we need Google traffic but not LLMs.”

That may be a valid reason. A site that publishes unique instructional information about a software product that does not exist elsewhere may want to block an LLM from indexing their content because if they don’t then the LLM will be able to answer questions while also removing the need to visit the site.

But for other sites with less unique content, like a product review and comparison site or an ecommerce site, it might not be the best strategy to block LLMs from adding information about those sites into their parametric memory.

Brand Messaging Is Lost To LLMs

As AI assistants answer questions directly, users may receive information without needing to visit a website. This can reduce direct traffic and limit the reach of a business’s pricing details, product context, and brand messaging. It’s possible that the customer journey ends inside the AI interface and the businesses that block LLMs from acquiring knowledge about their companies and offerings are essentially relying on the search crawler and search index to fill that gap (and maybe that works?).

The increasing use of AI assistants affects marketing and extends into revenue forecasting. When AI systems summarize offers and recommendations, companies that block LLMs have less control over how pricing and value appear. Advertising efforts lose visibility earlier in the decision process, and ecommerce attribution becomes harder when purchases follow AI-generated answers rather than direct site visits.

According to Hostinger, some organizations are becoming more selective about what which content is available to AI, especially AI assistants.

Tomas Rasymas, Head of AI at Hostinger commented:

“With AI assistants increasingly answering questions directly, the web is shifting from a click-driven model to an agent-mediated one. The real risk for businesses isn’t AI access itself, but losing control over how pricing, positioning, and value are presented when decisions are made.”

Takeaway

Blocking LLMs from using website data for training is not really the default position to take, even though many people feel real anger and annoyance of the idea of an LLM training on their content.  It may be useful to take a more considered response that weighs the benefits versus the disadvantages and to also consider whether those disadvantages are real or perceived.

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Lightspring

YouTube CEO Announces AI Creation Tools, In-App Shopping For 2026 via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

YouTube CEO Neal Mohan announced the company’s priorities in his annual letter, previewing new AI creation tools, expanded shopping features, and format changes to Shorts.

AI Creation Tools

YouTube is adding three AI creation features this year. Creators will be able to make Shorts using their own likeness, produce games from text prompts through the experimental Playables program, and experiment with music creation tools.

More than 1 million channels used YouTube’s AI creation tools daily in December, according to the letter. The company also reported 20 million users learned about content through its Ask tool in December, and 6 million daily viewers watched at least 10 minutes of autodubbed content.

Mohan sees these tools as creative aids rather than replacements.

“Throughout this evolution, AI will remain a tool for expression, not a replacement,” he wrote.

YouTube also addressed concerns about AI-generated content quality, saying it’s building on spam and clickbait detection systems to reduce what Mohan called “AI slop.”

Shopping Expands With In-App Checkout

YouTube is pushing further into commerce with in-app checkout, letting viewers purchase products without leaving the site.

More than 500,000 creators are already in YouTube Shopping. Mohan cited creator Vineet Malhotra, who drove “millions of dollars in YouTube Shopping GMV in 2025.”

I covered YouTube’s commerce push back in September when the company announced AI-powered product tagging and automatic timestamps for shopping videos. In-app checkout is the next step, aiming to reduce the friction of sending viewers to external sites.

Brand partnership tools are expanding too. Shorts creators will be able to add links to brand sites for sponsored content, and a new feature lets creators swap out branded segments after publishing to turn back catalogs into recurring revenue.

Shorts Gets Image Posts

Image posts are coming to the Shorts feed this year. Shorts now averages 200 billion daily views, according to Mohan.

The addition brings YouTube closer to Instagram’s format, mixing static images with video in the same feed.

Parental Controls

Parental control updates announced last week let parents set time limits on Shorts scrolling for kids and teens, including setting the timer to zero. YouTube calls this an “industry first.”

How 2025 Promises Played Out

I covered Mohan’s 2025 letter when he announced TV had surpassed mobile as the primary viewing device in the U.S. That letter made similar commitments. Some shipped, others are still pending.

Auto dubbing, which he promised to expand to all YouTube Partner Program creators, rolled out. The 2026 letter says 6 million daily viewers now watch at least 10 minutes of autodubbed content. AI tools for video ideas, titles, and thumbnails launched through the Inspiration Tab last year.

YouTube TV’s multiview improvements are still coming. The 2025 letter promised enhancements; the 2026 letter says “fully customizable multiview” arrives soon. The specialized YouTube TV plans Mohan announced this year are new.

The likeness-based Shorts creation, text-to-game features, in-app checkout, and image posts in Shorts are all new to the 2026 roadmap.

Why This Matters

YouTube keeps building tools that hold users and transactions inside its ecosystem. AI creation features give creators more production options. In-app checkout gives YouTube more control over the commerce layer.

The $100 billion YouTube says it paid creators over the past four years shows the scale of its creator economy. These updates aim to keep that system growing.

Looking Ahead

Most features don’t have specific launch dates. Mohan used “this year” and “soon” throughout the letter.

Parental control updates are rolling out now. Creators in YouTube Shopping should watch for checkout integration, and those using AI tools can expect expanded options throughout 2026.

A Little Clarity On SEO, GEO, And AEO via @sejournal, @martinibuster

The debate about AEO/GEO centers on whether it’s a subset of SEO, a standalone discipline, or just standard SEO. Deciding on where to plant a flag is difficult because every argument makes a solid case. There’s no doubt that change is underway and it may be time find where all the competing ideas intersect and work from there.

The Case Against AEO/GEO

Many SEOs argue that AEO/GEO doesn’t differentiate itself enough to justify being anything other than a subset of SEO, sharing computers in the same office.

Harpreet Singh Chatha (X profile) of Harps Digital recently tweeted about AEO / GEO myths to leave behind in 2025.

Some of what he listed:

  • “LLMs.txt
  • Paying a GEO expert to do “chunk optimization.” Chunking content is just making your content readable.
  • Thinking AEO / GEO have nothing in common with SEO. Ask your favourite GEO expert for 25 things that are unique to AI search and don’t overlap with SEO. They will block you.
  • Saying SEO is dead. “

The legendary Greg Boser (LinkedIn profile), one of the original SEOs since 1996 tweeted this:

“At the end of the day, the core foundation of what we do always has been and always will be about understanding how humans use technology to gain knowledge.

We don’t need to come up with a bunch of new acronyms to continue to do what we do. All that needs to happen is we all agree to change the “E” in SEO from “Engine” to “Experience”.

Then everyone can stop wasting time writing all the ridiculous SEO/GEO/AEO posts, and get back to work.”

Inability To Articulate AEO/GEO

What contributes to the perception that AEO/GEO is not a real thing is that many proponents of AEO/GEO fail to differentiate it from standard SEO. We’ve all seen it where someone tweets their new tactic and the SEO peanut gallery chimes in, nah, that’s SEO.

Back in October Microsoft published a blog post about optimizing content for for AI where they asserted:

“While there’s no secret strategy for being selected by AI systems, success starts with content that is fresh, authoritative, structured, and semantically clear.”

The post goes on to affirm the importance of SEO fundamentals such as “Crawlability, metadata, internal linking, and backlinks” but then states that these are just starting points. Microsoft points out that AI search provides answers, not ranked list of pages. That’s correct and it changes a lot.

Microsoft says that now it’s about which pieces of content are being ranked:

“In AI search, ranking still happens, but it’s less about ordering entire pages and more about which pieces of content earn a place in the final answer.”

That kind of echoes what Jesse Dwyer of Perplexity AI recently said about AI Search and SEO:

“As for the index technology, the biggest difference in AI search right now comes down to whole-document vs. “sub-document” processing.

…The AI-first approach is known as “sub-document processing.” Instead of indexing whole pages, the engine indexes specific, granular snippets (not to be confused with what SEO’s know as “featured snippets”).”

Microsoft recently published an explainer called “From discovery to influence:A guide to AEO and GEO” that’s tellingly focused mostly on shopping, which is notable and remarkable because there’s a growing awareness that ecommerce stands to gain a lot from AI Search.

No such luck for informational sites because it’s also gradually becoming understood that Agentic AI is poised to strip informational sites of all branding and value-add and treating them as sources of data.

Common SEO Practices That Pass As GEO

Some of what some champion as GEO and AEO are actually longstanding SEO practices:

  • Crafting content in the form of answers
    Good SEOs have been doing this since Featured Snippets came out in 2014.
  • Chunking content
    Crafting content in tight paragraphs looks good in mobile devices and it’s something good SEOs and thoughtful content creators have been doing for well over a decade.
  • Structured Content
    Headings and other elements that strongly disambiguate the content are also SEO.
  • Structured Data
    Shut your mouth. This is SEO.

The Customer Is Always Right

Some of in the GEO Is Real campe tend to regard themselves as evolving with the times but they also acknowledge they’re just offering what the clients are demanding. SEO practioners are in a hard spot, what are you going to do? Plant your flag on traditional SEO and turn your back on what potential clients are begging for?

Googlers Insist It’s Still SEO

There are Googlers such as Robby Stein (VP of Product), Danny Sullivan, and John Mueller who say that SEO is 100% still relevant because under the hood AI is just firing off Google searches for top ranked sites to backfill into synthesized answers and links (Read: Google Downplays GEO – But Let’s Talk About Garbage AI SERPs). OpenAI was recently hiring a content strategist that is able to lean into to SEO (not GEO), which some say demonstrates that even OpenAI is focused on traditional SEO.

Optimization Is No Longer Just Google

Manick Bhan (LinkedIn profile), founder of the Search Atlas SEO suite, offered an interesting take on why we may be transitioning to a divided SEO and GEO path.

Manick shared:

“SEO has always meant ‘search engine optimization,’ but in practice it has historically meant ‘Google optimization.’ Google defined the interface, the ranking paradigm, the incentives, and the entire mental model the industry used.

The challenge with calling GEO a ‘sub-discipline’ of SEO is that the LLM ecosystem is not one ecosystem, and Google’s AI Mode is becoming a generative surface itself.”

Manick asserts that there is no one “GEO” because each of the AI search and answer engines use different methodologies. He observed that the underlying tactics remain the same but the “the interface, the retrieval model, and the answer surface” are all radically changed from anything that’s come before.

Manick believes that GEO is not SEO, offering the following insights:

“My position is clear: GEO is not just SEO with a fresh coat of paint, and reducing it to that misses the fundamental shift in how modern answer engines actually retrieve, rank, and assemble information.

Yes, the tactics still live in the same universe of on-page and off-page signals. Those fundamentals haven’t changed. But the machines we’re optimizing for have.

Today’s answer engines:

  • Retrieve differently,
  • Fuse and weight sources differently,
  • Handle recency differently,
  • Assign trust and authority differently,
  • Fan out queries differently,
  • And incorporate user behavior into their RAG corpora differently.

Even seemingly small mechanics — like logit calibration and temperature — produce practically different retrieval outputs, which is why identical prompts across engines show measurable semantic drift and citation divergence.

This is why we’re seeing quantifiable, repeatable differences in:

  • Retrieved sources,
  • Answer structures,
  • Citation patterns,
  • Semantic frames,
  • And ranking behavior across LLMs, AI Mode surfaces, and classical Google results.

In this landscape, humility and experimentation matter more than dogma. Treating all of this as ‘just SEO’ ignores how different these systems already are, and how quickly they’re evolving.”

It’s Clear We Are In Transition

Maybe one of the reasons for the anti-GEO backlash is that there is a loud contingent of agencies and individuals who have very little experience with SEO, some who are fresh out of college with zero experience. And it’s not their lack of experience that gets some SEOs in ranting mode. It’s the things they purport are GEO/AEO that are clearly just SEO.

Yet, as Manick of Search Atlas pointed out, AI search and chat surfaces are wildly different from classic search and it’s kind of closing ones eyes to the obvious to deny that things are different and in transition.

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Natsmith1