Google’s December 2024 Updates: Final Results via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Google launched two updates in December that rolled out in succession like waves carrying happy surfers to the beach and a tsunami to the unlucky few. Many SEOs who braced for SERP drama were met with a surprising impact.

Facebook Groups: The Update Was Good!

A common theme in Facebook and forum posts is that the Google Update had a positive effect that resulted in many sites hit by previous sites were returning to life all by themselves. One person reported that a number of their dormant affiliate sites suddenly awakened and were attracting traffic. Then there were some random SEOs taking credit for de-ranked client sites returning to the SERPs, leading me to wonder if they also take credit for their clients losing rankings in the first place…

Black Hat Response To Google’s Update

The forums on Black Hat World (BHW) generally provide an indicator of how much hurt Google’s updates are handing out. Some members of BHW forum were posting about how their sites were coming back.

One member posted:

“This new update is the first update in past years for my websites to grow 🙂 For now, traffic has increased 100%+ and keeps going up…”

Another one echoed that post:

“For me it is going good for 2 days. Hope not to be bad…”

A third member shared:

“My website ranking returned today after 9 months from March update. So seams the keywords and links showing again for first time since. I was affected by the march and thought it wouldn’t recover ever again hopefully this December update once finished rolling out my site won’t be removed again”

And yet another one shared a similar experience:

“My dead website is starting to pick up keywords on ahrefs, increasing impressions on search console, but still no major change regarding traffic.”

There was one outlier who shared that their financial site lost rankings likely due to having been built on expired domains (though it’s easy to imagine other reasons).

Among the celebratory sharing was this outlier post from someone whose glass is half empty:

“Lots of sites got tanked including 3 of mine.”

Overall there was a positive tone to the black hat forum members sharing their actual experiences with Google’s December updates. That fits the pattern of what was being shared in Facebook groups, that the December updates were bringing some sites back from whatever algorithm hits they suffered in previous updates.

Then There Is The X Response.

On X, every Google update announcement is met by a large amount of comments about how big brands are the winners, spam sites are dominating the SERPs (which contradicts the first complaint), and that Google is destroying small businesses. These kinds of commments have been around for decades, from before X/Twitter. The defining characteristic of these kinds of remarks are that they are general in nature and don’t reflect anything specific about the update, they’re just venting about Google.

The response to Google’s update announcement on X was predictably negative. I’m not being snarky when I say the responses are predictably negative, that’s literally the consistent tone for every update announcement that Google makes on X.

Representative posts:

Google is destroying small businesses:

“…How is it possible every update since September 23 has destroyed the traffic of small/medium publishers while boosting corp websites that put out top 10s trash content.”

Google updates consistently benefit Reddit:

“Just call it what it is: The Gift More Traffic to Reddit Update #94”

And the Google destroyed my business post:

“I used to work independently, writing blogs and earning a decent income. I even believed I would never need a traditional job in my life. But thanks to Google, which wiped out my websites one after another, I’m now left with no income, no motivation and no job. Thank you Google”

Again, I am not minimizing the experiences of the people making those posts. I am just pointing out that none of those posts reflect experiences specific to the December Google updates. They are general statements about Google’s algorithms.

There are some outliers who were posting that the update was big but the same people say that for every update. Although 2024 was a year of massive change, those outlier posts have been consistent from well before 2024. I don’t know what’s going on there.

Google’s Core Algorithm Update: What Happened?

It feels clear that Google dialed back something in the algorithm that was suppressing the rankings of many websites. It’s been my opinion that Google’s algorithms that determine if a site is “made for search engines” has been overly hard on expert sites by people whose poor understanding of SEO resulted in otherwise high quality sites laden with high traffic keywords, sometimes showing exact matches to keywords shown in People Also Asked. That, in my opinion results in a “made for search engines” kind of look. Could it be that Google tweaked that algorithm to be a little more forgiving of content spam just as it’s forgiving for link spam?

Something to consider is that this update was followed by an anti-spam update, which could be an improved classifier to catch the spam sites that may have been set loose by the core algorithm update, while leaving the expert sites in the search results.

What About 2025?

Google’s CEO recently stated that 2025 would be a year of major changes. If the two December updates are representative of what’s coming in the future it could be that the heralded changes may not be as harsh as the series of updates in 2024. We can hope, right?

Major Outage Hits OpenAI ChatGPT via @sejournal, @martinibuster

ChatGPT Search is down for users worldwide, becoming unresponsive at approximately 11 AM EST. Down detectors and reports on social media reflect that many users cannot access the site. OpenAI is reporting a major outage.

Major Outage At OpenAI

OpenAI is reporting a major outage is hitting it’s ChatGPT, API, and SORA services. The issue is described by OpenAI as caused by an upstream provider. Upstream provider is a vague description that can be compute-related on Microsoft’s side or a network related service.

Screenshot Of  Official ChatGPT Outage Status

OpenAI Sora Is Only Partially Affected

The major outage has hit both ChatGPT and the API but OpenAI’s Sora service is only partially affected.

Screenshot Shows Severity Of Outage

The major outage has hit both ChatGPT and the API but OpenAI’s Sora service is only partially affected.

The outage began by at least 11 AM and the problem was identified 18 minutes later. OpenAI continues to work on a solution an hour later.

This is a developing event and this article will be updated as more information becomes available.

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Tithi Luadthong

Track Santa With NORAD & Google For Christmas Eve 2024 via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

It’s Christmas Eve, excitement fills the air as children around the world eagerly await Santa Claus’s arrival.

The waiting is over and the inevitable questions start:

“Where is Santa?”

“Do you think he’s in our neighborhood yet?”

This year, the original Santa tracker from NORAD will help you to track Santa’s whereabouts as he starts his night shift at the International Date Line in the Pacific Ocean and heads to New Zealand and Australia.

And Google also continues its tradition with an interactive website and mobile app so users can follow Old Saint Nick’s journey as he delivers presents worldwide until he finishes in South America.

NORAD Santa Tracker: A Holiday Tradition

For over 65 years, the NORAD Santa Tracker has helped families follow Santa’s whereabouts.

The NORAD Santa Tracker began in 1955 when a misprinted phone number in a Sears advertisement directed children to call NORAD’s predecessor, the Continental Air Defense Command (CONAD), instead of Santa.

Colonel Harry Shoup, the director of operations, instructed his staff to give updates on Santa’s location to every child who called.

NORAD continues the tradition to this day.

Screenshot from: noradsanta.org/en/, December 2024.

How To Track Santa With NORAD

  1. Visit the NORAD Santa Tracker website.
  2. On Christmas Eve, the live map will display Santa’s current location and next stop.
  3. For a more traditional experience, call the NORAD Tracks Santa hotline at 1-877-HI-NORAD (1-877-446-6723) to speak with a volunteer who will provide you with Santa’s current location.
  4. Follow NORAD’s social media channels for regular daily updates.

This year, NORAD has added an AI chatbot called Radar to help you get the latest updates.

The Evolution of Google’s Santa Tracker

Since it launched in 2004, Google’s Santa Tracker has changed and improved. The team uses this project to try out new technologies and make design updates. Some of these new features, like “View in 3D,” are later added to other Google products and services.

What’s In The 2024 Google Santa Tracker

This year’s collection includes games like Elf Ski and Penguin Dash, alongside creative activities such as Santa’s Canvas and the coding-focused Code Lab.

Young learners can explore global cultures through the Translations activity, while classic favorites like Present Bounce and Snowball Storm deliver pure holiday fun.

The centerpiece remains the actual Santa tracking feature, which uses a playful mapping interface to “follow” Santa’s journey across the globe.

Complete with arrival times and destination information, it creates an engaging way for families to build anticipation on Christmas Eve.

Screenshot from: santatracker.google.com, December 2024.

How to Use the Google Santa Tracker

  1. Visit the Google Santa Tracker website or download the mobile app for Android devices.
  2. On Christmas Eve, the live map will show Santa’s current location, the number of gifts delivered, and his estimated arrival time at your location.
  3. Explore the map to learn more about the 500+ locations Santa visits, with photos and information provided by Google’s Local Guides.

Extra Features & Activities

Beyond games, the platform showcases detailed animated environments ranging from cozy kitchens where elves prepare holiday treats to snowy outdoor scenes filled with winter activities.

The experience is wrapped in Google’s characteristic bright, cheerful art style, with colorful illustrations that bring North Pole activities to life.

For parents seeking both entertainment and educational value during the holiday season, Google Santa Tracker offers a free, accessible way to channel children’s excitement into engaging activities.

Whether practicing basic coding concepts or learning holiday traditions from around the world, kids can explore while counting down to Christmas.

To All, A Good Night

As you wait for Santa this Christmas Eve, you can choose Google’s interactive features or enjoy the nostalgic feel of NORAD’s tradition.

Happy holidays from all of us at Search Engine Journal!


Featured Image: alphaspirit.it/Shutterstock

Microsoft Launches Multi-Format Campaigns for Audience Ads via @sejournal, @brookeosmundson

Following on the footsteps of Performance Max campaigns, Microsoft Ads launched multi-format campaigns for Audience Ads.

This new feature allows advertisers to create a single campaign that seamlessly integrates various ad formats, including native, display, and online video ads.

Upon its launch, multi-format campaigns for Audience ads are available globally and now the default selection when creating a new Audience ads campaign.

Benefits of Multi-Format Campaigns

The new campaign type comes with several advantages to advertisers, including:

  • More cohesive campaign management: You now only need one audience ads campaign for different ad formats across display, native, and video. Previously, you would’ve needed to set up different campaigns for each ad format.
  • Easier budget management: You can manage and optimize your campaign budget across the different ad formats all within one campaign.
  • Continued flexibility: The ability to create separate campaigns for different ad formats still exists, giving your account the flexibility it needs to optimize according to its goals.

How to Set Up A Multi-Format Campaign

In order to use multi-format campaigns, you need to choose a campaign objective of either of the following:

  • Drive conversions
  • Generate leads
  • Build brand awareness
Microsoft Ads goal selection during campaign creation.Screenshot taken by author, December 2024.

Then, you’ll choose “Audience” as the campaign type.

Microsoft Audience Ads selection.Screenshot taken by author, December 2024

During the campaign creation process, you can select the different types of ad formats. You can choose just one, or all three ad formats depending on your assets and your goals.

Setting up different ad formats in Microsoft multi-format campaigns.Screenshot taken by author, December 2024

After creating your first ad format, you’ll scroll down to the bottom and either select “continue” or “Save and create another ad” to create the additional ad formats within the same campaign:

Create multiple ad formats in Microsoft Audience ads campaign.Screenshot taken by author, December 2024

After creating all your ad formats, you’ll follow the remainder of the typical campaign steps, like:

  • Targets and locations
  • Budgets and bid strategies
  • Ad group settings

Create A More Cohesive Campaign To Drive Results

This update reflects Microsoft Ads’ commitment to evolving its platform to meet the needs of modern advertisers.

By offering a streamlined, flexible solution for combining ad formats, Microsoft makes it easier for advertisers to reach their audiences across diverse channels without the complexity of managing multiple campaigns.

It’s especially helpful for advertisers with smaller budgets that want to use Audience ads, but don’t have the budget to set up three different campaigns just to use each ad format.

For advertisers looking to maximize efficiency and deliver cohesive messaging across native, display, and video ads, multi-format campaigns provide an innovative solution.

Will you be giving multi-format campaigns a try in 2025?

Google Reveals Top Searches Of 2024 via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

Google has released its annual “Year in Search” report, highlighting the top trending searches, news, people, entertainment, and more that captured the world’s attention in 2024.

Based on Google search data, the report offers a glimpse into the topics, events, and figures that defined the year.

Here’s an overview of top trending searches worldwide and a breakdown of U.S.-specific trends.

Global Top Trending Searches 2024

Overall Searches

Globally, the top trending searches were dominated by major sporting events.

The Copa América soccer tournament topped the list, followed by the UEFA European Championship and the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup cricket tournament.

  1. Copa América.
  2. UEFA European Championship.
  3. ICC Men’s T20 World Cup.
  4. India vs. England.
  5. Liam Payne.

News

In the news category, the U.S. presidential election was the most searched topic worldwide, surpassing interest in the Olympic games, which came in third.

Excessive heat and Hurricane Milton also drove significant search interest, ranking as the second and fourth top global news events.

  1. U.S. Election.
  2. Excessive heat.
  3. Olympics.
  4. Hurricane Milton.

Entertainment

In entertainment, veteran comedian and actor Katt Williams topped the global list of most searched actors. Rising stars like Ella Purnell and Hina Khan also earned spots in the top five.

Highly anticipated sequels dominated movie searches, with “Inside Out 2,” “Deadpool & Wolverine,” and “Dune: Part Two” ranking as the top three.

Top Actors:

  1. Katt Williams.
  2. Pawan Kalyan.
  3. Adam Brody.
  4. Ella Purnell.
  5. Hina Khan.

Top Movies:

  1. Inside Out 2.
  2. Deadpool & Wolverine.
  3. Saltburn.
  4. Beetlejuice Beetlejuice.
  5. Dune: Part Two.

United States Top Trending Searches 2024

Overall Searches

  1. Election.
  2. Donald Trump.
  3. Connections.
  4. New York Yankees.
  5. Kamala Harris.

People

  1. Donald Trump.
  2. Kamala Harris.
  3. JD Vance.
  4. Joe Biden.
  5. Catherine, Princess of Wales.

Entertainment

Actors:

  1. Katt Williams.
  2. Jacob Elordi.
  3. Glen Powell.
  4. Jeremy Allen White.
  5. Shane Gillis.

Musicians

  1. Usher.
  2. Diddy.
  3. Kendrick Lamar.
  4. Drake.
  5. Justin Timberlake.

Sports

Sports fans worldwide were captivated by boxer Mike Tyson, the second most searched athlete globally behind Algerian karate champion Imane Khelif.

Sixteen-year-old soccer phenom Lamine Yamal also made the top five, reflecting the growing buzz about the young star.

Among sports teams, American franchises dominated, with the New York Yankees, Los Angeles Dodgers, and Boston Celtics ranking in the top five for global searches.

However, interest in soccer was evident, with Inter Miami CF and German club Bayer Leverkusen also making the list.

Athletes:

  1. Mike Tyson.
  2. Imane Khalif.
  3. Simone Biles.
  4. Scottie Scheffler.
  5. Jake Paul.

Teams:

  1. New York Yankees.
  2. Los Angeles Dodgers.
  3. New York Mets.
  4. Boston Celtics.
  5. Minnesota Timberwolves.

Digital Culture & Gaming

In gaming, the massively multiplayer life sim Connections was the most searched game globally, followed by the creature-capturing open-world adventure Palworld.

The trends point to gamers’ desire for connection and imaginative escapism.

Games:

  1. Connections.
  2. Strands.
  3. Infinite Craft.
  4. Palworld.
  5. Sprunki.

Lifestyle Trends

Aesthetics:

  1. Mob wife aesthetic.
  2. Nancy Meyers aesthetic.
  3. Pillow face aesthetic.
  4. Brat aesthetic.
  5. Decora aesthetic.

Food & Recipes

Olympic-themed chocolate muffin recipes topped global food-related searches, while the traditional Chinese treat tanghulu came in second. Dubai chocolate bar rounded out the top five, showcasing an international palate.

  1. Olympic chocolate muffins.
  2. Tanghulu.
  3. Tini’s mac and cheese.
  4. Mama Kelce’s cookie.
  5. Dense bean salad.

Popular Locations (Google Maps)

When it came to getting out and about, Google Maps searches showed Central Park in New York as the most searched-for park in the world, while the British Museum topped the list of museums.

For sports venue searches, Madison Square Garden led the pack.

Top U.S. Hiking Areas:

  1. Dater Mountain Nature Park, Sloatsburg, NY.
  2. Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area, OR.
  3. Garden of the Gods, Colorado Springs, CO.
  4. Looking Glass Falls, Asheville, NC.
  5. Diamond Head Crater Trailhead, Honolulu, HI.

Music Trends

Google’s “Hum to Search” feature, which identifies songs based on audio clips, revealed that people around the world were eager to locate catchy tunes like “Beautiful Things” by Benson Boone and “Die With A Smile” by Lady Gaga.

The sea shanty “Wellerman” also had a global resurgence.

Most Hummed Songs:

  1. Beautiful Things – Benson Boone.
  2. Axel F – Crazy Frog
  3. Wellerman – Santiano.
  4. Past Lives – Slushii.
  5. Too Sweet – Hozier.

A Snapshot Of 2024 Through Search

Google’s Year in Search 2024 reflects what connected people worldwide over the past year.

Key highlights include the World Cup, travel, a renewed love for nature, and virtual adventures. Common themes are sports, entertainment, connection, and comfort.

We’ll be watching to see what people search for in 2025 and beyond.

For a complete overview of this year’s search trends, visit Google’s Year in Search mini-site.

More Resources:


Featured Image: Daniel Pawer/Shutterstock

Study: ChatGPT & AI Tools Gain Ground In Search Market via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

A new study by Previsible reveals significant changes in search behavior, with AI language models (LLMs) gaining traction as referral traffic sources.

The analysis of over 30 websites shows Perplexity and ChatGPT emerging as alternatives to traditional search engines.

David Bell, co-founder of Previsible, believes this indicates Google’s growth is at a standstill:

“Google is basically plateaued and has begun to have its search dominance degraded. The reason being is that people are starting to use ChatGPT, Claude, Co-pilot, Bing, all these different experiences to better solve their search intent.”

Here are some key points from the study. While it doesn’t provide a complete picture, it offers the best information available right now.

Key Findings

Referral Traffic

The study found that Perplexity and ChatGPT command approximately 37% of LLM referral traffic, while CoPilot and Gemini follow with 12-14% each.

Notably, the finance sector dominates LLM-driven traffic, accounting for 84% of all referrals analyzed.

In a video walkthrough of the study, Bell explains:

“Finance, in particular, has an outsized increase in traffic from language models. This could be due to Perplexity and other language models having integrations or relationships with different platforms that allow more direct access to users.”

Content Distribution

The study reveals that blog posts receive 77.35% of LLM referral traffic, followed by:

  • Homepage visits (9.04%)
  • News content (8.23%)
  • Guides (2.35%)

“Informational content still matters in the age of AI search,” Bell noted. However, he advises focusing on conversion rate optimization (CRO) and user journey, as product pages do not surface prominently in language models.

According to the study, product pages receive less than 0.5% of LLM referral traffic, suggesting challenges for ecommerce strategies.

Looking Ahead

LLM referral traffic currently represents 0.25% of total traffic for the most impacted sectors, though the study notes significant growth rates.

In the last 90 days of the study, Previsible found:

  • 900% growth in ChatGPT referrals for the events industry
  • 400%+ growth in ChatGPT traffic for e-commerce and finance sectors
  • Consistent growth across all models except CoPilot

Bell explains what this could mean for websites:

“If you extrapolate out, if you average all of these out, let’s say roughly 200% growth in organic or AI traffic every 90 days for the next 12 months, it can be up to 20% of overall traffic to a website.”

🚨 Free Tool Alert 🚨

Previsible has created a free Looker Studio dashboard to help businesses track website traffic from Language Learning Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Co-pilot, Gemini, and Claude.

You can select your Google Analytics 4 (GA4) account and a date range to view data.

The dashboard shows:

  • Organic Sessions: Total organic sessions during the selected time.
  • Total LLM Sessions: Number of sessions from LLMs, with percentage breakdowns.
  • LLM Traffic Over Time: A line graph showing LLM traffic trends, with separate lines for each LLM.
  • LLM Traffic by Landing Page: A table of top landing pages from LLM traffic, including sessions, percentages, average time on page, and comparison to site averages.

How This Helps

By analyzing this data, you can:

  • Assess the impact of LLMs on your traffic compared to organic traffic.
  • Identify which LLMs drive the most traffic and adjust your content.
  • Track LLM traffic growth over time and adapt your strategies.
  • Discover popular landing pages among LLM users and improve them for engagement.
  • Compare time spent by LLM users on each page to the site average to identify areas for improvement.

In Summary

Here are three key takeaways from the study:

  • Finance websites are seeing the strongest LLM referral activity, with blog content receiving the majority of visits
  • Product pages rarely surface in LLM results, suggesting the need for adjusted e-commerce strategies
  • Growth rates are significant, potentially reaching 20% of total traffic within a year if current trends continue

When looking at these trends, it’s important to keep a balanced approach to getting traffic and optimizing your strategies.

Don’t pursue AI traffic if it could hurt your sales.

AI language models are becoming new sources of website traffic. However, they currently make up only about 0.25% of overall traffic in the sectors that are most affected.

It will be interesting to see how this number changes by next year.


Featured Image: Koshiro K/Shutterstock

Google Offers To Loosen Search Engine Deals In Antitrust Response via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

Google has submitted its proposal to address the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) antitrust lawsuit, which accuses the company of monopolistic practices in search.

Google disagrees with the court’s initial decision and plans to appeal. However, as part of the legal process, Google and the DOJ must present remedy proposals.

Background

In October 2020, the DOJ and several state attorneys general sued Google for breaking antitrust laws to maintain its control over search services and advertising.

In September 2024, Judge Amit Mehta ruled in favor of the DOJ.

The DOJ demands that Google sell Chrome, which it argues strengthens Google’s search dominance.

Additionally, the Justice Department suggested Google sell Android if other solutions fail to restore competition.

Google’s Defense

Google has condemned the DOJ’s proposal, labeling it a “radical interventionist agenda.”

Kent Walker, Google’s President of Global Affairs, argued that the remedies would “break a range of Google products” and result in “unprecedented government overreach.”

Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s VP of Regulatory Affairs, stated that the case concerns contracts, not broader competition issues.

The company believes its success comes from having better products and innovative ideas rather than engaging in unfair competition.

Google stated in its filing:

“People don’t use Google because they have to — they use it because they want to.”

DOJ’s Demands

The Justice Department’s proposal seeks extensive structural changes, including:

  • Mandatory sale of the Chrome browser
  • Possible sale of Android
  • Prohibition of exclusive agreements
  • Mandatory data sharing with competitors
  • Enhanced oversight through a technical committee

Google’s Remedies Proposal

Google’s proposal focuses on search distribution agreements with browsers and device manufacturers.

Here are the key points:

  1. Browser Agreements: Browser companies like Apple and Mozilla would be allowed to negotiate multiple default search engine agreements across different platforms.
  2. Android Contracts: Device makers would have greater freedom to preload multiple search engines and Google apps independently
  3. Oversight and Compliance: A compliance monitoring system would be implemented

Next Steps

A remedies hearing is scheduled for April, at which time Google will appeal the court’s ruling.

Google argues its proposal meets the court’s findings about search contracts, while the DOJ seeks more extensive changes.

This case outcome could impact the search engine market and Google’s business model as we know it.


Featured Image: JHVEPhoto/Shutterstock

Yoast Co-Founder Calls For WordPress Leadership Change – Mullenweg Resists via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Joost de Valk, co-founder of the Yoast SEO plugin, called for a change in WordPress governance that removes Mullenweg as the sole decision maker, offering to lead the transition to a more democratic and diverse board that is representative of WordPress stakeholders. Matt Mullenweg disagreed.

Critique Of Mullenweg’s Leadership

Joost says that he was prompted to speak out after Matt Mullenweg’s decision to pause WordPress services over the holidays which inadvertently caused an issue with WordCamp registrations, forcing Joost to open a GitHub ticket to fix the problem. The holiday pause made it clear to Joost one-person control of the WordPress project had become problematic.

Mullenweg’s leadership style was called into question, with Joost characterizing him as a Benevolent Dictator For Life (BDFL) whose rule was no longer benevolent. He cited Mullenweg from an interview where he states he doesn’t identify as a dictator and suggested the phrase “enlightened leader.” Joost scoffed at the idea, stating that many in the WordPress community would disagree with the self-description of “enlightened leader.”

WordPress Community Lacks Democracy

The blog post notes the irony the WordPress Project’s mission is to democratize publishing but the WordPress project itself far from democratic, essentially controlled by one person. He expressed the belief that the current governance structure doesn’t allow for diversity of opinions and that his restrictive control over the WordPress trademark is stifling growth.

Screenshot Of WordPress’s Mission Statement

On the lack of diversity of opinions he writes:

“You need many voices, many ideas, many backgrounds. You need to embrace diversity. Unfortunately, those with ideas that don’t follow the same direction as our current leader, are being shut down, quite a few even banned…”

One of the changes Joost proposes is a loosening of Mullenweg’s grip on the WordPress trademark to allow for more growth:

“The WordPress trademark is given to the public domain or otherwise dealt with in such a way that every company can freely say that they do ‘WordPress hosting’, ‘WordPress support’ etc. Not just because that’s the right thing to do in my mind, but because doing so means we allow growth of the terms and the concepts.”

Joost’s Role and Vision For Change

Lastly, Joost volunteers to lead the change at WordPress so that it becomes a truly democratic foundation with a governing board representing all the stakeholders.

He writes:

“Taking back the commons means that we try to hear every voice, be considerate of all the different use cases of that commons and bring us all forward.

…I’m here, and willing to lead through this transition.”

Among the changes that Joost proposes is a “federated” WordPress repository, a way for multiple plugin and theme directories can curate reviews and addition which then update to the other directories, decentralizing the official WordPress theme and plugin repositories.

He expects to enter discussions with others sometime in the middle of January 2025 to come up with a plan for how to move forward.

Mullenweg Rejects Joost’s Proposals

Matt Mullenweg commented on Joost’s blog post, offering a passive-aggressive dismissal of everything he proposed. His comment was veiled in politeness while handing out indirect criticism and a recommendation that Joost should leave the WordPress community.

These parts of Mullenweg’s response suggest that Joost should start his own community outside of WordPress:

“I think this is a great idea for you to lead and do under a name other than WordPress… There’s really no way to accomplish everything you want without starting with a fresh slate…”

Here is Mullenweg’s full response:

“I think this is a great idea for you to lead and do under a name other than WordPress. There’s really no way to accomplish everything you want without starting with a fresh slate from a trademark, branding, and people point of view.”

The Internal Struggle Is Already Happening

If Mullenweg resists change, an internal struggle within the WordPress community seems inevitable. In fact, momentum for this has already begun; a group of WordPress contributors recently signed an open letter seeking governance reform.

The open letter was written by:

  • “Core committers and contributors
  • Make/WordPress team elders and contributors
  • Others serving in various community roles”

They wrote:

  • “We object to the status quo, and believe the WordPress project’s current internal operating structure threatens the health and sustainability of the project and its community.
  • We object to the continued opaqueness of the WordPress governance model.
  • We object to one person, Matt Mullenweg, controlling all official infrastructure, including the project’s website, email systems, support forums, core, plugin, and theme repositories, update systems, security tools, communication channels, and other technical assets.
  • We object to major decisions being made without community input, advice, or support.”

Change is coming. Joost’s proposal is a way to accomplish that change in a manner that protects the core principles and community of the WordPress open source project.

The HCU Effect In Google Updates via @sejournal, @martinibuster

It’s fairly commonplace for Google Updates to prompt SEOs to raise concerns about the Helpful Content Update (HCU). A careful consideration of known facts reveals that it may be possible to determine whether a site is truly impacted by HCU-related signals.

Black Box Systems

Black box systems are something that all SEOs should consider understanding because it helps prevent misunderstandings about the consequences of a Google Update, both the core and spam updates.

A black box is a system where someone observing from the outside knows what goes in (the input) and can see what comes out  (the output). What the observer cannot do is infer what is happening inside the box based on the input or the output of the black box.

There are literally thousands of processes going on inside Google’s black box algorithm which makes it impossible to isolate the impact of a single factor. Identifying the ranking effect of the HCU is even more impossible because Google removed it as a standalone system and integrated into the core algorithm.

On a side note, the black-box nature of Google’s ranking algorithms is why SEO ranking factor research based on millions of search results (the output) is unreliable. Those studies make good clickbait and will continue to be created as long as SEOs remain unaware of the principle of the black box.

Helpful Content Update (HCU)

The helpful content system (commonly referred to as the HCU) was integrated into Google’s core algorithm in March 2024 and the system no longer exists.  It now exists as a component of the ranking algorithm among other ranking-related algorithms.

What that means is that it’s not a standalone system that impacts sites a couple times a year. It’s now integrated into the ranking systems that run all the time.

Previously, when Google updated the Helpful Content System, a site’s rankings drop could reasonably be attributed to the system. That’s no longer the case, as it’s now a part of the ranking algorithm that runs continuously.

When Google announces an update they no longer mention if the former HCU was updated because it’s not a system anymore, it’s just a bunch of signals in the ranking algorithm that runs all the time.

This is how Google explained it:

“Announced in 2022 as the “Helpful Content Update”, this was a system designed to better ensure people see original, helpful content written by people, for people, in search results, rather than content made primarily to gain search engine traffic. In March 2024, it evolved and became part of our core ranking systems, as our systems use a variety of signals and systems to present helpful results to users.”

Here’s the exception to that rule:

If Google’s update announcement mentions they are improving the signals for identifying “people-first” content then it’s fairly reasonable to assume that some component of the former HCU was updated.

What Needs To Be Understood About The HCU

It needs to be understood that there is literally no way to claim with 100% certainty that the HCU is the reason why any given site lost rankings during a core algorithm update. There is no way to isolate the effects of the HCU signals from the hundreds or thousands of other signals.

Except for when Google’s update announcement specifically mentions one of the components, but even then it’s important to identify the effects on the site instead of shrugging and declaring it’s the HCU. That’s an excuse, not a diagnosis.

How To Diagnose Effects Of HCU

Google recommends reading their documentation about all the signals for helpful “people-first” content in order to understand the effects of HCU related issues. People-first means content that is not search-engine first.

The documentation says:

“Google’s automated ranking systems are designed to present helpful, reliable information that’s primarily created to benefit people, not to gain search engine rankings, in the top Search results. This page is designed to help creators evaluate if they’re producing such content.”

Google’s documentation on people-first content recommends the following topics for debugging ranking issues:

  1. Content and quality
  2. Expertise
  3. Page experience
  4. People-first content
  5. Search engine-first content

Google’s documentation goes on to say that after identifying relevant web pages, other signals are applied to check if the content exhibit “aspects” of experience, expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness (EEAT).

“After identifying relevant content, our systems aim to prioritize those that seem most helpful. To do this, they identify a mix of factors that can help determine which content demonstrates aspects of experience, expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness, or what we call E-E-A-T.

Of these aspects, trust is most important. The others contribute to trust, but content doesn’t necessarily have to demonstrate all of them. For example, some content might be helpful based on the experience it demonstrates, while other content might be helpful because of the expertise it shares.”

Takeaway

The takeaway from Google’s documentation about people-first content is that there are multiple components to what HCU is. People-first content is super important, especially because it’s the standard SEO practice to create search-engine first content by starting with top ranked keywords, organizing site architecture around keywords, and generally optimizing for keywords and not for people.  For more on that topic read: A Candid Assessment Of AI Search & SEO

Google’s People-First Documentation

Creating helpful, reliable, people-first content

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Studio Romantic

Mullenweg’s WordPress Pause Triggers Unexpected Complications via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Matt Mullenweg recently paused multiple WordPress.org services for a holiday break but unintended effects started almost immediately, affecting the attendance of future WordPress conferences taking place around the world. Joost de Valk requested a fix on GitHub.

Mullenweg’s Pause In Services

Mullenweg’s unexpected pause in WordPress services affected new account registrations on WordPress.org, new plugin, theme and photo directory submissions and reviews of new plugins. Mullenweg did not set a time for the return of those services, only saying that they’ll return once he has the “time, energy, and money” sometime in 2025. So the pause in WordPress.org services is for an indeterminate amount of time.

Unintended Consequences Of WordPress Pause

Joost de Valk filed a GitHub ticket calling attention to a serious issue affecting WordCamp registration for new community members. The GitHub ticket foregrounds the problem inherent in Mullenweg’s unilateral decision to pause certain WordPress.org services.

Mullenweg’s dramatic pause in services had the unintended consequence of diminishing the growth, energy and momentum of the WordPress community itself.

Joost’s GitHub ticket explains why Mullenweg’s holiday break is disruptive:

“Recently, a change was made to require people to have a WordPress.org account to buy a ticket for a WordCamp. Because of that change, the new Holiday Break imposed by Matt causes issues. Because of that imposed holiday break, people can no longer sign up for a WordPress.org account and thus can no longer do that before buying a WordCamp ticket.

There are several, large and small, WordCamps that might be affected by this, as can be seen from the list on Central, and probably including WordCamp Asia 2025.”

Members of the WordPress community agreed. These are a sample of the comments representative of WordPress community members’ concerns:

MakarandMane shared:

“Following 2 weeks there are two Wordcamp Kolhapur & Kolkata.. After 2 weeks another WordCamp in pune.
Kolhapur is new community which focus totally on new attendee who don’t have an account. This will affect our tickets sales and contributor day.”

A concern about WordCamp EU was also raised:

“And WCEU has just opened their ticket sales…
In the WordCamp rules, we have to be inclusive…. refusing to sell a WordCamp ticket is not really…. welcoming to new community members”

Solution Found

A solution was proposed to fix the issue caused by Mullenweg’s pause in services.

WordPress community member dd32 posted:

“It’s been agreed to re-open the registration for WordCamp purposes, that’s been done in https://meta.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/14325”

Community members were grateful for the fix although some reported that they were still blocked from registering a new account for WordPress but that was a glitch in their browser, fixed by switching to a new browser or a new IP address.

Concern Raised About Solution

Not everyone agreed that the solution was ideal. One WordPress community member posted their concern and received four likes from other members, indicating that others agreed with them.

decodekult wrote:

“I would suggest reconsidering this solution. It addresses the urgent thing here (people could not buy ticket!) but it ignores the primary petition: remove wordpress.org login requirement for buying WordCamp tickets.

The change that closed this ticket does not do that: it guesses where you came from, and if it contains the magic words, then you are lucky enough as to create an account on wordpress.org.

Given that the primary reason for requiring a wordpress.org account that the owner can log into for buying WordCamp tickets was precisely preventing specific people from buying WordCamp tickets, because they could not log into their accounts due to their relationship with a specific company, and given that this ban was legally lifted by a court decision, I raise my hand here and request, as this ticket did from its own title, that the wordpress.org login requirement be removed for buying WordCamp tickets.”

What Happens When Decisions Are Imposed

The importance of what happened is not just about the inability of new community members to register for local WordCamps. The issue is one of decisions and control. One person, Matt Mullenweg, appears to have made the unilateral decision to pause WordPress.org services. Joost de Valk himself uses the word “imposed” to characterize the pause, writing:

“…the new Holiday Break imposed by Matt causes issues. Because of that imposed holiday break, people can no longer sign up for a WordPress.org account…”

The word “imposed” in this context means a unilateral decision made by one person without consultation or choice from community members. Imposed is a strong (and appropriate) word because it conveys that the holiday break was not optional or voluntary but mandated by Matt Mullenweg.

Although this issue was solved by the WordPress community, it would never had happened if the decision had been made with input from stakeholders across the entire WordPress community, from developers, core contributors to WordCamp organizers. This is what happens when decision-making lacks community input and accountability.

Read the GitHub ticket:

Remove wordpress.org login requirement for buying WordCamp tickets

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Studio Romantic