Organic vs. Paid Social Media: How To Align Your Strategy via @sejournal, @brookeosmundson

In the ever-changing social media landscape, many companies ask whether they should focus on organic or paid social media.

Spoiler alert: You’re asking the wrong question.

It is a well-known “rule” of marketing that it takes seven interactions with a brand before a consumer makes a purchase decision.

In addition, more than two-thirds (68%) of consumers have made a purchase through social media.

It’s clear that brands need to have both an organic and paid media strategy.

That being said, creating effective social media strategies is no easy feat.

Whether you’re new to social media strategy or looking for tips to refresh your brand, this guide is for you.

Read on to uncover the differences between organic vs. paid social media, examples of each type of social media marketing approach, and how to create an effective strategy that aligns both.

What Are The Differences Between Organic And Paid Social Media

While you may be tempted to create the same content for organic and paid social media, it’s necessary to distinguish between the two.

Each approach has its own characteristics, advantages, and strategies – but also some common ground. Let’s take a look at the benefits and goals for comparison.

An organic social media strategy typically focuses on the following:

  • Content creation.
  • Reach.
  • Engagement.
  • Long-term relationship building.

While there is no direct cost associated with organic social media, it’s important to distinguish the indirect costs.

The primary cost of organic social media involves content creation and engagement with followers. With consistent posting and community engagement, you will gradually build an organic following.

A paid social media strategy differentiates from organic social media in these areas:

  • Content promotion.
  • Reach.
  • Cost.
  • Engagement and conversions.
  • Short-term goals and results.
  • Scalability.

To summarize, while organic and paid social media share common ground and goals, there are distinct differences between the two approaches.

What Is Organic Social Media?

Now that we’ve distinguished the key differences between organic and paid social media, let’s dive further into organic social media.

Organic social media is a channel strategy where businesses create and share original content on social media platforms without paying for reach.

The type of content posted can vary per platform and typically consists of a mixture of:

  • Text posts.
  • Images.
  • Videos.
  • Blog articles.
  • And more.

Aside from posting branded content, organic social media involves other community engagement, including:

  • Responding to user comments.
  • Fostering conversations on the platform(s).

While organic social media doesn’t always provide the reach and targeting of paid social media, it’s still considered a core component of a holistic digital marketing strategy.

So, why is organic social media so important if it doesn’t provide massive reach and conversions?

With organic social media, the primary goal is to engage with the brand’s existing follower base and to build long-term relationships with those customers.

Additionally, organic social media is a place for companies to establish brand voice and authenticity.

Let’s take a look at a few examples of organic social posts from varied brands.

Example 1

In this example, the brand created a listicle article catering to a specific group of women.

Once a user clicks on the post, they’re taken directly to the brand’s website to view the full content.

The brand also engages with user comments and aims to increase website traffic to popular blog posts.

Example 2

In this example, the brand showcases its main product in a lifestyle form.

With many people working remotely, they’re looking to personalize and upgrade their office aesthetics.

This post shows the possibilities and flexibilities of its product in a real-life example.

Example 3

The social platform X (formerly known as Twitter) is known as a way for brands to keep their content lighthearted while not directly promoting products or services.

The Delta example above does exactly that.

The brand created an interactive word scramble for users, which keeps them engaged. Additionally, users are encouraged to comment, which helps boost engagement and visibility.

These days, brands must get more creative than ever for organic content to stand out.

It’s no secret that organic reach on social media declines every year, making it hard to engage with existing followers and gain new ones along the way.

Enter paid social media.

What Is Paid Social Media?

Paid social media is a tactic that involves promoting content through advertising dollars.

Unlike organic social media, which only reaches existing followers, paid social media allows content to be targeted to specific audiences.

Running social advertising has many benefits, including:

  • Create content for specific, targeted audiences.
  • Expand and increase reach in a scalable manner.
  • Increase overall engagement on the platform.
  • Works well for short-term goals, such as lead generation or purchases.
  • The ability to track and measure campaign performance.

Typically, paid social media ads consist of these main formats:

  • Video ads.
  • Image ads.
  • Carousel ads.
  • Text-only ads.

Video ads can be used across many social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, LinkedIn, X (formerly Twitter), and more.

Each platform has its own inventory for sponsored ads, such as:

  • Newsfeed.
  • Stories.
  • Reels.
  • Sidebar sections.
  • And more.

Some brands decide to create dedicated content for different audiences and platforms, while others decide to boost organic content to a wider audience.

Below are a few examples of brands and how they use paid social advertising.

Example 1

Ironically, this is paid advertising at its finest.

The example above is promoting the primary B2B advertising platform, encouraging relevant businesses to advertise with it.

Example 2:

Clinique exampleImage from Clinique, August 2023

This example shows a screenshot of a Snapchat video ad. This ad type is strategically placed while users watch their friends’ Snapchat stories as a way to promote new products.

The ads have a strong CTA placement at the bottom and a clickable product highlight in the lower left-hand corner.

Example 3

The Farmer's Dog

The last example is the form of an Instagram video ad placed within a user’s newsfeed.

It would seem video ads are the go-to format lately, as it’s difficult to find static image ads in the wild.

The video ad also includes a clickable Shop Now button and allows users to like, comment, or share the ad for further engagement.

How To Create A Strategy To Align Paid And Organic Social Media

Now the fun part begins: creating a cohesive strategy inclusive of both organic and paid social media.

As mentioned earlier, a social media strategy should not be an “either/or” mindset.

It will take a consistent, holistic strategy that encompasses the advantages of both arenas.

Let’s break down the steps to developing a sound strategy that integrates both approaches for maximum value.

Step 1: Define Your Goals

This may go without saying, but goals are essential to any strategy.

Without goals, there’s no guidance or direction to provide feedback on what’s working and what’s not.

Before establishing channel goals, the ‘big picture’ business goals need to be established.

From there, specific goals are defined for each channel, including both organic and paid social media. These could include:

It’s important to note which approach will contribute to each goal to help define success and keep note of that.

Step 2: Identify & Leverage Your Target Audience

Understanding your target market is crucial, especially for social media efforts.

It’s not just about uncovering the demographic components of your audience, but also about identifying behavior trends and where they spend time online.

Researching this information ahead of time will guide both organic and paid social media efforts to ensure you’re reaching the right people on the right platform.

Once your target audience(s) is identified, you can then use these components to build relevant audience lists for paid social media campaigns to reach new users.

Step 3: Identify Platforms & Develop Content Themes

Part of step two is to identify where your target audience spends time online. Once that’s been identified, it’s time to align those platforms with your strategy.

Selecting the right social media platforms is so important, especially for organic social media.

While it’s typically easier to run paid social campaigns on multiple platforms, establishing an authentic organic presence on each chosen platform can be time-consuming and tricky – especially if it’s a platform your brand hasn’t used before, or if it’s not 100% aligned with your business goals.

Different platforms cater to different audiences and content formats, so choose wisely based on your audience and business goals.

Not all chosen platforms have to utilize organic and paid approaches, and that’s okay!

After identifying your platforms, the hard part kicks in: content themes.

Again, depending on your overall business goals and audiences, the content produced on each platform, and each approach, could be similar or completely different.

What’s most important is creating a content strategy consistent with your brand identity. This should include certain themes, topics, messages, and even imagery or video aesthetics.

For example, while organic content may focus on keeping people engaged on the platform, the paid content may be promoting a certain offer.

The content is different, but keeping a similar theme, style, and language helps new users associate and remember your brand quickly.

Step 4: Plan And Segment Organic & Paid Content

Now that you have chosen your content themes, it’s time to plan and schedule content.

From an organic standpoint, this could include a mix of:

  • Images.
  • Videos.
  • Polls.
  • Stories
  • Etc.

Remember – organic content should provide value and focus on engagement.

Creating a content calendar is a great way to keep the team organized, especially if multiple teammates are responsible for managing social.

That being said, it’s important to do your research and test posting at different times of the day, days of the week, etc., to determine when engagement is most likely to occur.

From a paid social media perspective, aligning campaigns with the organic content calendar is a great way to synergize efforts and identify if or where paid social ads need to fill any particular calendar gaps.

An example of aligning paid social campaigns to the overarching business goals could be running ads for a new product launch or a huge sale.

These types of efforts can help boost immediate sales or demand while also helping strengthen the brand organically for the long haul.

Step 5: Create, Launch, & Optimize Campaigns

This step particularly focuses on paid social campaigns; however, the optimization and analysis can and should be done for both approaches.

Once steps one to four have been completed, this should make setting up paid campaigns a breeze (hopefully!).

Remember, each platform utilizes different ad formats, so the paid content should have been done in steps two and three.

Utilize the targeted personas created early on to build specific audiences in each platform.

While there are many audience-building similarities between social media platforms, each has nuances and specifications to keep in mind.

The audience targets in each platform should help guide campaign budgets, while the content of the ads should guide the campaign objectives.

For example, if you have a target audience of 500,000 users, a $20 daily budget likely won’t cut it to see significant results.

Additionally, if your goal is quality lead generation, the campaign objective likely shouldn’t be set to ‘awareness’ or ‘reach.’

Once campaigns have been built and launched, it’s time to watch and learn.

Typically, campaigns take a few days in a learning phase to identify what’s performing well and what needs to be improved. The learning phase will differ based on multiple factors, including audience size and budget.

It’s important to let the campaigns learn before taking any significant action (unless you see something dire, like a grammatical error or incorrect audience targeting).

Regularly reviewing the performance metrics of both organic and paid content should be part of the plan, and not done in silos.

In the early stages of creating your social media strategy, each approach should have key performance indicators (KPIs) associated with it, and this is where regular analysis comes in.

Significant learnings can be applied from one approach to another, and cross-channel learnings help adjust your strategy based on what’s working and what’s not.

Summary

Understanding the distinctions and synergies between organic and paid social media is crucial for building a well-rounded online presence.

While organic efforts prioritize brand authenticity, engagement, and nurturing connections, paid social media can provide targeted and expanded reach, and quick short-term results that are scalable over time.

Both approaches are vital components of a comprehensive marketing strategy.

Once you’ve nailed the basics, aligning your organic and paid social media strategies can enable your brand to establish a strong, consistent, and authentic identity in the ever-changing digital landscape.

More resources: 


Featured Image: oatawa/Shutterstock

How To Perform Website Experiments [+ SEJ Experiment Walk-Through & Results] [Webinar] via @sejournal, @hethr_campbell

How do you know what to change on your website or landing page to make it more effective?

Are the tweaks and tests you made to your site really successful? Or do they just look successful?

Could the best practices you’ve been following for years actually be what’s holding you back from achieving your goals and KPIs?

Join us on October 11 to learn a step-by-step process you can use to conduct experiments on your website to get the data you need to keep your website strong.

We’ll show you how to set up and design your very own experiments and collect data that will make a difference to your bottom line.

In this webinar, you’ll also learn:

  • The best time to run an experiment to get the most informative data.
  • What to do when you don’t see the expected results, and how to prevent other factors from influencing your results.
  • How we run our experiments, and what we plan to do with the results.

Join our very own Angie Nikoleychuk, Content Marketing Manager, and learn the key factors to focus on when running website experiments, how to manage your data collection, and how to make sure your users stay happy and engaged.

PLUS: You’ll get an exclusive walk-through of our new programmatic and in-house ad experiment, where we examined how ad types and layouts affect user behavior on our website.

Sign up now to secure your spot!

6 Audience Ads Updates From Microsoft Advertising via @sejournal, @kristileilani

In its latest article, Microsoft Advertising highlighted a series of updates to various features aimed at helping advertisers maximize ad campaign budget, reach new audiences, and increase ad options for specific verticals.

6 Updates To Audience Ads

This month’s news featured six updates to Audiences Ads, which leverage consumer intent signals, such as searches, web activity, and profile data.

This data allows brands to target an audience ready to convert on MSN, Microsoft Edge, Outlook.com, and additional publisher placements.

6 Audience Ads Updates From Microsoft AdvertisingScreenshot from MSN, October 2023

Automating Real-Time Bids For Conversions Or Budget

To simplify bidding, Microsoft is rolling out Maximize Conversions and Target CPA.

These features will allow Microsoft to automatically adjust real-time bids for the most conversions or an average target CPA (cost per action) over a 30-day timeframe.

Expanded Audience Ads Availability

In addition to new bidding features, Microsoft expanded its Audience Ads to 58 new markets in August, now covering 187 globally.

Predictive Targeting With Audience Intelligence

The recently released Predictive Targeting for Audience Ads utilizes Microsoft’s audience intelligence to find audiences more likely to convert but not considered by brands.

Placement Across Microsoft Casual Games On Windows Computers

Microsoft is rolling out several new placements for Audience Ads, starting with Windows computer game interfaces. By 2024, it is expected to be available for all Microsoft Casual Games.

Ads For Microsoft 365 App Users

This month, Microsoft is rolling out new Audience Ad placements on the free Microsoft 365 app for consumers in the US. EU markets can expect it for Android in January 2024.

Video And CTV Ads

Announced at DMEXCO, Video and CTV Ads connect brands to high-value audiences at scale through online video and connected TV partners.

Microsoft Advertising Updates For Verticals And Professional Services

To broaden its appeal, Microsoft is renaming its Hotel Campaigns to Lodging Campaigns to include accommodations beyond traditional hotels.

Microsoft also rolled out more vertical-specific ads across its search partner network, including Credit card and Property Promotion ads.

As an industry first, Microsoft introduced Property Promotion Ads for Vacation Rentals aimed at vacation rental customers.

Microsoft plans to add more professional services ads, which include Automotive and Tours and Activities,

Microsoft’s blog post concludes with a reminder for advertisers to try the Performance Max open beta for predictive solutions and automated workflows.

The extensive updates show Microsoft’s continued commitment to providing powerful tools for brands and advertisers to reach the right audiences to maximize conversions.


Featured image: sdx15/Shutterstock

How Do Ads Affect Website Visitor Behavior? [Exclusive] via @sejournal, @Juxtacognition

Almost no one will ask you to show them more ads.

We know ads are a powerful advertising medium and great for generating leads and sales.

But your website users? A recent WARC report found that 53% of survey respondents felt that “too many ads” could actually damage a brand.

There is a delicate interplay between ads, websites, users, and behavior. Whether you notice it or not, everything from the color of a line in a background image to the corners of a buy button on an ad can subtly influence your opinions, intentions, and choices.

For example, research shows that adding a second ad spot can increase the click-through rates (CTRs) of a solo ad spot.

And if you’ve ever purchased via an ad on your favorite social network, you know that ads can be vital in a successful customer journey.

As a publisher whose business model is based on advertising, we tussle with one question that comes up perennially: What is the right balance between ads and content? What happens when our site has ‘too many ads’?

I teamed up with Vahan Petrosyan, Search Engine Journal’s Director of Technology to discover how our advertisements shape user preferences, content consumption patterns, reader journeys, and user behavior on our site.

The Problem: “Too Many Ads!”

Marketers rely on ads to drive traffic, awareness, leads, and conversions. Publishers rely on them for revenue. For users, ads can cause friction in the user experience if they are deemed too intrusive, or even hinder website performance.

The web relies on a social contract: the rule of reciprocity 14. Website users generally accept advertising as a pseudo-currency in exchange for free content.

However, this “…only works if the website’s offering is attractive, with high utility and quality” 14. In fact, marketers usually point to ad quality first when dealing with page abandonment issues, declines in traffic, or search rankings problems.

So, with this in mind, we felt that we needed to answer two questions:

  • Which types of ads do users prefer? High-quality ads relevant to the content? And/or ads reflecting their previous online behavior?
  • What is the ideal balance of ads to content, where ad revenue is optimized while preserving our visitor’s experience?

Experiment 1: Which Ads Do Users Prefer?

While SEJ’s in-house ads align with the content we deliver and suit our audience of career marketers, programmatic ads offer something our in-house ads do not: thanks to targeting technology, programmatic ads align with a user’s browsing habits and their topical interests beyond SEO and marketing.

But are programmatic ads the best option? Do users get annoyed by seeing personalized ads while they’re in “work mode?”

Experiment - How Ad Type Affects User Behavior

We hypothesized that:

  • When only SEJ brand ads were visible, user engagement would be higher: they would spend more time reading, scroll farther through the content, and read more pages.
  • When only programmatic ads were visible, user engagement would be lower: they would spend less time reading, see less of the content, and read fewer pages.

To test these assumptions, we randomly divided our Canadian audience into one of three groups:

Group 1: “Programmatic only” – Users only received programmatic ads when visiting our site in the same standard layout as before the experiment.

Group 2: “SEJ ads only” – Users only saw house ads made and managed by us. These included ads for our webinars and ebooks and were displayed in our usual layout.

Group 3: “Control group”  – Users received both ad types in the same layout. In other words, they saw our site in its normal configuration.

If our hypothesis was right and users preferred SEJ brand ads over programmatic ads, users in the programmatic and control groups would view fewer pages, spend less time on the site, and spend less time reading.

Interestingly, that was not the result…

Experiment 1 Findings – Users Spent More Time On-Site When They Received A Mix Of Ads

When we compared the programmatic and SEJ-only conditions to our current layout (mix of ads), here’s what we found:

Websites, Ads, and User Behavior - Phase 1 Results

As you can see, serving only one ad type failed to have the expected results. Readers receiving only one type of ad spent far less time browsing SEJ and reading.

One possible explanation for the unexpected findings could be device type. However, when comparing mobile users in the 3 groups, we found that 52.71% fewer mobile users viewed 3 pages or more when visiting our site.

When only programmatic ads were delivered to users, this metric fell further, with 65.12% fewer mobile users viewing 3 pages or more. The type of content, browser used, and other variables all revealed similar results.

Regardless of the reason, it’s clear that users spend more time reading content on SEJ when they see a mix of ads.

Experiment 2: Do Users Prefer Fewer Ads?

Once we knew which ad types our readers preferred, it was time to find out what would happen if they saw fewer of them.

So, we returned our site to the original mixture of programmatic and SEJ-brand ads and set up a second experiment, dividing our Canadian audience into three groups:

Group 1: “High intrusive” condition – Acting as our control group, this group of Canadian traffic received our standard ad layout, including pop-ups that tell readers about upcoming webinars and new ebooks, the persistent footer bar across the bottom of the screen, and all the ads normally seen throughout our content.

Group 2: “Medium intrusive” condition – This ad layout condition removed only the most intrusive ads on the site. So, readers in this group would only see the footer bar, two rails on the right sidebar, above and below the content, and in the top navigation bar. Anything that may interfere with or interrupt the content, such as pop-ups, was removed.

Group 3: “Low intrusive” condition – Readers in this group saw only the bare minimum of ads delivered in the least intrusive way possible. Therefore, they only saw one rail of ads in the sidebar, above and below the content, and the top navigation bar ad.

Digital Advertising Experiment - How Does User Behavior Change As Ads Decrease?

Our hypothesis:
Fewer ads should increase pageviews, time on site, and the number of returning users. With less pesky ads in the way, readers should engage longer, more deeply, and come back for more.

Our hypothesis was wrong.

Experiment 2 Findings – User Engagement Increases with More Ads

We failed to see the hypothesized results when we compared our current ad layout (Group 1) to the other two conditions with fewer ads:

Websites, Ads, and User Behavior - Phase 2 Results

While the average time on-site improved when we reduced the number of ads, we can see that 50% fewer users read articles (calculated using time, scroll depth, and word count).  The number of users reading 3 pages or more per session, decreased.

Also unexpected: with fewer ads, our bounce rate increased.

Lastly, our pageviews declined as the number of ads shown declined.

We were scratching our heads at this point.

To verify our data, we used Microsoft Clarity. In the normal, “high intrusive” condition (on the right in the following screencap), we found that desktop users got significantly farther into the body of the content before abandoning the page. This is what we expected.

Users who view our site with ads would need to scroll further down the page, since ads push the content further below the fold.

However, our results revealed something very different when we compared results for high intrusive vs. low intrusive.

When there were fewer ads (low-intrusive condition on the left in the screen cap below), 74% of desktop users abandoned the page before reaching the content.

Users Scroll Less And Read Less Content When There Are Fewer Ads

Hmmm. Maybe this is only the case with our desktop users. Mobile users would definitely respond to fewer ads… right?

Inexplicably, this isn’t what happened.

Mobile users who saw our standard ad layout got significantly farther into the content, clicked more, and read more than those who saw few ads.

And when we compared retention rates across time, there were no significant differences on desktop or mobile.

In other words, users were not more likely to return to our site when we reduced the number of ads.

Why Are Users Spending More Time Reading When There Are More Ads?

To be honest, we don’t know why users seem to prefer our site with more ads. We can’t be sure without more experiments, but we have a few theories…

Ad Competition

We tend to judge the attractiveness of something by comparing it to what it’s adjacent to, known as ‘the halo effect’. Some research has shown that when multiple ad types appear on the same site, one ad type can increase the attractiveness, clicks, and attention of the other type 16.

If the ads are highly targeted and users like the items advertised, the halo effect could carry over to other products and offerings on the site and improve the reader’s perception of our site.

Repetition

Studies have shown that repetition can help or hurt ads depending on how users view them. If you like an ad, you’ll view it as less intrusive and more positive the more you see it 7.

If you don’t like an ad, you’ll see it more negatively the more times you see it 5. Is it possible that, with fewer ads and, therefore, less variety in ads on a page, visitors saw the ads as more repetitive, increasing their negative opinions of them?

IKEA Effect

We value, are increasingly satisfied by, and are more loyal to things we actively work for or invest in. That’s why fraternities and sororities use hazing rituals, and IKEA makes you spend hours putting together its furniture 2, 3, 10.

Ads could work similarly.

In alignment with the IKEA effect, seeing ads on a site could be seen by users as “paying” to view the free content. However, SEJ-brand ads are self-promotional and don’t generate revenue simply by viewing them. This could partly explain why users seem to prefer programmatic ad layouts or a mix of ads.

Early research on this digital marketing theory found mixed results, suggesting there may be confounding variables. However, it was completed in the late 90s and early 2000s, and users (and the online world) have changed drastically since then.

Do we subconsciously identify and sort programmatic ads from other ad types? It’s certainly possible.

Reciprocity

The SEJ-brand-ads-only condition could have been “too much of a good thing.” As mentioned, behavioral scientists have theorized that websites and readers exchange content for ad views in a sort of unspoken social contract 8, 14.

When we only serve in-house ads, the ad views no longer act as a payment, violating the rule of reciprocity, which could make users less tolerant.

Again, is it possible? Absolutely, but it’s likely not the only factor.

Belonging

We all want to belong. In fact, the feeling of belonging is a significant factor for general well-being and life satisfaction 1.

How do you make site visitors feel like they belong in an online space? Research says three themes encourage this feeling in site users: interaction/engagement, a culture of learning, and support 11.

So, if the ads on a website match our previous online behaviors, blending our work and personal life together or simply reflecting our past, present, and future concerns, that feeling could reflect on the website as a whole and the brand 4, 17.

In other words, it looks familiar and like the site really knows us, making us feel like we belong there.

This theory also plays on something known as the endowment effect 9. We value something far more when it belongs to us than when it belongs to someone else. If we make readers feel like they “belong” on our site, could users feel like our site has a higher value and, therefore, justify seeing more ads?

Familiarity

Behavioral science has found that we’re happy and comfortable in familiar settings. But when something is off, we notice and pay more attention to the thing that doesn’t belong.

Here’s an example:

If you carry a briefcase into a bank, most people in the bank won’t pay attention. In fact, they may not even notice you. But these same bystanders will definitely notice if you carry a pink flamingo into the bank.

In fact, they’ll pay so much attention to the unusual object you’re carrying that they’ll struggle to recall details about your appearance later. This effect is heightened if we perceive the unusual item in a setting as a threat 6. (It’s called the weapon effect.)

What if our readers are so used to the site layout that it feels unfamiliar when we deliver fewer ads? If that is the case, they would notice the ads more, even if there are fewer of them, and perceive the ads as being more intrusive. Is ad tracking enough to be perceived as a ‘threat’? Maybe.

If this theory is at play, users may actually prefer the site with fewer ads, but only after they’ve had time to get used to the new look and feel of the site.

User Intent

Previous studies have found that intent influences how users view and interact with ads. While users are simply browsing, they will see and interact with more ads than when their behavior is goal-directed 13.

That’s why users will click ads while scrolling on their favorite social network than when they land on your site while researching hotels.

Since much of the behavior analyzed in this experiment was goal-directed (users clicked for the specific purpose of reading an article or finding answers to a question), it would make sense that they would pay less attention to ads and possibly not notice that there are fewer of them.

This theory fails to explain why the use of our site decreases as the number of ads decreases, but it could help explain why fewer ads failed to increase site usage.

Attention

Previous research found that when ads don’t match the content regarding topics or visual aesthetics, users spend less time looking at and reading the content 12, 15. There were various theories about why this might occur, but the simplest is how our brains might process web pages.

When ads fail to match the content or look out of place, our brains may process the ads (the context) and the content (the target of our attention) separately.

When the ads match, we process the entire page as a whole, making the ads look less like context and more like they were meant to be there. This cohesive view frees up cognitive resources, which our brains can dedicate to reading, reducing attention to the ads overall.

During our experiment, conversions in our Canadian test groups declined as ads declined, dropping to zero in some instances, which provides some support for this theory.

Conclusion

Our experiment provided evidence that fewer ads resulted in a decrease in engagement– the opposite of what we expected. And ads that match the user’s browsing history (programmatic) may actually improve engagement more than just house ads.

The important takeaway here is that it’s worth testing. Not all sites will see the same results, and not all audiences will behave similarly.

The biggest lesson to take away from this experiment? Just because everyone says a thing, doesn’t make it true.

Question everything and test it for yourself.


Methodological notes:

  • While not as good as running an experiment site-wide, limiting our experiment to our Canadian audience allowed us to check our findings against our US readers, who would all be exposed to the same content, algorithm changes, social posts, ads, etc. It also helped control the financial costs, data size, and upheaval.
  • Users were randomly assigned to a condition on each visit, allowing us to randomize groups to reduce bias.
  • Findings were verified with subsequent testing and within-group analysis, which tracked users across sessions.
  • Users running ad and script blocking may have been omitted from the dataset.
  • Sample size: 100,000+.

Works Cited

  1. Baldwin, M., & Keefer, L. A. (2020). Being here and now: the benefits of belonging in space and time. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3069-3093.
  2. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 139-168.
  3. Furby, L. (1991). Understanding the psychology of possession and ownership: a personal memoir and an appraisal of our progress. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 457–463.
  4. Gravett, K., & Ajjawi, R. (2022). Belonging and situated practice. Studies in Higher Education, 1386-1396.
  5. Jankowski, J., Hamari, J., & Wątróbski, J. (2018). A gradual approach for maximising user conversion without compromising experience with high visual intensity website elements. Internet Research, 194-217.
  6. Mansour, J. K., Hamilton, C. M., & Gibson, M. T. (2019). Understanding the weapon focus effect: The role of threat, unusualness, exposure duration, and scene complexity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 991-1007.
  7. McCoy, S., Everard, A., Galletta, D. F., & Moody, G. D. (2017). Here we go again! The impact of website ad repetition on recall, intrusiveness, attitudes, and site revisit intentions. Information & Management, 14-24.
  8. McDonald, A. M., & Cranor, L. (2009). An empirical study of how people perceive online behavioral advertising.
  9. Morewedge, C. K., & Giblin, C. E. (2015). Explanations of the endowment effect: an integrative review. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 339-348.
  10. Norton, M. I., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2012). The “IKEA Effect”: When labor leads to love. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 453-460.
  11. Peacock, S., Cowan, J., Irvine, L., & Williams, J. (2020). An exploration into the importance of a sense of belonging for online learners. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18-35.
  12. Petty, R., & Cacioppo, J. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Hydroscience, 124-205.
  13. Rutz, O. J., & Bucklin, R. E. (2012). Does banner advertising affect browsing for brands? Clickstream choice model says yes, for some. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 10(2), 231–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-011-9114-3
  14. Schumann, J. H., von Wangenheim, F., & Groene, N. (2014). Targeted online advertising: using reciprocity appeals to increase acceptance among users of free web services. Journal of Marketing, 78(1), 59-75.
  15. Wojdynski, B. W., & Bang, H. (2016). Distraction effects of contextual advertising on online news processing: an eye-tracking study. Behaviour & Information Technology, 654-664.
  16. Yang, C., Li, L., & Yao, R. (2018). Research on spillover effect of paid search advertising channels. Wuhan International Conference on e-Business (pp. 476-483). Wuhan, China: Association for Information Systems Electronic Library (AISeL).
  17. Zhao, L., Lu, Y., Wang, B., Chau, P. Y., & Zhang, L. (2012). Cultivating the sense of belonging and motivating user participation in virtual communities: A social capital perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 574-588.
Microsoft Advertising Introduces 3 New Generative AI Solutions via @sejournal, @kristileilani

Microsoft announced a series of generative AI updates to its search and advertising platforms to redefine how we interact with search engines and online ads.

Earlier this year, the tech giant revealed its plans to implement generative AI into its services to change how we work.

It’s doing that with features like Compare & Decide Ads and Copilot in the Microsoft Advertising Platform.

Microsoft’s data reveals that the company’s AI-powered chat feature, Bing Chat, resonates well with younger users and encourages quicker decision-making.

Compared to traditional search methods, users on Chat reportedly take half the time to reach a decision.

Additional internal data revealed significant growth in Microsoft’s Edge browser, attributing it partly to the successful integration of Bing AI chat.

Compare And Decide Ads Offer Engaging Conversational Experience

Microsoft is introducing new advertising formats designed exclusively for the Bing Chat experience.

The first of these, Compare & Decide Ads, will allow users to evaluate options based on their chosen criteria.

Microsoft Advertising Introduces 3 New Generative AI SolutionsScreenshot from Microsoft, September 2023

Slated for a closed beta in early 2024, these ads will collate all relevant data into a concise table to revolutionize retail, travel, and auto advertising.

Microsoft also plans to release more Conversational Ad experience formats over the coming months to help advertisers engage with AI chat users.

Microsoft Introduces First Ads For Chat API Partners

In addition to the new Conversational Ad experiences, Microsoft also announced its first two partners using the new Ads for Chat API.

Snapchat’s My AI chatbot, accessed by 150 million people globally on the popular social platform, is among the first to serve sponsored contents in its chat responses via the Ads for ChatAPI.

Microsoft Advertising Introduces 3 New Generative AI SolutionsScreenshot from Snapchat, September 2023

Axel Springer’s product Hey_, with 16-17 million visits daily, has also implemented the advertising solution.

Microsoft intends to respond to feedback about the Ads for Chat API service from its current partners before expanding it to more.

Copilot For Microsoft Advertising Offers Intelligence AI Assistance

Another groundbreaking feature is the Copilot in the Microsoft Advertising Platform.

Microsoft Advertising Introduces 3 New Generative AI SolutionsScreenshot from Microsoft, September 2023

This intelligent assistant aims to help advertisers and agencies streamline their advertising efforts, making recommendations for images, headlines, and descriptions.

Microsoft is conducting tests with a limited number of advertisers before rolling it out for open beta “in the coming months.”

AI Continues To Transform Advertising And Search

The advancements in Microsoft’s advertising and search features have significant implications for the ad industry, offering more effective targeting and enhanced user experiences.

Microsoft advertisers are invited to sign up for a webcast in November to learn more about generative AI in Microsoft solutions.


Featured image: Lori Butcher/Shutterstock