SEO Considerations for New Domain Names

Securing a good domain name is easier than a decade ago. The proliferation of top-level domains means short and catchy names are obtainable, and there’s no longer an organic ranking benefit to a .com.

The necessity of a findable brand name is now crucial. Shoppers are discovering brands and products via generative AI platforms such as ChatGPT, Claude, and DeepSeek, as well as on social sites such as Reddit, TikTok, and Instagram — despite having no links to click.

The result is consumers discover a brand and then search for it on Google, Bing, and similar engines, producing more clicks and impressions for branded terms. The trend will likely grow as genAI platforms become mainstream.

Hence memorable domain names are both available and crucial.

Here are my search-engine optimization considerations for a new domain.

Avoid Generic Names

Years ago domain names influenced organic search rankings. A keyword-focused domain was critical. No more. To Google and others, domain names alone do not imply relevancy.

Yet bland, nondescript domains are easily forgotten, thus complicating visibility in branded searches.

Seek a name that implies a niche and is memorable. Tools such as Namify can help.

Screenshot of a Namify page showing the brand name options

Namify offers brand name suggestions, such as this example for “A brand that offers unique fashion design.”

Assess Brand Competitors

The expansion of top-level domains means multiple companies can register the same name on, say, .com, .co, .biz., and .us. Search for the name you’re considering. If another company ranks for it, even in a different niche, carefully consider whether you could compete with it on branded queries.

Tools such as Moz and Semrush measure and track domain authority and organic traffic history. Both help assess the organic brand-search strength of would-be competitors.

Screenshot of the Semrush interface showing the authority score

Semrush says Dunkindonuts.com has a “71” authority score.

Avoid Apparent Misspellings

Google automatically generates results for the correct spelling of a query if it considers it misspelled. Thus seemingly clever spellings of prominent terms could backfire.

Avoid branded domain names that trigger automated corrections by search engines. Consumers will search for a new brand if they see it in an ad or an email. They likely won’t find it if the search engine thinks it’s an error.

Google thinks “asable” should be “aceable.”

WooCommerce Rebrand Offers Lessons For Gaining Competitive Edge via @sejournal, @martinibuster

An interview with WooCommerce shows that their recent rebrand is a strategic refresh, offering lessons for businesses and search marketers on how to stay relevant and competitive.

A Business Refresh

A recently announced rebrand by WooCommerce is far more than a logo update; it’s part of an evolution of their platform that demonstrates the strategic value of reassessing user expectations to stay competitive.

A spokesperson from WooCommerce agreed:

“Exactly: the brand update reflects our broader evolution toward a more integrated platform. While the visual changes are noticeable, they represent our shift toward making WooCommerce more powerful out of the box while maintaining the flexibility of open source.”

From Evolution To A Refresh

WooCommerce has been on a steady evolution from a plugin to a platform. And even though it’s referred to itself as a platform for awhile now, the evolution from plugin to platform is speeding up because of an internal WooCommerce initiative called More In Core. Announced in 2024, More In Core is a shift to a WooCommerce experience that provides a more complete ecommerce experience straight of the box, delivering the core functionalities that most ecommerce sites need without needing to install additional plugins.

One of the examples, from October 2024, is the Brand Plugin integration, which used to be a premium plugin but is now a standard feature of the platform itself. The Brand feature enables store owners to create a taxonomy based on brands.

A WooCommerce spokesperson explained:

“While ‘More in Core’ is an internal name we use (we’re excited about these improvements!), our goal isn’t simply adding more features — it’s about thoughtfully building a comprehensive commerce platform that delivers the essential tools that the majority of merchants need out of the box, reducing plugin conflict and management, increasing the depth of integration between platform features, and freeing builders and sellers to focus on other parts of their business.

We’re starting by integrating Woo-owned extensions, like Brands. This isn’t about removing opportunities for third-party developers — we remain committed to a vibrant ecosystem where developers can build and grow on our platform. We’re carefully considering which features are truly essential for most merchants and integrating them in ways that maintain the flexibility WooCommerce is known for.

Looking ahead to 2025, merchants and developers can expect continued thoughtful and deep integration of key features, continued performance improvements across product and order management in particular, and a streamlined user experience that’s leveraging more and more of WordPress’ modern admin designs.”

User Experience And UI

Focusing on the user is a great place to start a business refresh. Do site visitors use your site the same way? Are there emerging trends to consider?

I asked WooCommerce if there were any any specific UX and UI improvements implemented as part of their recent February 2025 brand refresh. They answered:

“The brand refresh aligns with ongoing work to make WooCommerce more intuitive. We’re focusing first on improving core experiences in the admin interface and store management — the essential interactions our merchants use daily.

More specifically, we’re rolling out improvements to the payments onboarding and configuration experience.

We’re creating a new commerce-optimized starter theme with a set of creative variations available out of the box. We’re iterating rapidly on the WooCommerce Analytics product we just released in beta, and collaborating directly with the community on new capabilities around order status and fulfillment management.”

Lessons For Search Marketers

I asked about how their brand refresh fits into a larger strategy in order to find out what others can learn about doing something like this for their own brands and websites. I asked them for what lessons search marketers could learn from their experience and they described a process that identified stakeholders from the ecosystem to the users, user expectations set by competitors and wrapping all of that into creating their refresh.

The WooCommerce spokesperson shared:

“Our rebrand considered the multiple groups that make up our ecosystem: builders who create stores for clients, developers who create products and extensions, merchants who run their businesses on WooCommerce, hosts who help connect us to a larger set of customers, and contributors to our open source platform. The key was researching each group to understand how they interact with WooCommerce differently: developers building businesses on our platform, merchants managing daily operations, builders creating client sites, and contributors enhancing the core platform.

And of course we also had to factor in the current landscape. What other ecommerce platforms look like, what other technology companies look like — and how can we stand out. All that, plus we needed to make sure it felt true to Woo: that it aligned with our open-source roots, what we believe in, and what the platform does. We’re incredibly proud of what our in-house design and marketing teams accomplished here; it’s a great demonstration of the team we’ve assembled and what they’re capable of.

For search marketers, there’s a valuable lesson here about understanding your different audience segments and how they interact with your product or service. Just as we needed to consider how our brand speaks to builders versus merchants versus developers, search marketers need to consider how different user groups search for and interact with their content. It’s about creating a cohesive message that resonates across audiences while addressing their specific needs and pain points.”

Priorities For A Refresh

Some people like the flexibility of only activating needed functionalities because of concerns about the performance hit that comes from feature bloat. My understanding is that there are ways to turn off unneeded functionalities, is that true? Would turning them off be as simple as a toggle (a module UI), or would they have to jump into the code to do that?

How does one go about deciding what what’s best for the user? At what point do you say, not enough people need this?

WooCommerce offered the following useful insights:

“We’re being very thoughtful about considering what features become part of core WooCommerce. We started by looking at our own premium extensions that provide essential commerce functionality — features that most merchants need to run their businesses effectively.

This isn’t about adding features just to add them, and it’s definitely not about limiting opportunities for third-party developers who are crucial to our ecosystem. We recognize that some merchants and builders need specific features that our extensions don’t offer — and that’s the power of WooCommerce. At the same time, we also recognize that having to manage multiple extensions for simple functions, like brands, can create pain points.

Instead, it’s about providing a solid foundation that both merchants and developers can build upon. Features can be easily enabled or disabled through the admin interface so merchants can keep their sites lean and fast. This modular approach means stores can use what they need while developers can continue to innovate and extend the platform in new ways, relying on robust core functionality that’s always available.

When evaluating what becomes part of core, we look at how essential the feature is for most merchants — what they need to get a store online, selling, shipping, and getting paid — plus how it fits into the broader WooCommerce ecosystem. And of course for anything we add into core, performance is top of mind for our product teams.

Our goal is to strengthen the platform’s foundation while maintaining the openness and flexibility that makes WooCommerce so powerful. In some cases we’re looking at opening up new capabilities via lower level changes, without necessarily dictating how those capabilities should be used. Order statuses are a good example here: adding separate statuses for fulfillment and payment enables all sorts of new functionality, even if we don’t immediately require all solutions to leverage both.”

Focus On Performance

Adding more features or code to a site can degrade performance, something WooCommerce considered as part of the initiative. Adding needed functions helped make the entire platform more stable which ended up helping performance.

An example that WooCommerce shared was last year’s introduction of High-Performance Order Storage (HPOS), an optimized way to store customer order information that increases store website performance over the traditional ways of handling the same data.

The spokesperson answered:

“Performance remains fundamental to our approach. When we consider adding features to core, we’re actually making a thoughtful trade-off: for functionality that most merchants need, having it built-in and optimized is often more performant than requiring an additional plugin. This can reduce complexity and potential conflicts while improving overall site performance.

Our team ensures that as we integrate features, we’re doing so in a way that maintains or improves site speed. HPOS is a prime example — we’re rebuilding fundamental structures to improve scalability. Each feature addition is carefully evaluated for its performance impact, and we’re committed to keeping WooCommerce fast and efficient. We’re also currently in the middle of a performance review across all of our main functionalities to see where we can make improvements ahead of adding anything new.

For 2025, our focus is on thoughtfully enhancing WooCommerce’s essential capabilities while maintaining the open ecosystem that lets developers build innovative solutions for merchants, and improving the quality of our user experience from end to end. The goal isn’t to add more for the sake of more — it’s about providing a solid, performant foundation that benefits merchants, builders, and developers, and raising the bar for everyone.”

Should You Consider A Business Refresh?

What WooCommerce is doing is a reminder that settling on a strategy and moving forward year after year isn’t enough; consumer needs and the ways they interact online are constantly evolving. Taking inventory of emerging trends and user expectations is a sound practice for keeping an enterprise fresh and relevant—especially important right now as the Internet undergoes one of the most significant transformations in decades. Ultimately, consumers, not competitors, should drive your strategy. Identifying better ways to interact with users, customers, and site visitors can help position you as the disruptor rather than the disrupted.

Featured Image by Shutterstock/insta_photos

GBP Reviews Outage Is Over via @sejournal, @martinibuster

A Googler published an update to let businesses know that the ongoing outage is almost over and that most businesses that have lost review counts should have seen them return to pre-outage levels. Businesses that continue to experience a review outage should see their problem resolved within a matter of days.

Google Business Profile Outage

The Googler posted the following update:

“13-Feb-2025 Update
Most affected profiles now display accurate ratings and reviews. However, while we have made significant progress, some profiles may still experience a temporary lower count. These profiles should recover to pre-issue levels over the next few days. No reviews were unpublished due to this issue. If your review count does not return to the level it was before this issue in the next few days, please contact support.”

What Went Wrong?

An outage occurred that resulted in local business profiles reviews completely removed or showing less than normal. This caused considerable distress because businesses rely on their good reputations for businesses and it makes it harder for consumers to judge whether to visit a store, restaurant or service.

Google Reassures That #Anchor URLs In GSC Are Okay via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Google’s John Mueller explained why Google Search Console sometimes shows URLs with hashtags in performance reports and clarified that  there’s no need to be concerned that that the wrong URLs are being indexed.

URLs With #Anchor Hashtags

What John Mueller discussed in the Bluesky post is URLs with hashtags that look like this:

https:example.com/example-url/#:~:text=

URLs with hashtags show up in Google Search Console (GSC) could give the impression that the wrong URLs are being indexed by Google but according to John Mueller, that’s not the case.

Some Reports Use Canonical URLs

He wrote that some GSC reports show the canonical URL. What that means is that Google will report one URL even if there are multiple versions of the same URL recording for that report, presumably such as indexing reports.

Mueller wrote:

“Every now and then, someone posts about finding “hashtags” (URLs with #anchors) in Search Console. Here’s what’s up with that (and none of this is new). Most search features report on the canonical URL (the main URL used for indexing), a handful don’t. Sometimes search uses anchors -“

Some URLs Are Reported With #Anchors (Hashtags)

Mueller then said that the Performance report shows URLs with #anchors, also referred to as URLs with hashtags. These are links from Google’s search results that lead to a specific section of a page.

The URL part could look like this:

/#:~:text=Example%20of%20text%20in%20a%20url%20from%20google%20serps.

And that results in a section of a page that looks like this:

Mueller continued:

“… anchors, as in links with #hashtags [*] – to link to a specific part of a page. You see that when you click on a link in the search results and it highlights a sentence (called “text fragments”). Sometimes this is used to report in Search Console in your performance report.

… That’s where these are from. They’re not indexed like that. I don’t love that there’s a mix of canonical & non-canonical URLs in the performance report, some savvy SEOs appreciate being able to separate them out though. It’s not a sign of a problem.”

Performance Reports With #Anchor URLs

That’s a useful thing to show the non-canonicalized #anchor URLs in the performance report because it shows that this special kind of deep link search result is sending traffic. The alternative is to find the statistics in the keyword reporting but that doesn’t indicate that the traffic was from a deep link to a page section, which this kind of reporting does show.

Read Mueller’s post here.

Featured Image by Shutterstock/The Bold Bureau

DeepSeek And Its Impact On The Generative AI Global Race via @sejournal, @AlliBerry3

Since launching to the public on Jan. 20, 2025, Chinese startup DeepSeek’s open-source AI-powered chatbot has taken the tech world by storm.

As the top free app by downloads in the U.S. Apple app store since Jan. 26 – with 16 million app downloads in its first 18 days (ChatGPT had 9 million in the same timeframe) – DeepSeek’s performance and accompanying search feature is at least on par with OpenAI’s ChatGPT for a fraction of the cost.

Its launch led U.S.-based AI technology company, Nvidia, to the greatest drop in market value for a U.S. company in U.S. stock market history. That’s quite an entrance!

U.S. tech analysts and investors seem to all fear that the U.S. is falling behind in the generative AI global race.

This may be warranted considering how quickly and cost-effectively DeepSeek was able to get R1 developed and out the door.

DeepSeek utilizes reinforcement learning, meaning the model learns complex reasoning behaviors through reinforcement without supervised fine-tuning, which allows it to save significant computational resources.

But, is DeepSeek really going to emerge as the leader in AI? And what are the implications for this development for the future of search? Let’s dive in.

What Has Happened Since DeepSeek Launched?

While U.S. tech companies were humbled by the speed and claimed cost efficiency of this launch, DeepSeek’s arrival has not been without controversy.

A lot of questions lurk, ranging from suspected intellectual property violations to security, data privacy, Chinese censorship, and the true cost of its technology.

Legal Issues For Copyright And Data Protection

OpenAI and Microsoft are investigating whether DeepSeek used OpenAI’s API to integrate their AI models into DeepSeek’s own models.

OpenAI claims it has evidence of DeepSeek distilling the outputs of OpenAI to build a rival model, which is against OpenAI’s terms of service, but likely not against the law.

Distillation allows for the transfer of knowledge of a large pre-trained model into a smaller model, which enables the smaller model to achieve comparable performance to the large one while reducing costs.

This is more than a little ironic given the lawsuits against OpenAI for ignoring other site’s terms of service and using their copyrighted internet data to train its systems.

There are also questions about where user data is stored and how it is processed, given that DeepSeek is a Chinese-based startup.

For anyone handling customer information and payment details, integrating a tool like DeepSeek that stores data in a foreign jurisdiction could violate data protection laws and expose sensitive information to unauthorized access.

Given that DeepSeek has yet to provide its privacy policies, industry experts and security researchers advise using extreme caution with sensitive information in DeepSeek.

DeepSeek Security Breach

Wiz Research, a company specializing in cloud security, announced it was able to hack DeepSeek and expose security risks with relative ease on Jan. 29.

It found a publicly accessible database belonging to DeepSeek, which allowed it full control over database operations and access to user data and API keys.

Wiz alerted the DeepSeek team, and they took immediate action to secure the data. However, it is unclear who else accessed or downloaded the data before it was secured.

While it’s not uncommon for startups to move fast and make mistakes, this is a particularly large mistake and shows DeepSeek’s lack of focus on cybersecurity so far.

National Security Concerns Similar To TikTok

There are national security concerns about DeepSeek’s data collection policies reminiscent of fears about TikTok, which saw a similar rise in global prominence out of Chinese-based company ByteDance.

The U.S. government briefly banned TikTok in January 2025, which came out of concerns about how the company was collecting data about users. There were also fears that the Chinese government could use the platform to influence the public in the U.S.

A few incidents in the last several years that initiated that fear include TikTok employees utilizing location data from the app to track reporters to find a source of leaked information, and TikTok employees being reported to have plans to track specific U.S. citizens.

While TikTok is active in the U.S. right now, its future is unconfirmed.

For similar reasons to the TikTok concerns, a number of governments around the world, including Australia and Italy, are already working to ban DeepSeek from government systems and devices. The U.S. is also considering a ban on DeepSeek.

Chinese Censorship

Regardless of whether you run DeepSeek locally or in its app, DeepSeek’s censorship is present for queries deemed sensitive by the Chinese government, according to a Wired investigation.

However, because it is open source, there are ways of getting around the censorship, but it’s difficult.

Doing so would require running on your own servers using modified versions of the publicly available DeepSeek code, which means you’d need access to several highly advanced GPUs to run the most powerful version of R1.

Questions About Cost

Much has been written about the cost of building DeepSeek. Initial claims by DeepSeek were that it took under $6 million to build based on the rental price of Nvidia’s GPUs.

However, a report from SemiAnalysis, a semiconductor research and consulting firm, has since argued that DeepSeek’s hardware spend was higher than $500 million, along with additional R&D costs.

For context, OpenAI lost about $5 billion in 2024 and anticipates it will lose more than $11 billion in 2025. Even if DeepSeek did cost $500 million or more, it still cut costs compared to what leading competitors are spending.

So, how did they cut costs?

Before DeepSeek came along, the leading AI technologies were built on neural networks, which are mathematical systems that learn skills by analyzing huge amounts of data. This requires large amounts of computing power.

Specialized computer chips called graphics processing units (GPUs) are an effective way to do this kind of data analysis. This is how chipmaker Nvidia grew to prominence (and also had a huge fall in market value on the day DeepSeek launched).

GPUs cost around $40,000 and require considerable electricity, which is why leading AI technologies like OpenAI’s ChatGPT were so expensive to build.

Sending data between chips can also require more energy than running the chips themselves.

DeepSeek was able to reduce costs, most notably by using a method called “mixture of experts.”

Instead of creating one neural network that learned data patterns on the internet, they split the system into many neural networks and launched smaller “expert” systems paired with a “generalist” system, reducing the amount of data needed to travel between GPU chips.

The Implications Of Being Open Source

DeepSeek-R1 is as “open-source” as any LLM has been thus far, which means anyone can download, use, or modify its code.

Similar to Meta’s Llama, the code and technical explanations are shared, enabling developers and organizations to utilize the model for their own business needs, but the training data is not fully disclosed.

Many believe DeepSeek is a big step toward democratizing AI, allowing smaller companies and developers to build on DeepSeek-R1 and achieve greater AI feats faster.

This could lead to more innovation in places with more limited access to the tech needed to build AI solutions.

But, critics fear that open-source models can expose security vulnerabilities that could be exploited, which we’ve already seen in DeepSeek’s first weeks in the public.

DeepSeek And The Future of SEO

So, what does this all really mean for search professionals? The way I see it, DeepSeek is just the next splashy AI chatbot with search capabilities in the rapidly changing world of SEO.

It’s important to understand that while tools like DeepSeek and ChatGPT use advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning, they still simply provide answers to real questions that real people ask.

Their responses heavily focus on semantic understanding, intent matching, and contextual analysis, but they ultimately serve the same core user need.

While we have years of experience testing optimization tactics on more established search engines like Google, we’re still at the beginning stages of understanding optimization for generative AI chatbots.

Final Thoughts

Whether DeepSeek will stick and grow in prominence remains to be seen.

Obviously, if other governments follow Australia, Italy, and potentially the U.S. to ban DeepSeek, that would limit its potential for growth.

And much as DeepSeek rose to prominence rapidly by providing a blueprint for others and significantly lowering costs, a new market-moving AI could always be just around the corner.

Regardless of what happens with DeepSeek, we are at the beginning of a very rapid period of innovation in AI technology.

As SEO professionals, we need to be prepared to test a surge of new platforms and reverse engineer how they arrive at their responses to user queries.

More Resources:


Featured Image: Phonlamai Photo/Shutterstock

Why Google’s 4th Quarter Results Raise Questions for SEO & PPC via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Few professions can match a digital marketer’s perspective on what Google’s fourth-quarter results mean for SEO and online advertising. I asked six search marketers, each with over 20 years of experience in all areas of search for insights into what those results mean. What they shared indicates what SEO and advertising professionals should be paying attention to in 2025.

The six digital marketers who were separately interviewed all suggested that four general trends may be impacting Google search and advertising performance:

  1. Shifting User Behavior
  2. Changes To Google Search
  3. Google’s Not Immune To Competition
  4. Wider Economic & Market Conditions

Shifting User Behavior & Rising Competition

Although I interviewed each search marketer individually, they all agreed that user search habits were trending away from traditional search and migrating to AI and social platforms, indicating that Google is no longer immune to competitive pressure in both search and advertising.

Benu Aggarwal of Silicon Valley-based Milestone, Inc. (LinkedIn Profile) referenced the staggering investments in AI infrastructure as tangible proof of an ongoing shift in how people access information across consumer and business use cases.

“A lot of traffic is moving to LLMs such as ChatGPT, Perplexity (and Google’s Gemini). This is evidenced by Alphabet’s investments in AI, particularly in making compute inexpensive. They’re not alone, Meta, OpenAI, Nvidia, AWS, others are all investing in AI compute to support the surging demand.”

Michael Bonfils, of Digital International Group, (LinkedIn profile) shared that OpenAI was the leading disruptor to Google’s search platform, followed by a generational shift away from search toward visual social media platforms.

Michael said:

“I’ve been saying this since November 30, 2022 that this thing that OpenAI has just released has the potential to disrupt the intent of search users on Google, making it faster and more responsive with no ad disruptions and filtering out forum comments And the timing couldn’t be worse when you have an entire generation (Z/Alpha) who have moved to TikTok/IG for their search results.”

Chuck Price of Measurable SEO (LinkedIn profile) contributing additional nuance to the observation of user platform shift:

“Platform migration pressures play a role. Behavioral shifts toward visual/search hybrids (TikTok, Instagram) and answer-engine interfaces (Perplexity) suggest Google’s monopoly on search touchpoints is eroding, particularly among Gen Z and technical audiences.”

Duane Forrester, SVP, Search INDEXR.ai and formerly of Bing and Yext (LinkedIn profile) noted that the consumer journey is increasingly beginning somewhere other than Google Search:

“Search starts are down as consumers move to social platforms. Revenue is being impacted.

This is going to be our new normal in the search industry. With younger generations now aging and their habits being different, it’s natural to see them shift behavior from traditional search into new directions.

If you thought search engines were a forever thing, you were wrong. Reliance without diversification was always a recipe for disaster. This formula remains consistent. Change is also consistent and as people shift behavior, you better, too.”

Changes To Google Search

The fact that people are using other platforms for shopping ideas, inspiration and information gathering may be signs that Google’s search dominance is increasingly vulnerable to competition. That’s something that was unthinkable as recently as five years ago.

There were multiple changes to how search results are presented in Google Search, with the most notable being that AI Overviews and other search features reduced the need to click through to an answer. This trend to show answers and not links, often referred to as “zero-click” search results, is an ongoing trend that was previously limited to informational search queries.

The complaints from some SEOs about zero-click search results that initially greeted the introduction of Featured Snippets were arguably overstated. Informational searches that require one-dimensional answers (spelling, name of a person, etc.) don’t lead to meaningful traffic (for the website or the user). The traffic from Featured Snippets becomes very meaningful when people have a reason to dig deeper to learn more about a product, movie, a celebrity or a topic.

But Google AI Overviews (AIO) completely destroyed that useful tradeoff with the Internet ecosystem. The comprehensiveness of AIOs reduce the need to click to a website because they show the answer to the current question and enable users to view summaries to answers Google anticipated follow-up questions (read about Google’s Information Gain Patent).

While the complaints about zero-click search results for featured snippets were overstated, Google’s AIO and expanded layouts virtually eliminate the need to click through to websites. This not only disrupts the web ecosystem but may also introduce unanticipated shifts in search advertising trends.

Everett Sizemore, of eSizemore search marketing consultancy (LinkedIn Profile) offered his opinion on how changes to Google Search and external pressures are affecting Google’s earnings:

“The slowdown in Google’s growth doesn’t surprise me for several reasons.

First, what used to be a rumor of competition has grown into a measurable threat. According to Statcounter Global Statistics, Google’s global search market share dipped below 90% for the last three months of 2024. That hasn’t happened since 2015.

And those numbers likely don’t even account for the rising wave of AI-driven search alternatives like Perplexity and GPTSearch, the latter of which is conservatively projected to capture at least 1% of the search market by year’s end. Among younger users, the shift will likely be even more dramatic.

Second, Google’s search results pages (SERPs) are an absolute mess. Too many cluttered, disparate features have turned the once-streamlined UX into a Frankenstein-like disaster.

Remember those bloated Yahoo Search pages from the late ’90s? The ones Google originally disrupted with its clean, white background and ten blue links? Well, we’ve come full circle—back to the chaotic, overstuffed experience we were trying to escape in the first place. Frankly, it looks like someone puked up a bunch of widgets onto the page.

Google isn’t disappearing anytime soon, but its hold on search is weakening—one earnings quarter at a time.”

Google Is No Longer Immune To Competition

Chuck Price, founder of search consultancy Measurable SEO (LinkedIn profile), called attention to how multiple trends may be contributing to an erosion of search dominance and its concomitant effect on search advertising, putting some of the blame on the zero-click paradigm:

“The main takeaway, as I see it, is that the 0.2% YoY deficit doesn’t tell the full story.

What’s surprising for me in the Alphabet earnings report is the relative stability of search revenue, 12.5% growth versus 12.7% YoY. This seems counterintuitive, when considering how the SERPs have evolved over the past year with expanded answer boxes, AI-generated summaries and entity-driven knowledge panels. All of these features reduce the need to click on an ad or click through to a website.

Did Google’s advertising algorithms manipulate pricing to get that close? If one were to look at the YoY click data, I strongly suspect the deficit is far worse.”

Google is under pressure from ChatGPT Search, Perplexity AI and other AI search engines which introduce entirely new platforms that replace the 25+ year old Search Engine Paradigm. Google is competing platform to platform with AIO and their Gemini search assistant. Michael Bonfils suggested that those events have forced Google into a difficult position with limited options:

“They have reached a damned if I do damned if I don’t situation. They are either going to make the experience better for the user, worse for the publisher/advertiser or vice versa.”

Wider Economic And Advertising Pressure

Gabriella Sannino, founder of international marketing and SEO company Level343 (LinkedIn profile) shared a wider perspective of trends to interpret what Google’s fourth quarter results means for the search marketing community. Her answer, reflecting 20 years experience in all areas of digital marketing, included search advertiser sentiment and the worldwide economic situation.

Gabriella answered:

“When you look at the big picture and then the results, I don’t think the slower growth is entirely because of major SERP changes. I think it’s a mix of factors causing buyer behavior shifts:

First, ad and marketing budgets often get cut first when times get uncomfortable. So, slower growth may just be reflecting the sign of the times rather than anything Google’s done.

Second, ongoing privacy changes can affect ads in ways that have nothing to do with Google. Browser privacy settings can make ads less targeted or reduce how well they can be measured. Consequently, advertisers get less data for conversion improvements, retargeting, and ad optimization.

Third, you can’t review the advertising situation in isolation. The competition for ad dollars from TikTok, Amazon ads, Microsoft Advertising (especially with the AI-driven Bing hype), and so on must also be considered. A multi-channel mix means some of Google’s revenue goes bye-bye to other platforms.

Many businesses have tighter budgets, so ad ROI is under more scrutiny. And, there are many disillusioned business owners realizing that Google is changing too frequently to put their entire budget on it. AIOs were a real sign that things were changing, again. I wouldn’t be surprised if Google starts playing with ad space there fairly soon.”

Google’s Not In A Downward Spiral

Our panelist of search marketers interpret the fourth quarter results as signaling that Google is no longer immune from competition and is vulnerable to losing traffic to AI and social platforms as consumers increasingly begin their shopping and informational journeys outside of traditional search.

Google’s search results are perceived as cluttered and unstable because of constant changes to SERP layouts triggered by an increasing amount of keyword phrases. This may contribute to a sense of uncertainty. Nobody observed that Google is in a downward spiral. But the combination of the instability, changes in user behavior, and gains by other platforms are trends to look out for in 2025.

Stepping back for an overall view shows that continuing global economic issues and the attractiveness of advertising across multiple channels may be contributing to a shift in marketing spend. The search marketers I interviewed, who collectively have over 120 years of experience, hinted at concerns about deeper challenges in Google’s core businesses, with one search marketer questioning if there’s more paid search instability than is apparent in the most recent quarterly results.

Google Sitelinks Algorithm Bug Shows Wrong Links via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Google’s search algorithms are showing multiple languages in the sitelinks for Google Search Console. Regardless of whether this is new or not, it may give an idea of how the underlying algorithm evaluates a website for sitelinks.

Sitelinks Are Supposed To Be Helpful

Sitelinks is a Google Search feature that shows links to different areas of a website when a user does a search for a brand name. Google supposedly analyze a website’s site structure and links to pages that users will find the most useful, which is helpful. Google’s documentation doesn’t get into details of what that analysis analyzes but I suspect that Google notes which sections of a site users tend to search for, inbound links, and site architecture (internal linking) then uses that information to generate the sitelinks feature.

There may be a bug in how Google is showing sitelinks for Google Search Console though.

A search for Google Search Console shows sitelinks in multiple languages:

  • Japanese
  • Hungarian
  • Dutch
  • Danish

Screenshot Of Google Sitelinks Bug

I searched using the domains of other websites and didn’t see the same effect. It’s unclear how long this has been happening but it’s interesting from an SEO perspective. The reason it’s interesting is because whatever analysis Google is using to determine sitelinks is causing this weird search result.

Hat tip to web developer and search marketing expert Brenda Malone (LinkedIn profile) for spotting this!

WordPress SEO Myths Busted: What You Really Need To Know via @sejournal, @cshel

WordPress powers over 40% of websites globally – and why would it not? It is relatively easy to use and has expansive options when it comes to plugins and pre-built themes.

But even though WordPress has been in active development and use for more than 20 years, misconceptions about WordPress SEO are rampant and many site owners are confused about what truly drives rankings.

Because I can’t respond to every single misconception that pops up on X (Twitter) or Reddit, I would like to clear up some of the confusion by busting the more pervasive myths and sharing actionable insights based on my experience.

Whether you’re an old pro or running your first site, I hope you leave with clarity and confidence in your WordPress SEO strategy.

Myth #1: WordPress Is Going Away Or Shutting Down

The Reality: Despite the current public debate about governance, I *assure* you – WordPress isn’t going anywhere.

It remains a robust, community-driven platform with a massive global user base.

WordPress’ open-source nature makes it incredibly flexible and free to use, but open-source also means that discussions about its future direction happen publicly and, sometimes, loudly.

Here’s what you need to know:

  • WordPress Isn’t Going Away Anytime Soon: The core functionality of WordPress remains stable and widely supported. The infrastructure is backed by millions of contributors, developers, and users.
  • What If There’s a Fork? Forks happen in open-source projects more often than you might think. Some are a bigger deal than others. If you’ve heard this mentioned and it made you nervous because you don’t really know what it means, please be assured there is no reason for panic. A fork happens when developers create a new version by branching off from the original project. While this sounds dramatic, forks typically prioritize compatibility to retain users. Most plugins will remain compatible in the early stages, and developers often create tools to make transitions seamless.
  • The Bottom Line: There’s no immediate reason to leave WordPress. Any major changes will take time, and you’ll have plenty of notice. Whether the ecosystem stays unified or forks, your investment in WordPress remains secure.

Focus on what matters: a solid SEO strategy, fast performance, and user-centric content. These fundamentals will serve you well no matter what.

Myth #2: WordPress Is SEO-Friendly By Default

The Reality: WordPress gives you a strong foundation, but it’s not set-it-and-forget-it. Even out of the box, there are configurations to set.

Some SEO needs may require a plugin if your theme doesn’t offer built-in support and you’re not comfortable modifying the code yourself.

Once you’ve got all of the configurations set, and you’ve set up your plugins and configured those, there will still be on-page and content SEO that is done as you’re writing the content.

You can’t install WordPress and then stop thinking about SEO forever.

  • Permalinks And Metadata: I always update permalinks to create clean, descriptive URLs. Titles, meta descriptions, and alt text for images need to be provided and optimized, too.
  • Plugins Are Helpful, Not Magical: I use Yoast to handle metadata defaults and sitemaps efficiently, but even the best plugin is only as good as the strategy behind it. Anything can be misconfigured, so make sure you understand the settings you’re being asked to define.
  • Content Structure Matters: High-quality content and a logical site architecture remain crucial.
  • Themes Can Make or Break SEO: A poorly coded theme can undo the built-in SEO advantages WordPress provides. Many users choose WordPress for the variety of prebuilt themes, but picking one that supports your SEO efforts is critical. A bad theme can tank your rankings – and that’s not WordPress’s fault.

Myth #3: An SEO Plugin Will Guarantee High Rankings

The Reality: SEO plugins are like a compass – they point the way, but you still have to do the hiking.

  • Know The Basics: Plugins can’t replace good keyword research or content strategy. Are you targeting keywords just because they have high search volume, or because they’re terms your users are actually searching for? Most sites make money on conversions, not raw traffic, so attracting the right traffic is essential.
  • Answer User Questions: Do you know what questions your users are asking? Is your content helping them make decisions, use your product, or solve their problems? If not, your content strategy needs work – and that’s not WordPress’s fault.
  • Use Suggestions Wisely: Just because a plugin gives you a green light doesn’t mean your content will automatically rank. Think of the green light as a progress indicator, not a guarantee of success. I use these recommendations as helpful guidelines, but they don’t replace solid market research or a content strategy tailored to your audience. Without that foundation, you could end up with a grammatically correct, SEO-optimized article about a topic no one cares about – or one that blends into an already saturated space. That’s not the plugin’s fault; it’s a reminder that SEO tools support your efforts but can’t create demand or originality for you.

Ultimately, there’s no magic SEO bullet – not in plugins, not in content management systems, and certainly not in shortcuts.

Myth #4: Performance And Speed Don’t Matter That Much

The Reality: Core Web Vitals are an indication of performance, and page speed itself significantly affects user experience and the ability of bots and crawlers to access your site.

But this doesn’t mean hitting specific scores will guarantee a top ranking. Instead, it’s about ensuring your site provides a great experience while optimizing speed and performance.

  • Stay In Control With Manual Updates: Running manual updates ensures you’re not reliant on automatic processes, which can sometimes fail or get delayed. Knowing how to handle updates helps you prevent vulnerabilities from outdated plugins or themes.
  • Remove Unused Plugins And Themes: Unused plugins and themes can create security risks, even if they’re inactive. Regularly cleaning your site minimizes potential attack vectors and keeps your installation lightweight.
  • Run Performance Audits: Audits can help identify performance bottlenecks, detect plugins or scripts that slow down your site, and catch issues before they affect user experience. SEO isn’t set-it-and-forget-it; monitoring your site’s health is crucial for staying competitive.

Myth #5: Content-Length Is More Important Than Quality

The Reality: Search engines care about providing accurate, useful answers and user satisfaction, not arbitrary word counts. It’s baffling that this myth still persists today.

Does this mean that you should stop doing long-form content? No. This means that different types of answers and information naturally call for different amounts of content.

The point is to provide as much quantity (number of words) as is necessary to accomplish the mission. Extra word count for the sake of extra word count is counterproductive.

  • Intent First: I focus on answering user questions directly. There is zero need to add filler details and backstories just to increase the word count. Provide information if the information is necessary and useful to the reader. If your reader is looking for details on how to fix their bicycle chain, they do not need a history lesson on the invention of the bicycle.
  • Avoid Fluff: Write enough to cover the topic thoroughly, but avoid padding your content for length. Even if you’re not adding unnecessary details and information to your article, make sure you avoid fluffing out the sentences to increase word count, too. When I say “fluffing,” I mean taking a sentence that can be perfectly expressed in five words and expanding it to 25 words unnecessarily. For example: “The cat sat quietly” becomes “The small, furry feline creature chose to sit still in an unmoving manner on the comfortable spot by the window.”

Myth #6: Backlinks Are All You Need For SEO Success

The Reality: Backlinks help, but they’re not a magic SEO bullet, just as I mentioned earlier.

It’s like getting glowing recommendations for a restaurant that serves bad food – those referrals won’t save it from bad reviews if the dining experience is poor.

  • Balance Your Efforts: Link-building should be paired with strong technical SEO and high-quality content.
  • Don’t Neglect User Experience: Sites that are hard to navigate or slow to load will struggle, even with strong backlinks.
  • Content Matters: Backlinks can’t compensate for irrelevant or low-value content.
  • Technical SEO Is Critical: Technical SEO plays a vital role in making backlinks work for your site. If search engines can’t easily crawl and index your pages because of poor technical structure, those backlinks won’t be able to pass authority effectively or improve your rankings.

Key Takeaways For WordPress SEO In 2025

SEO has evolved dramatically over the past year, especially with the rise of AI-driven search results, pulling from authoritative sites that provide real value and context.

With Google facing competition from AI-powered engines like Bing’s integration with OpenAI, it’s more important than ever to expand your approach and adapt to the shifting landscape.

1. Ongoing Maintenance Beats Default Settings

  • Regular Auditing Is Essential: Even with WordPress’s built-in features, active maintenance is key. Periodically review your SEO settings, content structure, and performance to ensure your site remains optimized.
  • Understand Plugin Limitations: Plugins offer great guidance but are not a replacement for thoughtful strategy. Pay attention to plugin settings and adapt them to your goals rather than relying solely on default configurations.

2. Make Use Of WordPress Plugins Thoughtfully

  • Enhance Content Optimization: You can certainly use plugins for guidance and to manage some of the technical SEO jobs, but no plugin can do *all* the work, especially when it comes to content. Content can be optimized, but optimized content that isn’t adding value or providing useful information still isn’t going to perform well.
  • Simplify Tasks: AI enhancements are all the rage in WordPress plugins and themes, but don’t let the AI make decisions without your oversight and input – strategy is still a human task.

3. Don’t Rely Solely On Google

  • Broaden Search Strategy: Pay attention to Bing’s integration with AI-powered tools and other emerging engines.
  • New Search Experiences: Be ready to adapt as search engines experiment with interfaces and AI.

4. Prioritize Security And Updates

  • Update Regularly: Keep plugins, themes, and core files updated to avoid vulnerabilities.
  • Remove Unnecessary Plugins: Keep your plugin directory clean to reduce security risks.

To Sum It Up

WordPress remains a powerful tool, but success requires adaptability.

Don’t let internal debates distract you from building a fast, secure, user-friendly site. Focus on proven strategies, stay flexible, and be ready for emerging SEO trends.

Whether it’s Google, Bing, or the next big thing, you’ll be ready. Audit your site’s speed, usability, and content strategy today.

Use plugins and tools to simplify optimization – but never forget the human touch in your SEO strategy.

More Resources:


Featured Image: JuIsIst/Shutterstock

Google Confirms Business Profile Reviews Outage via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Google confirmed an outage in business profile reviews that has resulted in missing reviews for many local business profiles and is working toward fixing the problem.

Google Business Profile

Google Business Profiles are a way for local businesses to add their business to Google and have it show up in local search and Google Maps. It also allows businesses to manage how their site shows up in search, enabling Google to show accurate information about hours, website, contact information, images and reviews.

The reviews is a feature that allows users to share their experiences with businesses. It’s a useful way for businesses to increase earnings through positive word of mouth.

GBP Reviews Outage

Google Business Profile reviews have gone missing, which is bad news for businesses because of how influential reviews are for building trust.

A Googler acknowledged the outage and committed to updating the community about fixes to the system. She did however ask businesses to read their guidelines about reviews, which could be seen as implying that some businesses with missing reviews may have had reviews removed for a reason.

She wrote:

“GBP Review Count Known Issue Update

Known Issue
We’re aware of an issue affecting some Google Business Profiles, causing some profiles to show lower-than-actual review counts due to a display issue. The reviews themselves have not actually been removed. We’re working hard to resolve this and restore accurate review counts as quickly as possible. We appreciate your patience and will share updates on this thread as they become available.

Before reporting missing reviews, please note that there are several reasons why reviews may be removed from maps. Usually, missing reviews are removed for policy violations like spam or inappropriate content.

Read more about our Review policy guidelines here before proceeding. You can also refer to the Help Center Article for more information.”

This is a developing story, this article will be updated with additional information once it becomes available.

Featured Image by Shutterstock/The Image Party

Google’s Advice on Fixing Unwanted Indexed URLs via @sejournal, @martinibuster

An SEO posted details about a site audit in which he critiqued the use of a rel=canonical for controlling what pages are indexed on a site. The SEO proposed using noindex to get the pages dropped from Google’s index and then adding the individual URLs to robots.txt. Google’s John Mueller suggested a solution that goes in a different direction.

Site Audit Reveals Indexed Add To Cart URLs

An SEO audit uncovered that over half of the client’s 1.43k indexed pages were paginated and “add to shopping cart” URLs (the kind with question marks at the end of them). Google ignored the rel=canonical link attributes and indexed the pages, which illustrated the point that rel=canonical is just a hint and not a directive. Paginated in this case just means the dynamically generated URLs related to when a site visitor orders a page by brand or size or whatever (this is usually referred to as faceted navigation).

The add to shopping cart URLs  looked like this:

example.com/product/page-5/?add-to-cart=example

The client had implemented a rel=canonical link attribute to tell Google that another URL was the correct URL to index.

The SEO’s solution:

“How I plan on fixing this is to no-index all these pages and once that’s done block them in the robots.txt”

SEO Decisions Depend On Details

One of the most tired and boring SEO dad jokes is “it depends.” But saying “it depends” is no joke when it’s followed by what something depends on and that’s the crucial detail that John Mueller added to a LinkedIn discussion that already had 83 responses to it.

The original discussion, by an SEO who’d just finished an audit, addresses the technical challenges associated with controlling what gets crawled and indexed by Google and why rel=canonical is not an unreliable solution because it is a suggestion and not a directive.

A directive is a command that Google is obligated to follow, like a meta noindex rule. A rel=canonical link attribute is not a directive, it’s treated as a hint for Google to use for deciding what to index.

The problem that the original post described was about managing a high number of dynamically generated posts that were slipping into Google’s index.

John Mueller On Dealing With Unwanted Indexed URLs

Mueller’s take on the problem was to suggest the importance of reviewing the URLs for patterns that may give a clue as to why unwanted URLs are getting indexed and then applying a more granular (specific) solution.

He advised:

“You seem to have a lot of comments here already, so my 2 cents are more as a random bystander…

– I’d review the URLs for patterns and look at specifics, rather than to treat this as a random list of URLs that you want canonicalized. These are not random, using a generic solution won’t be optimal for any site – ideally you’d do something specific for this particular situation. Aka “it depends”.

– In particular, you seem to have a lot of ‘add to cart’ URLs – you can just block these with the URL pattern via robots.txt. You don’t need to canonicalize them, they should ideally not be crawled during a normal crawl (it messes up your metrics too).

– There’s some amount of pagination, filtering in URL parameters too – check out our documentation on options for that.

– For more technical rabbit holes, check out https://search-off-the-record.libsyn.com/handling-dupes-same-same-or-different “

Why Was Google Indexing URLs With Query Parameters?

A topic raised by multiple people in the LinkedIn discussion is the problem of Google indexing shopping cart URLs (add to shopping cart URLs). No answers were provided but it may be something particular to the shopping cart platform and solving that may be limited to the above described solutions.

Read John Mueller’s advice here.