Google Announces Search Updates Powered By Gemini 2.0 via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

Google has announced a series of updates to Search for 2025, powered by Gemini 2.0, the company’s latest AI model.

Updates To AI Overviews

One of the most notable updates is the enhancement of AI Overviews.

CEO Sundar Pichai notes:

“Our AI Overviews now reach 1 billion people, enabling them to ask entirely new types of questions — quickly becoming one of our most popular Search features ever.”

With Gemini 2.0, AI overviews will soon handle complex topics and multi-step questions, including advanced math, multimodal queries, and coding.

Pichai explained:

“We’re bringing the advanced reasoning capabilities of Gemini 2.0 to AI Overviews to tackle more complex topics and multi-step questions, including advanced math equations, multimodal queries and coding.”

Google is testing these updates and plans to roll out the improved AI Overviews in early 2025, with plans to expand to more countries and languages within the next year.

Gemini 2.0

Gemini 2.0, mainly the Gemini 2.0 Flash model, is key to the recent Search updates.

As described by Google DeepMind’s leadership:

“2.0 Flash even outperforms 1.5 Pro on key benchmarks, at twice the speed.”

This model improves performance and can handle different types of inputs and outputs.

The announcement states:

“In addition to supporting multimodal inputs like images, video and audio, 2.0 Flash now supports multimodal output like natively generated images mixed with text and steerable text-to-speech (TTS) multilingual audio.”

Additionally, Gemini 2.0 Flash can use tools like Google Search and run code to access user-defined functions from other sources.

New Possibilities For Search

Google is developing new features for Search, including Project Mariner, which aims to improve user interaction with agents in web browsers.

The company describes it as:

“… an early research prototype built with Gemini 2.0 that explores the future of human-agent interaction, starting with your browser.”

Looking Ahead

Integrating Gemini 2.0 into Google Search could be a key step in improving users’ experience with AI overviews.

The success of these updates will depend on how well Google implements them while maintaining safety and responsibility.

As the updates roll out, we will see how users respond and whether these changes enhance the search experience.

Study: Google AI Overviews Appear In 47% Of Search Results via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

A new study shows that Google’s AI Overviews appear in nearly half of all search results and take up to 48% of mobile screen space.

Conducted by Botify and DemandSphere, the research analyzed over 120,000 keywords across 22 websites.

The study, conducted between August and September, finds that traditional SEO metrics like click-through rates may no longer give a complete picture of search performance.

When AI Overviews show up with featured snippets—which happens 60% of the time—these can occupy up to 76% of mobile screens, pushing regular listings out of view.

While strong organic rankings remain crucial, with 75% of AI Overview mentions coming from top-12 ranked pages, businesses need to adapt their strategies to the rise of AI in search.

Here are more highlights from the study.

Zero-Click Search

The study highlights a trend toward zero-click searches, with 60% of searches now resolved without users clicking links.

This shift creates a new challenge for businesses dependent on organic search traffic.

Search Volume & Keyword Length

Key findings about search patterns include:

  • Keywords with under 1,000 monthly searches triggered AI Overviews 55% of the time
  • Long-tail keywords (5+ words) generated AI Overviews in 73.6% of cases
  • Commercial intent queries showed AI Overviews 19.4% of the time
  • Informational queries triggered the feature 58.7% of the time

Crawlability Issues

The research showed that Google misses crawling about 50% of pages on large websites, while Bing misses 20% of pages that get organic traffic from Google.

The report notes:

“You may have the best answer in your site’s pages, but if they aren’t found within the Google search index, they risk not being cited in an AI Overview — no matter how well-optimized they are otherwise.”

Content Quality & Relevance

The study introduced a new way to measure content relevance using cosine similarity analysis.

It found that websites cited in AI Overviews often closely match the AI-generated summaries, indicating that higher quality content is linked to better visibility in AI search results.

What This Means

The study suggests several strategic priorities for businesses:

  • Measure visual SERP metrics like pixel depth to quantify true organic visibility
  • Analyze semantic similarity between page content and AI Overview summaries
  • Prioritize earning, growing, and defending top 12 organic ranking positions
  • Maintain strong SEO fundamentals to support organic performance
  • Develop a broader AI search strategy encompassing new platforms like Bing, ChatGPT Search, and Meta AI

Methodology & Scope

The research, conducted from August 15 to September 1, analyzed:

  • 36,000 commercial keywords
  • 85,638 informational keywords
  • 22 websites across e-commerce, publishing, and branded sectors
  • Both desktop and mobile search results

Looking Ahead

The study reveals changes in how users view search results and how businesses should manage their online visibility. AI Overviews pose challenges for organic search but also present opportunities for adaptable businesses.

Key points for search marketers include maintaining strong organic rankings, tracking visual SERP positioning, and creating content that meets user needs.

As search engines enhance their AI tools, it’s vital to maintain a strong foundation of technical SEO while expanding AI-focused strategies for greater visibility.


Featured Image: Cast Of Thousands/Shutterstock

Judge Sides With WP Engine Against Automattic & Mullenweg In WordPress Dispute via @sejournal, @martinibuster

A judge ruled in WP Engine’s favor in their request for a preliminary injunction against Automattic and Matt Mullenweg. The court agreed that WP Engine will suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted and giving the defendants (Automattic and Mullenweg) 72 hours to return things to the way they were as of September 20th, 2024.

The judge ruled against Mullenweg and Automattic on every argument, granting WP Engine a preliminary injunction. The ruling requires the defendants to restore WP Engine’s access to WordPress.org, regain control of the WordPress.org directory listing for the Advanced Custom Fields (ACF) plugin, and remove a list of WP Engine customers from the domains.csv file linked on the wordpressenginetracker.com website.

There were six parts labeled A – F that outline the judge’s analysis of the case:

A. Success on the Merits

B. Irreparable Harm

C. Balance of Equities

D. Public Interest

E. Bond

F. Scope of Injunction

A. Success on the Merits

On WP Engine’s “claim for tortious interference with contractual relations” the judge ruled:

“Defendants’ arguments in opposition do not compel a different conclusion.

Defendants’ argument that the interference WPEngine alleges consists of acts they had a right to take fares no better.”

B. Irreparable Harm

Mullenweg and Automattic completely failed at defending against WP Engine’s claims of irreparable harm if the injunction isn’t granted. The judge wrote:

“Defendants counter with four arguments. None is persuasive”

C. Balance of Equities

In this part of the ruling the judge had to weigh the impact of the injunction on both parties. The judge found that WP Engine had good reason for obtaining an injunction to prevent further harm and that there would be no impact on Automattic or Mullenweg.

The judge wrote:

“The conduct described at length above – including the termination of WPEngine’s access to WordPress, the interference with the ACF plugin, and the additional burdens imposed on WPEngine’s customers, such as the sign-in pledge – demonstrates that WPEngine has a significant interest in obtaining preliminary injunctive relief.

Defendants’ arguments in opposition do not establish that they will suffer any damage that overrides WPEngine’s interest in obtaining relief. …Requiring Defendants to restore access on those terms while this action proceeds imposes a minimal burden.”

D. Public Interest

This part of the ruling addresses how granting the injunction impacts parties beyond the plaintiff and defendants. The judge concluded that denying the preliminary injunction would cause significant harm.

The court explained:

“Here, the public consequences of withholding injunctive relief are significant. Mullenweg himself acknowledges that ‘[t]oday, more than 40% of all websites run on WordPress.’

…Over two million websites run the ACF plugin Mullenweg allegedly tampered with, and those users rely on the stability of the plugin, and WordPress more broadly, to operate their websites, run their businesses, and go about their day online.

Moreover, the availability of WordPress as open-source software has created a sector for companies to operate at a profit. This includes Mullenweg’s own companies like Automattic and Pressable, and as Mullenweg himself acknowledged in 2017, it also includes WPEngine, which at the time, Mullenweg described as ‘the largest dedicated managed WP host…’

Those who have relied on the WordPress’s stability, and the continuity of support from for-fee service providers who have built businesses around WordPress, should not have to suffer the uncertainty, losses, and increased costs of doing business attendant to the parties’ current dispute.

Defendants’ arguments in opposition do not persuade otherwise.

…Accordingly, the final Winter element – the public interest – weighs in favor of granting preliminary injunctive relief.”

E. Bond

Automattic and Mullenweg argued that WP Engine should be required file a bond of $1.6 million to ensure that they are compensated for potential costs and damages if it’s later found that the preliminary injunction was granted without sufficient basis.

The judge agreed with WP Engine’s argument that reverting to the status quo, to how things were on September 20th, would have no effect.

They wrote:

“WPEngine’s arguments are persuasive. …the Court finds that any harm to Defendants resulting from the issuance of preliminary injunctive relief is unlikely, as it merely requires them to revert to business as usual as of September 20, 2024. Accordingly, the Court declines to require WPEngine to post a bond.”

F. Scope Of Injunction

The court has ordered the defendants, their coworkers, and anyone helping them to stop doing the following things:

  • Preventing WP Engine, its employees, users, customers, or partners from accessing WordPress.org.
  • Disrupting WP Engine’s control over or access to plugins or extensions hosted on WordPress.org
  • Modifying WP Engine plugins on WordPress installations (websites built with WordPress software) through unauthorized auto-migrate or auto-update commands
  • The court ordered that the defendants take actions within 72 hours to address WP Engine’s claims and restore things to the way they were on September 20, 2024.
  • Delete the list of WP Engine customers from the WP Engine Tracker website and the GitHub repository.
  • Restore WP Engine employee login credentials to WordPress.org and login.wordpress.org.
  • Disable any “technological blocking” like IP blocking, that were set up around September 25, 2024.
  • Remove the checkbox added on October 8, 2024, at login.wordpress.org, which required users to confirm they were ‘not affiliated with WP Engine in any way, financially or otherwise.’
  • Restore WP Engine’s control over its Advanced Custom Fields (ACF) plugin directory listing to the way it was on September 20, 2024.

The injunction goes into effect immediately and will remain until the court issues a final judgment after the trial.

A Win For WP Engine And The WordPress Community

Many people agree with the principle that those who profit from WordPress should give back to it. However the overwhelming sentiment on social media has not been supportive of how Mullenweg’s actions against WP Engine. Today a judge agreed with WP Engine and issued a preliminary injunction in their favor.

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Brian A Jackson

Automattic Acquisition Will Bring AI Into WordPress via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Automattic announced the acquisition of WPAI, a company that creates AI-powered functionalities that make WordPress easier and more efficient to use. The core technologies of the current apps will be integrated into new offerings by Automattic.

WPAI

WPAI released it’s first product, CodeWP in 2022. CodeWP was an AI integrated development environment (IDE) for developers, enabling them to quickly generate code that’s optimized for performance and WordPress standards.

The second app produced by WPAI is AgentWP, released in August 2024. AgentWP was an autonomous AI agent that could proactively take action such as as making design changes. It indexes a website and is able to improve WordPress website workflow from content to code generation.

The technology of both apps will be integrated into WordPress.

According to the announcement by WPAI:

“We are excited to combine forces with Automattic to push the boundaries of how we can apply artificial intelligence to be more impactful on the CMS that powers the majority of the internet,’ says James LePage. ‘By integrating our technology and research with current and future Automattic products, we’ll be able to accelerate towards our goal of making WordPress, the Operating System of the Web, more accessible to everybody.”

Automattic explains:

“WPAI is an AI startup, focused on building AI solutions for WordPress. The brilliant founding team behind it—James LePage, Greg Hunt, and Ovidiu “Ovi” Iulian Galatan—will be joining Automattic to lead the exploration of applied AI as an interaction paradigm for WordPress. They’ll be working on testing, building, and integrating innovative AI solutions into the core ecosystem to redefine how users and developers work with WordPress.”

Read the announcement on Automattic:

Automattic Welcomes WPAI

Read the announcement on WPAI:

WPAI Has Been Acquired by Automattic

Check out WPAI’s free WP Chat tool that answers WordPress related questions (while it’s still available):

https://wp.chat

Google Site Reputation Abuse: FAQ Addresses Concerns via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

Google has released FAQ guidance on its site reputation abuse policy.

The update covers important points about managing third-party content and recovery processes.

Breaking Down Third-Party Content Rules

Google wants to clarify what counts as a violation. Using third-party content is not a problem in itself.

A violation happens when that content is used to take advantage of a site’s existing rankings.

Google explains:

“Having third-party content alone is not a violation of the site reputation abuse policy. It’s only a violation if the content is being published in an attempt to abuse search rankings by taking advantage of the host site’s ranking signals.”

This is especially important for publishers using:

  • Freelance writers
  • White-label services
  • External content creators
  • User-generated content

Google defines third-party content as:

“Content created by a separate entity than the host site,” including “users of that site, freelancers, white-label services, content created by people not employed directly by the host site.”

Recovery Options: What Works & What Doesn’t

Publishers who want to fix manual actions now have clear instructions on what to do with their content:

What Not to Do:

  • Don’t move content to subdirectories or subdomains.
  • Don’t redirect URLs that have received penalties.
  • Don’t just move content without proper documentation.

As stated in the FAQ:

“Moving content to a subdirectory or subdomain within the same site’s domain name: This doesn’t resolve the underlying issue and may be viewed as an attempt to circumvent our spam policy, which may lead to broader actions against a site in Google Search.”

However, Google notes that:

“Moving content to a new domain: This is far less likely to be an issue if the new domain has no established reputation and you follow our spam policies.”

What to Do:

  • Move content to new domains that do not have a good reputation.
  • Use “noindex” tags and make proper reconsideration requests.
  • Apply “nofollow” attributes for any necessary cross-linking.

Affiliate Content Gets Green Light

Good news for publishers: Google confirmed that affiliate content is not affected by this policy.

The documentation clarifies:

“The policy is not about targeting affiliate content… Affiliate links marked appropriately aren’t considered site reputation abuse.”

To comply, publishers must properly mark their affiliate links. This means you can continue to earn money through legitimate strategies while following the new rules.

Technical Implementation Guidelines

For websites under manual action, Google has outlined important technical requirements:

  1. Using a noindex tag alone will not remove the penalty automatically.
  2. You must submit reconsideration requests through Search Console.
  3. You need to document all steps taken to fix the issues.

The documentation reads:

“You still need to reply to the manual action in Search Console and explain that the content has been noindexed. We recommend doing this rather than letting the manual action remain against your site.”

The guidance also addresses linking practices:

“If you link from the old site to the new site, make use of the nofollow attribute for those links on the old site.”

Forward-Looking Implications

This FAQ release shows that Google is improving how it communicates policy changes.

The clarifications arrive at a crucial time as publishers work to align their strategies with Google’s evolving standards while maintaining sustainable businesses.


Featured Image: Mameraman/Shutterstock

TikTok’s Fight for Survival: The Latest Updates and Impacts on Advertisers via @sejournal, @brookeosmundson

TikTok isn’t going down without a fight.

On December 9, 2024, TikTok filed an emergency motion to block a law that could ban the app nationwide by January 2025.

This move is their latest attempt to keep the app accessible to its 170 million U.S. users and prevent chaos for the brands and advertisers who rely on the platform to connect with audiences.

TikTok’s argument? A ban isn’t just extreme—it’s unnecessary.

The company insists it has already taken steps to protect user data and comply with security concerns, pointing out that shutting down operations would harm not just them but also the advertisers, creators, and businesses who’ve made TikTok an essential part of their strategies.

TikTok’s Emergency Motion for Injunction

TikTok filed for an emergency motion for injunction Monday morning, seeking to temporarily block the enforcement of a U.S. law that mandates ByteDance to sell its American operations or face a nationwide ban.

TikTok is asking for this injunction to stay the ban while it appeals the court’s decision to the Supreme Court.

In its motion, TikTok argued that the potential ban would cause irreparable harm not only to the company, but also to its U.S. users, many of whom rely on the platform for business, entertainment, and livelihood.

The company emphasized that advertisers and brands would face significant disruptions, losing access to an audience that has become a cornerstone of modern digital marketing strategies.

TikTok also maintained that the U.S. government’s concerns about national security could be addressed without such extreme measures, asserting that it has made significant efforts to ensure data security and operational transparency.

What Prompted the Emergency Response?

TikTok’s emergency motion comes after a rough few weeks.

On December 6, 2024, a federal appeals court upheld the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act. This law demands that ByteDance sell TikTok’s U.S. operations by January 19, 2025—or risk an outright ban.

The reasoning behind the law isn’t new. Lawmakers argue TikTok’s ties to China pose a risk to national security, raising fears that sensitive user data could fall into the wrong hands.

TikTok has repeatedly denied these claims and pointed to efforts like “Project Texas,” which promises to store all U.S. user data on American soil. Still, skepticism remains high.

What makes this latest ruling a game-changer is that it leaves TikTok with little room to maneuver.

The emergency motion aims to delay the ban and give the Supreme Court time to weigh in. But with the clock ticking, the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Background on the Potential TikTok Ban in the United States

The saga of a potential TikTok ban has been unfolding for years. In 2020, the previous presidential administration attempted to ban TikTok over similar national security concerns, but those efforts were blocked by courts.

Since then, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have introduced measures to address what they see as risks associated with TikTok’s Chinese ownership.

In April 2024, Congress passed the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, which set a 270-day deadline for ByteDance to divest TikTok’s U.S. operations or face a ban.

While TikTok has consistently opposed these measures, citing its efforts to safeguard user data through initiatives like “Project Texas,” lawmakers have remained skeptical.

The recent appeals court decision has brought this issue to a critical juncture. If the ban is implemented, it would mark the most significant regulatory action against a social media platform in U.S. history, affecting millions of users and reshaping the digital advertising ecosystem.

What This Could Mean for Advertisers

Let’s not sugarcoat it: a TikTok ban would be a massive headache for advertisers.

The platform has redefined how brands engage with audiences, especially Gen Z and Millennials. Its short-form video format, trend-driven content, and sky-high engagement rates have made TikTok a favorite for brands big and small.

Here’s what advertisers could face if the ban moves forward:

  • Campaign Chaos: All those carefully planned TikTok campaigns? They’d be paused—or worse, canceled. That’s wasted ad spend and lost momentum.
  • Rebuilding on New Platforms: TikTok’s unique culture isn’t something you can replicate overnight. While platforms like Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts offer alternatives, they don’t have the same vibe—or the same audience.
  • Budget Reallocations: Brands will have to decide where to funnel their TikTok budgets, which might mean experimenting with platforms they’ve never used before. Spoiler alert: that’s not always a smooth transition.

Smaller businesses and creators could feel the squeeze the most. For many of them, TikTok isn’t just another platform—it’s the platform driving sales and visibility.

Without it, they’ll face the uphill battle of finding new ways to connect with audiences.

The Legal Battle Isn’t Over

As TikTok fights for survival, advertisers and brands are left wondering: what now?

For starters, this is a wake-up call to diversify your digital marketing strategy. TikTok might be your bread and butter today, but no platform is guaranteed.

Whether it’s a ban, algorithm changes, or shifting user trends, having all your eggs in one basket is always risky.

For now, the best move is to stay informed and be ready to pivot. Keep an eye on what the Supreme Court decides in the coming months and start exploring alternative platforms if you haven’t already.

While the future of TikTok in the U.S. hangs in the balance, one thing is clear: adaptability will be the key to weathering whatever comes next.

Google’s Updated Crawler Guidance Recommends ETags via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Google announced an update to their crawler documentation, adding more information about caching which should help better understand how to optimize for Google’s crawler. By following the new guidelines on implementing proper HTTP caching headers, SEOs and publishers can improve crawling efficiency and optimize server resources.

Updated Crawler Documentation

The crawler documentation now has a section that explains how Google’s crawlers use HTTP caching mechanisms that help to conserve computing resources for both publishers and Google during crawling.

Additions to the documentation significantly expand on the prior version.

Caching Mechanisms

Google recommends enabling caching with headers like ETag and If-None-Match, as well as optionally Last-Modified and If-Modified-Since, to signal whether content has changed. This can help reduce unnecessary crawling and save server resources, which is a win for both publishers and Google’s crawlers.

The new documentation states:

“Google’s crawling infrastructure supports heuristic HTTP caching as defined by the HTTP caching standard, specifically through the ETag response- and If-None-Match request header, and the Last-Modified response- and If-Modified-Since request header.”

Google’s Preference For Preference for ETag

Google recommends using ETag over Last-Modified because ETag is less prone to errors like date formatting issues and provides more precise content validation. It also explains what happens if both ETag and Last-Modified response headers are served:

“If both ETag and Last-Modified response header fields are present in the HTTP response, Google’s crawlers use the ETag value as required by the HTTP standard.”

The new documentation also states that other HTTP caching directives are not supported.

Variable Support Across Crawlers

The new documentation explains that support for caching differs among Google’s crawlers. For example, Googlebot supports caching for re-crawling, while Storebot-Google has limited caching support.

Google explains:

“Individual Google crawlers and fetchers may or may not make use of caching, depending on the needs of the product they’re associated with. For example, Googlebot supports caching when re-crawling URLs for Google Search, and Storebot-Google only supports caching in certain conditions”

Guidance On Implementation

Google’s new documentation recommends contacting hosting or CMS providers for assistance. It also suggests (but doesn’t require) that publishers set the max-age field of the Cache-Control response header in order to help crawlers know when to crawl specific URLs.

Entirely New Blog Post

Google has also published a brand new blog post:

Crawling December: HTTP caching

Read the updated documentation:

HTTP Caching

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Asier Romero

Google Product Studio Rolls Out To Additional Countries via @sejournal, @brookeosmundson

Google just expanded Google Product Studio, its AI-powered tool for creating better product images, to more countries.

Originally launched in May 2023, this handy feature is built right into Merchant Center Next, the revamped hub for managing product listings.

It’s a game-changer for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and retailers looking to level up their visuals without breaking the bank—or spending hours in photo editing software.

What Is Google Product Studio?

At its core, it’s a tool that uses generative AI to help businesses enhance their product photos.

Whether you’re trying to grab attention in Shopping ads, make your images pop on organic search, or just keep up with competitors, this tool makes it quick and easy.

So, why should you care about Google Product Studio?

Well, let’s face it: consumers judge products by their visuals, and not everyone has the budget for professional photoshoots. That’s where Google Product Studio comes in, offering features like:

  • Background Removal and Replacement: Transform a cluttered image into a clean, professional-looking shot—or swap in a themed background for a seasonal promo.
  • Image Upscaling: Say goodbye to pixelated photos. Product Studio can upscale low-resolution images to make them shine.
  • Seasonal and Thematic Overlays: Want to add a holiday vibe or showcase a specific theme? It’s as simple as a few clicks.

Additionally, Product Studio now supports video generation, which launched just a few months ago.

These tools are especially useful for advertisers who need their listings to look polished without a lot of extra effort. Better visuals mean better click-through rates, which helps improve overall conversions and sales.

Where is Google Product Studio Available Now?

Until recently, Product Studio was only available in select regions, but this latest expansion means more merchants can now access it.

As of today, Product Studio is available in 15 new countries, including:

  • Czech Republic
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • Greece
  • Hungary
  • Ireland
  • Mexico
  • New Zealand
  • Norway
  • Portugal
  • Romania
  • Slovakia
  • Sweden
  • Turkey
  • Ukraine

With this expansion, Product Studio is now available in 30 countries, which has already been made available previously to:

  • Australia
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Brazil
  • Canada
  • Germany
  • India
  • Italy
  • Japan
  • Netherlands
  • Poland
  • Spain
  • Switzerland
  • United Kingdom
  • United States

The Continued Expansion of AI

In a world where e-commerce competition keeps heating up, Product Studio is a lifeline for retailers who want to stay ahead.

Better images don’t just look good—they drive results. And with this expansion, more merchants worldwide can take advantage of Google’s AI magic to bring their product listings to life.

As e-commerce continues to evolve, tools like this make it easier than ever to keep up—and stand out.

Google expects to roll out Product Studio to additional countries in the following months.