Reddit Integrates AI-Powered Search With New “Reddit Answers” via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

Reddit is testing a new AI-powered search feature called “Reddit Answers” with a small group of users in the United States.

This tool should help users find information, recommendations, and personal opinions by using real conversations from Reddit’s many communities.

In an announcement, the company states:

“In line with our mission to empower communities and provide human perspectives to everyone, starting today, we’re rolling out a test of Reddit Answers, a new way to get the information, recommendations, discussions, and hot takes people are looking for – on any topic – from real conversations and communities across all of Reddit.”

Transforming Search On Reddit

Reddit Answers offers a simple search tool powered by AI.

You can ask questions and get relevant answers from discussions on Reddit.

Screenshot from redditinc.com/blog/introducing-reddit-answers, December 2024.

When a question is submitted, the tool creates summaries of conversations and details from different subreddits.

It also links related communities and posts, allowing you to explore full conversations for more context.

The annoucement continues:

“People know that Reddit has answers, advice, and perspectives on almost anything they’re looking for, and AI-powered search is part of our longer-term vision to improve the search experience on Reddit – making it faster, smarter, and more relevant.”

Screenshot from reddit.com/answers, December 2024.

Why This Matters

Reddit’s search function has been a problem for users, who often find it less effective than other search engines. Reddit Answers aims to address this and help users find information more easily on the platform.

Many users turn to Google to search for Reddit content, adding “Reddit” to their queries because Reddit’s search often lacks relevant results.

By using AI to provide targeted answers and summaries, Reddit Answers could reduce this reliance on Google and keep users engaged.

Availability

Currently, the feature is available to a limited number of users in the U.S. and only works in English. The company plans to add more languages and expand to additional locations soon.

Those eager to experience the new search feature and stay informed about its availability can visit the dedicated Reddit Answers webpage for updates.

What 7 SEO Experts Think About AI Overviews And Where Search Is Going via @sejournal, @theshelleywalsh

Generative AI and the introduction of AI Overviews to SERPs have dominated this year as search has changed more in the last year than in the last 10 or 20 years.

But it might be that many of these changes are coming in spite of Gen AI and not because of.

SEO has been maturing and aligning with classic marketing for many years. AI has been the catalyst that has now created an urgency to rethink SEO strategies and start to approach SEO in a digital marketing holistic way.

SEO is no longer about just being visible in SERPs. Consideration is also needed for visibility in Gen AI apps, social media, and any channel where your audience might be.

Search traffic will likely become more fractured across different channels, and an SEO’s job will become much more complex. The days of easy traffic are well in the rearview mirror.

For the last six months, I interviewed a series of the smartest minds in SEO about their thoughts on AIO.

I asked them all the same question: “What do you think about AI Overviews? How will they impact the industry, and where is this going?”

7 SEO Experts Share Their Thoughts About AI Overviews

The most interesting part about asking the same question to different people is that you get a wide variety of answers – all approaching from different angles.

All of the excerpts below are just an extract and summary taken from a series of short videos.

It’s worth watching each of the videos in full to get the nuance and detail of what each of the experts has to say.

Pedro Dias: AI Is Raising The Bar For Knowledge

I started by speaking to Pedro Dias earlier in the year.

Ex-Googler Pedro has always been focused on user experience, and he believes Gen AI is widening the gap between generalists and true specialists. And that real expertise will be more valuable than ever. It’s the middle ground that will be displaced.

Pedro also believes in building communities and considering the customer journey – where you can give away content for free and where you gate your most valuable resources for your audience.

“The real value lies in crafting more comprehensive materials. Ideally, these should be gated or shielded from Google, allowing us to funnel readers genuinely interested in deeper insights into our platforms. This approach protects our assets and enables us to nurture a loyal audience who seeks value beyond surface-level information.

Professionals need to determine what they can safely offer to AI for broad discovery and what content should remain exclusive to their clients. Every business must identify this balance. While competition will compel some to disclose more detailed content, creators must decide where to draw the line between free and premium offerings.

AI is raising the bar for knowledge. It’s widening the gap between generalists and true specialists, making deep expertise more valuable than ever. Middle-ground professionals, who rely on surface-level knowledge, are at risk of being displaced.

The industry will thrive on the backs of those investing in research, innovation, and specialized knowledge. Others may settle for AI-generated information, but there will always be an audience that seeks deeper insights and expertise.”

Erika Varangouli: SEO Cannot Be Independent Of Brand

Erika believes that we have been spoiled previously, as SEO was not as complex as it is today.

Search used to focus on keywords and clicks, which is a much more one-dimensional approach than what we face today.

She also believes that creativity and branding are essential moving forward.

“20 years ago, you’d just write stuff about car insurance – ‘best car insurance’ – and make sure you had it everywhere.

So, in reality, it wasn’t about understanding or satisfying an audience. But as online behaviors, features, and capabilities have developed, we couldn’t just continue doing SEO that way.

I think moving forward, one of the predominant skills is going to be creativity. SEO has always been about strategy and strategic thinking, but now, more than ever, it’s going to require creativity. And that will probably be the edge we have over AI.

It’s becoming clearer that SEO cannot work outside of understanding the basic principles of marketing, psychology, and branding.

I think something that’s been obvious for a long time is that SEO cannot be independent of brand. But it was functional even if you ignored it for a long time.

I think we’ve passed the point now where we cannot ignore it. SEO reports that rely on rankings, clicks, or traffic won’t look great, but how SEO can really bring results is through collaboration with other marketing disciplines and the business as a whole.

Think about the audience, owning the conversations – not owning the clicks – and you should be fine.”

Jono Alderson: Understanding The Problems Your Audience Has Will Be Crucial

Jono believes that AI Overviews are a symptom of a bigger change and that it was never Google’s objective to be a list of 10 blue links.

What they have always aspired to is to understand what you want and solve your problem.

“This 20-year period we’ve had of typing into an input box and getting a list of links was a temporary dysfunction on that journey.

Now, we’re seeing the first chapter of where they really wanted to get to, and that has some big changes. The obvious ones are things like zero-click searches becoming more prolific, where people type or speak something, and Google solves the problem in situ.

This has huge impacts on the web’s economic model – not just for sites relying on conversions but also those relying on clicks for advertising.

Google’s own advertising ecosystem, which relies on visits to ad-running websites, is affected, too. Everyone, including Google, is still figuring out what this all means.

The model of creating content just to bridge traffic to websites is falling apart because Google and users no longer need that content.

In many cases, Google’s AI-generated results will be better because they’re unbiased, multi-sourced, up-to-date, and not selling a specific product.

Producing content for keywords just to rank may not be the future of SEO. While being topical, newsworthy, or adding truly new value still works, if your strategy is based on just writing articles, there’s an existential crisis at hand.

Understanding the problems your audience has will be crucial. Instead of focusing on keywords or the products people want, we need to focus on the frustrations they have before they start searching.

I think conventional user research – surveys, asking questions – will be more important than building spreadsheets of keywords. Moving away from keywords and understanding human needs will be key.

Search behavior is already shifting. We need to stop thinking about just typing queries into Google.

People are searching on TikTok and Instagram, and even using voice commands with their smart homes. Brand discovery and awareness will play a bigger role, and we’ll need to adapt by creating content that’s useful, relevant, and trustworthy.”

Mark Williams-Cook: Branded Search Is The Gold Standard

Mark’s opinion is that we’re in an odd place and sitting on the fence between two technologies. He thinks that there is a disconnect between user expectations and search engine capabilities.

“The key point here is that with AI models like LLMs and overviews, we’ve introduced a new way and expectation for users.

Now, they can ask tools like ChatGPT a question as if they’re talking to another person and receive a direct answer.

The danger is that most people don’t understand how AI works or realize it can make mistakes.

Google has built trust over 20 years, so people assume its answers are accurate, even though AI Overviews have produced some very incorrect results.

The issue is users aren’t aware of AI’s limitations, so when an Overview gives faulty information, people’s defenses are down. They trust Google and assume AI is inherently ‘clever’ without realizing it can produce biased or inaccurate responses.

There are knowledge spaces, or ‘solved knowledge spaces,’ as Jono Alderson calls them, where information doesn’t change much, like a lasagna recipe. I think AI Overviews are useful in these areas, which might reduce traffic to sites focused on this kind of content. However, it’s honestly a relief to see less repetitive content online.

For industries impacted by AI overviews, it might be time to shift focus rather than trying to fit old practices into the new landscape.

The blended SERPs will focus more on overall presence, not just page optimization. It’s about where and how frequently your brand is mentioned across the web, more like digital PR. This favors brands with a broad digital footprint.

Ultimately, branded search – people searching specifically for your brand – is the gold standard, and I think that’s where AI overviews could push us.”

Dan Taylor: ChatGPT Search Will Lay The Groundwork For Significant Changes

I spoke to Dan a few days after ChatGPT Search launched. Dan conducted some initial research and testing on how the AI search engine handled queries.

He believes that in its current state, ChatGPT Search would not appeal to the mass market as it felt lacking. He thinks it is still raw and rugged and perhaps not quite ready for a broad audience of non-tech users.

But, he does think this could be a big moment similar to the introduction of Ask Jeeves (for those who remember). It pioneered a different approach to search modeling, and ChatGPT Search will be influential.

“ChatGPT Search is very query-dependent. For local search, for instance, it wasn’t a great experience. I noticed that, with niche or specific queries, it had a better logical structure.

For example, in a recent search for sports scores, Google prioritized the dominant, common interpretation over timeliness.

ChatGPT Search, however, better understood the fresh intent of the query. It wasn’t visually polished, but the information was accurate and elaborate.

In terms of SEO, if ChatGPT Search gains traction, SEOs will need to adapt to optimize for this new format. The summaries in AI Overviews are already doing a lot of the work for users, but there’s an open question about accuracy and trustworthiness that’s fundamental to how this will develop.

I think it has the potential to be a pioneering force in AI-powered search. This could be the ‘Ask Jeeves’ moment for AI search, helping to establish the landscape for a new wave of competition.

We’re in a different ecosystem now, and OpenAI is heavily funded. Whether it remains at the forefront, or another big player steps in, ChatGPT Search will at least lay the groundwork for significant changes in search.”

Alli Berry: Combining AI With A Strong Sense Of Brand Will Lead The Future

Alli predominantly works in the finance space, so her experience has not been impacted as much as other verticals. Currently, Google limits AI Overviews in Your Money or Your Life (YMYL) SERPs.

Like many others, she believes that a shift to branding is needed and that smaller companies will need to engage audiences directly, and reduce their reliance on Google.

“I don’t have a strong yes or no opinion on these Overviews; I see them as the next generation of disruption at the top of the SERPs.

Now, it’s on us as practitioners to figure out how to make the most of them. I’ve had great success with featured snippets in the past, so I hope we can replicate that with AI Overviews.

I think the space will have to change. Right now, the financial industry feels very transactional, and there’s not much emphasis on building long-term relationships or communities.

Few finance sites do this well, and it’s a huge opportunity. Smaller companies will need to collect user information, engage audiences directly, and reduce their reliance on Google.

If brands don’t adapt, they’ll fade out. Quick-hit search answers won’t sustain them in the long run. Whether in finance or another industry, brands need to focus on recognition and audience growth.

That requires thoughtfulness and an effort to create something people want to connect with. This change, while challenging, will improve the brands that survive.

We’ve come full circle to classic marketing. Building brand recognition is vital.

Digital marketing went through a phase of undervaluing traditional advertising because it was hard to measure ROI. But now, it’s about creating brand associations, being visible, and providing value to audiences through direct content like newsletters.

Brands that combine AI with a strong sense of brand will lead the future. That combination is critical moving forward. “

Arnout Hellemans: It’s More About Experience Optimization

Arnout thinks we are on the verge of a big shift. Google must reinvent itself, but its focus right now seems to be on competing with Amazon.

There could be a future where Google integrates its accounts so you can make purchases directly within the search interface.

He can see that the younger generations are using TikTok and Snapchat instead of Google. He also thinks that to create demand in search volume, you need to create hype on those platforms.

Arnout is also driven by creating better user experiences and focusing on conversions and not clicks. He believes that we should optimize websites not just for traffic but to help people convert.

“Google had the technology to launch something like ChatGPT before OpenAI, but they didn’t because they knew it would hurt their bottom line. They were forced into it when people flocked to ChatGPT. Now, with so many alternatives, Google has to adapt.

With the launch of ChatGPT Search, how much market share will it take from Google? I think it’ll be significant. Brave, Perplexity, and other engines will nibble at Google’s dominance.

Most of these searches are informational, so initially, it might not cut into ad revenue. But, as users shift from informational searches to comparisons and eventually purchases, the impact will grow.

Google could already provide a similar experience but hesitates because of shareholder value. It’ll be interesting to see the initial market share data.

If they lose a small percentage, it might be manageable, but if they lose 10% or more, they’ll have to act quickly. Ad revenue may still rise in the short term due to higher CPC prices, but [in the] long term, the competition is fierce.

Younger generations are gathering knowledge from TikTok. It’s fascinating. Most of their knowledge comes from there. The biggest spikes in Google Trends now are TikTok trends.

To generate search volume, you need to hype solutions on platforms like YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok. That’s how you create demand.

It’s fascinating to think about the younger generation’s habits. They even use Snapchat over Google Maps now. It’s hard for us to imagine, but that’s their reality.

I think we’re moving towards an age where it’s not about sheer traffic but about delivering a truly optimized experience. The old age of SEO is gone.

It’s more about experience optimization – truly delivering the best experience ever. “

What We Can Takeaway About AI Overviews

Although we have eight different responses to the same question, the common themes and what we can take away from these conversations are to:

  • Leverage your expertise and deep knowledge with your audience.
  • Focus on brand building and building your audience.
  • Build communities around your brand.
  • Create content that solves problems.
  • Embrace TikTok in the user journey to find information.
  • AIO mostly takes away informational queries that don’t hold any conversion value.
  • Focus on conversion and not clicks.

Thank you to all the experts who appeared as guests on IMHO and offered their time and opinions.

More Resources:


Featured Image: Deemerwha Studio/Shutterstock

Build Your Own Ecommerce Platform in 2025

In 2025, advances in composable commerce may enable even smaller ecommerce merchants to build tailored, flexible online shopping experiences that drive incremental revenue in competitive markets.

Composable commerce is an evolution of the more familiar headless commerce model.

Headless commerce decouples the frontend presentation layer from the backend code for faster updates and improved performance. Composable commerce takes it further, allowing the integration of best-of-breed tools and applications for a tailored, scalable, and, likely, more profitable ecommerce platform.

Composable commerce is the integration of best-of-breed tools and applications for a tailored and scalable platform.

Headless to Composable

For example, a headless commerce retailer might use an API to complete an ecommerce transaction in multiple channels, such as a website, app, social media, or point-of-sale system.

Composable commerce does the same and integrates a “packaged business capability” such as a return management system or an influencer marketing platform.

“Headless is still growing and evolving,”  wrote Allison “Al” Williams, general manager of business to consumer at BigCommerce, in an email to Practical Ecommerce. “What started as a very dev-centric ‘best practice’ primarily driven by front-end development teams…has now turned into a more holistic and modular approach…for managing overall ecommerce architecture (e.g., composable commerce).”

This trend toward modularity can benefit online merchants. Composable commerce is flexible, allowing businesses to adapt quickly to changing customer needs and market trends. Its modular design scales, making adding or removing components relatively easy, and encourages innovation by integrating technologies such as AI and low-code platforms.

Composable Commerce Benefits

Composable commerce is both compatible and an alternative to traditional, all-in-one ecommerce platforms such as BigCommerce and Shopify.

Combined, the benefits of headless and composable commerce produce dynamic and personal shopping experiences.

“With this evolution from headless to composable commerce, the merchant can pick and choose different applications to build a tech stack that best fits their business and their customers,” wrote BigCommerce’s Williams.

Flexibility allows users to custom-build a technology stack. Online shops that feel platform-constrained can use composable commerce to integrate microservices, APIs, cloud, headless, and Jamstack (JavaScript, APIs, and markup language).

The result could be faster mobile loads, new personalization methods, and data-driven product placement and pricing.

Adaptability of composable commerce ensures businesses can pivot as needs change. For example, a gourmet food retailer could launch subscription meal kits and use a customer data platform to offer recipes and ingredients tailored to each customer.

A modular stack means the business can add custom tools and capabilities regardless of its ecommerce or point-of-sale platform. Thus a change does not require overhauling or disrupting the entire system, enabling rapid time-to-market.

Scalability means composable commerce supports growth without breaking existing infrastructure.

For example, a regional home goods store might expand into international markets. By adding multilingual and multi-currency applications, the business meets the needs of new customers while maintaining its existing infrastructure.

Configurability facilitates customization. A shop can build experiences tailored to its brand and customers.

Imagine a fitness equipment retailer that integrates a virtual reality tool, allowing shoppers to visualize a home gym setup before purchasing. This versatility differentiates the retailer from competitors relying on more generic solutions.

Challenges

To date, most headless and composable commerce users are enterprise businesses and small shops with technical chops.

“A common challenge we hear is the perceived complexity of transitioning to a headless architecture, particularly managing multiple vendors and ensuring the seamless integration of components,” wrote Williams. “This complexity compounds based on the number of brands, geographies, and channels.”

Yet that is why 2025 might be a breakout year for composable commerce, especially for smaller businesses, judging from the number of companies building modular services. Practical Ecommerce has identified many composable commerce rollouts, including releases Commercetools, LTImindtree, PhaseZero, and Vtex.

All-in-one platforms recognize the opportunity. Shopify, BigCommerce, and Salesforce offer composable storefronts and address the topic in guides and blog posts:

Alternative meat could help the climate. Will anyone eat it?

This article is from The Spark, MIT Technology Review’s weekly climate newsletter. To receive it in your inbox every Wednesday, sign up here.

Last week, we celebrated Thanksgiving here in the US, and I had hearty helpings of ham and turkey alongside my mashed potatoes and green bean casserole.

Meat is often the star on our plates, but our love of animal-based foods is a problem for the climate. Depending on how you count it up, livestock accounts for somewhere between 10% and 20% of all greenhouse gas emissions.

A growing number of alternative foods seek to mimic or replace options that require raising and slaughtering animals. These include plant-based products and newly approved cultivated (or lab-grown) meats. An increasing number of companies are even raising microbes in the lab in the hopes that we’ll add them to the menu, as I covered in a story this week.

But as one of my colleagues always puts it when I tell him about some alternative food product, the key question is, will anyone eat it?

Food might just be one of the trickiest climate problems to solve. Technically, none of us has to be eating any of the highest-emissions foods—like beef—that are worst for the climate. But what we eat is deeply personal, and it’s often tied up with our culture and our social lives. Many people want hamburgers at a barbecue and nice steak dinners. 

The challenge of our food system’s climate impact is only getting more tricky: richer countries tend to eat more meat, and so as populations grow and the standard of living rises around the world, we’re going to see emissions from livestock production rise, too.

In an effort to combat that trend, alternative food products aim to deliver foods similar to the ones we know and love with less harmful effects on the climate. Plant-based options like those from Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods have exploded in recent years, finding their way into supermarkets and even onto the menus of major fast-food brands like Burger King.

The problem is, a lot of alternative products have been struggling lately. Unit sales of meat alternatives in the US were down by 26% between 2021 and 2023, and fewer households are buying plant-based alternative meat options, according to a report from the Good Food Institute. Consumers say that alternatives still aren’t up to par on taste and price, two key factors that determine what people decide to eat.

So companies are racing to invent better products. I’ve spent a lot of time covering cultivated (or lab-grown) meats. To make these products, animal cells are grown in the lab and processed into things like chicken nuggets. Two companies got approval to sell cultivated chicken in the US in 2023, and we’ve seen both offer their products in limited runs at high-end restaurants.

But these products are still not quite the same thing as the meat we’re used to. When I tried a burger that contained cells grown in a lab, it was similar to plant-based ones that have a softer texture than I’m used to. Chicken from Upside Foods, served at a Michelin-starred restaurant, had similar textural differences. And these products are still only available at very small scales, if at all, and they’re expensive. 

microbial protein powder on a tabletop

LANZATECH

One key issue that comes up again and again as I report on these new products is what to call them. The industry strongly prefers cultivated, not “lab-grown.” Probably better to not remind people that they’re eating something grown in vats in a laboratory. As the companies that make these products often point out, we don’t typically use this sort of language for the animal-based products we’re used to. You’d never find the phrase “slaughtered baby cow” on a menu, just “veal.”

I was thinking about this issue of language and marketing again recently as I reported a story about a company looking to grow bacteria, dry it, and sell it to feed animals or people. I found myself a little weirded out by the prospect of dried microbe powder finding its way into my diet. But I don’t have a problem drinking wine or eating cheese, two products that rely on microbes and a fermentation process to exist.

Maybe LanzaTech will come up with a marketing plan that makes their microbe powder  an easy addition to my Thanksgiving table. Ultimately though, no matter how well they’re marketed, I’m not sure how much we can rely on alternative products to solve the climate challenge that is our food system. 

As is often the case when it comes to addressing climate change, we’re going to need not only some behavioral changes, but also technical solutions like cattle burp pills and new fertilizer options, as well as policy to help nudge our food system in the right direction. 


Now read the rest of The Spark

Related reading

A new crop of biotech startups is looking to grow food out of thin air. Read more about a few of the leading businesses in this story from earlier this fall.

Cultivated meat products are made with animal cells grown in the lab. Last year, I covered what we know about what those products mean for climate change.  

We’re expecting too much from our fake meat products. Here’s how my colleague James Temple stopped worrying and learned to love alternatives

Rumin8 and Pivot Bio, two of our Climate Tech Companies to Watch this year, are both working to address emissions from agriculture. 

Keeping up with climate  

China announced it would ban the export to the US of several rare minerals that are crucial in technology like semiconductors. The move follows efforts by the US to shift supply chains away from China. (New York Times)

Donald Trump has pledged to ramp up tariffs on Chinese goods, while other nations around the world have already put such policies in place. (Rest of World)

Australia is on track to meet its 2030 emissions target. The country’s climate pollution is projected to fall more than 42% below 2005 levels by the end of the decade. (Bloomberg)

Talks to form an international plastic treaty fell apart this week. Some countries favored cutting down plastic production, while others, including oil-rich nations, pushed back. (Washington Post)

The US Department of Energy announced a nearly $7 billion loan to Stellantis and Samsung for two battery factories that will supply batteries for EVs. (New York Times)
→ That follows a $6.6 billion loan to Rivian to help the company build a stalled factory in Georgia. (Associated Press)
→ The Biden administration is racing to lock in loans and safeguard them against rollbacks before Donald Trump takes office in January. (E&E News)

California could increase use of ethanol, a move the state says could lower gas prices. But experts warn that expanded use of ethanol made from corn can have negative consequences for climate progress and the environment. (Inside Climate News)

Norway’s government is blocking plans to mine the sea bed. There were plans to begin offering permits in the first half of 2025, and preparations will continue during the suspension. (Reuters)
→ These deep-sea “potatoes” could be the future of mining for battery materials. (MIT Technology Review)

A decade ago, sea surface temperatures in the Pacific shot up in a dramatic marine heat wave. Now, scientists are looking for clues in that event to understand what rising temperatures will mean for the ocean. (New York Times)

What China’s critical mineral ban means for the US

MIT Technology Review Explains: Let our writers untangle the complex, messy world of technology to help you understand what’s coming next. You can read more from the series here.

This week, China banned exports of several critical minerals to the US, marking the latest move in an escalating series of tit-for-tat trade restrictions between the world’s two largest economies.

In explicitly cutting off, rather than merely restricting, materials of strategic importance to the semiconductor, defense, and electric vehicle sectors, China has clearly crossed a new line in the long-simmering trade war. 

At the same time, it selected minerals that won’t cripple any industries—which leaves China plenty of ammunition to inflict greater economic pain in response to any further trade restrictions that the incoming Trump administration may impose. 

The president-elect recently pledged to impose an additional 10% tariff on all Chinese goods, and he floated tariff rates as high as 60% to 100% during his campaign. But China, which dominates the supply chains for numerous critical minerals essential to high-tech sectors, seems to be telegraphing that it’s prepared to hit back hard.

“It’s a sign of what China is capable of,” says Gracelin Baskaran, director of the Critical Minerals Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a bipartisan research nonprofit in Washington, DC. “Shots have been fired.”

What drove the decision?

China’s announcement directly followed the Biden administration’s decision to further restrict exports of chips and other technologies that could help China develop advanced semiconductors used in cutting-edge weapon systems, artificial intelligence, and other applications.

Throughout his presidency, Biden has enacted a series of increasingly aggressive export controls aimed at curbing China’s military strength, technological development, and growing economic power. But the latest clampdown crossed a “clear line in the sand for China,” by threatening its ability to protect national security or shift toward production of more advanced technologies, says Cory Combs, associate director at Trivium China, a research firm.

“It is very much indicative of where Beijing feels its interests lie,” he says.

What exactly did China ban?

In response to the US’s new chip export restrictions, China immediately banned exports of gallium, germanium, antimony, and so called “superhard materials” used heavily in manufacturing, arguing that they have both military and civilian applications, according to the New York Times. China had already placed limits on the sale of most of these goods to the US.

The nation said it may also further restrict sales of graphite, which makes up most of the material in the lithium-ion battery anodes used in electric vehicles, grid storage plants, and consumer electronics. 

What will the bans do?

Experts say, for the most part, the bans won’t have major economic impacts. This is in part because China already restricted exports of these minerals months ago, and also because they are mostly used for niche categories within the semiconductor industry. US imports of these materials from China have already fallen as US companies figured out new sources or substitutes for the materials. 

But a recent US Geological Survey study found that outright bans on gallium and germanium by China could cut US gross domestic product by $3.4 billion. In addition, these are materials that US politicians will certainly take note of, because they “touch on many forms of security: economic, energy, and defense,” Baskaran says. 

Antimony, for example, is used in “armor-piercing ammunition, night-vision goggles, infrared sensors, bullets, and precision optics,” Baskaran and a colleague noted in a recent essay.

Companies rely on gallium to produce a variety of military and electronics components, including satellite systems, power converters, LEDs, and the high-powered chips used in electric vehicles. Germanium is used in fiber optics, infrared optics, and solar cells

Before it restricted the flow of these materials, China accounted for more than half of US imports of gallium and germanium, according to the US Geological Survey. Together, China and Russia control 50% of the worldwide reserves of antimony.

How does it affect climate tech?

Any tightened restrictions on graphite could have a pronounced economic impact on US battery and EV makers, in part because there are so few other sources for it. China controls about 80% of graphite output from mines and processes around 70% of the material, according to the International Energy Agency

“It would be very significant for batteries,” says Seaver Wang, co-director of the climate and energy team at the Breakthrough Institute, where his research is focused on minerals and manufacturing supply chains. “By weight, you need way more graphite per terawatt hour than nickel, cobalt, or lithium. And the US has essentially no operating production.”

Anything that pushes up the costs of EVs threatens to slow the shift away from gas-guzzlers in the US, as their lofty price tags remain one of the biggest hurdles for many consumers.

How does this impact China’s economy? 

There are real economic risks in China’s decision to cut off the sale of materials it dominates, as it creates incentives for US companies to seek out new sources around the world, switch to substitute materials, and work to develop more domestic supplies where geology allows.

“The challenge China faces is that most of its techniques to increase pain by disrupting supply chains would also impact China, which itself is connected to these supply chains,” says Chris Miller, a professor at Tufts University and author of Chip War: The Fight for the World’s Most Critical Technology.

Notably, the latest announcement could compel US companies to develop their own sources of gallium and germanium, which can be extracted as by-products of zinc and aluminum mining. There are a number of zinc mines in Alaska and Tennessee, and limited extraction of bauxite, which produces aluminum, in Arkansas, Alabama, and Georgia.

Gallium can also be recycled from numerous electronics, providing another potential domestic path for US companies, Combs notes.

The US has already taken steps to counter China’s dominance over the raw ingredients of essential industries, including by issuing a $150 million loan to an Australian company, Syrah Resources, to accelerate the development of graphite mining in Mozambique.

In addition, the mining company Perpetua Resources has proposed reopening a gold mine near Yellow Pine, Idaho, in part to extract antimony trisulfide for use in military applications. The US Department of Defense has provided tens of millions of dollars to help the company conduct environmental studies, though it will still take years for the mine to come online, noted Baskaran and her colleague. 

Wang says that China’s ban might prove “shortsighted,” as any success in diversifying these global supply chains will weaken the nation’s grip in the areas it now dominates. 

What happens next?

The US is also likely to pay very high economic costs in an escalating trade war with China. 

Should the nation decide to enact even stricter trade restrictions, Combs says China could opt to inflict greater economic pain on the US through a variety of means. These could include further restricting or fully banning graphite, as well other crucial battery materials like lithium; cutting off supplies of tungsten, which is used heavily in the aerospace, military, and nuclear power sectors; and halting the sale of copper, which is used in power transmission lines, solar panels, wind turbines, EVs, and many other products. 

China may also decide to take further steps to prevent US firms from selling their goods into the massive market of Chinese consumers and industries, Miller adds. Or it might respond to stricter export restrictions by turning to the US’s economic rivals for advanced technologies.

In the end, it’s not clear either nation wins in a protracted and increasingly combative trade war. But it’s also not apparent that mutually assured economic damage will prove to be an effective deterrent. Indeed, China may well feel the need to impose stricter measures in the coming months or years, as there are few signs that President-elect Trump intends to tone down his hawkish stance toward China.

“It’s hard to see a Trump 2.0 de-escalating with China,” Baskaran says. “We’re on a one-way trajectory toward continued escalation; the question is the pace and the form. It’s not really an ‘if” question.”

Donating embryos for research is surprisingly complex

This article first appeared in The Checkup, MIT Technology Review’s weekly biotech newsletter. To receive it in your inbox every Thursday, and read articles like this first, sign up here.

There’s a new film about IVF out on Netflix. And “everyone in the field [of reproductive medicine] has watched it,” according to one embryologist I spoke to recently. Joy is a lovely watch about the birth of the field, thanks to the persistent efforts of Robert Edwards, Jean Purdy, and Patrick Steptoe in the face of significant opposition.

The team performed much of their key research during the 1960s and ’70s. And Louise Brown, the first “test tube baby” (as she was called at the time), was born in 1978. It’s remarkable to think that within 40 years of that milestone, another 8 million babies had been born through IVF. Today, it is estimated that over 12 million babies have resulted from IVF, and that the use of reproductive technology accounts for over 2% of births in the US.

IVF is a success story for embryo research. But today, valuable embryos that could be used for research are being wasted, say researchers who gathered at a conference in central London earlier this week.

The conference was organized by the Progress Educational Trust, a UK-based charity that aims to provide information to the public on genomics and infertility. The event marked 40 years since the publication of the Warnock Report, which followed a governmental inquiry into infertility treatment and embryological research. The report is considered to be the first to guide recognition of the embryo’s “special” status in law and helped establish regulation of the nascent technology in the UK.

The report also endorsed the “14-day rule,” which limits the growth of embryos in a lab to this two-week point. The rule, since adopted around the world, is designed to prevent scientists from growing embryos to the point where they develop a structure called the primitive streak. At this point, the development of tissues and organs begins, and the embryo is no longer able to split to form twins. 

The embryos studied in labs have usually been created for IVF but are no longer needed by the people whose cells created them. Those individuals might have completed their families, or they might not be able to use the embryos because their circumstances have changed. Sometimes the embryos have genetic abnormalities that make them unlikely to survive a pregnancy.

These embryos can be used to learn more about how humans develop before birth, and to discover potential treatments for developmental disorders like spina bifida or heart defects, for example. Research on embryos can help reveal clues about our fundamental biology, and provide insight into pregnancy and miscarriage.

A survey conducted by the Human Fertility and Embryology Authority, which regulates reproductive technology in the UK, found that the majority of patients would rather donate their embryos to research than allow them to “perish,” Geraldine Hartshorne, director of the Coventry Centre for Reproductive Medicine, told the audience.

Despite this, the number of embryos donated for research in the UK has dropped steeply over the last couple of decades, from 17,925 in 2004 to 675 in 2019—a surprising decline considering that the number of IVF cycles performed increased steadily over the same period. 

There are a few reasons why embryos aren’t making it into research labs, says Hartshorne. Part of the problem is that most IVF cycles happen at clinics that don’t have links with academic research centers.

As things stand, embryos tend to be stored at the clinics where they were created. It can be difficult to get them to research centers—clinic staff don’t have the time, energy, or head space to manage the paperwork legally required to get embryos donated to specific research projects, said Hartshorne. It would make more sense to have some large, central embryo bank where people could send embryos to donate for research, she added.

A particular problem is the paperwork. While the UK is rightly praised for its rigorous approach to regulation of reproductive technologies, which embryologists around the globe tend to describe as “world-leading,” there are onerous levels of bureaucracy to contend with, said Hartshorne. “When patients contact me and say ‘I’d like to give my embryos or my eggs to your research project,’ I usually have to turn them away, because it would take me a year to get through the paperwork necessary,” she said.

Perhaps there’s a balance to be struck. Research on embryos has the potential to be hugely valuable. As the film Joy reminds us, it can transform medical practice and change lives.

“Without research, there would be no progress, and there would be no change,” Hartshorne said. “That is definitely not something that I think we should aspire to for IVF and reproductive science.”


Now read the rest of The Checkup

Read more from MIT Technology Review‘s archive

Scientists are working on ways to create embryos from stem cells, without the use of eggs or sperm. How far should we allow these embryo-like structures to develop

Researchers have implanted these “synthetic embryos” in monkeys. So far, they’ve been able to generate a short-lived pregnancy-like response … but no fetuses.

Others are trying to get cows pregnant with synthetic embryos. Reproductive biologist Carl Jiang’s first goal is to achieve a cow pregnancy that lasts 30 days. 

Several startups are using robots to fertilize eggs with sperm to create embryos. Two girls are the first people to be born after robot-assisted fertilization, says the team behind the work. 

From around the web

Mexico’s Sinaloa cartel is recruiting young chemistry students from colleges to make fentanyl. Specifically, the students are being tasked with the often dangerous job of trying to synthesize precursor chemicals that must currently be imported. They also try to design stronger versions of the drug that are more likely to get users hooked. (New York Times)

Billionaire Greg Lindberg is running his own “baby project.” Having duped, misled, and paid off a series of egg donors and surrogates, the disgraced insurance tycoon currently has 12 children, nine of whom were born in the last five years or so. He is the sole parent caring for eight of them, despite facing significant jail time since being convicted of bribery and pleading guilty to money laundering and fraud conspiracy charges for crimes unrelated to the baby project. The scale of his project is an indictment of the US fertility industry. (Bloomberg Businessweek)

The UK government has agreed to a contract for more than 5 million doses of a vaccine designed to protect people from the H5 bird flu virus. The vaccine is being procured as part of pandemic preparedness plans and will be used only if the virus starts spreading among humans. (UK Health Security Agency)

Last week, MPs voted in favor of a bill to legalize assisted dying in England and Wales. In the past few months, the debate over the bill has included horror stories of painful deaths. Most deaths are “ordinary,” but we all stand to benefit from talking about, and understanding, what death involves. (New Statesman)

An unknown disease has killed 143 people in southwest Congo, according to local authorities. The number of infections continues to rise, and the situation is extremely worrying. (Reuters)

Brian Thompson, the 50-year-old CEO of US health insurance company UnitedHealthcare, was fatally shot in New York city on Wednesday. The New York Times is reporting that bullet casings found at the scene appear to have been marked with the words “delay” and “deny.” The words may refer to strategies used by insurance companies to avoid covering healthcare costs. (New York Times)

3 things that didn’t make the 10 Breakthrough Technologies of 2025 list

Next month, MIT Technology Review will unveil the 2025 list of 10 Breakthrough Technologies. Every year, our newsroom looks across the fields we cover for technologies that are having a true breakthrough moment. This annual package highlights the technologies that we think matter most right now. 

We define ‘breakthrough’ in a few ways—perhaps there’s been a scientific advance that now makes a new technology possible, or a company has earned regulatory approval for a vital medical treatment. Maybe a consumer device has reached a tipping point in its adoption, or an industrial technology has passed the critical pilot phase with flying colors. In the 2025 edition, which comes out in January, you’ll see some of the latest advances in automation, medicine, and the physical sciences (just to name a few) that we expect will have a major impact on our lives. 

In the meantime, here are three technologies that we considered including on the 2025 list but ultimately decided to leave off. Though these nominees didn’t make the cut this year, they’re still worth keeping an eye on. We certainly will be. 

Virtual power plants 

Virtual power plants are energy systems that link together many different technologies to both generate and store power. They allow utility companies to connect solar panels and wind turbines with grid batteries and electric vehicles, and to better manage the flow of power across the grid. 

During times of peak electricity usage, software linked to smart meters may one day automatically decide to power someone’s home by drawing electricity from a fully charged EV sitting in a neighbor’s garage, thereby reducing demand on the grid. The software could also work out how to compensate the EV owner accordingly. 

In the US, an estimated 500 virtual power plants now provide up to 60 gigawatts of capacity (that’s about as much total capacity as the US grid will add this year). Some such systems are also up and running in China, Japan, Croatia, and Taiwan. But lots more virtual power plants would need to be configured before they start to affect the grid as a whole.

Useful AI agents

AI agents are all the rage right now. These AI-powered helpers will, supposedly, schedule our meetings and book our trips and carry out all kinds of tasks online on our behalf. Agents employ generative models to learn how to navigate websites and desktop software (and manage our passwords and credit card details). They will perhaps interact and coordinate with other people’s agents along the way. 

And there is real development power behind them—Salesforce just launched a platform where companies can make their own customer service agents, and Anthropic’s Claude model is gaining the ability to navigate a computer by using a mouse and keyboard, just like people. 

However, many challenges remain in getting these agents to know what you mean when you make specific requests, and enabling them to carry out the necessary actions reliably. Given the formidable hurdles, we think it may be a little while before they are good enough to be truly useful. AI agents may be coming, but not just yet.

eVTOLs

The acronym is a mouthful, but you can think of electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft as being kind of like electric helicopters. Most versions in development are not designed to be personal vehicles; they’d be flown by pilots to transport commuters in from the suburbs, or whisk visitors downtown from the airport. Someday, these air taxis may fly themselves. 

There’s been real progress toward getting eVTOLs off the ground. Earlier this year, manufacturer EHang received the first Chinese certificate to mass-produce this type of vehicle, and it has begun taking orders. South Korea and the UAE have put policies in place to allow eVTOLs to operate there. And in the US, Archer recently earned its FAA certification to begin commercial operations. Then, in October, the FAA finalized rules for training pilots and operating eVTOLs—marking the first time in decades that the agency has approved such rules for a new category of aircraft. 

Interest and momentum have built in recent years. Major players in the aviation industry, including Boeing and Airbus, have invested in startups or funded internal R&D projects to develop these futuristic aircraft. However, no eVTOL company has actually begun commercial operations yet, so we’ll keep watching for that. 

Join us for a special live Roundtables event Unveiling the 10 Breakthrough Technologies of 2025″ on Friday, January 3rd at 12:30 pm ET. We’ll give a sneak peek at the 2025 list before it’s released to the public. This is a subscriber-only event. Register to attend or subscribe for access.

Beardbrand Shifts to Growth, New Channels

I occasionally focus an “Ecommerce Conversations” episode on Beardbrand, my business. I do that not to promote the company but to share our challenges and successes in the hopes of helping others.

In 2024 alone, I’ve addressed last year’s sales decline, continued hurdles, and the hassle of changing fulfillment providers. I also interviewed our attorney, who successfully defended us in a lawsuit alleging accessibility violations.

We’ve now overcome many of our operational setbacks. We had to relaunch certain products and switch our manufacturer. We’ve moved to a warehouse here in Texas, which gives us more oversight. With these problems solved, the focus shifts back to growth and finding new channels.

That’s what I’ll discuss in this episode. My entire audio is embedded below. The transcript is edited for clarity and length.

Black Friday, Cyber Monday

Our 2024 Black Friday and Cyber Monday campaigns didn’t meet expectations. Traditionally, our BFCM focus is product launches instead of discounting. We wanted to introduce a new product for Black Friday, but the launch was delayed until Cyber Monday and then pushed to mid-December. This disrupted our holiday selling. Sales weren’t down, but the missed product launch made a noticeable dent.

Last year, we introduced a bundling promo — buy three items, get a fourth free — and it performed so well that we kept it as a permanent feature. We had no similar Black Friday promo this year. We considered a subscription-based discount but decided against it due to concerns about sending the wrong message to customers and the potential complexity of managing it.

I also sent an email inadvertently encouraging customers to wait for Cyber Monday instead of taking advantage of Black Friday deals.

Cyber Monday was our best revenue day since Black Friday 2023. We had planned to launch our utility deodorant this year, but it too got pushed to mid-December.

We reverted on Monday to offering pre-launch pricing to loyal customers. They had a short window to purchase the product at a lower price. This strategy is my preferred way to handle discounts because it feels less like a markdown and more like a product release with dynamic pricing.

We sent three emails throughout Cyber Monday promoting the eventual launch, which helped boost sales. However, there were some logistical hiccups. Our pre-launch pricing wasn’t displaying correctly, and we had to fix it last minute. Despite the challenges, the promo went well, and we hit our sales goals.

Sales Growth

November 2024 sales were up about 8% compared to last year. However, we’re replacing lost organic YouTube sales with ads. In 2022, 48% of new customer sales came from YouTube, generating roughly $670,000. By 2023, that dropped to $366,000; this year, we’ll be lucky to reach $250,000. With YouTube becoming less effective, we’ve had to shift to social platforms such as Facebook and X, bringing our overall 2024 advertising spend 75% higher than last year.

Adapting for 2025

As we move to 2025, we’re in a better place operationally, but we need growth channels. Beardbrand’s products are consumable — ideally, customers will reorder. We may explore new fragrances or product sizes in 2025 but won’t go overboard with launches. The goal is to focus on top-selling products with consistent customer education and communication.

Our business is fundamentally shifting. We must assess the growth potential of organic channels such as YouTube or, instead, shift to advertising for customer acquisition.

I never set sales targets. I focus instead on the inputs and let the outputs follow. Businesses should appreciate the hard work and effort, regardless of whether it pans out. Factors like timing, market conditions, and even packaging can influence success, as can a bit of luck.

Ultimately, it’s essential to enjoy the journey. Every day is a gift. There’s no right or wrong way to build a business — it’s about aligning it with your values and goals. That’s the beauty of being an entrepreneur.

Google CEO: Search Will Change Profoundly In 2025 via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Sundar Pichai, Google’s CEO, was interviewed by Andrew Ross Sorkin at the New York Times DealBook Summit, where he discussed what to expect from Google Search in 2025 but also struggled to articulate Google’s concern for content creators.

When asked to compare where Google is today relative to the rest of the industry and whether Google should be the “default winner” Pichai reminded the interviewer that these were “the earliest stages of a profound shift” and underlined that Google is a leader in AI and not the follower. The entire AI industry is built on top of Google research discoveries that were subsequently open sourced, particularly transformers, without which the AI industry would not exist as it is today.

Pichai answered:

“Look, it’s a such a dynamic moment in the industry. When I look at what’s coming ahead, we are in the earliest stages of a profound shift. We have taken such a deep full stack approach to AI.

…we do world class research. We are the most cited, when you look at gen AI, the most cited… institution in the world, foundational research, we build AI infrastructure and when I’m saying AI infrastructure all the way from silicon, we are in our sixth generation of tensor processing units. You mentioned our product reach, we have 15 products at half a billion users, we are building foundational models, and we use it internally, we provide it to over three million developers and it’s a deep full stack investment.

We are getting ready for our next generation of models, I just think there’s so much innovation ahead, we are committed to being at the state of the art in this field and I think we are. Just coming today, we announced groundbreaking research on a text and image prompt creating a 3D scene. And so the frontier is moving pretty fast, so looking forward to 2025.”

Blue Link Economy And AI

It was pointed out by the interviewer that Google was the first mover on AI and then it wasn’t (a reference to OpenAI’s breakout in 2022 and subsequent runaway success). He asked Pichai how much of that was Google protecting the “blue link economy” so as not “to hurt or cannibalize that business” which is worth hundreds of billions of dollars.

Pichai answered that out of all the projects at Google, AI was applied the most to Search, citing BERT, MUM and multimodal search as helping close the gaps in search quality. Something that some in the search industry fail to understand is that AI has has been a part of Google since 2012 when it used Deep Neural Networks for identifying images and speech recognition and in 2014 when it introduced the world to sequence to sequence learning (PDF) for understanding strings of text. In 2015 Google introduced RankBrain, an AI system directly related to ranking search results.

Pichai  answered:

“The area where we applied AI the most aggressively, if anything in the company was in search, the gaps in search quality was all based on Transformers internally. We call it BERT and MUM and you know, we made search multimodal, the search quality improvements, we were improving the language understanding of search. That’s why we built Transformers in the company.

So and if you look at the last couple of years, we have with AI overviews, Gemini is being used by over a billion users in search alone.”

Search Will Change Profoundly In 2025

Pichai continued his answer, stating directly that Search will profoundly change not just in 2025, but in early 2025. He also said that progress is going to get harder because the easier things to innovate have been done (low hanging fruit).

He said:

“And I just feel like we are getting started. Search itself will continue to change profoundly in 2025. I think we are going to be able to tackle more complex questions than ever before. You know, I think we’ll be surprised even early in 2025, the kind of newer things search can do compared to where it is today… “

Pichai also said that progress wouldn’t be easy:

“I think the progress is going to get harder when I look at 2025, the low hanging fruit is gone.

But I think where the breakthroughs need to come from where the differentiation needs to come from is is your ability to achieve technical breakthroughs, algorithmic breakthroughs, how do you make the systems work, you know, from a planning standpoint or from a reasoning standpoint, how do you make these systems better? Those are the technical breakthroughs ahead.”

Is Search Going Away?

The interviewer asked Pichai if Google has leaned into AI enough, quoting an author who suggested that Google’s “core business is under siege” because people are increasingly getting answers from AI and other platforms outside of search, and that the value of search would be “deteriorating” because so much of the content online will be AI-generated.

He answered that it’s precisely in a scenario where the Internet is flooded with inauthentic content that search becomes even more valuable.

Pichai answered:

“In a world in which you’re flooded with like lot of content …if anything, something like search becomes more valuable. In a world in which you’re inundated with content, you’re trying to find trustworthy content, content that makes sense to you in a way reliably you can use it, I think it becomes more valuable.

To your previous part about there’s a lot of information out there, people are getting it in many different ways. Look, information is the essence of humanity. We’ve been on a curve on information… when Facebook came around, people had an entirely new way of getting information, YouTube, Facebook, Tik… I can keep going on and on.

…I think the problem with a lot of those constructs is they are zero sum in their inherent outlook. They just feel like people are consuming information in a certain limited way and people are all dividing that up. But that’s not the reality of what people are doing. “

Pichai Stumbles On Question About Impact On Creators

The interviewer next asked if content is being devalued. He used the example of someone who researches a topic for a book, reads twenty books, cites those sources in the bibliography and then gets it published. Whereas Google ingests everything and then “spits” out content all day long, defeating the human who in earlier times would write a book.

Andrew Ross Sorkin said:

“You get to spit it out a million times. A million times a day. And I just wonder what the economics of that should be for the folks that create it in the beginning.”

Sundar Pichai defended Google by saying that Google spends a lot of time thinking about the impact to the “ecosystem” of publishers and how much traffic it sends to them. The interviewer listened to Sundar’s answer without mentioning the elephant in the room, search results stuffed with Reddit and advertising that crowds out content created by actual experts, and the de-prioritization of news content which has negatively impacted traffic to news organizations around the world.

It was at this point that Pichai appeared to stumble as he tried to find the words to respond. He avoids mentioning websites, speaking in the abstract about the “ecosystem” and then when he runs out of things to say changes course and begins speaking about how Google compensates copyright holders who sign up for YouTube’s Content ID program.

He answered:

“Look I… uh… It’s a… very important question… uhm… look I… I… think… I think more than any other company… look you know… we for a long time through… you know… be it in search making sure… while it’s often debated, we spend a lot of time thinking about the traffic we send to the ecosystem.

Even through the moment through the transition over the past couple of years. It’s an important priority for us.”

At this point he started talking about Google’s content platform YouTube and how they use “Content ID” which is used to identify copyright-protected content. Content ID is a program that benefits the corporate music, film, and television industries, copyright owners who “own exclusive rights to a substantial body of original material that is frequently uploaded to YouTube.”

Pichai continued:

“In YouTube we put a lot of effort into understanding and you know identifying content and with content ID and uh creating monetization for creators.

I think… I think those are important principles, right. I think um… there’s always going to be a balance between understanding what is fair use uh… when new technology comes versus how do you… give value back proportionate to the value of the IP, the hard work people have put in.”

Insightful Interview Of Alphabet’s CEO

The interviewer did a great job at asking the hard questions but I think many in the search marketing community who are more familiar with the search results would have asked follow up questions about content creators who are not on Google’s YouTube platform or the non-expert content that pushes down content by actual experts.

Watch the New York Times Interview here:

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Shutterstock AI Generator
(no irony intended)

Google Rolls Out One-Click Event Tracking In GA4 via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

Google simplifies analytics tracking with new one-click key event features in GA4, powered by machine learning.

  • Google released one-click event tracking in GA4 with two features: “Mark as key event” and “Create key event.”
  • Machine learning identifies important site events automatically, eliminating manual setup time.
  • These features are now available for all GA4 properties and enable better tracking and reporting.