Keyword Research Has A New Strategy & It’s Getting Local Businesses Into AI Results [Webinar] via @sejournal, @hethr_campbell

Keyword research has an expanded purpose in the world of local SEO. The keyword intent you’re already building for clients can now feed the trust signal layer that drives local AI recommendations, but only if it’s deployed in the right places.

When AI tools recommend a local business, they’re not just reading the website. They’re weighing a layer of activity around the business: how often it’s reviewed, how those reviews are responded to, how its Google Business Profile is updated, and what language is showing up across all of it. That activity is the trust signal layer, and on-page SEO alone doesn’t generate it.

Local AI recommendations pull from that activity: keyword-rich, consistent engagement tied to a business’s local presence. Reviews, review responses, and GBP posts are where the keyword intent you’ve already built needs to land. The terms your clients want to be known for have to show up on the surfaces AI is actively reading, at a cadence that signals the business is current. Most agencies finish the keyword research and stop at the website. The intent is sitting in a doc instead of working across the places AI is actually pulling from.

The research is already done. What’s missing is the deployment plan for keyword-driven trust signals: where to place each term by signal type, how to format it so it reads as natural engagement, and how to keep that activity running across every client account without burning hours on manual work.

What You’ll Learn in This Local SEO & AI Search Webinar

  • Where AI is pulling keyword-rich signals from: The specific sources keyword research needs to feed: reviews, responses, and GBP activity. Plus how placement inside each one influences local AI recommendations.
  • How to build keyword-driven trust signals from scratch: Keyword selection, placement by signal type, and the response cadence that tells AI a business is active and relevant.
  • How to automate that activity across your full client roster: Review response automation, keyword refresh intervals, and GBP activity scheduling on a consistent weekly cadence so every account runs the same play.

What Reviewly.ai Has Learned Running This Across Local Client Rosters

The session is led by Jeff “Herschy” Schwerdt, founder and CEO of Reviewly.ai, the platform built to deploy and automate keyword-driven trust signals across local SEO accounts.

He’s not teaching this from a research lens; he’s teaching the workflow Reviewly.ai actually runs to keep review responses, GBP activity, and keyword placement on a consistent weekly cadence for every client. Expect specific signal placements, the automation cadences that are working, and the patterns showing up in local AI recommendations right now.

“SEO Expert” Became “AI Search Expert” (Gulp.): How To Control AI Answer Accuracy via @sejournal, @lorenbaker

About a year ago, your job description changed without your permission. This on-demand session helps you catch up and take the lead.

Suddenly need to track both SERP rankings and AI accuracy? How do you make sure AI is saying the right things about your brand? What’s the best way to transition from SEO to AI Search Expert?

👆 Follow our lead. Register above, get 3 strategies & become the AI search expert your org needs.

You aren’t just fighting for clicks anymore; you’re fighting to ensure that when an AI model speaks for your brand, it actually mentions you, and gets the information right.

Accurate AI Answers = Your SEO Expertise + 3 Strategies

Good news: your SEO expertise isn’t a relic, it’s the exact foundation that works in AI search. In this session, seoClarity’s Chris Sachs, VP of Client Success, and Tania German, VP of Marketing, shared a roadmap that positions your brand as the definitive answer in AI search results.

You’ll Walk Away With:

  • The Orchestrator’s Playbook — How to lead the cross-functional teams (PR, product, content) that determine what AI models learn to trust about your brand.
  • Answer Certainty Metrics — How to move beyond “visibility” reporting and prove your brand is the definitive solution AI delivers to users.
  • Narrative Reclamation — How to stop third parties from defining your brand in AI outputs and position your organization as the primary Source of Truth.

Register above to watch the full session and get proven strategies to help you control AI outputs, lead the teams that make it happen, and prove it’s working to leadership and beyond.

Is Your Small Business Showing Up in Local Search? Here’s How To Find Out [Webinar] via @sejournal, @lorenbaker

Most small business owners have a Google Business Profile. Few have optimized it for how customers are actually searching today.

Local search has split across multiple surfaces.

Customers are using Google Maps, asking voice assistants like Siri and Alexa, checking Yelp and Facebook reviews, and getting answers straight from AI tools like ChatGPT, often before they ever visit a website. If your small business isn’t showing up across those touchpoints, you’re losing customers to competitors who are.

Why Local Search Visibility Is Harder Than It Used to Be

Ranking on Google used to be the whole game. Now, local SEO means making sure your business information is accurate, consistent, and optimized across every platform a nearby customer might use to find you. That includes AI-generated search results, which pull from a different set of signals than traditional rankings, and most small business owners haven’t had time to figure out what those signals are.

What You’ll Learn in This Free SEO Webinar

About The Speakers

Thryv’s small business trainers work directly with owners every day, which means their advice is grounded in what actually works for businesses with small teams and limited time. Their last SEJ webinar drew over 1,000 registrants, and this session goes even deeper on the local search and AI visibility questions small business owners are asking right now.

500M AI Searches Later: How To Actually Improve AI Search Visibility & Citations via @sejournal, @hethr_campbell

What signals actually drive AI search visibility?

Are competitors getting cited in AI Overviews while you’re watching from the sidelines?

How do you go from AI visibility gap alerts to a system that closes them?

Most SEO teams already have dashboards showing where they’re invisible in AI search. Few have a process to fix it.

Learn To Turn AI Search Visibility Data Into A High-Visibility System

Reconnect with Sam Garg, Founder and CEO of Writesonic, as he shares his practical framework for diagnosing citation gaps, prioritizing the right actions, and automating execution with AI agents and free open-source SEO & GEO tools.

You’ll Learn:

  • What drives AI citations: Visibility signal analysis from 500M+ AI conversations. You’ll learn which content types, sources, and placements actually get cited in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini.
  • GEO tasks that move the needle: Citation outreach, content refresh, and third-party placements, plus how to use AI agents and open-source tools to automate them.
  • Where AI search is headed next: Early signals on AI ecommerce and the shift from recommendations to transactions for your channel strategy.

This SEO webinar session covers what 500M+ AI conversations reveal about how citations are earned, which actions actually move the needle (citation outreach, content refresh, third-party placements), and how to use autonomous AI agents to execute at scale.

Watch on-demand now to get the most data-backed, actionable guidance available on improving your brand’s AI search visibility.

How AI Overviews Surface Negative Reviews, Without Anyone Searching for Them via @sejournal, @EraseDotCom

This post was sponsored by Erase.com. The opinions expressed in this article are the sponsor’s own.

Why is my brand appearing in AI comparisons I didn’t ask to be in?
How do I find out what AI tools are saying about my brand?
What’s the difference between traditional reputation management and AI reputation management?

Any issues with your brand’s reputation are what AI decides to show searchers, unprompted.

Throughout Q1 2026, we’ve seen a behavioral shift in how prospects discover brand reputation issues. AI-assisted research tools now autonomously surface negative content, such as reviews, complaints, forum threads, social media discussions, inside comparison queries, without users deliberately searching for problems.

When someone asks ChatGPT “which CRM should I choose,” these AI engines don’t just list features. They pull in user complaints, Reddit gripes, and years-old forum threads as part of their comparison. Your brand’s negative signal can appear in an answer about your competitor. Even more concerning, as Fast Company recently reported, there’s growing evidence of AI engines misquoting or misrepresenting brand statements, compounding the challenge of maintaining an accurate reputation in AI-generated summaries.

AI Comparison Queries Are Now Reputation Audits. Here’s What That Means.

Traditional reputation management focused on suppressing results when someone searched “[your brand] + reviews.” That’s still important, but it’s no longer sufficient.

It’s time for a reputation audit.

AI Overviews and LLM-powered search engines treat every product comparison as an opportunity to synthesize user sentiment. When evaluating options, these tools actively scan for negative reviews on complaint sites, Reddit discussions, forum threads, gripe site entries, and customer support complaints that made it into public view.

The critical difference: users aren’t asking about problems. They’re asking about solutions. But AI engines interpret “helping” as including negative signals from your brand footprint.

Why Some Complaints Show Up in AI Answers & Others Don’t

Not every negative mention gets pulled into AI-generated answers, but certain patterns increase surfacing likelihood:

  • Recency + volume: Fresh complaints with multiple corroborating sources rank high.
  • Specificity: Vague posts get filtered out. Detailed complaints that include product names and outcomes are weighted as valuable context.
  • Platform authority: Reddit, Trustpilot, G2, and industry forums get treated as trusted sources.
  • Recurrence across sources: If the same issue appears in multiple places, AI engines treat it as a verified pattern.

The 4-Step Framework: How to Audit, Remove, Rebuild, and Suppress Your Brand’s AI Reputation Signals

Understanding what’s in your negative signal footprint, prioritizing what can and should be addressed, and building a positive content layer that represents your brand accurately when AI tools pull information is the key to success.

Map what AI engines can access about your brand across platforms where complaints surface.

  1. Open ChatGPT or Perplexity and type: “What are the pros and cons of [your brand] vs [top competitor]?” Take a screenshot of the response and note any negative claims.
  2. On Google, search site:[key platform].com “[your brand name]” + “scam” OR “complaint”. This forces the search engine to show you only the filtered conversations AI models are currently scraping.
  3. Search for your brand on Google and check the featured snippets for anything negative, other SERP features like People also ask for negative or adversarial searches.

Key platforms to check:

  • Review platforms (Trustpilot, G2, Capterra, Yelp, Google Business Profile).
  • Reddit (search your brand name + product category + complaint terms).
  • Industry forums (Stack Overflow for tech, niche communities for specialized services).
  • Facebook groups and community pages (particularly industry-specific or local groups where your customers congregate).
  • Social media (Twitter/X, LinkedIn discussions, TikTok comments).
  • Legacy gripe sites (RipoffReport, Complaintsboard); while largely deindexed, content may still be cited by AI engines.

Document these details:

  • Content type and platform.
  • Date posted.
  • Specific claims made.
  • Factual accuracy.
  • Current visibility in Google and AI summaries.

Focus on detailed complaints with enough context that AI engines might treat them as credible sources.

Step 2: Prioritize Based on Surfacing Likelihood

Focus on:

  • High priority: Recent complaints with specific details, issues mentioned across multiple platforms, content on high-authority platforms (Reddit, major review sites), complaints naming features or pricing specifically.
  • Medium priority: Older complaints (1-2 years) still in search results, isolated reviews without corroboration.
  • Low priority: Very old content (3+ years) with low engagement, complaints about discontinued products.

How To Create A Priority Matrix

Create a simple scoring matrix to decide what to tackle first:

  • High Priority: Content that appears in AI summaries AND has high organic visibility (check Semrush or Ahrefs for estimated monthly visits to that specific URL) or compare them against queries for those keywords that you have available in search console – if it’s a branded search, you should have full visibility on this from search console.
  • Verified Impact: For platform-specific reviews (G2, Trustpilot, Google Business), use your internal analytics to track how many users are clicking “Helpful” on negative reviews. A review with 50+ “Helpful” votes is a massive signal that AI engines will not ignore.

Step 3: Remove or Respond Where Possible

Some negative content can be removed outright. Some deserve a response, and some require both.

How to Get Negative Content Taken Down

If the content violates platform policies (false information, impersonation, harassment), request removal through the platform’s reporting process.

For legacy complaint sites and gripe sites, professional content removal services can often negotiate takedowns based on inaccuracies or policy violations, though as reputation defense strategies evolve for AI, the focus has shifted from simply removing content to building stronger positive signals.

For content that mentions you but doesn’t necessarily focus on your brand (like a Reddit thread comparing five tools where yours gets one negative mention), removal usually isn’t an option, but you can dilute its impact by ensuring positive mentions appear more frequently in similar discussions.

When Responding Publicly Actually Helps You

Legitimate complaints about real issues, misunderstandings you can clarify with facts, or service failures where an explanation adds credibility. Keep responses factual, non-defensive, and focused on resolution. AI engines can pull your response into summaries, giving you a chance to reframe the narrative.

When Engaging Makes Things Worse — Skip It

Fake reviews, emotional rants without substance, old complaints about discontinued products, or situations where engagement will amplify visibility.

Step 4: Build a Positive Content Layer That AI Engines Prefer

This is where ongoing reputation management becomes critical. You need owned and earned content that AI engines will preferentially cite when answering comparison queries.

What Goes Into A Positive Content Layer

  • Structured FAQ content: Create pages answering common objections and questions with clear headers and schema markup.
  • Case studies: Detailed examples with metrics, timelines, and direct customer quotes give AI engines concrete data to cite.
  • Community presence: Contribute to Reddit and forums where your audience asks questions. Build credibility through value, not promotion.
  • Third-party validation: Get featured in roundups and comparison articles on authoritative sites.
  • Regular content updates: AI models prioritize recent content. Keep your owned content fresh.
  • How this plays into broader online reputation management: What you’re building isn’t just an AI strategy—it’s a defensible reputation infrastructure. Comprehensive, recent, authoritative content across multiple touchpoints creates a buffer that makes it harder for isolated negative signals to dominate.

How To Build A Positive Content Layer 

  1. Turn your FAQ into a knowledge base that addresses common objections (e.g., “Is [your brand] worth the price?”). Depending on how much reach and authority your brand has, it can be worthwhile to publish these as their own pages with a clear H1 question as the headline and breadcrumb the Q and As in a format like /faq/[service area]/[objection] to create more internal linking opportunities and depth rather than just having everything on a massive FAQ page.
  2. Reach out to some of your satisfied customers and ask for a 2–3 sentence quote about a specific outcome they achieved. Publish these as a case study snippet on your site. Specificity (metrics, timeframes) helps to ensure LLMs treat content as credible evidence rather than marketing copy. Link to their LinkedIn or business website, if possible, to help reinforce that it is a real review for a real customer.
  3. Identify high-authority “Best of” lists or industry roundups where your brand is missing and email the editors to provide a unique expert insight or updated product data for inclusion. These seed high-trust citations that AI engines prioritize when synthesizing brand comparisons and reputation summaries. The higher they rank on Google, the better.

Monitoring becomes essential at this stage. Track which keywords trigger AI Overviews that mention your brand, watch for new complaints surfacing in high-authority platforms, and measure whether your positive content is getting cited in AI-generated comparisons. This isn’t a one-time project; it’s an ongoing program.

Start Here: Your Easy Steps to Managing Your AI Reputation

If you’re dealing with high-stakes reputation issues where missteps could amplify problems, specialized online reputation management services and experts like our team at erase.com can help you move faster and avoid pitfalls. The goal isn’t just reacting to what’s already out there; it’s building a system where positive signals consistently outweigh isolated negatives when AI engines scan for information.

The shift is already here. The question is whether you’re managing it proactively or discovering it reactively when a prospect mentions “something they saw in ChatGPT.”


Image Credits

Featured Image: Image by Erase.com. Used with permission.

ChatGPT vs. Perplexity vs. Gemini: Which LLMs Are Driving Real Conversions? [Expert Panel] via @sejournal, @hethr_campbell

AI search is sending high-intent traffic, but not equally across platforms.

Which LLM is actually driving conversions in your clients’ verticals?

Should GEO efforts be concentrated on ChatGPT versus Perplexity or Gemini?

How do you build an AI search reporting framework clients will actually trust?

Watch the on-demand webinar now to get conversion data by LLM.

How To Identify & Focus On The LLM That Works For You

Not every LLM deserves equal optimization effort.

Misallocating that effort is costing your clients rankings, leads, and revenue.

In this on-demand GEO webinar, Natalie Ann and our expert panel for a breakdown of which platforms are driving measurable results, and how to build an AI search strategy backed by conversion data.

You’ll Be Able To:

  • Identify which LLMs drive the highest conversion rates in your clients’ industries
  • Prioritize GEO spend and content optimization based on platform-level performance data
  • Package LLM optimization as a billable service with reporting that proves impact to clients

Watch now, follow along below, and be ready to rethink how you’re allocating AI search effort.

How Brands Are Increasing AI Visibility By Up To 2,000% [Webinar] via @sejournal, @hethr_campbell

The answer is Reddit, and yes, this 90-day strategy is worth your time.

Most brands treat Reddit as an afterthought.

However, Reddit is where buyers finalize their purchase decisions.

Reddit is where human trust gets built.

Therefore, Reddit serves as a trust signal for how AI search tools determine which brands are worth recommending.

AI Mentions & Cites Brands Based On Trust Signals, Across Channels

When ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Google AIO recommends a brand, it’s drawing on a web of signals that indicate the brand is credible, relevant, and mentioned by real people in real contexts.

Reddit is one of the most authentic of those signals.

Your opportunity: not Reddit instead of other channels, but Reddit as a meaningful addition to the multi-channel trust footprint AI reasons from.

One brand OGS Media worked with saw 2,000% AI visibility growth in 90 days after building a genuine Reddit presence. That’s the strategy Bartosz and Brent are unpacking on May 5.

What You’ll Learn In This AI Search Webinar

  • How Reddit community content contributes to the multi-channel trust signals AI uses to evaluate and surface brands
  • The 5-stage framework behind OGS Media’s 2,000% AI visibility result
  • The 7 most common Reddit mistakes brands make
  • What authentic subreddit engagement looks like when it’s actually working
  • How to find and engage in Reddit conversations that influence both buyers and AI

About the Speakers

Bartosz Goralewicz is the CEO of OGS Media and one of the most experienced Reddit marketing practitioners in SEO. Brent Csutoras is a Reddit Official Advisor and the Owner of Search Engine Journal, with nearly two decades of hands-on Reddit strategy for brands across every major vertical.

The 90-Day GEO Playbook for Local Search: How To Show Up When AI Does The Searching

This post was sponsored by Uberall. The opinions expressed in this article are the sponsor’s own.

Local consumers have stopped searching the way we built our marketing around.

This significant change in buyer habits has been quietly happening in the last 18 to 24 months.

According to recent Uberall research into AI search behavior, an estimated $750 billion in consumer spend is already shifting toward AI-powered search. Roughly 60% of all searches now end without a single click to a website. And in a finding that should stop every marketer cold, or at least those working for multi-location businesses, 68% of brands are missing entirely from the recommendations AI engines generate in their category.

That problem goes beyond channels. It’s a fast-moving visibility problem that risks affecting conversions and revenue.

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) is the discipline built for this moment. Where SEO optimized pages for a ranking, GEO optimizes entities for a recommendation.

The goal is no longer just to be found in Search Engine Results Pages (SERPs). It’s to be cited, summarized, and trusted when a model answers on your customer’s behalf.

In GEO, three pillars carry the weight. If you’ve worked in SEO for any length of time, the shape will look familiar — compounding visibility isn’t new, it’s the surface that’s changed.

  • Source of truth. The basic facts about your brand (name, address, hours, services) need to match everywhere a model might look. Inconsistent signals train AI engines to trust you less.
  • Context engineering. Your content has to answer the questions customers actually ask, in the language they ask them. Of course, conversational answers should take priority over keyword clusters.
  • Orchestration. You measure citations, refresh content, and compound visibility over time.

Here is how those three pillars translate into a realistic 90-day plan teams can actually run.

Phase 1 (Week 1): Foundational Analysis

You cannot optimize what the model cannot parse. The first week is a data hygiene sprint, rather than a content sprint.

Start with the local SEO basics most teams assume are already clean:

  • Audit your NAP details (Name, Address, Phone) across Google Business Profiles, Apple Maps, Yelp, Bing Places, and the major data aggregators. Even small inconsistencies — a missing suite number, an old phone format, a rebrand that never propagated — train AI engines to treat your brand as a lower-confidence entity.
  • Check your location pages, about page, and product pages for structured data. Schema isn’t a magic AI switch — recent tests suggest LLMs largely read it like any other on-page text. What it does is reduce ambiguity about what your business is and does, and that clarity is what helps a model interpret and cite you correctly.
  • Type the questions your customers actually ask into ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. Not branded queries – real ones like “best orthodontist near Lincoln Park,” “which EV charger works with a Ford Lightning,” “coffee shops in Berlin that allow dogs.” Note where you appear, where you don’t, and which competitors show up instead.

That gap list becomes your brief for the next 80 days. It’s also where most brands discover the blind spots they didn’t know they had.

Phase 2 (Days 7–30): Context Engineering And Targeted Content

Once you know which prompts you’re missing from, the work becomes specific. For each blind spot, you are building the content a model would actively want to cite.

A few patterns that hold up across industries:

  • One prompt, one page. If “best family dentist in Austin with Saturday hours” returns three competitors and none of your locations, build or optimize the pages that answer exactly that. Don’t bury the answer three scrolls down.
  • Write for the question, not the keyword. AI engines extract complete answers, not phrases. A well-structured FAQ with direct, factual responses often outperforms a 2,000-word, keyword-stuffed guide that dances around the point
  • Cite yourself credibly. Include dates, local details, original data, named authors, and explicit comparisons. Models reward specificity and downgrade vague claims.

This is the phase where content that actually gets cited starts to look different from content built for the old ranking game. It is tighter, more factual, and structured around how someone would ask a question out loud.

Phase 3 (Days 30–60): Surgical Placement & Off-Page Authority

Off-page authority still matters. The economics, however, have flipped.

The instinct is to chase top-tier publishers. For GEO, that is usually the wrong move.

The sites that generative engines pull from most often aren’t always the ones with the highest domain authority. These are the ones relevant to your business and are cited more frequently, even if they’re not huge publications.

A more effective approach:

  • Focus on sites that already rank in Google for the prompts your customers use — the kind of credible, topical sources you’d want them to find when they’re researching. Top-tier placement isn’t the goal; any authoritative site that actually serves your audience counts.
  • The publishers AI engines already cite in your category are the ones models trust enough to source from. Re-run your Phase 1 prompts, track which domains keep appearing in the citations, and that’s your shortlist.
  • Size and prestige aren’t reliable proxies for AI citation rates. A specialist publication with real topical authority in your category often earns more AI citations than a bigger, more generic name.

The goal isn’t link volume. It is being mentioned, in context, in the sources your category’s models already trust.

Phase 4 (Days 60–90): Orchestration And Compounding

By day 60, you should have new content live, citations starting to show up on publisher sites, and enough signal to measure. Phase 4 is where GEO stops being a project and starts being a system.

Three metrics worth tracking weekly:

  • AI citation rate — how often your brand is named in AI-generated answers for your priority prompts.
  • Share of Voice — your citation rate relative to competitors across the same prompt set.
  • Content decay — which cited pages are losing citations over time and need refreshing with new data, dates, or insights.
Image created by Uberall, April 2026

The compounding effect here is profound. Brands that treat GEO as an ongoing loop — audit, publish, place, measure, refresh — see substantially higher citations and conversion rates. A recent Search Engine Journal webinar, featuring Uberall with AthenaHQ, states that GEO-savvy brands see 2x as many citations and 3–9x higher conversion rates within 90 days compared to brands still optimizing purely for classic search.

That delta matters more than it looks. As zero-click behavior grows, the citation inside the AI answer is the conversion surface.

For a concrete example, Audika France, a multi-location hearing-care brand and Uberall customer, ran this orchestration loop as an early adopter. They used it to track how AI engines described their clinics, spot the attributes models were missing, and close the gap between visible and recommended. Their results show how one multi-location brand went from an AI blind spot to a consistent recommendation.

What To Do Next

The pattern is consistent across multiple industries, including retail and restaurants. Brands that start now build a structural advantage that is hard to unwind once the category catches up. The ones that wait end up explaining to their board a year from now why a competitor became the default recommendation in every model their customers use.

If you want a snapshot of how your locations are performing in AI search, check out our AI Visibility Grader tool. It gives you a quick view of your AI visibility and the factors shaping it.

Or if you want to take this further and get a higher definition picture of where you stand in AI search, GEO Studio’s free trial will map your brand’s presence across the major generative engines.

Local search has changed. This is how you become the default answer.


Image Credits

Featured Image: Image by Michelle Azar/ Uberall. Used with permission.
In-Post Image: Image by Uberall. Used with permission.

Why Your Content Isn’t Being Cited in AI Answers (And How to Fix It) [Webinar] via @sejournal, @lorenbaker

When a customer asks ChatGPT, Gemini, or another AI tool a question, that system selects a short list of sources to cite in its answer. If your brand isn’t on that list, it’s not a visibility problem; it’s a brand and content strategy problem.

What AI Actually Evaluates

AI systems don’t cite randomly.

They evaluate content against specific criteria: topical authority, structural clarity, and brand trust signals they can measure. Most brands haven’t audited their content against these criteria, making the content of this upcoming SEO webinar an advantage for you.

What You’ll Learn

In this SEJ webinar, Wayne Cichanski, VP of Search & Site Experience at iQuanti, unpacks how AI systems generate answers and what determines whether your brand’s content earns a place in them:

  • How AI-powered search selects and cites content, so you know exactly what you’re optimizing for
  • Which topical authority and brand trust signals determine whether your content earns a place in AI-generated answers
  • Specific, practical tactics for creating and restructuring content that increases your brand’s AI visibility
AEO In 2026: Which Content Formats Earn AI Citations & How to Produce More [Webinar] via @sejournal, @hethr_campbell

AI-generated answers are capturing intent before the click, and that changes where to invest, what to measure, and which formats to prioritize. The question isn’t whether to adapt, it’s knowing exactly what to do first.

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Is A Core Discipline

AEO sits alongside SEO as a primary driver of how brands get discovered in 2026. The content formats, authority signals, and workflows that earn citations in ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini are distinct from what drives traditional rankings.

What You’ll Learn

  • Which AEO and content marketing trends will have the most impact on AI citation rate and organic visibility in 2026.
  • How to reframe your success metrics when AI answers replace the click, and what to optimize for instead.
  • Which content formats generate the highest likelihood of AI citation, and how to build more of them into your editorial workflow.
  • How to integrate agentic workflows into your content operation to scale authority-building without losing quality.

About the Speakers

Shannon Vize is Sr. Content Marketing Manager at Conductor, focused on the intersection of AI and content strategy. Pat Reinhart is VP of Services & Thought Leadership at Conductor, with deep experience helping digital teams adapt their search strategies to emerging discovery behaviors.

This session delivers a practical, prioritized framework for operationalizing AEO and building AI search visibility in 2026.